It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In the wake of the 2008 financial meltdown, financial organizations accelerated consolidation and transformation of business models in pursuit of turning the sector back to financial solvency (Paulet et al.,2015). The urgent need to transform and consolidate their position, exacerbated the rollout of new technologies which included robotic process automation. Robotic process automation offers a great and efficient way to alleviate human resource costs, other variable costs, provide reliant, consistent and responsive customer service offerings to both internal and external customers (Willcocks, Lacity, & Craig, 2017). The purpose of this study was to examine the level of interest by employees in adopting and using robotic process automation in the financial sector context. The study was conducted using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) framework by Vanketesh et al (2012). The UTAUT2 framework is commonly used to assess and evaluate the effects of performance and effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions on the behavioral intention to use technology (Venkatesh et al., 2003). The framework’s overall fit, explanatory power, and the individual causal links it hypothesizes were evaluated by examining the acceptance of robotic process automation among employees in the financial sector. Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions were all found to be significant determinants of attitude and intention to adopt and use robotic process automation. The relatively high R-square of the model (R2 = 0.78) indicating that approximately 78 percent of the variance in Behavioral Intention is explainable by Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, and Facilitating Conditions suggests how well the model fits the observed data. An online survey collected data from 155 eligible financial sector employees from all 50 states. The response rate was 71 percent considering 63 respondents were rejected due to incomplete data, or other disqualifying factors.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer