It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In recent years, proximity labelling has established itself as an unbiased and powerful approach to map the interactome of specific proteins. While physiological expression of the labelling enzyme is beneficial for the mapping of interactors, generation of the desired cell lines remains time-consuming and challenging. Using our established pipeline for the rapid generation of C- and N-terminal CRISPR-Cas9 knock-ins (KIs) based on antibiotic selection, we were able to compare the performance of commonly used labelling enzymes when endogenously expressed. Endogenous tagging of the μ subunit of the AP-1 complex with TurboID allowed identification of known interactors and cargo proteins that simple overexpression of a labelling enzyme fusion protein could not reveal. We used the KI-strategy to compare the interactome of the different adaptor protein (AP) complexes and clathrin and were able to assemble lists of potential interactors and cargo proteins that are specific for each sorting pathway. Our approach greatly simplifies the execution of proximity labelling experiments for proteins in their native cellular environment and allows going from CRISPR transfection to mass spectrometry analysis and interactome data in just over a month.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
* 1) We changed the tone of the manuscript and focussed more on the benefits of the presented KI strategy over other strategies used in the field. By doing so, we restructured the manuscripts and moved the comparison of the biotin ligases (Former Fig. 2, now supplementary Fig. 1) into the supplementary information. At the same time, we pointed out differences and advantages compared to other strategies in both the introduction and discussion. 2) We expanded the manuscript with an additional MS dataset derived from N-terminal tagging of clathrin light chain to show that both C- and N-terminal KI strategy can be used to obtain high quality MS data. 3) To evaluate the MS data quality, we added GO-term analysis to characterize the protein hits (potential interactors) and show the high accuracy of the presented approach. 4) We carried out validation of some top hits from the AP-1 dataset (Fig. 3).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer