It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Global production fragmentation generates indirect socioeconomic and environmental impacts throughout its expanded supply chains. The multi-regional input-output model (MRIO) is a tool commonly used to trace the supply chain and understand spillover effects across regions, but often cannot be applied due to data unavailability, especially at the sub-national level. Here, we present MRIO tables for 2012, 2015, and 2017 for 31 provinces of mainland China in 42 economic sectors. We employ hybrid methods to construct the MRIO tables according to the available data for each year. The dataset is the consistent China MRIO table collection to reveal the evolution of regional supply chains in China’s recent economic transition. The dataset illustrates the consistent evolution of China’s regional supply chain and its economic structure before the 2018 US-Sino trade war. The dataset can be further applied as a benchmark in a wide range of in-depth studies of production and consumption structures across industries and regions.
Measurement(s) | multi-regional input-output |
Technology Type(s) | partial survey |
Factor Type(s) | province • year |
Sample Characteristic - Location | China |
Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data:
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Industrial Ecology Programme, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Trondheim, Norway (GRID:grid.5947.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1516 2393)
2 Shandong University, Institute of Blue and Green Development, Weihai, China (GRID:grid.27255.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 1174)
3 Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai, China (GRID:grid.16821.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 8293)
4 University College London, The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
5 Tianjin University, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin, China (GRID:grid.33763.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 2484)
6 Anhui University of Finance and Economics, School of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Bengbu, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.464226.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 7263)
7 University College London, The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); Tsinghua University, Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modelling, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 0662 3178)