It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Erosion on hydro turbine mostly depends on impingement velocity, angle of impact, concentration, shape, size and distribution of erodent particle and substrate material. In the case of Francis turbines, the sediment particles tend to erode more in the off-designed conditions than at the best efficiency point. Previous studies focused on the optimized runner blade design to reduce erosion at the designed flow. However, the effect of the change in the design on other operating conditions was not studied. This paper demonstrates the performance of optimized Francis turbine exposed to sediment erosion in various operating conditions. Comparative study has been carryout among the five different shapes of runner, different set of guide vane and stay vane angles. The effect of erosion is studied in terms of average erosion density rate on optimized design Francis runner with Lagrangian particle tracking method in CFD analysis. The numerical sensitivity of the results are investigated by comparing two turbulence models. Numerical results are validated from the velocity measurements carried out in the actual turbine. Results show that runner blades are susceptible to more erosion at part load conditions compared to BEP, whereas for the case of guide vanes, more erosion occurs at full load conditions. Out of the five shapes compared, Shape 5 provides an optimum combination of efficiency and erosion on the studied operating conditions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kathmandu University, Kavre, Nepal
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kathmandu University, Kavre, Nepal; Department of Energy and Process Engineering, NTNU, Norway
3 Department of Energy and Process Engineering, NTNU, Norway