It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The IEA EBC Annex 72 focuses on the assessment of the primary energy demand, greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts of buildings during production, construction, use (including repair and replacement) and end of life (dismantling), i.e. during the entire life cycle of buildings. In one of its activities, reference buildings (size, materialisation, operational energy demand, etc.) were defined on which the existing national assessment methods are applied using national (if available) databases and (national/regional) approaches. The “be2226” office building in Lustenau, Austria was selected as one of the reference buildings. TU Graz established a BIM model and quantified the amount of building elements as well as construction materials required and the operational energy demand. The building assessment was carried out using the same material and energy demand but applying the LCA approach used in the different countries represented by the participating Annex experts. The results of these assessments are compared in view of identifying major discrepancies. Preliminary findings show that the greenhouse gas emissions per kg of building material differ up to a factor of two and more. Major differences in the building assessments are observed in the transports to the construction site (imports) and the construction activities as well as in the greenhouse gas emissions of the operational energy demand (electricity). The experts document their practical difficulties and how they overcame them. The results of this activity are used to better target harmonisation efforts.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 treeze Ltd., Switzerland
2 Aalborg University, Denmark
3 Korea Institute of Civil Engineering & Building Technology, Korea
4 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
5 Graz University of Technology, Austria
6 W/E Consultants, Netherlands
7 BRANZ, New Zealand
8 Universidad de Sevilla, Spain
9 ETH Zurich, Switzerland
10 Ascona, Germany
11 HES-SO, IGT-LESBAT, Switzerland
12 MINES ParisTech, France
13 Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary
14 NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
15 University of Minho, Portugal
16 University of Palermo, Italy
17 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong-Kong
18 Texas A&M University, USA
19 KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
20 University of Campinas, Brazil
21 Czech Technical University in Prague, University Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Czech Republic
22 Groupe Ageco, Canada
23 École de technologie supérieure, Canada
24 Resource Efficient Built Environment Lab (REBEL), Edinburgh Napier University, United Kingdom
25 EnergyVille / KU Leuven / VITO, Belgium
26 Tianjin University, China