This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebral vascular disease [1, 2], affecting about 1.39 billion people worldwide [3]. The main treatment modality for hypertension is pharmacological treatment. Although considerable progress has been made in the field of antihypertensive medicines, only 13.8% of adults with hypertension had their blood pressure (BP) controlled up to the standard worldwide [3]. Because of its relative safety, acupuncture has led to a growing interest among nonpharmacological complementary therapies, in the treatment of hypertension. Also, it has been shown potential in lowering BP, although the effects were not proven sustaining [4].
Plenty of research studies focusing on antihypertensive mechanisms of acupuncture have shown that acupuncture elicits antihypertensive effects through the regulation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, vascular endothelium function, oxidative stress, neuroendocrine system, and so on [5]. However, the efficacy and mechanisms of acupuncture for experimentally induced hypertension have not been systematically investigated yet. The scientific theory for systematic reviews of animal studies was initially summarized in a commentary published in The Lancet [6]. A systematic review of preclinical animal studies contributes to translational medicine and potentially brings about more precise medical care decisions [7]. In addition, systematic review of preclinical evidence could inform the design and contribute to success of future clinical studies, indicate the necessity of further research, reduce unnecessary study replication, and implement the principle of “replacement, refinement, and reduction of animals” in animal research [8]. Thus, the aim of present review is to synthesize and appraise pooling results of acupuncture’s antihypertensive effects in animal models, quantitively assess influencing factors of acupuncture’s efficacy, explore future study direction, provide clues for clinical studies, and assess potential publication bias and its influence.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Search Strategy
The following sources were searched from inception to July 2020: Medline, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP information database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. In an effort to identify further published and unpublished research studies, we retrieved the reference lists of relevant reports and review articles identified from electronic databases. Following terms combined were used for searching: acupuncture OR acupoint, hypertension OR blood pressure, animal OR pre-clinical study OR mechanism study.
2.2. Inclusion Criteria
Studies were included if all of the following standards were met: sustaining high blood pressure (HBP) animal model, baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg [9, 10]; at least one of the following was used as outcome measures: SBP, DBP, and MAP; and SBP/DBP/MAP was compared with those of hypertension animals receiving sham-acupuncture or no treatment.
2.3. Exclusion Criteria
Studies were excluded if any of the following standards was met: the HBP was induced by stress or adrenaline administration and was not lasting; studies were conducted to compare the effects of different acupuncture methods on hypertension, with no treatment or sham-acupuncture treatment as control; studies did not use BP values as outcomes; and duplicate publications.
2.4. Selection of Studies
Two reviewers screened the titles and/or abstracts of searched studies and excluded obviously irrelevant studies, such as clinical studies, reviews, and nonhypertension and nonacupuncture studies. The full texts were obtained for the remaining studies. A flowchart of study selection is presented in Figure 1.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]2.5. Data Extraction
Two reviewers independently assessed the eligible studies and extracted data using a predefined template. The following items were extracted: publication information, experimental animal information, type of animal model, acupuncture manipulation methods, outcome measurements, data of mean outcome, standard deviation, and sample of animals in the acupuncture as well as the control groups. If the results were only shown by chart, the data were obtained by accurate measurement from the figures by software Digxy1.0.0.1. The missing information was sought by sending e-mail or telephone call to the corresponding author of the article. Stata 12.0 software was used for data analysis.
2.6. Quality Assessment
The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed according to the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines, the standards of reporting in animal research. 20 items were included in the guideline. Standards of grading were adjusted based on previous report [11, 12]. Items “1” and “11” were marked a lowest score of 0 and a highest score of 1 (0 = inaccurate, not concise, or not reported; 1 = accurate, concise, or reported). The other items (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20) were marked a lowest score of 0 and a highest score of 2 (0 = clearly inaccurate or not reported; 1 = possibly accurate, unclear, or incomplete; 2 = clearly accurate). The total scores of one study ranged from 0 to 38. The category score was sum of scores by each item. The maximum score was the maximum possible score, i.e., when each item was assessed as clearly accurate [11]. We calculated a ratio quality score/maximum score, generating three possible quality intervals of which 0.8–1 was considered “excellent,” 0.5–0.8 was considered “average,” and scores below 0.5 was considered “poor.”
2.7. Bias Assessment
The risk of bias was evaluated with the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool [13]. This tool contains 10 items about the selection, performance, detection, attrition, reporting bias, etc. Each item was labeled yes, no, or unclear to score selected articles. Studies with 1 item recognized to be high risk of bias were considered to have an entire high risk of bias. Studies with unclear risk of bias for at least one item were considered to be at unclear risk of bias, and studies with low risk of bias in all items were assessed as low risk of bias [14].
The assessment of the methodological quality and risk of bias was performed by two authors separately. Any divergence was resolved through discussion with a third reviewer.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
Meta-analyses were performed using Stata 12.0 software. Outcome measures of SBP, DBP, and MAP were considered as continuous data. The effect size was calculated by combining these data with the random effects model, respectively. Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot and Egger’s test. The I2 statistic was used for detection of heterogeneity. If the I2 statistic was higher than 50%, we considered significant heterogeneity was present. To explore the impact of factors potentially influencing the BP outcome, subgroup analyses were conducted for the following factors: acupuncture methods used, age of acupuncture initiation, age of BP measurement, duration of each acupuncture session, total acupuncture sessions, and acupuncture treatment frequency. Sensitivity analyses were performed by deleting one study at a time from the pooled studies.
3. Results
According to search criteria, we retrieved 4030 potentially relevant records from 6 databases, of which 2012 were duplicate records. After screening titles and abstracts of remaining 2018 records, 1914 records were excluded for one or more of the following reasons: (1) not research studies of hypertension or hypertension combined with other conditions, (2) unsustainable hypertension, e.g., the HBP was caused by cold or electric stress, (3) not animal study, (4) not an acupuncture study or acupuncture combined with other therapy, (5) review articles, and (6) other language. By browsing the whole text of the remaining 104 records, a total of 37 studies were excluded for one or more of the following reasons: (1) unsustainable hypertension, (2) not animal study, (3) without BP measurement, (4) without control group, and (5) full article could not be obtained. Finally, 67 eligible studies were included, and 1522 animals were involved in the meta-analysis.
3.1. Study Characteristics
Totally, 1522 animals were included for comparison. Of the hypertension models in these studies, 63 used SHR, 1 used AngII infusion [44], and 3 used renal artery stenosis [17, 21, 22]. 3 studies simultaneously assessed SBP/DBP/MAP as the outcome measures [42, 48, 52]. 20 studies assessed SBP and DBP as the outcome measures [23, 32, 35, 36, 38, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 50, 53, 55, 56, 60, 62, 68, 72, 79, 80]. 3 studies assessed SBP and MAP as the outcome measures [37, 58, 70]. 35 studies assessed only SBP as the outcome measures [9, 17–22, 24–27, 29–31, 33, 34, 39, 40, 46, 51, 54, 57, 59, 61, 63–65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75–78]. 6 studies assessed only MAP as the outcome measure [15, 16, 28, 44, 66, 74]. 40 studies adopted manual acupuncture [9, 17, 20, 25, 29, 32–41, 43, 45–47, 50, 51, 53, 54, 57–63, 65–68, 70, 71, 75–78], of which 35 adopted manipulation instead of simple needle penetration [9, 17, 20, 25, 29, 32–41, 43, 45–47, 50, 51, 53, 54, 57, 59–61, 63, 65, 66, 68, 71, 76–78]. 20 studies used EA as intervention [15, 16, 18, 21–23, 27, 28, 30, 31, 42, 44, 48, 52, 64, 69, 72–74, 79]. 4 studies combined manipulation and EA as intervention [24, 49, 55, 56]. 2 studies used other auxiliary devices combined with acupuncture as treatment [19, 80]. The needle retaining time ranged from 0.5 minute to 30 minutes. The duration of acupuncture ranged from 1 time to 48 times. Animal age of treatment initiation ranged from 8 weeks to 34 weeks. Study characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Characteristics of included studies.
Study | Animals (species, sex, weight) | Model | Control group | Outcome measurement | Week-age of acupuncture initiation (weeks) | Week-age of BP measurement (weeks) | Acupuncture methods | Acupoints | Acupuncture retaining time (minutes) | Acupuncture duration (sessions) |
Chen 2001 [15] | SHR, male and female, 189.17 ± 31.26 g | SHR | HTN | MAP | 10 | 13 | EA | ST36 | 15 | 12 |
Chen 2002 [16] | SHR, male and female, NR | SHR | HTN | MAP | 11 | 14 | EA | ST36 | 15 | 15 |
Liu 2003 [17] | Wistar, NR, 200 ± 20 g | Renal ischemia | HTN | SBP | 22 | 24 | Manip | ST36, SP3, PC6, KI1 | 20 | 14 |
Su 2003 [18] | SHR, male, NR | SHR | HTN | SBP | 9 | 22 | EA | ST36, LI11 | 30 | 45 |
Yang 2006 [19] | SHR, male, 270 ± 10 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 12 | 15 | Other device | ST36, LR3 | 3 | 15 |
Yang 2008 [20] | SHR, male, 190 ± 10 g | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP | NR | NR | Manip | LR3 | 5 | 7 |
Wei 2008 [21] | SD, male and female, 190 ± 10 g | Renal ischemia | HTN | SBP | NR | NR | EA | LI11 | 20 | 28 |
Qian 2008 [22] | SD, male and female, 175 ± 25 g | Renal ischemia | HTN | SBP | NR | NR | EA | LI11 | 20 | 56 |
Liu 2009 [23] | SHR, male, 220 ± 20 g | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP, DBP | NR | NR | EA | HT7 | 30 | 1 |
Jiang 2010 [24] | SHR, male, 150 ± 50 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 34 | 37 | EA | LI11, GB20, SP6 | 15 | 18 |
Wang 2010 [25] | SHR, male, 200 ± 20 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 9 | 10 | Manip | LR3 | 5 | 7 |
Xiong 2011 [26] | SHR, male, NR | SHR | HTN | SBP | 13 | 21 | EA | ST36 | NR | 40 |
Wang 2011 [27] | SHR, male, 200 ± 20 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | NR | NR | EA | LR3 | 5 | 7 |
Tian 2012 [28] | SHR, male, 220 ± 30 | SHR | HTN | MAP | 8 | 16 | EA | ST36, DU20 | 20 | 28 |
Duan 2013 [29] | SHR, male, 200 ± 20 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 11 | 13 | Manip | LR3 | 20 | 14 |
Chen 2013 [30] | SHR, male, 385.22 ± 21.26 | SHR | HTN | SBP | 24 | 30 | EA | ST36, LI11 | 20 | 42 |
Wang 2013 [31] | SHR, male, 360 ± 20 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 26 | 32 | EA | ST36, LI11 | 20 | 42 |
Xu 2014 [32] | SHR, male, 260 ± 20 | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | 12 | 16 | Manip | LR3 | 10 | 24 |
Yu 2014 [33] | SHR, male, 210 ± 10 | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP | 12 | 13 | Manip | LR3, KI3 | 5 | 7 |
Shen 2015 [34] | SHR, male, 245 ± 25 | SHR | HTN | SBP | 17 | 21 | Manip | ST9 | 1 | 20 |
Liu 2015 [35] | SHR, male, 215 ± 25 | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | 17 | 21 | Manip | ST9 | 1 | 20 |
Liu 2015 [36] | SHR, male, 215 ± 25 | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | 17 | 21 | Manip | ST9 | 1 | 20 |
Zeng 2015 [37] | SHR, male, 255 ± 5 | SHR | HTN | SBP, MAP | 13 | 15 | Manip | LR3 | 0.5 | 12 |
Tian 2015 [38] | SHR, male, 225 ± 25 | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | 12 | 16 | Manip | LR3 | 10 | 24 |
Sun 2015 [39] | SHR, male, 225 ± 25 | SHR | HTN | SBP | 12 | 16 | Manip | LR3 | 10 | 24 |
Zhang 2015 [40] | SHR, male, 210 ± 10 | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP | 12 | 13 | Manip | KI3 | 5 | 7 |
Fu 2015 [41] | SHR, male, 300 ± 10 g | SHR | Sham-acu | SBP, DBP | 18 | 22 | Manip | ST9 | 1 | 28 |
Chang Lee 2016 [42] | SHR, male, NR | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP | NR | NR | EA | LR3 | 30 | 21 |
Chen 2016 [43] | SHR, male, 190 ± 10 g | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP, DBP | 10 | 11 | Manip | LR3 | 5 | 7 |
Tan 2016 [44] | SD, male, 190 ± 10 g | AngII-induced | HTN | MAP | NR | NR | EA | LI11 | 20 | 14 |
Wang 2016 [45] | SHR, male, 250 ± 20 g | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP, DBP | 11 | 14 | Manip | ST9 | 2 | 21 |
Wang 2016 [46] | SHR, male, 210 ± 10 | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP | 12 | 13 | Manip | KI3 | 5 | 7 |
Wang 2016 [47] | SHR, male, 250 ± 20 | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | 11 | 15 | Manip | ST36, LR3 | 20 | 28 |
Xin 2016 [48] | SHR, male, 255 ± 15 | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP, MAP | 12 | 20 | EA | PC6 | 30 | 56 |
Wang 2017 [49] | SHR, male, 260 ± 9.04 | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP, MAP | 12 | 16 | Manip + EA | ST36, LI11 | 16 | 20 |
Zhang 2017 [50] | SHR, male, 190 ± 10 g | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | NR | NR | Manip | LR3, PC6 | 30 | 15 |
Guo 2017 [51] | SHR, male, 190 ± 10 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 9 | 13 | Manip | ST9 | 20 | 28 |
Xin 2017 [52] | SHR, male, 255 ± 15 g | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP, MAP | 13 | 21 | EA | PC6 | 30 | 56 |
Xin 2017 [53] | SHR, male and female, 220 ± 20 g | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | NR | NR | Manip | ST36, LI11 | 30 | 21 |
Guo 2018 [54] | SHR, male, 190 ± 10 g | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP | 10 | 10 | Manip | ST9 | 30 | 1 |
Wang 2018 [55] | SHR, male, 259.17 ± 9.71 | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | 12 | 16 | Manip + EA | ST36, LI11 | 15 | 20 |
Wang 2018 [56] | SHR, male, NR | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP, MAP | 12 | 14 | MA | ST36, LR3 | 15 | 14 |
Wang 2018 [57] | SHR, male, 225 ± 25 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 9 | 13 | Manip | LR3 | 20 | 24 |
Wang 2018 [58] | SHR, male, 259.17 ± 9.71 | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | 12 | 16 | Manip + EA | ST36, LI11 | 15 | 20 |
Deng 2018 [59] | SHR, male, 190 ± 10 g | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP | 12 | 16 | Manip | KI3 | 5 | 24 |
Huang 2018 [60] | SHR, male, 235 ± 15 g | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP, DBP | 11 | 15 | Manip | LR3, KI3 | 15 | 24 |
Ma 2018 [61] | SHR, male, 190 ± 10 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 9 | 13 | Manip | ST9 | 20 | 24 |
Dong 2018 [62] | SHR, male, 295 ± 15 | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | 17 | 25 | MA | ST36, ST9, LI11 | 20 | 48 |
Zhao 2018 [63] | SHR, male, 190 ± 10 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 10 | 14 | Manip | ST9 | 20 | 28 |
Zheng 2018 [64] | SHR, male, 275 ± 25 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 17 | 21 | Manip | ST9 | 20 | 28 |
Li 2018 [65] | SHR, male, 240 ± 10 | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP | 12 | 16 | Manip | ST36, PC6, BL15, BL20 | 30 | 28 |
Luo 2018 [66] | SHR, male, 190 ± 10 g | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | MAP | 12 | 16 | EA | ST36, DU20 | 20 | 28 |
Cui 2019 [67] | SHR, male, 240 ± 20 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 10-11 | 18-19 | MA | ST36, ST7, LI11 | 30 | 40 |
Luo 2019 [9] | SHR, male, 230 ± 20 g | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP | 12 | 16 | Manip | LR3 | 5 | 24 |
Wang 2019 [68] | SHR, male, 235 ± 15 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 12 | 16 | EA | DU20, LR3 | 20 | 30 |
Wang 2019 [69] | SHR, male, 280 ± 8 g | SHR | HTN, Sham-acu | SBP, DBP | 13 | 14 | Manip | LR3 | 10 | 7 |
Ma 2019 [70] | SHR, male, NR | SHR | HTN | SBP, MAP | 12 | 14 | MA | LR3 | 20 | 14 |
Ji 2019 [71] | SHR, male, 215 ± 15 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 11 | 15 | Manip | DU20, LR3 | 20 | 28 |
Zheng 2019 [72] | SHR, male, 275 ± 25 g | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | 17 | 21 | EA | ST7 | 20 | 28 |
Ning 2019 [73] | SHR, male, 300 ± 30 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 16 | 28 | EA | BL23 | 15 | 42 |
Sun 2019 [74] | SHR, male, 275 ± 25 g | SHR | HTN | MAP | 17 | 21 | EA | ST7 | 20 | 28 |
Cui 2020 [75] | SHR, male, 180 ± 20 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 10 | 14 | MA | ST36, ST7, LI11 | 30 | 20 |
Hao 2020 [76] | SHR, male, 220 ± 30 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 10 | 12 | Manip | LR3 | 20 | 14 |
Fang 2020 [77] | SHR, male, 200 ± 20 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 9 | 13 | Manip | ST36, LI4, LR3 | 5 | 28 |
Sun 2020 [78] | SHR, male, 220 ± 30 g | SHR | HTN | SBP | 10 | 12 | Manip | LR3 | 20 | 15 |
Sun 2020 [79] | SHR, male, 275 ± 25 g | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | 17 | 21 | EA | ST7 | 20 | 28 |
Yang 2020 [80] | SHR, male, NR | SHR | HTN | SBP, DBP | 16 | 20 | Other | LR3 | 1 | 20 |
NR: not reported; SHR: spontaneously hypertension rat; HTN: hypertension; Sham-acu: sham-acupuncture; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; MAP: mean arterial pressure; EA: electroacupuncture; MA: manual acupuncture; Manip: manipulation.
3.2. Quality Assessment
Twenty items were evaluated according to the ARRIVE guidelines. According to ratio quality score/maximum score, the items 5/6/10/12/13/14/17/18 were considered to be poor. The items 2/3/4/7/9/11/19/20 were considered to be average. Also, the items 1/8/15/16 were considered to be excellent. Detailed information of identified studies’ quality is shown in Table 2.
Table 2
Quality assessment according to the Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiment (ARRIVE) guidelines.
Studies | ARRIVE items | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Total | |
Chen 2001 [15] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 15 |
Chen 2002 [16] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 14 |
Liu 2003 [17] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12 |
Su 2003 [18] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 14 |
Yang 2006 [19] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 19 |
Yang 2008 [20] | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
Wei 2008 [21] | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 18 |
Qian 2008 [22] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 15 |
Liu 2009 [23] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 17 |
Jiang 2010 [24] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 30 |
Wang 2010 [25] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 21 |
Xiong 2011 [26] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 21 |
Wang 2011 [27] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
Tian 2012 [28] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 20 |
Duan 2013 [29] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 20 |
Chen 2013 [30] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
Wang 2013 [31] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 15 |
Xu 2014 [32] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 22 |
Yu 2014 [33] | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 24 |
Shen 2015 [34] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 21 |
Liu 2015 [35] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 22 |
Liu 2015 [36] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
Zeng 2015 [37] | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 19 |
Tian 2015 [38] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 22 |
Sun 2015 [39] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 24 |
Zhang 2015 [40] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 19 |
Fu 2015 [41] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 26 |
Chang Lee 2016 [42] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
Chen 2016 [43] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 27 |
Tan 2016 [44] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
Wang 2016 [45] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 17 |
Wang 2016 [46] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 24 |
Wang 2016 [47] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 19 |
Xin 2016 [48] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
Wang 2017 [49] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 21 |
Zhang 2017 [50] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 18 |
Guo 2017 [51] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 20 |
Xin 2017 [52] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 24 |
Xin 2017 [53] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14 |
Guo 2018 [54] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 24 |
Wang 2018 [55] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 25 |
Wang 2018 [56] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25 |
Wang 2018 [57] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
Wang 2018 [58] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 25 |
Deng 2018 [59] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
Huang 2018 [60] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 27 |
Ma 2018 [61] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 18 |
Dong 2018 [62] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 21 |
Zhao 2018 [63] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 23 |
Zheng 2018 [64] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 20 |
Li 2018 [65] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 20 |
Luo 2018 [66] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 26 |
Cui 2019 [67] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 19 |
Luo 2019 [9] | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 28 |
Wang 2019 [68] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 22 |
Wang 2019 [69] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 27 |
Ma 2019 [70] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 24 |
Ji 2019 [71] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
Zheng 2019 [72] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 21 |
Ning 2019 [73] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
Sun 2019 [74] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
Cui 2020 [75] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 21 |
Hao 2020 [76] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25 |
Fang 2020 [77] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 20 |
Sun 2020 [78] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
Sun 2020 [79] | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
Yang 2020 [80] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 20 |
Category score (quality obtained) | 60 | 77 | 78 | 68 | 38 | 66 | 86 | 117 | 69 | 51 | 40 | 49 | 61 | 64 | 114 | 128 | 8 | 64 | 71 | 94 | 1403 |
Maximum score (quality expected) | 67 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 67 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 2546 |
Ratio: quality score/maximum score | 0.90 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.29 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.87 | 0.51 | 0.38 | 0.60 | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.85 | 0.96 | 0.06 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.70 | 0.55106 |
1: title; 2: abstract; 3: introduction-background; 4: introduction-objectives; 5: methods-ethical statement; 6: study design; 7: experimental procedure; 8: experimental animals; 9: housing and husbandry; 10: sample size; 11: allocation; 12: experimental outcomes; 13: statistics; 14: results-baseline data; 15: number analysed; 16: outcome and estimation; 17: adverse events; 18: discussion-interpretation/scientific implications; 19: general applicability/relevance; 20: funding; Total: represents total score obtained by each study out of a maximum of 38 points.
3.3. Risk of Bias
Risk of bias was appraised for each included study. 37 studies were thought to have low risk of sequence generation. 23 studies were judged as having low risk of baseline characteristics. No study was considered to have low risk of allocation concealment, random housing, blinding against performance bias, random outcome assessment, and blinding against detection bias. 56 studies were thought to have low risk of incomplete data. All of the 67 studies were thought to have low risk of selective outcome reporting and other bias. Thus, all studies were judged as having high risk of bias. Details of bias assessment information of identified studies are shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Risk of bias assessment according to the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool.
Studies | SYRCLE items | |||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
Chen 2001 [15] | ? | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Chen 2002 [16] | ? | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Liu 2003 [17] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | ? | y | y |
Su 2003 [18] | ? | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Yang 2006 [19] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Yang 2008 [20] | ? | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wei 2008 [21] | ? | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Qian 2008 [22] | ? | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Liu 2009 [23] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Jiang 2010 [24] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wang 2010 [25] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | ? | y | y |
Xiong 2011 [26] | ? | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wang 2011 [27] | ? | y | ? | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Tian 2012 [28] | ? | n | n | n | n | n | n | ? | y | y |
Duan 2013 [29] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Chen 2013 [30] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wang 2013 [31] | ? | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Xu 2014 [32] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Yu 2014 [33] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Shen 2015 [34] | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Liu 2015 [35] | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y |
Liu 2015 [36] | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Zeng 2015 [37] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | ? | y | y |
Tian 2015 [38] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Sun 2015 [39] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Zhang 2015 [40] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Fu 2015 [41] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Chang Lee 2016 [42] | ? | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Chen 2016 [43] | ? | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Tan 2016 [44] | ? | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wang 2016 [45] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wang 2016 [46] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wang 2016 [47] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Xin 2016 [48] | n | y | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y |
Wang 2017 [49] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | ? | y | y |
Zhang 2017 [50] | ? | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Guo 2017 [51] | y | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Xin 2017 [52] | n | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Xin 2017 [53] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Guo 2018 [54] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wang 2018 [55] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wang 2018 [56] | ? | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wang 2018 [57] | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wang 2018 [58] | y | n | n | n | n | n | ? | ? | y | y |
Deng 2018 [59] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | ? | y | y |
Huang 2018 [60] | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Ma 2018 [61] | y | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Dong 2018 [62] | y | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Zhao 2018 [63] | y | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Zheng 2018 [64] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Li 2018 [65] | ? | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Luo 2018 [66] | ? | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Cui 2019 [67] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Luo 2019 [9] | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Wang 2019 [68] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | ? | y | y |
Wang 2019 [69] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Ma 2019 [70] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Ji 2019 [71] | y | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Zheng 2019 [72] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Ning 2019 [73] | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Sun 2019 [74] | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | ? | y | y |
Cui 2020 [75] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Hao 2020 [76] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Fang 2020 [77] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Sun 2020 [78] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Sun 2020 [79] | y | ? | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
Yang 2020 [80] | y | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y |
1: sequence generation; 2: baseline characteristics; 3: allocation concealment; 4: random housing; 5: blinding of participants and personnel; 6: random outcome assessment; 7: blinding of outcome assessment; 8: incomplete outcome data; 9: selective outcome reporting; 10: other bias; y: low risk of bias; ?: unclear; n: high risk of bias.
3.4. Effectiveness
3.4.1. SBP
61 studies including 1385 animals conducted the meta-analysis of SBP value. Compared with the hypertension model group, acupuncture showed a mean reduction of SBP for 25.37 mmHg with significant heterogeneity in a pooled analysis of 60 studies (Figure 2) (MD −25.37, 95% CI: −29.18 to −21.56,
3.4.2. DBP
23 studies including 523 animals conducted the meta-analysis of DBP value. Compared with the hypertension model group, acupuncture showed a mean reduction of DBP for 21.26 mmHg with statistically significant heterogeneity in a pooled analysis of 22 studies (Figure 4) (MD −21.26, 95% CI: −26.21 to −16.30,
3.4.3. MAP
12 studies including 274 animals conducted the meta-analysis of MAP value. Compared with the hypertension model group, acupuncture showed a mean reduction of MAP for 21.96 mmHg with statistically significant heterogeneity in a pooled analysis of 12 studies (Figure 6) (MD −21.96, 95% CI: −29.31 to −14.62,
3.5. Subgroup Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis
To investigate potential factors which influenced the BP measures, we stratified the included studies according to factors, as shown in Tables S1–S5. The subgroup analysis of MAP comparing acupuncture and sham-acupuncture was not conducted due to limited number of studies.
For SBP/DBP/MAP, sensitivity analyses showed that the results did not largely change after omitting any one study (Figures S1–S6).
3.6. Assessment of Publication Bias
Funnel plot of all outcome measures between different groups (Figures 8–13) showed symmetry, indicating no significant publication bias. Egger’s test of different comparisons of SBP/DBP/MAP showed no publication bias present. Details of Egger’s test are shown in Table S6.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF][figure omitted; refer to PDF][figure omitted; refer to PDF][figure omitted; refer to PDF][figure omitted; refer to PDF][figure omitted; refer to PDF]3.7. Related Mechanisms
The underlying molecular mechanisms of acupuncture involved in the present review for hypertension are summarized as follows: (1) inhibition of inflammatory factors including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [21], interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein [40, 46], as well as inflammation-related genes [63], through toll-like receptor 4 [66] in the PVN; (2) reduction of oxidative stress reactions [64, 72–74, 79] by inhibiting nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activity by downregulation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 [58]; (3) inhibition of AngII activity in the plasma [23, 32, 62, 67, 75], myocardium [59, 71], thoracic aorta [69], rostral ventrolateral medulla [62], kidney [62], etc. and reversion of the artery remodeling [53] and left ventricle [45, 57] through mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling [24]; (4) inhibition of glucocorticoid system, including corticotropin-releasing hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and cortisol and glucocorticoids receptor [48, 52]; and (5) mediation of the balance between vasorelaxation factors and vasomotor factors and improvement of the endothelial dysfunction [15, 16, 21, 25–27, 34, 39, 49, 57, 59]. This is consistent with the genomic study of acupuncture, which suggested acupuncture may regulate multiple biological processes mainly involving oxidative stress, inflammation, and vascular endothelial function [70].
4. Discussion
To our knowledge, we present the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of acupuncture in treating animal models of hypertension. For the outcome measures, including SBP/DBP/MAP, our meta-analysis showed better results in the acupuncture group than in the model or sham-acupuncture group. This indicates that acupuncture might potentially decrease HBP, though there was high heterogeneity among the results of the analysed studies.
4.1. Limitations
Limitations are enumerated as follows. First, being limited in English and Chinese databases, other language studies may be missed. The absence of other language studies may bring about selective bias. Second, negative results were hardly published. Thus, the whole body of positive results might bring about exaggerated efficacy. Third, most included studies are defective in terms of randomization, allocation concealment, blinding assessment, and sample size calculation by both assessment scales, which are central for the preclinical study design criteria [81]. Low methodological quality and high risk of bias weakened the robustness of the current preclinical evidence. Fourth, the high level of heterogeneity among different studies implied not only differences of laboratory animals but also the acupuncture method details. Though subgroup analyses according to several factors were conducted to explore possible sources of heterogeneity, the results failed to completely account for the heterogeneity. Thus, the present study should be interpreted cautiously.
4.2. Efficacy Assessment
Although the effectiveness of acupuncture’s antihypertension in most studies was demonstrated by the value of BP, the ultimate goal of hypertension treatment is to prevent target organ damage and decrease mortality. Among the 67 included studies, 15 assessed the target organ damage, including left ventricle, kidney, and blood vessel remodeling. Limited by study period, none of the studies assessed the mortality of hypertension animals. Thus, target organ damage should be paid attention to in future acupuncture antihypertension studies.
Although blood pressure variability (BPV) is not a physiological index daily detected in clinical practice, it is deemed as a prognostic factor independent of BP value for cardiovascular mortality [82, 83]. Evidence shows that cardiac accident of hypertension may be the consequence of elevated variability but not BP alone [84, 85]. In addition, there is a strong correlation between elevated BPV and aggravated target organ damage [86]. Only 1 study assessed the effect of acupuncture on BPV [58]. Analysis of BPV may provide information about autonomic function, and there are also studies which demonstrated that acupuncture has the potential to mediate autonomic function [87]. Thus, exploring the effect of acupuncture on hypertension animal BPV may contribute to finding out the potential efficacy of acupuncture.
4.3. Implications
Preclinical studies usually provide evidence basis for clinical studies. To demonstrate the scientific function pathway of acupuncture, animal studies should be designed, study data should be analysed, and the result should be reported appropriately and transparently. There is a wealth of evidence showing the poor design of animal research [88], which is an obstacle to advance animal research into promising achievement for human disease. The ARRIVE guidelines have been issued since 2010 to unify the criteria of reporting in animal research and were utilized by this review to assess the quality of paper in respect of acupuncture’s antihypertension effects. The ARRIVE [89] is a reporting guideline containing a 20-entry checklist about each part of publishing papers. The SYRCLE tool was applied to assess the internal validity and risk of bias within individual studies [13]. In addition to items of ARRIVE and SYRCLE, acupuncture’s details including acupuncture manipulation, treatment duration, if electroacupuncture is used, the frequency and intensity of pulse method, etc. should be especially noted. Although these assessment tools could be used in acupuncture preclinical study [90], the need for adjusted and unified criteria in reporting of acupuncture preclinical study is imperative. Similar to the Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) [91], a specialized guideline for acupuncture’s preclinical study should be formulated in order to promote study’s transparency and repeatability.
5. Conclusion
To our knowledge, we present the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of acupuncture in treating animal models of hypertension. Although pooled data suggested that the acupuncture group was superior to the hypertension group or sham-acupuncture group for SBP/DBP/MAP, the presentation of poor methodological quality, high risk of bias, and heterogeneity deserves cautious interpretation of the results.
Authors’ Contributions
L-Y X contributed to the conception of the study. The manuscript protocol was drafted by L-Y X and ZL. The search strategy was developed by all the authors and was performed by S-Q Y, Y-X Z, and R-Y L. W-L L and H-Y W independently screened the potential studies and extracted data of included studies. Y-Z D and H-Y S assessed methodological quality and the risk of bias. L-Y X completed the data synthesis. X-Y D arbitrated in cases of disagreement, revised the manuscript, and ensured the absence of errors. All authors approved the publication of the work.
[1] H. K. Wall, M. D. Ritchey, C. Gillespie, J. D. Omura, A. Jamal, M. G. George, "Vital signs: prevalence of key cardiovascular disease risk factors for million hearts 2022–United States, 2011–2016," MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 67 no. 35, pp. 983-991, DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6735a4, 2018.
[2] M. D. Ritchey, H. K. Wall, M. G. George, J. S. Wright, "US trends in premature heart disease mortality over the past 50 years: where do we go from here?," Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 30 no. 6, pp. 364-374, DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.09.005, 2020.
[3] K. T. Mills, J. D. Bundy, T. N. Kelly, J. E. Reed, P. M. Kearney, K. Reynolds, J. Chen, J. He, "Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control," Circulation, vol. 134 no. 6, pp. 441-450, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.018912, 2016.
[4] J. Yang, J. Chen, M. Yang, S. Yu, L. Ying, G. J. Liu, Y. L. Ren, J. M. Wright, F. R. Liang, "Acupuncture for hypertension," Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 11,DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008821.pub2, 2018.
[5] J. Li, M. Sun, J. Ye, "The mechanism of acupuncture in treating essential hypertension: a narrative review," International Journal of Hypertension, vol. 2019,DOI: 10.1155/2019/8676490, 2019.
[6] P. Sandercock, I. Roberts, "Systematic reviews of animal experiments," The Lancet, vol. 360 no. 9333,DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09812-4, 2002.
[7] M. Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. Leenaars, M. Avey, "Systematic reviews of preclinical animal studies can make significant contributions to health care and more transparent translational medicine," Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 3,DOI: 10.1002/14651858.ed000078, 2014.
[8] S. P. Murphy, A. N. Murphy, "Pre-clinical systematic review," Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 115 no. 4,DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06998.x, 2010.
[9] X. Luo, J. Huang, J. Yu, C. Tang, "Effect of Taichong (LR3) acupuncture in spontaneously hypertensive rats," Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 39 no. 1, pp. 74-80, 2019.
[10] J. Li, Y. Wang, K. He, "Effect of acupuncture at LR3 on cerebral glucose metabolism in a rat model of hypertension: a (18)F-FDG-PET study," Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2018,DOI: 10.1155/2018/5712857, 2018.
[11] F. Javed, S. V. Kellesarian, T. Abduljabbar, A. T. Abduljabbar, Z. Akram, F. Vohra, I. Rahman, G. E. Romanos, "Influence of involuntary cigarette smoke inhalation on osseointegration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies," International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 47 no. 6, pp. 764-772, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.11.009, 2018.
[12] E. F. Andrade, D. R. Orlando, A. M. S. Araujo, "Can resveratrol treatment control the progression of induced periodontal disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies," Nutrients, vol. 11 no. 5,DOI: 10.3390/nu11050953, 2019.
[13] C. R. Hooijmans, M. M. Rovers, R. B. de Vries, M. Leenaars, M. Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. W. Langendam, "SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies," BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 14 no. 1,DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-43, 2014.
[14] A. Spoerri, D. Koletsi, T. Eliades, "Intrinsic hormone-like molecules and external root resorption during orthodontic tooth movement. A systematic review and meta-analysis in preclinical in-vivo research," Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 9,DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00303, 2018.
[15] Y. Chen, S. Mo, W. Wu, "Primary study on effect of electroacupuncture on blood pressure and nitric oxide of spontaneous hypertension rats," Chinese Journal of Basic Medicine in TCM, vol. 11, pp. 55-57, 2001.
[16] Y. Chen, S. Mo, W. Wu, "Effect of electroacupuncture “Zusanli” on serum nitric oxide (NO) and plasma endothelin (ET) of spontaneous hypertension rats (SHR)," Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 1, pp. 14-16, 2002.
[17] D. Liu, S. Fan, Y. Shen, "Laboratory study of acupuncture effect on hypertension," China Architecture of TCM, vol. 12, pp. 2062-2066, 2003.
[18] Z. Su, D. Xiao, J. Ju, "The effect of electro-acupuncture on blood pressure and aortic vascular remodeling in spontaneously hypertensive rats," Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, vol. 5, pp. 20-22, 2003.
[19] H. Yang, X. Zhong, T. Liu, "Impact of different emulated acupuncture-needle manipulations on blood pressure and myocardial angiotensinII content in spontaneous hypertension rats," Zhen Ci Yan Jiu, vol. 33 no. 3, pp. 186-190, 2008.
[20] L. Yang, "Mechanism study of Yuan-primary points on blood pressure in rats with hypertension and hypotension," 2008. Ph.D. Thesis
[21] D. Wei, "The Effect of electroacupuncture at Quchi on blood pressure, TNF- and NO of SHR," 2008. M.S. Thesis
[22] C. Qiam, B. Chen, X. Xie, "The effect of electroacupuncture on blood pressure and carotid artery remodeling of 2K1C hypertension rats," Shaanxi Journal of TCM, vol. 29 no. 8, pp. 1079-1080, 2008.
[23] W. Liu, L. Jin, D. Han, "Effect of electroacupuncture of different acupoints on blood pressure, plasma angiotensinII, aldosterone and atrial natriuretic peptide in spontaneous hypertension rats," Zhen Ci Yan Jiu, vol. 34 no. 6, pp. 393-397, 2009.
[24] L. Jiang, K. He, C. Chen, "Electroacupuncture intervention on the expression of mitogen activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 in aorta of rats with spontaneous hypertension," Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research, vol. 14 no. 20, pp. 3686-3690, 2010.
[25] J. Wang, C. Tang, Z. He, "Effects of acupuncture at Taichong, Chongyang and non-acupoint on blood pressure, plasma ET-1 and serum NO in rats with spontaneous hypertension," Guangdong Medical Journal, vol. 31 no. 15, pp. 1943-1945, 2010.
[26] X. Xiong, C. You, Q. C. Feng, T. Yin, Z. B. Chen, P. Ball, L. X. Wang, "Pulse width modulation electro-acupuncture on cardiovascular remodeling and plasma nitric oxide in spontaneously hypertensive rats," Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: ECAM, vol. 2011,DOI: 10.1093/ecam/neq063, 2011.
[27] J. Wang, C. Tang, Z. He, "Effect of moderate acupuncture-stimulation of “Taichong” (LR3) on blood pressure and plasma endothelin-1 levels in spontaneous hypertension rats," Zhen Ci Yan Jiu, vol. 36 no. 1, pp. 36-39, 2011.
[28] G. Tian, "The effect of long term electtroacupuncture at DU20, ST35 on CA1 microvessel and neuron injury of SHR hippocampus," 2012. Ph.D. Thesis
[29] S. Duan, "The effect of of twirling reinforcing-reducing acupuncture on hypothalamus TGF- β , p38PK mRNA in SHR," 2013. M.S. Thesis
[30] Z. Chen, Y. Qu, L. Zhang, "Effects of acupuncture on kidney morphological structure and expression of TGF- β 1mRNA in rats with spontaneous hypertension," Zhongguo Zhen Jiu, vol. 33 no. 9, pp. 824-828, 2013.
[31] S. Wang, "The effects of electroacupuncture ST36, LI11 on blood pressure and myocardial fibrosis of SHR," 2013. M.S. Thesis
[32] M. Xu, "Mechanisms of SHR artery ECM remodling reversing by twirling reinforcing-reducing acupuncture," 2014. M.S. Thesis
[33] J. Yu, "The central activation of acupuncture effects on the Yuan-source acupoints of liver and kidney channels to SHR," 2014. Ph.D. Thesis
[34] Y. Shen, W. Song, X. Fan, "Effects of acupuncturing Renying acupoint (ST9) on Blood Pressure and ET/NO level of spontaneously hypertensive rat," Shanxi Journal of TCM, vol. 31 no. 2, pp. 56-59, 2015.
[35] J. Liu, Y. Li, J. Wan, "The antioxidant mechanism of acupuncture antihypertensive from oxidation/antioxidant enzymes perspective," Liaoning Journal of TCM, vol. 42 no. 8, pp. 1543-1545, DOI: 10.1007/s11164-015-2099-x, 2015.
[36] J. Liu, J. Wan, T. Gao, "The effects of acupuncturing on spontaneously hypertensive rats blood pressure and antioxidant enzymes SOD & GSH-PX," Shaanxi Journal of TCM, vol. 10, pp. 1429-1431, 2015.
[37] X. Zeng, "The experimental study on the influence of acupuncture on NADPH oxidase-ROS pathway in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR)," 2015. M.S. Thesis
[38] Y. Tian, "The effects of twirling-rotating reinforcing-reducing acupuncture on RAS and kidney VEGF of SHR," 2015. M.S. Thesis
[39] J. Sun, Y. Tian, N. Jin, "Effects of reinforcing and reducing methods by twirling and rotating the needle on contents of NO and NOS in kidney of spontaneously hypertensive rats," China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, vol. 30 no. 10, pp. 3684-3686, 2015.
[40] H. Zhang, "Effect of acupuncture at Taixi point on the central inflammatory factors protein expression in SHR," 2015. M.S. Thesis
[41] J. Fu, Y. Wang, S. Wang, "Rat point Renying (ST9) location standard and the hypotensive effect of acupuncture," Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, vol. 34 no. 4, pp. 283-285, 2015.
[42] S.-N. Chang Lee, T.-J. Ho, M. A. Shibu, C. H. Day, V. P. Viswanadha, C.-H. Lai, Y.-L. Chen, D. J.-Y. Hsieh, Y.-S. Chen, C.-Y. Huang, "Protective effects of electroacupuncture at LR3 on cardiac hypertrophy and apoptosis in hypertensive rats," Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 34 no. 3, pp. 201-208, DOI: 10.1136/acupmed-2015-010782, 2016.
[43] Z. Chen, "Research about the influence of specificity of the proteins expression by needling Taichong acupoint," 2016. Ph.D. Thesis
[44] Y. Tan, Y. Wang, Q. Zhang, "Electroacupuncture of “Quchi” (LI11) inhibits the elevation of arterial blood pressure and abnormal sympathetic nerve activity in hypertension rats," Zhen Ci Yan Jiu, vol. 41 no. 2, pp. 144-149, 2016.
[45] Z. Wang, "Antihypertensive mechanism and cardio protective effect and renoprotective effect of Renying (ST9) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR)," 2016. Ph.D. Thesis
[46] J. Wang, X. Lin, X. Luo, "Effect of acupuncture at Taixi point on the medulla TNF- α and IL-6 protein expression in SHR," Journal of Jinan University, vol. 37 no. 4, pp. 327-330, 2016.
[47] Z. Wang, W. Wang, "Antihypertension and cardio-protective effect of Zusanli and Taichong in spontaneously hypertensive rats," International Journal of Chinese Medicine, vol. 38 no. 10, pp. 922-925, 2016.
[48] J. Xin, J. Gao, J. Liu, "Primary study of β 1-AR involved in alleviation of cardiac hypertrophy caused by hypertension by electroacupuncture," Proceedings of the 18th Annual Symposium of China Association for Science and Technology, .
[49] Y. Wang, H. Li, X. Li, "Effects of choosing time acupuncture on blood pressure, plasma endothelin-1, and NO of SHR at different time," Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, vol. 28 no. 1, 2017.
[50] J. Zhang, S. Xiao, J. Jiao, "Comparison of anti-hypertension effect of selecting Taichong (LR3) as the major point plus different acupoints of acupuncture on rats with spontaneous hypertension," Zhejiang JITCWM, vol. 27 no. 8, pp. 646-649, 2017.
[51] Y. Guo, X. Shi, R. Zhao, "Effects of acupuncture at Renying (ST9) on gene expression profile of hypothalamus in spontaneously hypertensive rats," Global TCM, vol. 10 no. 12, pp. 1417-1423, 2017.
[52] J. Xin, "Effects of electroacupuncture at Neiguan (PC6) on the pathological progression of hypertension myocardial hypertrophy and its underlying mechanisms," 2017. Ph.D. Thesis
[53] S. Xin, A. Ren, B. Wang, "Effects of different acupoints compatibility on blood pressure and vessel morphology," Zhejiang Journal of TCM, vol. 52 no. 7, pp. 485-486, DOI: 10.5771/0531-2485-2017-4-485, 2017.
[54] Y. Guo, X. Shi, T. Ma, "The short-term effect of brain areas involved in the acupuncture at “Renying” (ST9) treatment of hypertension model rats: a PET study," Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacology, vol. 24 no. 3, pp. 24-28, 2018.
[55] Y. Wang, H. Li, W. Liu, "Observation on different influence of acupuncture during Chenshi on the blood pressure of spontaneously hypertensive rats during Chenshi and Youshi," China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, vol. 33 no. 1, pp. 362-365, 2018.
[56] Y. Wang, Y. Hu, S. Xu, "Data analysis of acupuncture on blood pressure from 11 A.M to 1 P.M and 11 P.M to 1 A.M in spontaneously hypertensive rats by repeated measurements," Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 24 no. 11, pp. 1589-1591, 2018.
[57] H. Wang, F. Yang, H. Zhan, "Effects of twirling reinforcing and reducing method of acupuncture on NE, 5-HT and NO in cerebella of spontaneously hypertensive rats," Global TCM, vol. 11 no. 3, pp. 353-357, 2018.
[58] X.-R. Wang, J.-W. Yang, C.-S. Ji, X.-H. Zeng, G.-X. Shi, M. Fisher, C.-Z. Liu, "Inhibition of NADPH oxidase-dependent oxidative stress in the rostral ventrolateral medulla mediates the antihypertensive effects of acupuncture in spontaneously hypertensive rats," Hypertension, vol. 71 no. 2, pp. 356-365, DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.09759, 2018.
[59] B. Deng, "The study of acupucture at Taixi acupoint on blood pressure and myocardial protection," 2018. M.S. Thesis
[60] J. Huang, "Effects of acupuncture on glucose metabolism in hippocampus of spontaneously hypertensive rats based on PI3K-AKT signaling," 2018. Ph.D. Thesis
[61] T. Ma, Y. Guo, J. Lu, "Effect of acupuncture Renying (ST9) on the expression of aortic arch gene in SHR rats by gene chip," Journal of Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 34 no. 2, pp. 234-237, 2018.
[62] A. Dong, J. Guo, Y. Cui, "Effect of acupuncture on angiotensin II, angiotensin receptor 1 and gamma-aminobutyric acid in spontaneous hypertensive rats," Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 27 no. 11, pp. 1891-1894, 2018.
[63] R. Zhao, C. Guo, Y. Guo, "Study of acupuncture at “Renying (ST9)” on genes expression profile of hypothalamus in spontaneously hypertensive rats based on gene chip technique," Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacology, vol. 24 no. 1, 2018.
[64] J. Zheng, L. Sun, Z. Meng, "Effect of electro-acupuncture in Renying (ST9) on systolic blood pressure and contents of MDA, SOD, CAT, T-AOC in serum of spontaneous hypertension rats," Shandong Journal of TCM, vol. 37 no. 10, pp. 847-850, 2018.
[65] K. Li, "Research on the impact of acupuncture on vascular endothelium through the Rhoa/ROCK signal pathway in spontaneously hyperetensive rats," 2018. Ph.D. Thesis
[66] X. Luo, "Effect of acupuncture at Taichong and Taixi on hypothalamic protein expression in spontaneously hypertensive rats: based on TMT," 2018. Ph.D. Thesis
[67] Y. Cui, "The effect of acupuncture with antihypertensive formula on blood pressure vascular remodling spontaneously hypertensive rats and its mechanism," 2019. M.S. Thesis
[68] Y. Wang, C. Tang, J. Li, "Effects of acupuncture at “Taichong” (LR3) on time-effect of lowering blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats," Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 60 no. 22, pp. 1964-1967, 2019.
[69] Z. Wang, "Protective effect and mechanism of electroacupuncture at Baihui, Taichong on aorta injury of SHR," 2019. M.S. Thesis
[70] S. M. Ma, J. W. Yang, J. F. Tu, N. N. Yang, Y. Z. Du, X. R. Wang, L. Wang, J. Huang, C. Z. Liu, "Gene-level regulation of acupuncture therapy in spontaneously hypertensive rats: a whole transcriptome analysis," Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM, vol. 2019,DOI: 10.1155/2019/9541079, 2019.
[71] Z. Ji, J. Yuan, Z. Wang, "Effect of acupuncture on the expression of ANP, ACE2 and Ang (1–7)/Ang II ratio in heart tissue of spontaneously hypertensive rats," Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 16 no. 17, 2019.
[72] J. Zheng, L. Sun, Z. Meng, "Study on the hypotensive effect of acupuncture on Renying point based on oxidative stress," Jilin Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 39 no. 2, pp. 258-262, 2019.
[73] S. Ning, S. Yang, J. Ma, "Effects of electro-acupuncture on the expressions of Klotho and the oxidative stress in the kidney of spontaneous hypertension rats," China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, vol. 34 no. 8, pp. 3739-3742, 2019.
[74] L. Sun, J. Zheng, J. Xu, "Effect of acupuncture at Renying point (ST9) on blood pressure and oxidative stress response of ventrolateral medulla head in spontaneously hypertensive rats," Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacology, vol. 25 no. 2, pp. 101-104, 2019.
[75] Y. Cui, J. Guo, A. Dong, "Effect of acupuncture at different prescriptions of acupoints on blood pressure and serum CGRP, ET-1 and Ang II levels in SHR," Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, vol. 39 no. 1, pp. 84-89, 2020.
[76] X. Hao, J. Liang, T. Zeng, "Effects of twisting for reinforcing and reducing methods in acupuncture on Gaba and Glu in cerebella of spontaneously hypertensive rat," Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 29 no. 4, pp. 584-588, 2020.
[77] Y. Fang, H. Xu, C. Dong, "Effects of acupuncture at Taichong point on blood pressure, CYP4A, 20-HETE and renal injury in spontaneously hypertensive rats," Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 22 no. 3, pp. 161-165, 2020.
[78] J. Sun, J. Liang, T. Zeng, "Effects of twirling reinforcing-reducing manipulation on HPA axis of hippocampus in SHR rats and its anti-hypertensive mechanism," Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion, vol. 36 no. 5, pp. 67-70, 2020.
[79] L. Sun, J. Zheng, J. Xu, "Effects of acupuncture at Renying points (ST9) on blood pressure and antioxidant enzymes of medulla oblongata in spontaneously hypertensive rats," Gansu Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 33 no. 2, pp. 50-53, 2020.
[80] J. Yang, M. Wang, Y. Gao, "Study on the brain protective mechanism of acupuncture intervention on SHR based on RhoA/ROCK-1 pathway," Tianjin Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 37 no. 3, pp. 313-317, 2020.
[81] S. C. Landis, S. G. Amara, K. Asadullah, C. P. Austin, R. Blumenstein, E. W. Bradley, R. G. Crystal, R. B. Darnell, R. J. Ferrante, H. Fillit, R. Finkelstein, M. Fisher, H. E. Gendelman, R. M. Golub, J. L. Goudreau, R. A. Gross, A. K. Gubitz, S. E. Hesterlee, D. W. Howells, J. Huguenard, K. Kelner, W. Koroshetz, D. Krainc, S. E. Lazic, M. S. Levine, M. R. Macleod, J. M. McCall, R. T. Moxley, K. Narasimhan, L. J. Noble, S. Perrin, J. D. Porter, O. Steward, E. Unger, U. Utz, S. D. Silberberg, "A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research," Nature, vol. 490 no. 7419, pp. 187-191, DOI: 10.1038/nature11556, 2012.
[82] P.-F. Hsu, H.-M. Cheng, C.-H. Wu, S.-H. Sung, S.-Y. Chuang, E. G. Lakatta, F. C. P. Yin, P. Chou, C.-H. Chen, "High short-term blood pressure variability predicts long-term cardiovascular mortality in untreated hypertensives but not in normotensives," American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 29 no. 7, pp. 806-813, DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpw002, 2016.
[83] L. J. Mena, V. G. Felix, J. D. Melgarejo, "24-Hour blood pressure variability assessed by average real variability: a systematic review and meta-analysis," Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 6 no. 10,DOI: 10.1161/jaha.117.006895, 2017.
[84] P. M. Rothwell, "Does blood pressure variability modulate cardiovascular risk?," Current Hypertension Reports, vol. 13 no. 3, pp. 177-186, DOI: 10.1007/s11906-011-0201-3, 2011.
[85] J. S. Floras, "Blood pressure variability: a novel and important risk factor," Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 29 no. 5, pp. 557-563, DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.02.012, 2013.
[86] G. Parati, J. E. Ochoa, C. Lombardi, G. Bilo, "Assessment and management of blood-pressure variability," Nature Reviews Cardiology, vol. 10 no. 3, pp. 143-155, DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.1, 2013.
[87] Y. Zhu, F. Xu, D. Lu, P. Rong, J. Cheng, M. Li, Y. Gong, C. Sun, W. Wei, L. Lin, J. D. Z. Chen, "Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation improves functional dyspepsia by enhancing vagal efferent activity," American Journal of Physiology–Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 320 no. 5, pp. G700-G711, DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00426.2020, 2021.
[88] D. Moher, M. Avey, G. Antes, D. G. Altman, "The National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research," BMC Medicine, vol. 13 no. 1,DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0284-9, 2015.
[89] C. Kilkenny, W. J. Browne, I. Cuthi, "Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research," Veterinary Clinical Pathology, vol. 41 no. 1, pp. 27-31, DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165x.2012.00418.x, 2012.
[90] L. Lu, X.-g. Zhang, L. L. D. Zhong, Z.-x. Chen, Y. Li, G.-q. Zheng, Z.-x. Bian, "Acupuncture for neurogenesis in experimental ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis," Scientific Reports, vol. 6 no. 1,DOI: 10.1038/srep19521, 2016.
[91] H. MacPherson, D. G. Altman, R. Hammerschlag, L. Youping, W. Taixiang, A. White, D. Moher, "Revised standards for reporting interventions in clinical trials of acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement," PLoS Medicine, vol. 7 no. 6,DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000261, 2010.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2021 Ling-Yong Xiao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Objective. The aim of this study was to summarize and evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in hypertension animal study. Methods. Studies were searched from six databases, including Medline, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP information database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Study quality of each included study was evaluated according to the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines, and the risk of bias was evaluated by the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were selected as outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using Stata 12.0 software. The effect size was calculated by combining SBP/DBP/MAP data with the random effects model, respectively. Results. 67 studies containing 1522 animals were included. According to the ARRIVE guideline, 8 items were assessed as poor and 4 items were assessed as excellent. According to the SYRCLE tool, all studies were judged as having high risk of bias. Compared with the hypertension group, the pooled results showed significant antihypertension effects of acupuncture for SBP, DBP, and MAP. Similarly, compared with the sham-acupuncture group, the pooled results showed significant antihypertension effects of acupuncture for SBP, DBP, and MAP. Conclusion. Although pooled data suggested that the acupuncture group was superior to the hypertension group or sham-acupuncture group for SBP/DBP/MAP, the presentation of poor methodological quality, high risk of bias, and heterogeneity deserves cautious interpretation of the results.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details










1 Clinical Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China; National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin 300193, China
2 Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, China