Abstract

The aim of the study was to derive and compare metabolic parameters relating to benign and malignant pulmonary nodules using dynamic 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT, and nodule perfusion parameters derived through perfusion computed tomography (CT).

Twenty patients with 21 pulmonary nodules incidentally detected on CT underwent a dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT and a perfusion CT. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured on conventional 18F-FDG PET/CT images. The influx constant (Ki) was calculated from the dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT data using Patlak model. Arterial flow (AF) using the maximum slope model and blood volume (BV) using the Patlak plot method for each nodule were calculated from the perfusion CT data. All nodules were characterized as malignant or benign based on histopathology or 2 year follow up CT. All parameters were statistically compared between the two groups using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test.

Twelve malignant and 9 benign lung nodules were analysed (median size 20.1 mm, 9–29 mm) in 21 patients (male/female = 11/9; mean age ± SD: 65.3 ± 7.4; age range: 50–76 years). The average SUVmax values ± SD of the benign and malignant nodules were 2.2 ± 1.7 vs. 7.0 ± 4.5, respectively (p = 0.0148). Average Ki values in benign and malignant nodules were 0.0057 ± 0.0071 and 0.0230 ± 0.0155 min-1, respectively (p = 0.0311). Average BV for the benign and malignant nodules were 11.6857 ± 6.7347 and 28.3400 ± 15.9672 ml/100 ml, respectively (p = 0.0250). Average AF for the benign and malignant nodules were 74.4571 ± 89.0321 and 89.200 ± 49.8883 ml/100g/min, respectively (p = 0.1613).

Dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT and perfusion CT derived blood volume had similar capability to differentiate benign from malignant lung nodules.

Details

Title
Can dynamic imaging, using 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT perfusion differentiate between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules?
Author
Marin, Aleksander 1 ; Murchison, John T 2 ; Skwarski, Kristopher M 3 ; Tavares, Adriana AS 4 ; Fletcher, Alison 4 ; Wallace, William A 5 ; Salapura, Vladka 6 ; van Beek, Edwin JR 4 ; Mirsadraee, Saeed 7 

 Edinburgh Imaging facility Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 
 Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 
 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 
 Edinburgh Imaging facility Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 
 Department of Pathology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 
 Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 
 Edinburgh Imaging facility Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom 
Pages
259-267
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
De Gruyter Poland
ISSN
13182099
e-ISSN
0485893X
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2584706729
Copyright
© 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.