Structural Requirements of 1-(2-Pyridinyl)-5-pyrazolones for Disproportionation of Boronic Acids

Abstract

We observed an unusual formation of four-coordinate boron(III) complexes from the reaction of 1-(2-pyridinyl)-5-pyrazolone derivatives with arylboronic acids in the basic media. The exact mechanism is not clear; however, the use of unprotected boronic acid and the presence of a bidentate ligand appeared to be the key structural requirements for the transformation. The results suggest that base-promoted disproportionation of arylboronic acid with the assistance of the [N,O]-bidentate ligation of 1-(2-pyridinyl)-5-pyrazolone should take place and facilitate the formation of pyrazole diarylborinate. Experiments to obtain a deeper understanding of its mechanism are currently underway.

1. Introduction

Pyrazoles are important structural units that are frequently found in manypharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and functional materials, as they serve as core scaffolds possessing a wide range of biological activities as well as synthetic templates for organic synthesis. Indeed, a large number of arylated pyrazoles have been synthesized and proven to be effective inhibitors of COX-2, p38 MAP kinase, and CDK2/Cyclin A [1]. In particular, we were involved in the tautomeric transformations of 5-pyrazolone derivatives for the synthesis of NADPH oxidase inhibitors [2,3,4,5].

In the course of the investigation, we unexpectedly found the formation of diarylborinate complexes, particularly for the case with 1-(2-pyridinyl)-5-pyrazolone derivatives and arylboronic acids. However, the four-coordinate boron compounds have been routinely prepared from the reaction of [N,O]-bidentate ligands with triarylboranes [6] and diarylborinic acids [7]. This is a subject of great interest since four-coordinate boron(III) complexes make them very useful as luminescent materials for organic electronics and photonics, and sensing and imaging probes for biomedical purposes [8]. To the best of our knowledge, the finding is a unique instance of the formation of diarylborinates via the direct employment of arylboronic acids.

Meanwhile, this observation raised important questions, such as: “Where does it come from”? Although many questions still remain to be answered, herein we focus on reporting our early understanding of the structural requirements of 1-(2-pyridinyl)-5-pyrazolone derivatives for the disproportionation of arylboronic acids.

2. Results and Discussion

The starting pyrazolones 1a and 2a were prepared by the condensation of ethyl benzoylacetate with the corresponding hydrazines, respectively [9]. Pyrazole triflates 1b and 2b were made by treating the corresponding pyrazolones with trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride and N,N-diisopropylethylamine, where chloroform is the best choice to achieve excellent chemoselectivity and high yield [10]. Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling of 1b furnished the corresponding 5-phenylpyrazole 1c in 85% yield, as shown in Scheme 1. When 2b was used, however, an unknown product was observed in small amounts along with prolonged reaction times. The spectroscopic data apparently show the introduction of two phenyl groups into the entity, but still it was difficult to elucidate the molecular structure.

Initially, we assumed 2c would be a biphenylated product (C) resulting from the C-H activation of a Suzuki product (A from 2b) as the pyridine ring is known to act as a directing group via the formation of a six membered palladacycle (B), as illustrated in Scheme 2 [11]. In addition, a diarylated pyrazole (D) is conceivable, in which the pyrazole nitrogen serves as a transformable directing group, as documented in the Pd-catalyzed sp² C-H functionalization of N-arylpyrazole [12]. However, the C-H activation was not the case for 2c since this does not explain the most abundant peak observed at m/z = 401.

Next, we examined whether palladium catalysis was likely to exert influence on the disproportionation/dimerization of arylboronic acid, taking into account the detection of a palladium(II) species with a diarylborinate anion in the coupling reaction of aryl bromides with arylboronic acids catalyzed by the palladium complex [13]. Thus, in order to figure out what was really responsible for this transformation, negative control experiments were performed by the removal of each component from the reaction vessel one by one. The results are summarized in Table 1.

When the reaction of 2b was carried out without the palladium catalyst, this startlingly led to the same product (entry 1, Table 1). Furthermore, the use of the triflate was not a strict requirement for the transformation (entry 2). Subsequently, we ascertained that 2a could be regenerated in the presence of a base from 2b, presumably due to the hydrolytic instability of the triflate [14]. Another important feature was that there was no such indication from 1a (entry 3). So far, nothing had changed when phenylboronic acid pinacol ester was used with 2a, and the reaction was performed without the base (entries 4 and 5). To ensure a reliable formation of diarylborinate species, as the phenylboronic acid and the base were simply heated, we were able to isolate diphenylborinic acid 3a and triphenylboroxin 3b (entry 6). However, this could not be observed without the base. These observations demonstrate that base-induced disproportionation of boronic acids can also occur even without a chelate ligand, but will produce 3a in lower grade. The final installation was undertaken to confirm the structure of 2c (entry 7) by employing the reaction with diphenylborinic acid [15].

We explored the scope of the method by varying the boronic acids with different pyrazole substrates illustrated in Table 2. The reactions with 4-methoxy, 3-fluoro, 4-chloro, 4-bromo and 4-(N,N-diphenylamino)phenylboronic acid continually gave the products 2d–2h in moderate yields, respectively. There were no noticeable effects with the electronic influence of boronic acid substituents. 2-Benzothienylboronic acid afforded the product 2i at 41% yield without any issue, while 2-naphthylboronic acid afforded 2j at 21% yield, suggesting that there was a steric effect in this transformation. Noticeably, boronic acids with sensitive functional groups such as ester (2k, 23%) and styrene (2l, 38%) were properly operated.

We then extended the scope of the pyrazole substrates with different substituents, such as 3-methyl and 4-trifluoromethylpyrazole, which gave 2m (41%) and 2n (23%), respectively. Meanwhile, there was no such indication again with N-(4-pyridinyl)pyrazole (2o), indicating that [N,O]-bidentation is inarguably the most fundamental feature. With these results, we can deduce that N-(2-pyridinyl)pyrazole is stabilized by an intramolecular hydrogen bond and, thus, exists in a syn-periplanar orientation, which is well adjusted to accommodate an incoming boronic acid.

We primarily revealed that palladium catalysis has no role in the formation of the product. The use of unprotected boronic acid and a base is vital, and the presence of [N,O]-bidentate ligand seems to be the crucial structural requisite for this transformation. Previously, we reported that 1a remains as it stands, whereas 2a exclusively exists in the enol-form [2], and the X-ray crystal structure clearly shows that the carbonyl oxygen and pyridine nitrogen adopt an almost syn-periplanar arrangement that is capable of accommodating intramolecular hydrogen bonding.

Pleasingly, we were able to obtain a single crystal and determine the structure of 2c as a six-membered pyrazole diphenylborinate complex (Figure 1). Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were prepared by slow evaporation of a solution in ethyl acetate at room temperature. It is noteworthy that the crystal structure exhibited a pseudo-tetrahedral geometry around the boron center linked to two phenyl groups and with a [N,O]-bidentate chelating ligand. In addition, there was a broad singlet centered at 7.81 ppm in the ¹¹B NMR spectrum of 2c.

Single-crystal X-ray diffractions were measured on a Bruker APEX-II CCD diffractometer equipped with a monochromatic Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The data were collected at a low temperature of 100 K by the φ-ω scan method. The collected data were integrated using Bruker-SAINT software and an absorption correction was not applied. The structure was solved and refined through the least-squares method with the SHELXT and SHELXL program, respectively. All the non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically and hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions. Table 3 presents the crystallographic data and structural refinements. Atomic coordinates and crystallographic parameters for 2c were deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc28yrgg, CCDC number: 2113966).

Although a number of possible explanations can be advanced for such a unique transformation, we probed that the disproportionation of arylboronic acid could be induced by the base, with or without a bidentate ligand. Firstly, when 3 mmol of phenylboronic acid and 3 mmol of potassium phosphate were simply heated without ligand, we were able to isolate 0.12 mmol of diphenylborinic acid 3a along with triphenylboroxin 3b, as depicted in Scheme 3. This observation demonstrates that base-induced disproportionation of boronic acids is possible even without a chelate ligand, but will produce 3a with a lower efficiency. Meanwhile, in the presence of a bidentate ligand, the base-promoted disproportionation of arylboronic acid was accelerated, and thus, the formation of pyrazole diarylborinate occurred (entries 2 and 6, Table 1).

Based on the experimental considerations, we propose a plausible mechanism for the formation of the four-coordinate boron species facilitated by the assistance of the [N,O]-bidentate ligand, which enabled the aryl group migration between boronic acids, as illustrated in Scheme 4. We were aware that 2a as the enol could be modulated by its complexation to phenylboronic acid (2a–i). Accordingly, a recent report revealed that boronic acids can disrupt the intramolecular proton transfer fluorescence through complexation with 10-hydroxybenzo[h]quinolone by disrupting the intramolecular hydrogen bond [16]. Considering the thermodynamics of boronic acids, entropically favorable dimeric anhydride or trimeric aggregate might be involved in this transformation [17]. Particularly, the Petasis borono–Mannich reaction [18] has been extensively studied, in which the boronic acids act as organic group donors under metal-free transition conditions, and protodeboronation [19] and boron-to-heteroatom migration [20] have also been utilized via boronate complexes derived from different types of boronic anhydride species. The base may be required to drive the initial equilibrium sufficiently toward the ‘ate’ complex (2a-ii) so that boron-to-boron migration is feasible. The ‘ate’ complex is believed to be able to transfer the organic group from the anionic boron center onto a nearby electron-deficient sp² boron through a boronic anhydride assembly.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Generals

All solvents and reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used as received without further purification, unless otherwise stated. Tripotassium phosphate was crushed in mortar and dried at 70 °C in oven overnight and used. Reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography carried out on S-2 0.25 mm E. Merck silica gel plates (60F-254, Darmstadt, Germany) using UV light as the visualizing agent and an acidic mixture of anisaldehyde or a ninhydrin solution in ethanol and heat as developing agents. E. Merck silica gel (60, particle size 0.040–0.063 mm) was used for flash column chromatography. All yields were calculated from isolated products. All NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AV-500 instrument. ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra were referenced internally to the residual undeuterated chloroform (δ_H = 7.26 ppm and δ_C = 77.0 ppm). ¹¹B NMR spectra were referenced externally to BF₃.OEt₂. The ¹¹B NMR experiments were done with quartz NMR tubes (Wilmad). The NMR data were analyzed using MNova 10.0 processing software (version: MNova 14.1.0) (Mestrelab Research). The following abbreviations are used to designate multiplicities: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, quint = quintet, m = multiplet, br s = broad singlet. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm and coupling constants are in Hertz (Hz). High resolution mass spectra using Electronic Ionization (HRMS-EI) were recorded on Joel JMS-700 mass spectrometer. The data for X-ray structure determination were collected on Bruker SMART Apex II X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromated MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra for all compounds 2c–2n prepared in this study are in Supplementary Materials.

3.2. Representative Procedure for the Synthesis of Four-Coordinate Boron Complexes

A solution of 2a (237.3 mg, 1.0 mmol), PhB(OH)₂ (365.8 mg, 3.0 mmol) and K₃PO₄ (636.8 mg, 3.0 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (10 mL) was heated to reflux at 100 °C for 20 h. Subsequently, the solvent was removed by evaporation and the crude was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 10 mL). The organic layer was washed with saturated NaHCO₃ and brine, and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed under vacuum and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (hexane/EtOAc = 7/1) to give 2c (148.5 mg, 37% yield).

2-(5-((Diphenylboryl)oxy)-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (2c).

Yield: 37%; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.18–8.04 (m, 2H), 7.93 (dd, J = 6.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.87–7.78 (m, 2H), 7.44–7.34 (m, 3H), 7.32–7.21 (m, 11H), 5.98 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 157.06, 156.6, 147.0, 143.0, 142.1, 133.0, 132.5, 129.1, 128.6, 127.6, 127.2, 126.0, 119.3, 113.4, 86.6 ppm; ¹¹B NMR (160 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_B 7.81 ppm; HRMS-EI m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₂₆H₂₀N₃OB, 401.1699, found 401.1692.

Atomic coordinates and crystallographic parameters for 2c has been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc28yrgg, CCDC number: 2113966). These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 9 November 2021).

2-(5-((Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)boryl)oxy)-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (2d).

Yield: 45%; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.15 (m, 2H), 7.96 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 7.05 Hz, 2H), 7.45–7.38 (m, 3H), 7.26–7.22 (m, 5H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.45 Hz, 4H), 5.98 (s, 1H), 3.79 (s, 6H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 158.9, 156.9, 156.7, 147.0, 142.8, 142.0, 134.2, 132.6, 129.1, 128.6, 126.0, 119.2, 113.3, 113.2, 86.5, 55.0 ppm; HRMS (EI) m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₂₈H₂₄N₃O₃B, 461. 1911, found 461. 1911.

2-(5-((Bis(3-fluorophenyl)boryl)oxy)-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (2e).

Yield: 27%; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.16 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.89 (dd, J = 16.3, 6.1 Hz, 3H), 7.44 (dt, J = 13.8, 6.9 Hz, 3H), 7.28 (dd, J = 13.6, 7.1 Hz, 3H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 6.97 (dd, J = 14.9, 9.1 Hz, 4H), 6.04 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 163.9, 161.98, 157.3, 156.2, 146.8, 143.5, 141.7, 132.3, 129.37 (d, J = 7.6 Hz), 128.68, 128.37 (d, J = 1.9 Hz), 126.1, 119.59, 119.2 (d, J = 18.2 Hz), 114.3 (d, J = 21.0 Hz), 114.18, 114.0, 113.7, 86.80 ppm; HRMS-EI m/z [M]⁺ calcd for, C₂₆H₁₈BF₂N₃O 437.1511, found 437.1509.

2-(5-((Bis(4-chlorophenyl)boryl)oxy)-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (2f).

Yield: 31%; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.23–8.08 (m, 2H), 7.86 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 7.52–7.38 (m, 3H), 7.25 (dd, J = 27.6, 8.1 Hz, 9H), 6.01 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 157.3, 156.3, 146.9, 143.4, 141.6, 134.3, 133.5, 132.3, 129.3, 128.7, 127.9, 126.1, 119.6, 113.7, 86.7 ppm; HRMS-EI m/z [M]⁺ calcd for,C₂₆H₁₈BCl₂N₃O 469.0920, found 469.0927.

2-(5-((Bis(4-bromophenyl)boryl)oxy)-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (2g).

Yield: 35%; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.26–8.11 (m, 2H), 7.93–7.79 (m, 3H), 7.49–7.37 (m, 7H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.15 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 4H), 5.99 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 157.3,156.2, 143.4, 141.6, 134.6, 130.8, 129.3, 128.7, 126.1, 119.5, 113.7, 86.7, 77.3, 77.0, 76.8 ppm; HRMS-EI m/z [M]⁺ calcd for,C₂₆H₁₈BBr₂N₃O 566.9910, found 566.9918.

4,4’-(((3-Phenyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-yl)oxy)boranediyl)bis(N,N-diphenylaniline) (2h).

Yield: 27%; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.11 (dd, J = 14.0, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.06–7.96 (m, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.32 (m, 2H), 7.21 (ddd, J = 19.5, 10.9, 6.7 Hz, 8H), 7.07 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 4H), 7.02–6.84 (m, 5H), 5.98 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 156.7, 147.9, 146.7, 142.9, 142.1, 133.8, 129.2, 129.0, 128.6, 126.0, 124.1, 123.2, 122.3, 119.2, 113.3, 86.6 ppm; HRMS-EI m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₅₀H₃₈N₅OB, 735.3169, found 735.3177.

2-(5-((Bis(benzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)boryl)oxy)-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl) pyridine (2i).

Yield: 41%; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.52 (dd, J = 1.26, 8.67 Hz, 1H), 8.29–8.19 (m, 2H), 7.94–7.86 (m, 4H), 7.80–7.76 (m, 2H), 7.66 (dd, J = 0.51, 7.08 Hz, 1H), 7.49–7.37 (m, 3H), 7.35–7.24 (m, 4H), 7.71 (s, 2H), 6.42 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 156.3, 155.1, 146.6, 145.7, 142.3, 142.2, 141.2, 132.2, 129.9, 129.2, 129.1, 126.3, 124.4, 124.3, 123.8, 122.7, 122.5, 113.8, 87.3 ppm; HRMS (EI) m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₃₀H₂₀N₃OS₂B, 513. 1141, found 513.1141.

2-(5-((Di(naphthalen-2-yl)boraneyl)oxy)-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (2j).

Yield: 21%; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.18 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (dd, J = 12.7, 7.1 Hz, 6H), 7.77–7.67 (m, 4H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.49–7.36 (m, 7H), 7.22 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 1H), 6.07 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 157.2, 156.7, 147.1, 143.2, 142.1, 133.2, 132.8, 132.5, 130.6, 129.2, 128.6, 128.1, 127.6, 127.0, 126.1, 125.5, 119.4, 113.5, 86.7 ppm; HRMS-EI m/z [M]⁺ calcd for,C₃₄H₂₄BN₃O 501.2012, found 501.2019.

Dimethyl 4,4’-(((3-phenyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-yl)oxy)boranediyl)dibenzoate (2k).

Yield: 23%; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.17–8.04 (m, 2H), 7.93 (dd, J = 6.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.87–7.78 (m, 2H), 7.44–7.34 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.21 (m, 11H), 5.98 (s, 1H), 3.87 (s, 6H) ppm; ppm; ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 165.9, 160.0, 150.4, 145.1, 142.8, 139.3, 133.3, 130.1, 129.9, 129.2, 127.5, 121.4, 112.4, 86.8, 51.5 ppm; HRMS-EI m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₃₀H₂₄N₃O₅B, 517.1809, found 517.1813.

2-(5-((Di((E)-styryl)boraneyl)oxy)-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (2l).

Yield: 38%; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.31 (d, J = 5.73 Hz, 1H), 8.16 -8.06 (m, 2H), 7.88–7.85 (m, 2H), 7.46–7.35 (m, 6H), 7.32–7.27 (m, 6H), 7.20–7.15 (m, 2H), 6.71–6.63 (m, 4H), 5.96 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 156.9, 156.1, 146.8, 142.8, 141.3, 139.2, 139.0, 132.6, 129.1, 128.6, 128.3, 127.1, 126.3, 126.1, 119.7, 113.3, 86.35ppm; HRMS (EI) m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₃₀H₂₄N₃OB, 453.2012, found 453.2017.

2-(5-((Diphenylboraneyl)oxy)-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (2m).

Yield: 41%; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.07–8.04 (m, 2H), 7.91 (dd, J = 6.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32–7.21 (m, 11H), 5.98 (s, 1H), 2.34 (s, 3H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 159.9, 150.4, 149.7, 139.3, 138.5, 133.4, 128.7, 121.4, 112.4, 91.2, 16.5 ppm; HRMS-EI m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₂₁H₁₈N₃OB, 339.1543, found 339.1552.

2-(5-((Diphenylboraneyl)oxy)-3-methyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (2n).

Yield: 23%; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 8.21–8.13 (m, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.02–7.95 (m, 1H), 7.41–7.34 (m, 1H), 7.32–7.21 (m, 10H), 2.12 (s, 3H).¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_C 153.8, 146.5, 143.5, 142.5, 132.8, 127.7, 127.4, 122.2, 120.8, 120.0, 113.6, 96.3, 5.78 ppm; HRMS-EI m/z [M]⁺ calcd for, C₂₂H₁₇BF₃N₃O 407.1417, found 407.1411.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we found a simple, mild, transition metal-free method for the preparation of four-coordinate organoboron complexes, and also discussed on the key components and the structural requirements that enable such a boron-to-boron migration. While the use of unprotected boronic acid and a base is essential, the presence of [N,O]-bidentate ligand appeared to be the key structural requirements for this transformation. Based on the control experiments, the results support that four-coordinate boron species derived from the [N,O]-bidentate ligand 2a favor the formation of diarylborinic acid and/or disproportionation of arylboronic acid via the action of the base. The syn-periplanar arrangement of the [N,O]-bidentate ligand was found to be crucial. It was well organized to accommodate an incoming boronic acid, and thus, to enable to aryl group migration between boronic acids, presumably via a boronic anhydride species. Overall, the present method is particularly important in preparing four-coordinate organoboron species to ensure a completely efficient assembly of multi-component structures in a single operation. Experiments to obtain a deeper understanding of its mechanism and applications are currently underway.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.S.S. and K.-I.L.; synthesis and formal analysis, J.C. and V.S.S. and Y.H.; X-ray crystal study, V.S.S.; investigation, J.C., V.S.S. and K.-I.L.; biological validation, Y.B. and H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C. and V.S.S.; writing—review and editing, K.-I.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant number: NRF-2017M1A2A2049100).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figure, Schemes and Tables

Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i), Tf2O, i-Pr2NEt, CHCl3, rt, 0.5 h; (ii), PhB(OH)2 (3 eq), PdCl2 (dppf) (8 mol%), dppf (4 mol%), K3PO4 (3 eq), dioxane, 100 °C, 1 h (for 1c); 20 h (for 2c).

Scheme 2. Initially proposed structures for 2c.

Figure 1. The crystal structure of 2c.

Scheme 3. Disproportionation of phenylboronic acid (entry 6, Table 1).

Scheme 4. A plausible mechanism for the formation of 2c induced by [N,O]-bidentate ligation.

Table 1

Control experiments.

Entry	Substrate a	Reaction Conditions b	Product (Yield, %)
1	2b	PhB(OH)2, K3PO4, dioxane	2c (29)
2	2a	PhB(OH)2, K3PO4, dioxane	2c (37)
3	1a	PhB(OH)2, K3PO4, dioxane	- c
4	2a	PhB(OCMe2CMe2O), K3PO4, dioxane	- c
5	2a	PhB(OH)2, dioxane	- c
6	- d	PhB(OH)2, K3PO4, dioxane	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]3a (4%)    3b (26%) e
7	2a	3a, EtOH	2c (81%)

^a The structures shown in Scheme 1. ^b Unless otherwise indicated, the reaction conditions are as follows: substrate (1.0 mmol), boron reagent (3 eq), base (3 eq), solvent (10 mL), 100 °C, 20 h. ^c No reaction observed. ^d Without substrate. ^e See, Scheme 3.

Table 2

Scope of boronic acids and pyrazole substrates ^a.

[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]

[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]

^a Reaction conditions: pyrazole substrate (1 mmol), ArB(OH)₂ (3 eq), K₃PO₄ (3 eq), dioxane (10 mL), 100 °C, 20 h; where R’ = Ph, Me, R” = H, CF₃. ^b Not observed.

Table 3

Crystallographic data of 2c.

Crystal Data
C26H20BN3O	c = 11.2162 (1) Å	Z = 2
Mr = 401.26	α = 78.966 (1)o	Mo Kα radiation
Triclinic, P1	β = 81.795 (1)o	μ = 0.08 mm−1
a = 9.7309 (1) Å	γ = 79.993 (1)o	T = 296 K
b = 9.8830 (1) Å	V = 1035.91 (2) Å3	0.44 × 0.31 × 0.23 mm
Data Collection
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer		5044 independent reflections
19,866 measured reflections		3923 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041		280 parameters
wR(F2) = 0.106		H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03		Δρmax = 0.21 e Å−3
5044 reflections		Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Online supplementary information contains ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra for all compounds 2c–2n prepared in this study (Figures S1, S2 and S4–S25), and 11B NMR of 2c (Figure S3). CCDC 2113966 contains atomic coordinates and crystallographic parameters for 2c and these data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html, accessed on 2 November 2021.

References

1. Karrouchi, K.; Radi, S.; Ramli, Y.; Taoufik, J.; Mabkhot, Y.N.; Al-aizari, F.A.; Ansar, M. Synthesis and Pharmacological Activities of Pyrazole Derivatives: A Review. Molecules; 2018; 23, 134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23010134] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29329257]

2. Bin, H.-R.; Bae, Y.S.; Kim, G.; Lee, K.-I. Palladium-Catalyzed Peripheral Arylation of 5-Pyrazolones via Enolizable Bond Protection. Synthesis; 2011; 11, pp. 1783-1791.

3. Joo, J.H.; Huh, J.E.; Lee, J.H.; Park, D.R.; Lee, Y.; Lee, S.G.; Choi, S.; Lee, H.J.; Song, S.W.; Jeong, Y. et al. A novel pyrazole derivative protects from ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis through the inhibition of NADPH oxidase. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 22389. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22389] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975635]

4. Lee, S.G.; Lee, J.; Kim, K.M.; Lee, K.-I.; Bae, Y.S.; Lee, H.J. Pharmacokinetic Study of NADPH Oxidase Inhibitor Ewha-18278, a Pyrazole Derivative. Pharmaceutics; 2019; 11, 482. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11090482] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533299]

5. Sadu, V.S.; Choi, Y.M.; Kamma, K.R.; Kim, C.H.; Bae, Y.S.; Lee, K.-I. Crystal structure determination of N-and O-alkylated tautomers of 1-(2-pyridinyl)-5-hydroxypyrazole. J. Mol. Struct.; 2020; 1215, 128272. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128272]

6. Nagata, Y.; Chujo, Y. Main-chain-type organoboron quinolate polymers: Synthesis and photoluminescence properties. Macromolecules; 2007; 40, pp. 6-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma062007s]

7. Marciasini, L.; Cacciuttolo, B.; Vaultier, M.; Pucheault, M. Synthesis of borinic acids and borinate adducts using diisopropylaminoborane. Org. Lett.; 2015; 17, pp. 3532-3535. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01620] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26183591]

8. Frath, D.; Massue, J.; Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R. Luminescent materials: Locking π-conjugated and heterocyclic ligands with boron (III). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; 2014; 53, pp. 2290-2310. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201305554] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24482312]

9. Huang, Y.-Y.; Lin, H.-C.; Cheng, K.-M.; Su, W.-N.; Sung, K.-C.; Lin, T.-P.; Huang, J.-J.; Lin, S.-K.; Wong, F.F. Efficient di-bromination of 5-pyrazolones and 5-hydroxypyrazoles by N-bromobenzamide. Tetrahedron; 2009; 65, pp. 9592-9597. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2009.09.055]

10. Dvorak, C.A.; Rudolph, D.A.; Ma, S.; Carruthers, N.I. Palladium-Catalyzed Coupling of Pyrazole Triflates with Arylboronic Acids. J. Org. Chem.; 2005; 70, pp. 4188-4190. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo0477897] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15876117]

11. Lyons, T.W.; Sanford, M.S. Palladium-Catalyzed Ligand-Directed C–H Functionalization Reactions. Chem. Rev.; 2010; 110, pp. 1147-1169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr900184e] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078038]

12. Kwak, S.H.; Gulia, N.; Daugulis, O. Synthesis of Unsymmetrical 2,6-Diarylanilines by Palladium-Catalyzed C–H Bond Functionalization Methodology. J. Org. Chem.; 2018; 83, pp. 5844-5850. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.8b00659] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29737848]

13. Crociani, B.; Antonaroli, S.; Marini, A.; Matteoli, U.; Scrivanti, A. Mechanistic study on the coupling reaction of aryl bromides with arylboronic acids catalyzed by (iminophosphine)palladium(0) complexes. Detection of a palladium(ii) intermediate with a coordinated boron anion. Dalton Trans.; 2006; 22, pp. 2698-2705. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b514405a] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16804582]

14. Dhakal, B.; Bohé, L.; Crich, D. Trifluoromethanesulfonate Anion as Nucleophile in Organic Chemistry. J. Org. Chem.; 2017; 82, pp. 9263-9269. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.7b01850] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28858509]

15. Hagen, H.; Reinoso, S.; Albrecht, M.; Boersma, J.; Spek, A.L.; van Koten, G. O,N-Chelated boron aminophenolate complexes. Crystal structure of BPh2(OC₆H₄(CH₂NMe₂)-2). J. Organomet. Chem.; 2000; 608, pp. 27-33.

16. Aronoff, M.R.; VanVeller, B.; Raines, R.T. Detection of Boronic acids through excited-state intramolecular proton-transfer fluorescence. Org. Lett.; 2013; 15, pp. 5382-5385. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol402714k] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24099104]

17. Chaudhari, S.R. Screening and assignment of phenylboronic acid and its anhydride formation by NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett.; 2015; 634, pp. 95-97. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2015.05.061]

18. Candeias, N.R.; Montalbano, F.; Cal, P.M.S.D.; Gois, P.M.P. Boronic Acids and Esters in the Petasis-Borono Mannich Multicomponent Reaction. Chem. Rev.; 2010; 110, pp. 6169-6193. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr100108k]

19. Noonan, G.; Leach, A.G. A mechanistic proposal for the protodeboronation of neat boronic acids: Boronic acid mediated reaction in the solid state. Org. Biomol. Chem.; 2015; 13, pp. 2555-2560. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4OB02543A]

20. Voth, S.; Hollett, J.W.; McCubbin, J.A. Transition-Metal-Free Access to Primary Anilines from Boronic Acids and a Common ⁺NH₂ Equivalent. J. Org. Chem.; 2015; 80, pp. 2545-2553. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo5025078] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25594547]