It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Dynamical downscaling is an important approach to obtaining fine-scale weather and climate information. However, dynamical downscaling simulations are often degraded by biases in the large-scale forcing itself. We constructed a bias-corrected global dataset based on 18 models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 (ERA5) dataset. The bias-corrected data have an ERA5-based mean climate and interannual variance, but with a non-linear trend from the ensemble mean of the 18 CMIP6 models. The dataset spans the historical time period 1979–2014 and future scenarios (SSP245 and SSP585) for 2015–2100 with a horizontal grid spacing of (1.25° × 1.25°) at six-hourly intervals. Our evaluation suggests that the bias-corrected data are of better quality than the individual CMIP6 models in terms of the climatological mean, interannual variance and extreme events. This dataset will be useful for dynamical downscaling projections of the Earth’s future climate, atmospheric environment, hydrology, agriculture, wind power, etc.
Measurement(s) | temperature of air • atmospheric wind • humidity • geopotential height • temperature of sea surface • surface pressure • sea level pressure |
Technology Type(s) | climate model • meteorological reanalysis |
Factor Type(s) | zonal wind • meridional wind • temporal interval • geographic location |
Sample Characteristic - Environment | climate system • climate change |
Sample Characteristic - Location | global |
Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data:
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Chinese Academy of Sciences, RCE-TEA, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309)
2 The Chinse University of Hong Kong, Earth System Science Programme, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000000121742757)
3 The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.89336.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9924)
4 Nanjing University, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.41156.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2314 964X)