It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aims
There are conflicting data on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare patient outcomes according to the presence or absence of permanent AF at device implantation.
Methods and results
We retrospectively analysed remote monitoring data from 1141 CRT defibrillators. Propensity score with inverse‐probability weighting method was used to balance AF and sinus rhythm (SR) groups. Analysis endpoints included total mortality, appropriate defibrillation shocks, and CRT percentage. There were 229 patients (20.1%) in the AF group and 912 patients (79.9%) in the SR group. Compared with SR patients, AF patients were older (median age, 77 vs. 72 years, P < 0.001), more frequently male (82.5% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.02), and had higher heart rate (75.7 vs. 71.0 b.p.m., P < 0.001). Of the 229 AF patients, 162 (70.7%) received suboptimal CRT (<98%) and 67 (29.3%) had adequate CRT (≥98%). During a median follow‐up of 24 months, total mortality did not differ between AF and SR groups (propensity‐score‐weighted hazard ratio, HR 1.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.82–2.15], P = 0.25). The risk of appropriate shocks was significantly higher in the AF group with <98% CRT than in the SR group (weighted‐HR, 1.99 [1.21–3.26], P = 0.006) and was similar in the AF group with ≥98% CRT versus the SR group (1.29 [0.66–2.53], P = 0.45). During follow‐up, sinus rhythm was recovered in 23 patients in the AF group (10%) after a median time of 106 (42–256) days. The rate of sinus rhythm recovery in the AF group was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.8–6.7) per 100 patient‐years; the rate of permanent AF occurrence in the SR group was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.9–3.3) per 100 patient‐years.
Conclusions
Although mortality was similar across patient groups, patients with permanent AF and suboptimal CRT had twofold higher risk of appropriate shocks than SR patients or AF patients with CRT ≥ 98%.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Iacopino, Saverio 2
; D'Onofrio, Antonio 3 ; Curnis, Antonio 4 ; Pisanò, Ennio C. 5 ; Biffi, Mauro 6
; Della Bella, Paolo 7
; Dello Russo, Antonio 8 ; Caravati, Fabrizio 9 ; Zanotto, Gabriele 10 ; Calvi, Valeria 11 ; Rovaris, Giovanni 12 ; Senatore, Gaetano 13 ; Nicolis, Daniele 14 ; Santamaria, Matteo 15 ; Giammaria, Massimo 16
; Maglia, Giampiero 17 ; Duca, Antonio 18 ; Ammirati, Giuseppe 1 ; Romano, Salvo Andrea 19 ; Piacenti, Marcello 20 ; Celentano, Eduardo 21 ; Bisignani, Giovanni 22 ; Vaccaro, Paola 23 ; Miracapillo, Gennaro 24 ; Bertini, Matteo 25 ; Nigro, Gerardo 26 ; Giacopelli, Daniele 27
; Gargaro, Alessio 28
; Bisceglia, Caterina 7 1 Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
2 Villa Maria Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy
3 Ospedale Monaldi, Naples, Italy
4 Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
5 Ospedale Vito Fazzi, Lecce, Italy
6 Policlinico Sant'Orsola‐Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
7 IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
8 Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
9 ASST dei sette laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
10 Ospedale Mater Salutis, Legnago, Italy
11 Policlinico G. Rodolico, Az. O.U. Policlinico ‐ V. Emanuele, Catania, Italy
12 Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
13 Ospedale di Ciriè, Ciriè, Italy
14 Ospedale di Mantova, Mantova, Italy
15 Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
16 Ospedale Maria Vittoria, Torino, Italy
17 Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese Ciaccio, Catanzaro, Italy
18 IRCCS Neurolesi‐Ospedale Piemonte, Messina, Italy
19 Ospedale di Desio, Desio, Italy
20 Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy
21 Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
22 Ospedale “Ferrari”, Castrovillari, Italy
23 AOR Villa Sofia‐Cervello P.O. Cervello, Palermo, Italy
24 Ospedale di Grosseto, Grosseto, Italy
25 University of Ferrara, S. Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
26 University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli,” Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
27 Biotronik Italia S.p.a., Vimodrone, Italy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
28 Biotronik Italia S.p.a., Vimodrone, Italy





