It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) shows a large diversity of events that is modulated by climate variability and change. The representation of this diversity in climate models limits our ability to predict their impact on ecosystems and human livelihood. Here, we use multiple observational datasets to provide a probabilistic description of historical variations in event location and intensity, and to benchmark models, before examining future system trajectories. We find robust decadal variations in event intensities and locations in century-long observational datasets, which are associated with perturbations in equatorial wind-stress and thermocline depth, as well as extra-tropical anomalies in the North and South Pacific. Some climate models are capable of simulating such decadal variability in ENSO diversity, and the associated large-scale patterns. Projections of ENSO diversity in future climate change scenarios strongly depend on the magnitude of decadal variations, and the ability of climate models to reproduce them realistically over the 21st century.
El Niño-Southern Oscillation event intensities and locations show pronounced decadal variations, which need to be represented in models for better projections of future ENSO diversity, suggest analyses of observations and climate model simulations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Coventry University, Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry, UK (GRID:grid.8096.7) (ISNI:0000000106754565); University of Cape Town, Department of Oceanography, MARE Institute, Cape Town, RSA (GRID:grid.7836.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 1151)
2 University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a) (ISNI:0000000096214564); Physical Sciences Laboratory, NOAA, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.511342.0)
3 Centre de Recherches de Climatologie, UMR 6282 Biogéosciences, CNRS/Université de Bourgogne Franche Comté, Dijon, France (GRID:grid.5613.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2298 9313)
4 Hong Kong Baptist University, Department of Geography, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.221309.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 5980)
5 University of Reading, Department of Meteorology, National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), Reading, UK (GRID:grid.9435.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0457 9566)
6 Coventry University, Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry, UK (GRID:grid.8096.7) (ISNI:0000000106754565)