Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- The Conceptualization of Academic Self-Handicapping
- An Integrative Theoretical Framework of Academic Self-Handicapping
- Available Evidence on the Antecedents of Academic Self-Handicapping
- Self-Related Beliefs
- Level of Self-Esteem
- Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy
- Emotional-Motivational Variables
- Achievement Goals
- Implicit Theories of Intelligence
- Fear of Failure
- Test Anxiety
- Personality Traits
- Conscientiousness
- Neuroticism
- Gender
- Prior Levels of Achievement
- Construct Operationalization as Moderator Variable
- The Present Research
- Method
- Literature Search and Coding
- Effect Size Calculation, Moderator Effects, and Sensitivity Analyses
- Synthesis of Available Data
- Sensitivity Analyses
- Publication Bias
- Assessment of Heterogeneity and Moderator Analyses
- Results
- Publication Bias
- Mean Effect Sizes and Heterogeneity
- Moderating Effects of Self-Handicapping Scale Reliability and Scale Type
- Discussion
- Mean Effect Sizes
- Moderator Analyses for Self-Handicapping Operationalizations
- Possible Interactions Between Antecedents of Self-Handicapping
- Comparison of Self-Handicapping Meta-Analyses
- Self-Handicapping Interventions
- Limitations and Conclusion
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Self-handicapping is a maladaptive strategy that students employ to protect their self-image when they fear or anticipate academic failure. Instead of increasing their effort, students may harm their chances of success by procrastinating, strategically withdrawing effort, or engaging in destructive behaviors like drug abuse, so that potential failure can be attributed to these handicaps rather than to stable personal characteristics (e.g., low intelligence). A large body of research has focused on potential antecedents of students’ self-handicapping, but the literature is fragmented and the evidence is often mixed. Thus, we know little about which factors have the highest potential to trigger habitual self-handicapping and to explain interindividual differences in such behaviors. This meta-analysis is the first to synthesize available evidence across a broad range of potential antecedents of academic self-handicapping reported in 159 studies and 194 independent samples (N = 81,630). The strongest associations with habitual self-handicapping were found for the personality traits conscientiousness (r = −.40) and neuroticism (r = .38) as well as stable trait-like factors such as general self-esteem (r = −.34) and fear of failure (r = .39). Rather malleable factors, such as personal achievement goals (rs = −.19 to .27), showed comparatively smaller effects. Self-handicapping assessment (scale and reliability) significantly moderated most of the investigated associations, thereby implying higher internal validities for some measures...





