It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aims
The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of urinary N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) compared with plasma NT‐proBNP in patients presenting with acute chest pain in the emergency department.
Methods and results
We measured simultaneously plasma and urinary NT‐proBNP at admission in 301 patients with acute chest pain. In our cohort, 174 patients suffered from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A follow‐up (median of 55 months) was performed regarding the endpoints all‐cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (mortality, congestive heart failure, ACS with the necessity of a coronary intervention, and stroke). Fifty‐four patients died during follow‐up; 98 suffered from the combined endpoint. A significant and positive correlation of urinary and plasma NT‐proBNP was found (r = 0.87, P < 0.05). Patients with troponin positive ACS had significantly elevated levels of plasma and urinary NT‐proBNP compared with those with unstable angina pectoris or chest wall syndrome (each P < 0.05). The highest levels of both biomarkers were found in patients with congestive heart failure (each P < 0.05). According to Kaplan–Meier analysis, plasma and urinary NT‐proBNP were significant predictors for mortality and the combined endpoint in the whole study cohort and in the subgroup of patients with ACS (each P < 0.05). Regarding Cox regression analysis, plasma and urinary NT‐proBNP were independent predictors for mortality and the combined endpoint (each P < 0.05).
Conclusions
Urinary NT‐proBNP seems to provide a significant predictive value regarding the endpoints all‐cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain and those with ACS.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Internal Medicine II (Cardiology), University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
2 Department of Internal Medicine II (Cardiology), University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
3 Emergency Department, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
4 Department of Internal Medicine II (Cardiology), University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, Department of Pneumology, Donaustauf Hospital, Donaustauf, Germany
5 Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
6 Department of Cardiology, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany





