It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
A rapid coal phase-out is needed to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, but is hindered by serious challenges ranging from vested interests to the risks of social disruption. To understand how to organize a global coal phase-out, it is crucial to go beyond cost-effective climate mitigation scenarios and learn from the experience of previous coal transitions. Despite the relevance of the topic, evidence remains fragmented throughout different research fields, and not easily accessible. To address this gap, this paper provides a systematic map and comprehensive review of the literature on historical coal transitions. We use computer-assisted systematic mapping and review methods to chart and evaluate the available evidence on historical declines in coal production and consumption. We extracted a dataset of 278 case studies from 194 publications, covering coal transitions in 44 countries and ranging from the end of the 19th century until 2021. We find a relatively recent and rapidly expanding body of literature reflecting the growing importance of an early coal phase-out in scientific and political debates. Previous evidence has primarily focused on the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany, while other countries that experienced large coal declines, like those in Eastern Europe, are strongly underrepresented. An increasing number of studies, mostly published in the last 5 years, has been focusing on China. Most of the countries successfully reducing coal dependency have undergone both demand-side and supply-side transitions. This supports the use of policy approaches targeting both demand and supply to achieve a complete coal phase-out. From a political economy perspective, our dataset highlights that most transitions are driven by rising production costs for coal, falling prices for alternative energies, or local environmental concerns, especially regarding air pollution. The main challenges for coal-dependent regions are structural change transformations, in particular for industry and labor. Rising unemployment is the most largely documented outcome in the sample. Policymakers at multiple levels are instrumental in facilitating coal transitions. They rely mainly on regulatory instruments to foster the transitions and compensation schemes or investment plans to deal with their transformative processes. Even though many models suggest that coal phase-outs are among the low-hanging fruits on the way to climate neutrality and meeting the international climate goals, our case studies analysis highlights the intricate political economy at work that needs to be addressed through well-designed and just policies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details











1 Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12–15, EUREF Campus #19, 10829 Berlin, Germany
2 TU Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
3 Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12–15, EUREF Campus #19, 10829 Berlin, Germany; TU Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
4 Climate and Energy College, University of Melbourne, 187 Grattan Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
5 Center for Global Sustainability, University of Maryland, 3101 Van Munching Hall, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America
6 Center for Global Sustainability, University of Maryland, 3101 Van Munching Hall, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America; Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, United States of America
7 Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12–15, EUREF Campus #19, 10829 Berlin, Germany; School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
8 Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12–15, EUREF Campus #19, 10829 Berlin, Germany; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Post Box 601203, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
9 Australian National University, Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
10 Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12–15, EUREF Campus #19, 10829 Berlin, Germany; Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, University of Potsdam, August-Bebel-Str. 89, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
11 Center for Applied Economic Research, University of Münster, Stadtgraben 9, 48143 Münster, Germany
12 University of Wisconsin-Madison, La Follette School of Public Affairs, 1225 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706, United States of America
13 TU Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany; Europa-Universität Flensburg, Center for Sustainable Energy Systems (ZNES), Munketoft 3b, 24937 Flensburg, Germany
14 Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School, BN1 9SL Brighton, United Kingdom
15 Sustainable Engineering Group, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley 6102 Western Australia
16 Climate and Energy College, University of Melbourne, 187 Grattan Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia; Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia