It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background: Treatment nonadherence is a significant issue contributing to poor treatment outcomes and increased costs among individuals with diabetes. Patient perceptions about the necessity of taking prescribed medications and their concerns about these medicines predict their medication adherence. However, knowledge of the patient- and illness-related factors that affect these beliefs about diabetes medication is limited. Moreover, although the Necessity-Concerns Framework has been widely used to evaluate the relationship between beliefs about medicine and medication adherence, recent research has criticized the common analytic approach of using a simple difference score model to examine the effects of medication-related necessity beliefs and concerns and promoted the use of alternative multidimensional analyses. This study examined the relationships between patient-related factors, illness-related factors, and beliefs about medications, and used multidimensional analyses to examine the relationships between beliefs about medications and medication adherence among diverse adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods: The present study conducted secondary analyses of data from the baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of telephonic diabetes self-management support among 812 predominantly socioeconomically disadvantaged and ethnic minority adults with suboptimally controlled T2D. Medication beliefs were assessed using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). Medication adherence was assessed using the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale-Diabetes (ARMS-D). Relationships between patient-related and illness-related factors with medication beliefs were examined using linear regressions. Polynomial regression was used to examine the relationship between medication beliefs and medication adherence.
Results: Hispanic ethnicity (β=.15 p<.01), insulin use (β=.11 p<.05), and higher number of medications (β=.12 p<.05) were significantly associated with stronger beliefs about the necessity in taking medications, while higher level of education (β=-.09 p<.05) was associated with weaker necessity beliefs. Lower income (β= -.09 p<.05) and Hispanic ethnicity (β=.13 p<.01) were significantly associated with greater concerns about medications. None of the illness-related variables were significantly associated with medication concerns. Confirmatory polynomial regression rejected the use of the difference score model. Exploratory polynomial regression determined the quadratic model to be the best fit to test the relationship between medication-related necessity and concern beliefs and adherence.
Discussion: Individuals with indicators higher socioeconomic status (higher level of education and income) reported less perceived need and less concerns about their medications. Participants with indicators of worse disease severity (insulin use and higher number of prescribed medicines) as well as those identifying as Hispanic both reported greater perceived need for their medications; however, Hispanic participants also reported greater concerns about their diabetes medications. Confirmatory polynomial regression showed the difference score model to be an inappropriate fit in examining the relationship between medication beliefs and type 2 diabetes medication adherence. Exploratory analyses demonstrated higher-order polynomial models to be a superior fit over the linear terms and concluded that low concerns are necessary but not sufficient for adherence and having both low concerns and high necessity beliefs is optimal for good adherence. The current study’s use of improved methodological analyses to examine the relationship between medication beliefs and adherence significantly adds to the body of literature and also demonstrates the complex nature of the relationship between beliefs about medication and adherence in adults with type 2 diabetes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





