It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Organic tea is more popular than conventional tea that originates from fertilized plants. Amino acids inorganic soils constitute a substantial pool nitrogen (N) available for plants. However, the amino-acid contents in soils of tea plantations and how tea plants take up these amino acids remain largely unknown. In this study, we show that the amino-acid content in the soil of an organic tea plantation is significantly higher than that of a conventional tea plantation. Glutamate, alanine, valine, and leucine were the most abundant amino acids in the soil of this tea plantation. When 15N-glutamate was fed to tea plants, it was efficiently absorbed and significantly increased the contents of other amino acids in the roots. We cloned seven CsLHT genes encoding amino-acid transporters and found that the expression of CsLHT1, CsLHT2, and CsLHT6 in the roots significantly increased upon glutamate feeding. Moreover, the expression of CsLHT1 or CsLHT6 in a yeast amino-acid uptake-defective mutant, 22∆10α, enabled growth on media with amino acids constituting the sole N source. Amino-acid uptake assays indicated that CsLHT1 and CsLHT6 are H+-dependent high- and low-affinity amino-acid transporters, respectively. We further demonstrated that CsLHT1 and CsLHT6 are highly expressed in the roots and are localized to the plasma membrane. Moreover, overexpression of CsLHT1 and CsLHT6 in Arabidopsis significantly improved the uptake of exogenously supplied 15N-glutamate and 15N-glutamine. Taken together, our findings are consistent with the involvement of CsLHT1 and CsLHT6 in amino-acid uptake from the soil, which is particularly important for tea plants grown inorganic tea plantations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Anhui Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Hefei, China (GRID:grid.411389.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 4804); Nanjing Agricultural University, College of Horticulture, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.27871.3b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9750 7019)
2 Anhui Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Hefei, China (GRID:grid.411389.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 4804)
3 Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309)
4 Nanjing Agricultural University, College of Horticulture, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.27871.3b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9750 7019)
5 University of California, Department of Plant Biology, College of Biological Sciences, Davis, USA (GRID:grid.27860.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9684)