It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Plant metabolism is more complex relative to individual microbes. In single‐celled microbes, transcriptional regulation by single transcription factors (TFs) is sufficient to shift primary metabolism. Corresponding genome‐level transcriptional regulatory maps of metabolism reveal the underlying design principles responsible for these shifts as a model in which master regulators largely coordinate specific metabolic pathways. Plant primary and specialized metabolism occur within innumerable cell types, and their reactions shift depending on internal and external cues. Given the importance of plants and their metabolites in providing humanity with food, fiber, and medicine, we set out to develop a genome‐scale transcriptional regulatory map of Arabidopsis metabolic genes. A comprehensive set of protein–DNA interactions between Arabidopsis thaliana TFs and gene promoters in primary and specialized metabolic pathways were mapped. To demonstrate the utility of this resource, we identified and functionally validated regulators of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. The resulting network suggests that plant metabolic design principles are distinct from those of microbes. Instead, metabolism appears to be transcriptionally coordinated via developmental‐ and stress‐conditional processes that can coordinate across primary and specialized metabolism. These data represent the most comprehensive resource of interactions between TFs and metabolic genes in plants.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Department of Plant Biology and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Plant Biology Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
2 Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
3 Department of Plant Biology and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
4 Department of Plant Biology and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Plant Biology Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
5 Department of Plant Biology and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
6 Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; DynaMo Center of Excellence, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark