Abstract

The IEA EBC Annex 72 focuses on the assessment of the primary energy demand, greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts of buildings during production, construction, use (including repair and replacement) and end of life (dismantling), i.e. during the entire life cycle of buildings. In one of its activities, reference buildings (size, materialisation, operational energy demand, etc.) were defined on which the existing national assessment methods are applied using national (if available) databases and (national/regional) approaches. The “be2226” office building in Lustenau, Austria was selected as one of the reference buildings. TU Graz established a BIM model and quantified the amount of building elements as well as construction materials required and the operational energy demand. The building assessment was carried out using the same material and energy demand but applying the LCA approach used in the different countries represented by the participating Annex experts. The results of these assessments are compared in view of identifying major discrepancies. Preliminary findings show that the greenhouse gas emissions per kg of building material differ up to a factor of two and more. Major differences in the building assessments are observed in the transports to the construction site (imports) and the construction activities as well as in the greenhouse gas emissions of the operational energy demand (electricity). The experts document their practical difficulties and how they overcame them. The results of this activity are used to better target harmonisation efforts.

Details

Title
Comparison of the environmental assessment of an identical office building with national methods
Author
Frischknecht, R 1 ; Birgisdottir, H 2 ; C-U Chae 3 ; Lützkendorf, T 4 ; Passer, A 5 ; Alsema, E 6 ; Balouktsi, M 4 ; Berg, B 7 ; Dowdell, D 7 ; A García Martínez 8 ; Habert, G 9 ; Hollberg, A 9 ; König, H 10 ; Lasvaux, S 11 ; Llatas, C 8 ; F Nygaard Rasmussen 2 ; Peuportier, B 12 ; Ramseier, L 1 ; Röck, M 5 ; Verdaguer, B Soust 8 ; Szalay, Z 13 ; Bohne, R A 14 ; Bragança, L 15 ; Cellura, M 16 ; Chau, C K 17 ; Dixit, M 18 ; Francart, N 19 ; Gomes, V 20 ; Huang, L 14 ; Longo, S 16 ; Lupíšek, A 21 ; Martel, J 22 ; Mateus, R 15 ; Ouellet-Plamondon, C 23 ; Pomponi, F 24 ; Ryklová, P 21 ; D Trigaux 25 ; Yang, W 26 

 treeze Ltd., Switzerland 
 Aalborg University, Denmark 
 Korea Institute of Civil Engineering & Building Technology, Korea 
 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany 
 Graz University of Technology, Austria 
 W/E Consultants, Netherlands 
 BRANZ, New Zealand 
 Universidad de Sevilla, Spain 
 ETH Zurich, Switzerland 
10  Ascona, Germany 
11  HES-SO, IGT-LESBAT, Switzerland 
12  MINES ParisTech, France 
13  Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary 
14  NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway 
15  University of Minho, Portugal 
16  University of Palermo, Italy 
17  The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong-Kong 
18  Texas A&M University, USA 
19  KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden 
20  University of Campinas, Brazil 
21  Czech Technical University in Prague, University Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Czech Republic 
22  Groupe Ageco, Canada 
23  École de technologie supérieure, Canada 
24  Resource Efficient Built Environment Lab (REBEL), Edinburgh Napier University, United Kingdom 
25  EnergyVille / KU Leuven / VITO, Belgium 
26  Tianjin University, China 
Publication year
2019
Publication date
Aug 2019
Publisher
IOP Publishing
ISSN
17551307
e-ISSN
17551315
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2557904137
Copyright
© 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.