Removal of Hydrogen Peroxide Residuals and By-Product Bromate from Advanced Oxidation Processes by Granular Activated Carbon

Abstract

During drinking water treatment, advanced oxidation process (AOP) with O₃ and H₂O₂ may result in by-products, residual H₂O₂ and BrO₃⁻. The water containing H₂O₂ and BrO₃⁻ often flows into subsequent granular activated carbon (GAC) filters. A concentrated H₂O₂ solution can be used as GAC modification reagent at 60 °C to improve its adsorption ability. However, whether low concentrations of H₂O₂ residuals from AOP can modify GAC, and the impact of H₂O₂ residuals on BrO₃⁻ removal by the subsequent GAC filter at ambient temperature, is unknown. This study evaluated the modification of GAC surface functional groups by residual H₂O₂ and its effect on BrO₃⁻ removal by GAC. Results showed that both H₂O₂ and BrO₃⁻ were effectively removed by virgin GAC, while pre-loaded and regenerated GACs removed H₂O₂ but not BrO₃⁻ anymore. At the ambient temperature 150 µmol/L H₂O₂ residuals consumed large amounts of functional groups, which resulted in the decrease of BrO₃⁻ removal by virgin GAC in the presence of H₂O₂ residuals. Redox reactions between BrO₃⁻ and surface functional groups played a dominant role in BrO₃⁻ removal by GAC, and only a small amount of BrO₃⁻ was removed by GAC adsorption. The higher the pH, the less BrO₃⁻ removal and the more H₂O₂ removal was observed.

1. Introduction

The combination of an advanced oxidation process (AOP) as a pre-treatment with subsequent managed aquifer recharge (MAR) has been suggested as a comprehensive treatment system to effectively remove various organic micro-pollutants (OMPs) during drinking water production [1,2]. However, a disadvantage of applying ozone-based AOP is the formation of bromate (BrO₃⁻) [3,4,5], a genotoxic carcinogen [6], when bromide (Br⁻) is contained in the water. WHO, USEPA, and the European Union have set drinking water regulations for the maximum allowable concentration of BrO₃⁻ at 0.078 µmol/L (10 µg/L) [7,8,9]. In order to reduce the formation of BrO₃⁻, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) may be dosed excessively during AOP [10,11]. Since H₂O₂ contained in the effluent of ozone-based AOP may cause undesired effects to the ecosystem of subsequent MAR systems [12], it needs to be quenched to a low concentration before flowing into the MAR systems. Therefore, a subsequent removal process may be required for both of BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ control [13].

A recent study reported that the adsorption-based physical method has been proven to be more effective for BrO₃⁻ removal than chemical methods in potable water treatment [14]. Granular activated carbon (GAC) has been used as a powerful adsorbent in water treatment and some drinking water companies use GAC filters to quench the excessive H₂O₂ from AOP [15]. GAC and modified GAC also have been shown to decrease BrO₃⁻ formation [16] or remove BrO₃⁻ in a number of studies [17,18,19]. The previous studies focused on the effects of carbon type, pH, temperature, empty bed contact time, source water, natural organic matter (NOM) and other anions on BrO₃⁻ removal through kinetic and isotherm tests [17,20]. Previous studies found that BrO₃⁻ could be effectively removed by virgin GAC, while some studies revealed that after a certain running time, the loaded and/or regenerated GAC was no longer effective for BrO₃⁻ removal [17,20]. For example, 100% BrO₃⁻ removal was achieved in the first month and declined to around 5% removal after 11 months in a pilot with an empty bed contact time of 15 min [21]. The performance of GAC in most applications is influenced by its surface chemistry [22,23,24], so the modification of this GAC property, especially surface oxygen functional groups, has been frequently the target of a variety of GAC beneficiation treatments [25]. Oxidation as one of the most conventional modifications is mainly used to introduce carbon–oxygen surface groups in GAC [26]. Some oxidants, such as HNO₃, O₃ and H₂O₂, have been tested for GAC modification to increase the oxygen surface groups, and results indicated that the oxidation of GAC increased the content of acidic oxygen surface groups and the adsorption capacity of Hg, Cd, Cr(III), Cr(VI) and Cu(II) [26,27,28]. The oxidation treatment of GAC as a rule was performed mostly using O₂ and acid, and rarely with H₂O₂. The real situation in practice is the co-presence of BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂, while as far as to the authors’ knowledge, it has not been known whether the presence of H₂O₂ as a modification reagent of GAC can play a positive role in BrO₃⁻ adsorption by GAC during drinking water treatment. However, another possibility could be that the co-presence of BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ may compete the active sites or oxygen-containing functional groups of GAC so that they may negatively impact each other’s removal. What is more, the H₂O₂ decomposition product oxygen was speculated to cover the active sites on the surface of GAC or block the micropores [29], so that the presence of H₂O₂ may decrease BrO₃⁻ removal efficiency. Oppositely, the presence of H₂O₂ as a strong oxidant to modify GAC may increase the BrO₃⁻ removal, as stated earlier. However, till now it has not yet been investigated whether the co-presence of H₂O₂ and BrO₃⁻ can improve BrO₃⁻ removal by GAC.

The objectives of this study were to assess whether the presence of residual H₂O₂ from AOP in the water could improve the removal of BrO₃⁻ by GAC and to investigate the mechanism behind it.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. GAC

Virgin, pre-loaded and regenerated GAC (Norit ROW 0.8 CAT) was used in this study. The virgin GAC was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The pre-loaded and regenerated GAC were collected from Dunea drinking water plant (Bergambacht, The Netherlands). The GAC pre-loaded with natural organic matter was already used for two and half years at the Dunea plant. The particle size of all GACs was 0.8–1.0 mm.

The GAC for the batch experiments was prepared by the following procedures. The GAC was ground and sieved to obtain a particle size ranging from 0.25 mm to 0.8 mm. After sieving, the GAC was washed with ultra-pure water until the water remained colorless, and finally the GAC was dried at 175 °C for 72 h to remove volatile impurities.

2.2. Water and Chemical Reagents

The water used in batch experiments was prepared using chemical reagents and deionized water from a Millipore Milli-Q system. Chemicals including sodium bromate (NaBrO₃), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), concentrated acid (HCl), sodium carbonate (Na₂CO₃), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The H₂O₂ solutions were prepared from a 30% standard solution (Merck, Germany). All chemicals were of analytical grade. All solutions used in this study were prepared using water from a Millipore Milli-Q system.

2.3. Batch Experiments

In a survey of 100 drinking water utilities, BrO₃⁻ concentrations were in the range of <0.016–0.5 µmol/L following ozonation of water containing 0.025–5.36 µmol/L Br⁻ [30,31]. It was decided to investigate the upper value of this range in this study, so 0.5 µmol/L BrO₃⁻ was achieved in the batch experiments. Batch experiments were conducted using glass bottles with a volume of 1 L. During all the experiments, the batch reactors were wrapped in thin foil. A 0.052 µmol/L NaBrO₃ solution was prepared and 3 mL was dosed into the batch reactors to obtain a concentration of 0.5 µmol/L BrO₃⁻. The research of Lekkerkerker and Knol [32] showed that 180 µmol/L H₂O₂ dosage was enough to form sufficient hydroxyl radicals in the AOP, so the residual H₂O₂ concentration in effluent water of AOP will not exceed 180 µmol/L. Hence, 150 µmol/L H₂O₂ was dosed into the batch reactors in this study.

As is shown in Figure 1, a series of experiments were performed using 36 batch glass bottles at ambient temperature of 23–27 °C. The GAC dosage was always 5 g/L, and the H₂O₂ and BrO₃⁻ concentrations were always 150 µmol/L and 0.5 µmol/L, respectively. All the batch reactors with H₂O₂ were covered by aluminium foils to prevent potential degradation of H₂O₂ by the light.

In experiment A as shown in Figure 1, 16 batch reactors and three different GACs (virgin GAC, regenerated GAC and pre-loaded GAC) were used to investigate the removal of bromate and H₂O₂ by GAC with different running time. This experiment involved eight treatment groups (only H₂O₂, virgin GAC + H₂O₂, regenerated GAC + H₂O₂, pre-loaded GAC + H₂O₂, only BrO₃⁻, virgin GAC + BrO₃⁻, regenerated GAC + BrO₃⁻, and pre-loaded GAC + H₂O₂). The groups without GAC were references. Before the experiment started, the three GACs were collected to characterize their surface functional groups. Water samples were collected at 0, 10, 20, 60, 120 and 180 min for BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ analysis.

In experiment B as shown in Figure 1, 0.5 µmol/L BrO₃⁻ and/or 150 µmol/L H₂O₂ was dosed into batch reactors with virgin GAC to investigate whether the presence of residual H₂O₂ from AOP improved the removal of BrO₃⁻ by GAC. This experiment involved 6 treatment groups (BrO₃⁻, H₂O₂, BrO₃⁻ + H₂O₂, BrO₃⁻ + GAC, H₂O₂ + GAC, and BrO₃⁻ + H₂O₂ + GAC). The groups without GAC were references. Water samples were collected from the reactors for the analysis of BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂. To identify the consumed/modified oxygen containing surface functional groups during the contact time, GAC samples were collected for the analysis of surface oxygen functional groups at the beginning and the end of the experiment.

To further assess the effect of H₂O₂ presence on BrO₃⁻ removal in a broad pH range, batch experiment C was performed using eight batch reactors with virgin GAC, H₂O₂ and BrO₃⁻, in different pH levels ranging from 5.5 to 10. During the whole experiment, the solutions in batch reactors were not buffered. Every 5 min, solution pH was measured, and HCl or NaOH solution was dropped into batch reactors manually to reach a stable pH level. Water samples were collected at 0, 10, 20, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min for BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ analysis. Additionally, GAC samples were collected to measure the initial and ending surface functional groups.

2.4. Analytical Methods

2.4.1. Functional Groups Measurement

The amount of surface acidic and basic functional groups was measured by the Boehm method [33]. Four series of GAC samples (0.5 g) were added to four flasks (100 mL). Then, 50 mL of 0.05 mol/L sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO₃), sodium carbonate (Na₂CO₃) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were added to the flasks, respectively. The flasks were then sealed and stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The GAC samples were then filtrated and carefully washed. All filtrates were collected and subsequently diluted to 100 mL. Then, the diluent was titrated with 0.05 mol/L HCl and the surface oxygenated groups were determined according to the following assumptions: NaOH neutralizes carboxyl, phenolic and lactonic groups. Na₂CO₃ neutralizes carboxyl and lactonic groups. NaHCO₃ neutralizes carboxyl groups only. The amount of basic surface groups was determined with 0.05 mol/L HCl solution. The filtrate was collected as above, and then titrated with 0.05 mol/L NaOH solution.

2.4.2. Other Analysis and Measurements

Hydrogen peroxide test kits (1.18789.0001, VWR Company, Radnor, PA, USA) with a detection range of 0.44–180 µmol/L were used for water-phase H₂O₂ measurements because of ease of operation, the rapid decomposition of H₂O₂ and accuracy of results. After being filtered through 0.45 µm filters, the samples were transferred to a 10/20 mm rectangular cell and measured in a photometer (Spectroquant NOVA 60).

BrO₃⁻ was analysed using a Metrohm Schiedam ion chromatograph (SenTix^® 940 IDS probe, Multi 340i, WTW, Germany) equipped with a suppressed conductivity detector, using an A Supp 16 150/4.0 column, a guard column, and a 100 µL sample loop. A 3.75 mM Na₂CO₃ and 0.375 mM NaOH solution was used as the eluent. The eluent flow rate was set at 0.7 mL/min. pH was measured with a SenTix^® 940 (WTW) electrode (Xylem Inc., Weiheim, Germany), both using the WTW Multi 3420 m (Xylem Inc., Weiheim, Germany).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ Removal by Three GACs with Different Usage Times

Figure 2 presents H₂O₂ and BrO₃⁻ removal efficiencies within 180 min by virgin GAC, pre-loaded GAC and regenerated GAC, respectively. As is shown in Figure 2a, among the three kinds of GAC, virgin GAC had the best BrO₃⁻ removal capacity (81%). No BrO₃⁻ removal was observed in the batch reactor without GAC, indicating BrO₃⁻ was not self-decomposed or decomposed by microbes in a short experiment period of 180 min. The pre-loaded GAC did not remove BrO₃⁻ at all, which is in line with a previous study reporting that BrO₃⁻ removal rate by GAC apparently decreased with increasing operation time [34], probably because the active sites or valid functional groups on the surface of GAC were exhausted due to preloading in the preceding two years with natural organic matter present in the drinking water treatment plant [35]. It seems that 3.8% BrO₃⁻ was removed by regenerated GAC, which is in line with a previous study reporting that, compared with regenerated GAC, virgin GAC had a better removal effect on BrO₃⁻ [36]. This result indicates that the thermal regeneration restored active sites or functional groups on the surface of GAC to some degree. In conclusion, these results indicate that GAC may become invalid for BrO₃⁻ removal after a period of running, even after regeneration, in practice. As is shown in Figure 2b, H₂O₂ was not decomposed in the absence of GAC within 180 min, indicating that the decrease of H₂O₂ in other groups was caused by GAC instead of other factors. No obvious difference was observed between preloaded GAC and virgin GAC groups. H₂O₂ removal rate in regenerated GAC group was slightly lower than that in preloaded GAC group. GAC regeneration and recycle slighly decreased H₂O₂ removal capacity, but regenerated GAC is still able to effectively quench residual H₂O₂. Previous studies showed that GAC can be used to quench the residual H₂O₂ after drinking water treatment AOPs, and the catalytic activity of GAC has nothing to do with continuous exposure to hydrogen peroxide, but is related to the physical and chemical properties of the GAC surface [37,38].

3.2. Surface Functional Groups of Three GACs with Different Usage Times

Figure 3 presents the acidic and basic functional groups on the surface of three kinds of GAC with different usage times before the BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ removal experiment. Generally, the overall concentrations of acidic and basic functional groups are observed to be in the following order: virgin GAC > regenerated GAC > pre-loaded GAC, although the concentration of basic functional groups on the surface of virgin GAC is the same as that of regenerated GAC, indicating that the virgin GAC contained rich functional groups and the regeneration can recover a portion of functional groups. Usually, regardless of the regeneration method used, the porosity, specific surface area and surface oxygen functional groups on the surface of the regenerated GAC are less than that of the virgin GAC. Mesopores formed during the regeneration are considered to promote the carbon adsorption capacity [39]. Correspondingly, BrO₃⁻ removal ability was also recovered after GAC regeneration, but not much (Figure 2). Acid groups are classified to lactonic groups, carboxyl groups and phenolic groups. Among the three acidic functional groups, lactonic groups and phenolic groups on virgin GAC are greater than that on regenerated and pre-loaded GAC. This might also be one of the reasons why virgin GAC reached the highest removal efficiencies of BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ (Figure 2).

3.3. Effect of H₂O₂ on BrO₃⁻ Removal by Virgin GAC

To assess the interaction of BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ removal by virgin GAC, Figure 4 presents the removal of BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ by 5 g/L virgin GAC in the presence and the absence of the other. Figure 4a shows that the initial 0.5 µmol/L BrO₃⁻ was removed 60–80% by GAC under the presence and absence of H₂O₂ in 180 min, respectively. It can be observed that the BrO₃⁻ concentration decreased faster in the absence than in the presence of 150 µmol/L H₂O₂, that is the presence of 150 µmol/L H₂O₂ negatively impacted BrO₃⁻ removal by GAC, indicating 150 µmol/L H₂O₂ may not successfully modify the surface functional groups of GAC at the ambient temperature. A previous study found that the activated carbon modified with 0.04 mol/L hydrogen peroxide at 75 °C removed 85.6% cobalt from aqueous solution after 1h, while the activated carbon modified at a lower temperature of 25 °C removed only 74% cobalt after 1 h [40]. It further proves that the modification temperature has a great influence on the physical and chemical properties of the activated carbon surface, and the low temperature environment cannot modify GAC well. Figure 4b shows that 150 µmol/L H₂O₂ was decomposed fully by GAC and its decomposition in the presence and the absence of 0.5 µM BrO₃⁻ had no considerable difference during the 180 min contact time (p > 0.05), indicating an ignorable influence of 0.5 µmol/L BrO₃⁻ on H₂O₂ decomposition. In the reference without GAC, both BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ showed steady concentrations, indicating that no self-decomposition took place and the removal of BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ can be contributed to GAC.

3.4. The Mechanism of H₂O₂ Impact on BrO₃⁻ Removal by Virgin GAC

3.4.1. BrO₃⁻ Removal by Adsorption or Reduction?

Figure 5 presents the removal of BrO₃⁻ by virgin GAC and correspondingly the increase of reaction product Br⁻, in the presence and absence of H₂O₂. Under both situations, the BrO₃⁻ concentration gradually decreased, and correspondingly the Br⁻ concentration gradually increased with time. The molar mass of BrO₃⁻ and Br⁻ in the reactor tends to stabilize after a slight decrease in the first 6 min. This slight decrease could be caused by GAC adsorption. The gradual increase of Br⁻ with the decrease of BrO₃⁻ indicates that the removal of BrO₃⁻ by virgin GAC is mainly a reduction process, which might involve redox reactions between surface functional groups and BrO₃⁻. Obviously, the presence of 150 µmol/L H₂O₂ significantly inhibited the removal of BrO₃⁻ by virgin GAC. Figure 5 showed that the addition of H₂O₂ changed the physical and chemical properties of the GAC surface, resulting in a significant decrease in the acidic and basic oxygen-containing functional groups on the GAC surface, thereby reducing the reaction efficiency of the functional groups with BrO₃⁻. When H₂O₂ and BrO₃⁻ coexist, there may be competition for GAC oxygen-containing functional groups and adsorption active sites, which is one of the reasons why BrO₃⁻ removal was inhibited by H₂O₂. In addition, bromine mass loss in BrO₃⁻ and Br⁻ is observed due to the presence of H₂O₂, by comparing Figure 5a,b. During H₂O₂ decomposition, a small amount of OH· can be generated [41]. The OH· can further oxidize Br⁻ into intermediate products, such as HOBr and BrO⁻ [42], which could explain the bromine mass loss under the situation of H₂O₂ addition.

3.4.2. Modification of GAC Surface Functional Groups by H₂O₂

The surface oxygen-containing functional groups of initial GAC and the modified GAC after contacting with BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ are presented in Figure 6. It is observed that both H₂O₂ alone and BrO₃⁻ alone consumed acid groups and basic groups, indicating the presence of H₂O₂ consumed oxygen-containing surface functional groups with BrO₃⁻ instead of provided more functional groups. Therefore, the H₂O₂ concentration of 150 µmol/L could be too low to effectively modify GAC oxygen-containing surface functional groups. Among the three acid groups, both the amount of carboxyl groups and phenolic groups did not change significantly after different reactions and the main change lay in lactonic groups, indicating that H₂O₂ mainly reacted with lactonic groups. The functional group modification by H₂O₂ can be explained as follows.

H₂O₂ has a property of electrophilic attacking, so H₂O₂ attacks the unsaturated bonds of C=C by electrophilic addition and introduces the phenolic groups [43], as shown in Equation (1). In a previous study [43], around 1.47 mol/L H₂O₂ was used to modify activated carbon at 60 °C for 2 h and the modification treatment increased the formation of carboxyl groups and carbonyl groups but decreased the formation of phenolic groups, which was explained by the fact that phenolic groups formed in Equation (1) could be further oxidized to carboxyl groups by esterification and dehydration as shown in Equations (2) and (3). A previous study [44] showed that different from the steady rise of carboxyl groups and lactonic groups, the concentration of phenolic groups first increased and then decreased with the increase of H₂O₂ concentration, which could be caused by the fact that the dehydration of phenolic groups became faster than the formation of phenolic groups with the increase of oxidation ability. Therefore, the low H₂O₂ concentration, an environmentally relevant concentration, in this study might be not enough to further conduct the following two steps reactions, dehydration and esterification, as shown in Equations (2) and (3), which might explain the increase of phenolic groups instead of carboxyl group. In conclusion, an environmentally relevant concentration of H₂O₂ from AOP cannot significantly increase the concentrations of carboxyl and lactonic groups due to the limited oxidation ability.

(1)

(2)

(3)

3.5. Effect of pH on BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ Removal

The removal of BrO₃⁻ and H₂O₂ by virgin GAC under different pH conditions is shown in Figure 7. At pH 5.5 and 7, BrO₃⁻ concentration decreased sharply within the first 50 min, and then remained constant. In contrast, BrO₃⁻ concentrations slowly decreased within the whole 300 min and did not arrive at an equilibrium status at pH 8.5 and 10. Therefore, BrO₃⁻ removal efficiency was higher at the acidic and neutral conditions than at the basic condition, which seems in conflict with a previous study [45]. This is probably because (1) BrO₃⁻ is a strong oxidizer under low pH conditions, and its reactivity is in direct proportion to the square of the proton concentration [46]; (2) as pH decreases, the protonation of surface functional groups of activated carbon or dissociation of OH⁻ makes the material surface electropositive, resulting in electrostatic attraction of BrO₃⁻ [45]. As for H₂O₂, with the increase of pH, H₂O₂ decomposition was more efficient. At pH 10, almost all H₂O₂ was removed while only 64% H₂O₂ was removed at pH 5.5. The results indicate that a higher pH is favourable to H₂O₂ removal in GAC filters during drinking water treatment.

Figure 8 presents the effect of pH on surface functional groups’ modification by H₂O₂. With the increase of pH, the surface acid groups decreased from 1 mmol/g to 0.7 mmol/g in the pH range of 5.5–7 and then became stable in the pH range of 7–10. In contrast, the basic group greatly increased with the increase of pH from 5.5 to 10. At pH 10, even the basic groups reached 1.2 mmol/g, higher than the initial level of 0.8 mmol/g. With regard to the three acid groups, as the pH increased, the lactonic groups and phenolic groups presented a notable decrease and a slight decrease respectively, while the carboxyl groups did not show regular changes.

It is reasonable that the change trends of the acid groups and the basic groups with pH change were caused by acid-base neutralization. What is more, with the increase of pH, the basic groups were observed to increase (Figure 8), and simultaneously the H₂O₂ removal efficiency also increased (Figure 7), which is in line with previous studies reporting that the basic groups enhanced the H₂O₂ removal [35]. More specifically, the decrease of lactonic groups might be explained by the fact that the lactonic groups produced by the esterification reaction between carboxyl groups and phenolic groups decreased with the increase of pH.

4. Conclusions

Virgin GAC has the most acidic and basic surface functional groups, and correspondingly it presented the highest BrO₃⁻ removal. However, GAC hardly remove BrO₃⁻ anymore after two years running and thermal regeneration in this study. In our experiments, 5 g/L GAC decreased H₂O₂ from 150 μmol/L to <3 μmol/L within 80 min and the removal efficiency was not evidently impacted by GAC running time or regeneration.

The presence of 150 µmol/L H₂O₂ inhibited BrO₃⁻ removal by virgin GAC, which could be explained by the fact that H₂O₂ competed oxygen-containing functional groups with BrO₃⁻. H₂O₂ removal efficiency was hardly impacted by the presence of 0.5 μmol/L BrO₃⁻.

Redox reactions between BrO₃⁻ and surface functional groups played a dominant role in BrO₃⁻ removal by GAC, and a small amount of BrO₃⁻ was removed by GAC adsorption.

BrO₃⁻ removal efficiency was higher at acidic and neutral conditions than at basic conditions. In contrast, H₂O₂ removal efficiency was increased with pH increase, which could be explained by the increase of alkaline surface functional groups with the increase of pH.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.W. and L.W.; methodology, F.W. and L.W.; Investigation, F.W. and L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, F.W. and L.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.W. and J.P.v.d.H.; supervision, J.P.v.d.H.; project administration, F.W. and J.P.v.d.H.; funding acquisition, F.W. and J.P.v.d.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Foundation, grant number PCRRF19003.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Foundation (No. PCRRF19003).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Figure 1. The schematic diagram of the reactor (a) and the flowchart of the experimental plan (b).

Figure 2. (a) BrO3− and (b) H2O2 removal by different types of GAC. GAC dosage was 5 g/L. Initial BrO3 concentration was 0.5 µM.

Figure 3. Surface functional groups of three different types of GAC.

Figure 4. (a) BrO3− and (b) H2O2 removal by GAC under the co-present condition.

Figure 5. BrO3−, Br−, and BrO3− + Br− concentration in the absence and presence of H2O2. (a) with H2O2, (b) without H2O2.

Figure 6. Surface functional groups on the initial and modified GAC.

Figure 7. The removal of (a) BrO3− and (b) H2O2 at different pH by virgin GAC.

Figure 8. Surface functional groups of the modified oxidized GAC under different pH levels.