It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The graded association between family socioeconomic status (SES) and physical fitness is evident, but little is known about the mechanism underlying this association. This study investigated the role of early-life activities as mediators of the longitudinal relationship between early-life SES and health-related physical fitness in 168 adolescents (51.2% boys; final mean age: 12.4 years old). In Wave 1 (2011–12), their parents completed questionnaires about family socioeconomic status (SES), parent–child activities, and child screen time. In Wave 2 (2014–15), participants’ physical activity levels were assessed through parent proxy-reports. In Wave 3 (2018–19), a direct assessment of handgrip strength, standing long-jump, and 6-min walk test (6MWT) performance was conducted. After controlling for demographic factors, results of mediation analyses revealed that (a) Wave 1 SES predicted Wave 3 long-jump and 6MWT performance; (b) child physical activity level in Wave 2 mediated the relation between Wave 1 SES and standing long-jump performance in Wave 3; and (c) recreational parent–child activities and child screen time in wave 1 mediated the relation between Wave 1 SES and 6MWT performance in Wave 3. Our findings suggest that the type and frequency of early-life activities play a role in the graded association between childhood SES and physical fitness in adolescence.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 The University of Hong Kong, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000000121742757)
2 University of Glasgow, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Glasgow, UK (GRID:grid.8756.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 314X)
3 The University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Education, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000000121742757)
4 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Department of Applied Social Sciences, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.16890.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 6123)
5 The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Early Childhood Education, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.419993.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1799 6254)
6 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.10784.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0482)
7 The University of Hong Kong, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000000121742757); UCL School of Pharmacy, Research Department of Practice and Policy, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)