It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Direct implementation of metal-organic frameworks as the catalyst for CO2 electroreduction has been challenging due to issues such as poor conductivity, stability, and limited > 2e− products. In this study, Au nanoneedles are impregnated into a cupric porphyrin-based metal-organic framework by exploiting ligand carboxylates as the Au3+ -reducing agent, simultaneously cleaving the ligand-node linkage. Surprisingly, despite the lack of a coherent structure, the Au-inserted framework affords a superb ethylene selectivity up to 52.5% in Faradaic efficiency, ranking among the best for metal-organic frameworks reported in the literature. Through operando X-ray, infrared spectroscopies and density functional theory calculations, the enhanced ethylene selectivity is attributed to Au-activated nitrogen motifs in coordination with the Cu centers for C-C coupling at the metalloporphyrin sites. Furthermore, the Au-inserted catalyst demonstrates both improved structural and catalytic stability, ascribed to the altered charge conduction path that bypasses the incoherent framework. This study underlines the modulation of reticular metalloporphyrin structure by metal impregnation for steering the CO2 reduction reaction pathway.
Metal-organic frameworks are promising catalysts for CO2 electroreduction, yet limited by their poor conductivity and stability. Here, Au nanoneedles are inserted into the metalloporphyrin framework to activate C-C coupling and stabilize the structure for much enhanced ethylene production.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Soochow University, Soochow Institute for Energy and Materials Innovations, College of Energy, Suzhou, China (GRID:grid.263761.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0198 0694); Key Laboratory of Advanced Carbon Materials and Wearable Energy Technologies of Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, China (GRID:grid.263761.7)
2 Soochow University, Institute of Functional Nano and Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Suzhou, China (GRID:grid.263761.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0198 0694)
3 Shanghai Institute of Technology, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Shanghai, China (GRID:grid.419102.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1755 0738)
4 Soochow University, Soochow Institute for Energy and Materials Innovations, College of Energy, Suzhou, China (GRID:grid.263761.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0198 0694); Key Laboratory of Advanced Carbon Materials and Wearable Energy Technologies of Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, China (GRID:grid.263761.7); Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of New Materials for Sewage Treatment and Recycling, Suzhou, China (GRID:grid.263761.7)
5 California Institute of Technology, Materials and Process Simulation Center, Department of Chemistry, Pasadena, United States (GRID:grid.20861.3d) (ISNI:0000000107068890)