The authors of the published paper [1] would like to make the following corrections:
(1). The last four numbers in the second column (No. of Factors) of Table 3 should read 15, 15, 16, and 16 (instead of 16, 16, 19, and 19)
Original:
Table 3Performance comparison of machine learning models using threefold cross-validation.
Model and Factors | No. of Factors | Average RMSE (mm/yr) | Average NSE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Training | Test | Training | Test | ||
RF (all) | 36 | 0.96 | 2.01 | 0.83 | 0.25 |
GBM (all) | 36 | 0.88 | 1.84 | 0.84 | 0.39 |
RF (confirmed) | 16 | 1.08 | 1.91 | 0.79 | 0.31 |
GBM (confirmed) | 16 | 0.79 | 1.50 | 0.88 | 0.59 |
RF (nonrejected) | 19 | 1.09 | 1.96 | 0.79 | 0.27 |
GBM (nonrejected) | 19 | 0.82 | 1.52 | 0.87 | 0.57 |
Corrected:
Table 3Performance comparison of machine learning models using threefold cross-validation.
Model and Factors | No. of Factors | Average RMSE (mm/yr) | Average NSE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Training | Test | Training | Test | ||
RF (all) | 36 | 0.96 | 2.01 | 0.83 | 0.25 |
GBM (all) | 36 | 0.88 | 1.84 | 0.84 | 0.39 |
RF (confirmed) | 15 | 1.08 | 1.91 | 0.79 | 0.31 |
GBM (confirmed) | 15 | 0.79 | 1.50 | 0.88 | 0.59 |
RF (nonrejected) | 16 | 1.09 | 1.96 | 0.79 | 0.27 |
GBM (nonrejected) | 16 | 0.82 | 1.52 | 0.87 | 0.57 |
-
(2). The last parentheses on page 13 (4.3 Model Prediction) should contain the numbers 15 and 16 (instead of 16 and 19)
Original:
They both have a similar appearance because they used a similar number of variables (16 and 19).
Corrected:
They both have a similar appearance because they used a similar number of variables (15 and 16).
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reference
1. Nguyen, K.A.; Chen, W. DEM- and GIS-Based Analysis of Soil Erosion Depth Using Machine Learning. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.; 2021; 10, 452. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10070452]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.