It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Characterization and seasonal (periodic) monitoring of plant species distribution in the context of former industrial activity is crucial to assess long-term anthropogenic footprint on vegetated area. Species discrimination has shown promising results using both HyperSpectral (HS) and MultiSpectral (MS) images. Airborne HS instruments enable high spatial and spectral resolution imagery while time series of satellite MS images provide high temporal resolution and phenological information. This paper aims to compare supervised classification results obtained with non-parametric (Random Forest, RF, Support Vector Machine, SVM) and parametric methods (Regularized Logistic Regression, RLR) applied on both kinds of images acquired on an industrial brownfield. The studied site is a complex vegetated environment due to species diversity: 8 dominant species are retained. The performance obtained by preliminary feature selection based on principal component analysis and vegetation indices, to improve separability of spectral or temporal information according to species, is analysed. The best performance is obtained by RLR method applied on HS data without feature selection (global accuracy of 93 %). Feature selection is found to be a necessary step to perform classification with time series of MS images. Species that are difficult to distinguish from the HS image, namely Salix and Populus, are well separated using Sentinel-2 images (precision around 70%).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 ONERA DOTA BP74025 2 av. Edouard Belin, FR-31055 Toulouse cedex 4, France; ONERA DOTA BP74025 2 av. Edouard Belin, FR-31055 Toulouse cedex 4, France; Laboratoire d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et environnement, ENSAT - Avenue de l'Agrobiopole 31326 Castanet-Tolosan cedex, France
2 TOTAL S.E., CSTJF - avenue Larribau, 64000 Pau, France; TOTAL S.E., CSTJF - avenue Larribau, 64000 Pau, France
3 Laboratoire d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et environnement, ENSAT - Avenue de l'Agrobiopole 31326 Castanet-Tolosan cedex, France; Laboratoire d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et environnement, ENSAT - Avenue de l'Agrobiopole 31326 Castanet-Tolosan cedex, France
4 ONERA DOTA BP74025 2 av. Edouard Belin, FR-31055 Toulouse cedex 4, France; ONERA DOTA BP74025 2 av. Edouard Belin, FR-31055 Toulouse cedex 4, France