It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Reach&grasp requires highly coordinated activation of different brain areas. We investigated whether reach&grasp kinematics is associated to EEG-based networks changes. We enrolled 10 healthy subjects. We analyzed the reach&grasp kinematics of 15 reach&grasp movements performed with each upper limb. Simultaneously, we obtained a 64-channel EEG, synchronized with the reach&grasp movement time points. We elaborated EEG signals with EEGLAB 12 in order to obtain event related synchronization/desynchronization (ERS/ERD) and lagged linear coherence between Brodmann areas. Finally, we evaluated network topology via sLORETA software, measuring network local and global efficiency (clustering and path length) and the overall balance (small-worldness). We observed a widespread ERD in α and β bands during reach&grasp, especially in the centro-parietal regions of the hemisphere contralateral to the movement. Regarding functional connectivity, we observed an α lagged linear coherence reduction among Brodmann areas contralateral to the arm involved in the reach&grasp movement. Interestingly, left arm movement determined widespread changes of α lagged linear coherence, specifically among right occipital regions, insular cortex and somatosensory cortex, while the right arm movement exerted a restricted contralateral sensory-motor cortex modulation. Finally, no change between rest and movement was found for clustering, path length and small-worldness. Through a synchronized acquisition, we explored the cortical correlates of the reach&grasp movement. Despite EEG perturbations, suggesting that the non-dominant reach&grasp network has a complex architecture probably linked to the necessity of a higher visual control, the pivotal topological measures of network local and global efficiency remained unaffected.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Neurologia - Dipartimento Scienze dell’Invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa-Collo, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.414603.4)
2 University of Verona, Department of Computer Science, Verona, Italy (GRID:grid.5611.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1763 1124)
3 Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Riabilitazione e Medicina Fisica - Dipartimento Scienze dell’Invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa-Collo, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.414603.4)
4 Policlinico Italia, Roma, Italy (GRID:grid.414603.4)
5 Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Neuroriabilitazione ad Alta Intensità - Dipartimento Scienze dell’Invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa-Collo, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.414603.4)
6 Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Clinica Neurologica, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.8142.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 3192)