It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Starting from the analysis of a real situation in which the equivalent noise level was measured in a residential area, an urban area with the same characteristics was simulated. The purpose of these tests was not to determine exactly the noise level in the area, but to simulate the introduction of noise mitigation measures, and to highlight the difference between the noise level at the edge of the sidewalk and the level next to the building, at the pedestrian height. Four series of simulations were made. The first series starts from the simple situation (street with 4 traffic bands and tram line), without measures of noise reduction, for which a green area with a height of 1.50 m was implemented, a noise barrier and then both measures. The second series of simulations tests the impact that the reduced capacity of the traffic in the area may have, transforming the street into one with only two traffic bands, the remaining space being given to the sidewalk. To optimize noise mitigation, the same situations were simulated, but with the implementation of a green area of 3.00m height. Thus, it is found that the noise level decreases from 74-76 dB (A) to 58-60 dB (A), meaning a decrease of 16 dB (A). From these simulations it can be concluded that in order to reach a comfortable noise level that respects the maximum admitted level, it is recommended to decrease traffic intensity (through different interventions on road surface capacity, promoting of public transport, etc.), to implement anti-noise barriers of materials with a high sound absorption capacity and a green space with a height that exceeds the height of the anti-noise barrier and has a high density of leaves.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Architecture, “G.M. Cantacuzino” Faculty of Architecture, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, Iasi, Romania
2 Department of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, Romania





