It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The “mouthfeel” of food products is a key factor in our perception of food quality and in our appreciation of food products. Extensive research has been performed on what determines mouthfeel, and how it can be linked to laboratory measurements and eventually predicted. This was mainly done on the basis of simple models that do not accurately take the rheology of the food products into account. Here, we show that the subjectively perceived “thickness” of liquid foods, or the force needed to make the sample flow or deform in the mouth, can be directly related to their non-Newtonian rheology. Measuring the shear-thinning rheology and modeling the squeeze flow between the tongue and the palate in the oral cavity allows to predict how a panel perceives soup “thickness”. This is done for various liquid bouillons with viscosities ranging from that of water to low-viscous soups and for high-viscous xanthan gum solutions. Our findings show that our tongues, just like our eyes and ears, are logarithmic measuring instruments in agreement with the Weber-Fechner law that predicts a logarithmic relation between stimulus amplitude and perceived strength. Our results pave the way for more accurate prediction of mouthfeel characteristics of liquid food products.
What drives the mouthfeel of ’thickness’? When is a soup too ’thick’? Here, authors measure the rheology of liquid soups and show their subjectively perceived ’thickness’ can be directly associated to their non-Newtonian rheology.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Unilever Innovation Centre Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands; University of Amsterdam, Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, IoP, Amsterdam, Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000000084992262)
2 Unilever Innovation Centre Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6)
3 Wageningen University, Food Quality and Design, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666)
4 University of Amsterdam, Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, IoP, Amsterdam, Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000000084992262)
5 Wageningen University, Food Quality and Design, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666); Wageningen University, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666)
6 Unilever Innovation Centre Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6); University of Amsterdam, Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, IoP, Amsterdam, Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000000084992262); Utrecht University, Soft Condensed Matter, Debye Institute for NanoMaterials Science, Utrecht, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5477.1) (ISNI:0000000120346234)