It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The DAQ system of the CMS experiment at the LHC is upgraded during the accelerator shutdown in 2013/14. To reduce the interdependency of the DAQ system and the high-level trigger (HLT), we investigate the feasibility of using a file-system-based HLT. Events of ~1 MB size are built at the level-1 trigger rate of 100 kHz. The events are assembled by ~50 builder units (BUs). Each BU writes the raw events at ~2GB/s to a local file system shared with Q(10) filter-unit machines (FUs) running the HLT code. The FUs read the raw data from the file system, select Q(1%) of the events, and write the selected events together with monitoring meta-data back to a disk. This data is then aggregated over several steps and made available for offline reconstruction and online monitoring. We present the challenges, technical choices, and performance figures from the prototyping phase. In addition, the steps to the final system implementation will be discussed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
2 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
3 DESY, Hamburg, Germany
4 University of California, San Diego, California, USA
5 University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
6 FNAL, Chicago, Illinois, USA
7 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland; Also at Institute Rudjer Boskovic, Zagreb, Croatia