It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Fjords are semi-enclosed marine systems with unique physical conditions that influence microbial community composition and structure. Pronounced organic matter and physical condition gradients within fjords provide a natural laboratory for the study of changes in microbial community structure and metabolic potential in response to environmental conditions. Photosynthetic production in euphotic zones sustains deeper aphotic microbial activity via organic matter sinking, augmented by large terrestrial inputs. Previous studies do not consider both prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities when linking metabolic potential and activity, community composition, and environmental gradients. To address this gap we profiled microbial functional potential (Biolog Ecoplates), bacterial abundance, heterotrophic production (3H-Leucine incorporation), and prokaryotic/eukaryotic community composition (16S and 18S rRNA amplicon gene sequencing). Similar factors shaped metabolic potential, activity and community (prokaryotic and eukaryotic) composition across surface/near surface sites. However, increased metabolic diversity at near bottom (aphotic) sites reflected an organic matter influence from sediments. Photosynthetically produced particulate organic matter shaped the upper water column community composition and metabolic potential. In contrast, microbial activity at deeper aphotic waters were strongly influenced by other organic matter input than sinking marine snow (e.g. sediment resuspension of benthic organic matter, remineralisation of terrestrially derived organic matter, etc.), severing the link between community structure and metabolic potential. Taken together, different organic matter sources shape microbial activity, but not community composition, in New Zealand fjords.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Otago, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Dunedin, New Zealand (GRID:grid.29980.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7830); Leibniz-Institude of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Department of Experimental Limnology, Neuglobsow, Germany (GRID:grid.29980.3a)
2 University of Otago, Department of Marine Science, Dunedin, New Zealand (GRID:grid.29980.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7830)
3 University of Otago, Department of Marine Science, Dunedin, New Zealand (GRID:grid.29980.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7830); University of Vienna, Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Vienna, Austria (GRID:grid.10420.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2286 1424)
4 University of Otago, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Dunedin, New Zealand (GRID:grid.29980.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7830)