It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This study highlights the clinical features and treatment response of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) among three different branching vascular network (BVN) morphologies in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and further correlates the BVN features with those under fluorescent angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). In total, we reviewed 70 eyes with PCV followed up for > 12 months. OCTA, ICGA and FA images were obtained at baseline and post-treatments. BVN was assessed using OCTA and divided into three types by a previously described BVN classification: type 1 (trunk), type 2 (glomeruli), and type 3 (stick). At baseline, type 1 BVN had the poorest vision and thinnest subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), whereas type 3 had the best vision and thickest SFCT. The aforementioned trend sustained after treatments. Each BVN morphology in OCTA showed typical features in FA + ICGA and encompassed significant correlation (p = 0.004). In conclusion, OCTA is an innovative imaging tool for the detection and classification of BVN in PCV. Furthermore, OCTA has advantages of being noninvasive and free of systemic toxicities. The BVN can be divided into three types based on morphological characteristics in OCTA, which play crucial roles in clinical presentations and treatment outcomes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, New Taipei City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.412955.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0419 7197); National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.412094.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0572 7815)
2 Cathay General Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.413535.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0627 9786)
3 Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.415755.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0573 0483)
4 National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.412094.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0572 7815)
5 National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.412094.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0572 7815); National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241)