It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
An overreliance on commercial, kit-based RNA extraction in the molecular diagnoses of infectious disease presents a challenge in the event of supply chain disruptions and can potentially hinder testing capacity in times of need. In this study, we adapted a well-established, robust TRIzol-based RNA extraction protocol into a high-throughput format through miniaturization and automation. The workflow was validated by RT-qPCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection to illustrate its scalability without interference to downstream diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy. This semi-automated, kit-free approach offers a versatile alternative to prevailing integrated solid-phase RNA extraction proprietary systems, with the added advantage of improved cost-effectiveness for high volume acquisition of quality RNA whether for use in clinical diagnoses or for diverse molecular applications.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 National University of Singapore, Synthetic Biology for Clinical and Technological Innovation, Singapore, Singapore (GRID:grid.4280.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 6431); Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Synthetic Biology Translational Research Programme, Singapore, Singapore (GRID:grid.4280.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 6431); Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Department of Biochemistry, Singapore, Singapore (GRID:grid.4280.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 6431)
2 Imperial College London, Section of Structural and Synthetic Biology, Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); Imperial College White City Campus, London Biofoundry, Translation and Innovation Hub, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); UK Dementia Research Institute Centre for Care Research and Technology, Based at Imperial College London and the, University of Surrey, London, UK (GRID:grid.5475.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0407 4824)
3 Imperial College London, Section of Structural and Synthetic Biology, Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); Imperial College White City Campus, London Biofoundry, Translation and Innovation Hub, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111)




