About the Authors:
Gang Tian
Contributed equally to this work with: Gang Tian, Yu Wu
Roles Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
* E-mail: [email protected] (GT); [email protected] (JL)
Affiliation: Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4116-3215
Yu Wu
Contributed equally to this work with: Gang Tian, Yu Wu
Roles Data curation, Validation
Affiliation: Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
Xinrui Jin
Roles Data curation, Validation
Affiliation: Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
Zhangrui Zeng
Roles Formal analysis, Resources, Software
Affiliation: Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
Xiujuan Gu
Roles Data curation, Software, Validation
Affiliation: Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
Tao Li
Roles Data curation, Software, Validation
Affiliation: Network Manage Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
Xiu Chen
Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Visualization
Affiliation: Department of Neurology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
Guangrong Li
Roles Investigation, Methodology, Project administration
Affiliation: Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
Jinbo Liu
Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Visualization
* E-mail: [email protected] (GT); [email protected] (JL)
Affiliation: Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
Abstract
Objective
Hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia (HIL) of blood samples have been a concern in hospitals because they reflect pre-analytical processes’ quality control. However, very few studies investigate the influence of patients’ gender, age, and department, as well as sample-related turnaround time, on the incidence rate of HIL in fasting serum biochemistry specimens.
Methods
A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted to investigate the incidence rate of HIL based on the HIL index in 501,612 fasting serum biochemistry specimens from January 2017 to May 2018 in a tertiary university hospital with 4,200 beds in Sichuan, southwest China. A subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the differences in the HIL incidence rate by gender, age and department of patients, and turnaround time of specimens.
Results
The incidence rate of hemolysis, lipemia and icterus was 384, 53, and 612 per 10,000 specimens. The male patients had a significantly elevated incidence of hemolysis (4.13% vs. 3.54%), lipemia (0.67% vs. 0.38%), and icterus (6.95% vs. 5.43%) than female patients. Hemolysis, lipemia, and icterus incidence rate were significantly associated with the male sex with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.174 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.140–1.208], 1.757 (95%CI: 1.623–1.903), and 1.303 (95%CI: 1.273–1.333), respectively, (P<0.05). The hospitalized patients had a higher incidence of hemolysis (4.03% vs. 3.54%), lipemia (0.63% vs. 0.36%), and icterus (7.10% vs. 4.75%) than outpatients (P<0.001). Specimens with relatively longer transfer time and/or detection time had a higher HIL incidence (P<0.001). The Pediatrics had the highest incidence of hemolysis (16.2%) with an adjusted OR (AOR) of 4.93 (95%CI, 4.59–5.29, P<0.001). The Neonatology department had the highest icterus incidence (30.1%) with an AOR of 4.93 (95%CI: 4.59–5.29, P<0.001). The Neonatology department (2.32%) and Gastrointestinal Surgery (2.05%) had the highest lipemia incidence, with an AOR of 1.17 (95%CI: 0.91–1.51) and 4.76 (95%CI: 4.70–5.53), both P-value <0.001. There was an increasing tendency of hemolysis and icterus incidence for children under one year or adults aged more than 40.
Conclusion
Evaluation of HIL incidence rate and HIL-related influence factors in fasting serum biochemistry specimens are impartment to interpret the results more accurately and provide better clinical services to patients.
Figures
Table 7
Fig 4
Table 1
Fig 1
Table 2
Table 3
Fig 2
Table 4
Table 5
Fig 3
Table 6
Table 7
Fig 4
Table 1
Fig 1
Table 2
Citation: Tian G, Wu Y, Jin X, Zeng Z, Gu X, Li T, et al. (2022) The incidence rate and influence factors of hemolysis, lipemia, icterus in fasting serum biochemistry specimens. PLoS ONE 17(1): e0262748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748
Editor: Colin Johnson, Oregon State University, UNITED STATES
Received: June 9, 2021; Accepted: January 4, 2022; Published: January 19, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Tian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding: This work was supported by the doctor of medicine start-up fund of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (18057), and the Luzhou-Southwest Medical University applied basic research project (2018LZXNYD-ZK30), and the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (2019YFH0010).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1. Introduction
Biochemical analysis of blood samples provides an essential basis for auxiliary clinical diagnosis and treatment decision-making. Clinical laboratory specimens sent to the laboratory often lead to rejection due to different reasons (e.g., hemolysis, clotted, insufficient volume, and lipemic specimens) [1]. Hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia (HIL) are common pre-analytical problems affecting the results of routine clinical tests, and interfere with the accurate measurement of various analytes, and may lead to wrong interpretations [2, 3]. In vitro hemolysis is the most prevalent pre-analytical error [4], and the proportion of hemolyzed samples received at the laboratory has been reported as high as 3.3% of all routine blood samples [5], accounting for 40% to 70% of all unsuitable samples identified [6]. The total incidence rate of lipemia in blood samples ranges from 0.5% to 2.5%, depending on the types of hospital and the proportion of inpatient and outpatient samples [7]. On the contrary, jaundice often occurs in neonates, with 4.5 per 100 person-hours of the overall incidence rate [8]. Therefore, identifying specimens with HIL is crucial for laboratories to reduce or eliminate these analytical interferents.
In recent years, sophisticated chemical analyzers have automatically detected the HIL status and reported the HIL index to evaluate their effect on routine analytes because of its integrated, automated use on the chemistry and immunochemistry platforms [9]. The HIL status and comments provide a fast and accurate way to determine HIL effects on each analyte, especially when each analyte’s HIL index value is above the corresponding HIL alert index. Therefore, laboratory application of HIL status verifying the clinically significant HIL index is beneficial for reducing the laboratory turnaround time, re-tests, and specimen recollection [9]. Additionally, the Laboratory Information System (LIS) provides a helpful tool for monitoring and consulting based on comprehensive online data. Specimens with the wrong test items, sample types, containers can be identified and recorded on the LIS [10]. Therefore, the inclusion of the LIS and the HIL index in biochemical assays provides the means for evaluating analytic test results at the time of the whole process to decide whether they are reliable enough to be released to the requesting clinicians.
The study aimed to evaluate the incidence rate of HIL in an International Standardization Organization (ISO) 15189 accredited clinical laboratory in a tertiary university hospital; investigate whether the incidence rate of HIL is associated with gender, age, and department of patients, and sample turnaround time for providing adequate quality control and continuous improvement in the three fields of pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical processes.
2. Material and methods
2.1 Data sources
All clinical chemistry analyses were conducted in an ISO 15189 accredited clinical laboratory at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, in Sichuan province, Southwest China. The electronic health record is currently DHC (DHC Software, Co, Ltd, China) which contains historical data covering the entire retrospective analysis period. Clinical data were collected from the electronic medical records at the time of specimen collection, including gender, age, diagnosis, departments of each patient, transfer time, detection time of specimens, specimen types, and the HIL index. This study was carried out by the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). The data in this study is from the core laboratory clinical chemistry section and was collected as part of a study approved by the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (No. 20180306089). Five hundred twenty-one thousand four hundred three serum biochemical specimens, including proteins, enzymes, metabolites, fasting, and postprandial glucose, blood lipids, and electrolytes, were collected from 36 clinical departments in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 1, 2017, to May 31, 2018. In order to decrease the influence of diet, we included specimens of fasting blood samples by searching the LIS records retrospectively. Data were further excluded if the sampling time was beyond the fasting blood collection period (6:00 am to 11:30 am). Finally, the authors and seven medical college students checked records to exclude potential postprandial specimens, especially postprandial glucose, pancreatitis markers related specimens (e.g., amylase, lipase, and amylopsin), and specimens of emergency because of the ingestion or not unknown, and plasma specimens. Data of 19,791 serum or plasma biochemical specimens were excluded because of the postprandial serum biochemical specimens or data without the HIL index or the transfer time of specimen > 12 hours. We finally included 501,612 eligible fasting serum biochemical specimens for analysis.
2.2 Laboratory confirmation of HIL index values
The HIL index was measured automatically by the ADVIA-2400 system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics). The HIL index were measured automatically by the ADVIA-2400 system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics). The serum HIL index feature of the ADVIA-2400 chemistry system can detect and produce a qualitative estimate absorbance value of three sets of wavelengths: hemolysis (λ1 = 571 nm, λ2 = 596 nm), lipemia (λ1 = 658 nm, λ2 = 694 nm), and icterus (λ1 = 478 nm, λ2 = 505 nm) [11]. The concentration ranges of HIL index value were set as follows: hemoglobin, < 45 mg/dL (-), 45–140 mg/dL (+), 140–235 mg/dL (++), 235–445 mg/dL (+++) and > 445 mg/dL (++++); lipemia, < 120 mg/dL (-), 120~245 mg/dL (+), 245~495 mg/dL (++), 495–995 mg/dL (+++) and > mg/dL 995 (++++); icterus, < 1.60 mg/dL (-), 1.60–6.50 mg/dL (+), 6.50–15.0 mg/dL (++), 15.0–28.0 mg/dL (+++) and > 28.0 mg/dL (++++). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document C56A guides the use of serum indices to measure HIL interference and recommends the selection of assay-specific HIL cut-offs, above which HIL interferences will affect results. The HIL index in the study is defined as the lowest concentrations of HIL that interfere with chemical analyses, yielding a bias >10%.
2.3 Statistical analyses
Variables with a normal distribution were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD); otherwise, the median and interquartile range (IQR) was used. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were applied to continuous variables, chi-square tests, and Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical variables as appropriate. The univariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the odds ratio (OR) of HIL, and variables with P-value < 0.10 were included in the multivariate logistic regression model to provide an adjusted OR (AOR) by gender, age, transfer time, detection time, hemolysis, lipemia, and icterus. Statistical significance was determined using two-tailed tests, and a value of P < 0.05 was accepted as the statistical significance limit. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 22 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
3. Results
3.1 Demographic and clinical data information
Data of 501,612 fasting serum biochemical specimens were included in the study, which contains 249,581 (49.8%) specimens of males and 252,031 (50.2%) specimens of females with a mean age of 52.0 (39.0–64.0) and 50.0 (36.0–63.0), respectively. In total, the incidence of hemolysis, lipemia, and icterus was 384, 53, and 612 per 10,000 specimens. The highest incidence rate of hemolysis (11.8%), lipemia (1.18%), and icterus (11.1%) occurred in young children aged zero to three years. With the increase of age, there was a decreased HIL incidence for patients aged four to 30 years and an increased HIL incidence when the age was more than 30 years. The males have higher incidence rate of hemolysis (4.13% vs. 3.54%, P<0.001), lipemia (0.67% vs. 0.38%, P<0.001) and icterus (6.96% vs. 5.43%, P<0.001) than those in females. There were also significantly longer transference and detection times for HIL specimens than non-HIL specimens (P<0.001). Compared with the outpatients, there was a higher incidence of hemolysis (4.03% vs. 3.54%, P<0.001), lipemia (0.63% vs. 0.36%, P<0.001), and icterus (7.10% vs. 4.75%, P<0.001) for specimens from the hospitalized patients. The HIL incidence was related to the department of specimens with 2.50%–14.3% hemolysis, 0.20%–1.18% lipemia, and 4.18%–16.7% icterus. The department of Pediatrics and Neonatology (14.3%), Gynecology & Obstetrics (1.18%), and the Department of Infectious diseases (16.7%) had the highest hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia incidence, respectively (Table 1).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 1. Patients’ basic information and the incidence rate of hemolysis, lipemia, and icterus in 501,612 fasting serum biochemical specimens.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.t001
3.2 Incidence of hemolysis in the top 10 clinical departments
Table 2 shows the hemolysis incidence in the top 10 clinical departments and the related clinical and laboratory characterizations. The department of Pediatrics had the highest incidence rate of hemolysis (16.2%) than neonatology (11.3%), Cardiology (6.74%), Plastic and Burn (6.62%), Neurology (6.53%), Digestive Diseases (4.76%), Endocrinology (4.19%), Respiratory Medicine (4.16%), Otolaryngology (3.43%), Nephrology (3.12%), and the other 26 clinical departments. The department of Pediatrics had the highest OR of hemolysis [5.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.72–5.43)] and a decreased AOR of hemolysis (4.93, 95% CI: 4.59–5.29) by gender, age, transfer time and detection time, lipemia and icterus (Table 3). Compared with the female patients, the males had a significantly elevated incidence of hemolysis (4.13% vs. 3.54%), with a pooled OR of 1.174 (95%CI, 1.140–1.208, P<0.001) based on the top ten high hemolysis incidence departments (Fig 1).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 1. The pooled OR of hemolysis based on the top ten high hemolysis incidence departments (n = 127,155).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.g001
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 2. Incidence of hemolysis in the top 10 clinical departments (n = 127,155).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.t002
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis of the OR and the AOR of hemolysis in the top ten departments (n = 127,155).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.t003
3.3 The incidence rate of lipemia in the top 10 clinical departments
Table 4 shows the incidence rate of lipemia in the top 10 clinical departments. The department of neonatology has the highest incidence of lipemia (2.32%), which was higher than that in Gastrointestinal Surgery (2.05%), Neurosurgery (1.03%), Digestive Diseases (0.91%), Pediatrics (0.79%), Hepatobiliary Surgery (0.69%), Neurology (0.67%), Cardiothoracic Surgery (0.63%), Vascular Surgery (0.60%), Emergency (0.53%), and the other 26 clinical departments. The Neonatology department has the highest OR of lipemia (4.62, 95%CI: 3.72–5.73, P<0.001) in 36 clinical departments, whereas the AOR of lipemia was only 1.17 (95%CI: 0.91–1.51, P = 0.217) (Table 5). The department of Gastrointestinal Surgery has a second higher OR (4.22, 95%CI: 3.66–4.89, P<0.001), and the highest AOR (4.76, 95%CI: 4.70–5.53, P<0.001) than that in other departments. Besides, the males have a significantly elevated incidence of lipemia (0.67% vs. 0.38%) in comparison with the female patients, with a pooled OR of 1.757 (95%CI: 1.623–1.903, P<0.001) based on the top ten high lipemia incidence departments (Fig 2).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 2. The pooled OR based on the top ten high lipemia incidence departments (n = 103,857).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.g002
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 4. The top 10 departments with the high incidence rate of lipemia (n = 103,857).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.t004
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 5. Logistic regression analysis of the OR and the AOR of lipemia in the top ten departments (n = 103,857).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.t005
3.4 The incidence rate of icterus in the top 10 clinical departments
Table 6 shows the incidence rate of icterus in the top 10 clinical departments. The Neonatology Department has the highest incidence rate of icterus (30.0%) than Infectious Diseases Department (16.7%), Hepatobiliary Surgery (13.6%), Digestive Diseases Department (10.2%), Cardiology (6.96%), Emergency Department (6.81%), Vascular Surgery (6.36%), Cardiothoracic Surgery (6.18%), Outpatient Service (5.98%), Gastroenterology (5.54%) and the other 26 clinical departments. The Neonatology Department has the highest OR of icterus (6.71, 95%CI: 6.26–7.21, P<0.001), and the AOR of 7.62 (95%CI: 7.04–8.24, P<0.001) (Table 7). Compared with the female patients, the males have a significantly elevated incidence of icterus (6.95% vs. 5.43%), with an OR of 1.303 (95%CI: 1.273–1.333, P<0.001) based on the top ten high icterus incidence departments (Fig 3).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 3. The pooled OR based on the top ten high icterus incidence departments (n = 259,887).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.g003
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 6. The top 10 departments with the high incidence rate of icterus (n = 259,887).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.t006
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 7. Logistic regression analysis of the OR and the AOR of icterus in the top ten clinical departments (n = 259,887).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.t007
3.5 The influence of age for hemolysis, lipemia, and icterus incidence
Among 501,612 fasting serum biochemistry specimens, HIL incidence varied according to the age group. There was a significantly decreased HIL incidence for patients aged from zero to one year. On the contrary, there was a relatively increased risk for hemolysis and lipemia (both age >18 years) and icterus (18< age < 60 years), with the highest cases of hemolysis and icterus aging from 40 to 70 years. Significantly, the HIL incidence slowly increased from 18 years and reached the highest platform for hemolysis (40–70 years), lipemia (30–60 years), and icterus (40–80 years), shown in Fig 4.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 4. The influence of age on HIL incidence (n = 501,612).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.g004
4. Discussion
Clinical laboratory tests play an integral role in medical decision-making, and therefore, the results must be reliable and accurate [12]. However, lipemia, icterus, or hemolysis are encountered routinely in clinical practice, affecting the results of routine clinical tests [13]. Although hemolysis can be avoided by careful drawing and handling the whole-blood samples, it is one of the significant risks during blood drawing and the most common pre-analytical error in the clinic [14, 15]. In this study, the total incidence rate of hemolysis is 3.84%, similar to Wan Azman et al. report (3.3%) [6]. Hemolysis can be caused by many pre-analytical causes associated with venipuncture, sample collection, transportation methods, temperature, sample handling, and delayed processing [16, 17]. During venipuncture, many conditions cause hemolysis, including forceful evacuation of a syringe into a tube, prolonged tourniquet application, vigorous mixing of the blood collected into the tube, and the use of inappropriate needles [18]. In this study, we found that Pediatrics had the highest incidence of hemolysis (16.2%) with an adjusted OR (AOR) of 4.93 (95%CI, 4.59–5.29, P<0.001). A previous study found that newborns and children typically have more limited venous access and much smaller veins, causing an approximately 13% hemolysis rate for all blood draws in these groups [19]. These reasons may explain the high incidence rate of hemolysis, 16.2%, and the increasing tendency in the Pediatrics department for young children under one year old. As nurses from clinical departments have participated in standardized sampling, transferring training during ISO 15189 accreditation, the other top 10 high hemolysis rates departments have a similar incidence rate of hemolysis except for pediatrics and neonatology, with an AOR ranging from 1.15 to 1.16. Besides, we found a higher incidence of hemolysis for specimens from hospitalized patients than in outpatients (4.03% vs. 3.54%). Although it is hard to explain that higher hemolysis occurs in hospitalized patients compared to outpatients, enhancing nurses’ training on venipuncture techniques is helpful to reduce the incidence of hemolysis. In addition, our study found longer transportation times for those hemolysis specimens than non-hemolysis specimens (1.48h vs. 1.34h, P<0.001), demonstrating that longer transit time increased the risk of hemolysis [20]. When in vitro hemolysis occurs, RBCs release intracellular contents (e.g., potassium ion and hemoglobin) into the serum or plasma, causing a significant laboratory error source [21]. Consequently, it is crucial to focus on standardization of blood collection practices, staff training, and quickly transportation of blood specimens to reduce hemolysis rates in the pre-analytical process.
Lipemia is the most frequent endogenous interference that can influence various laboratory methods. The most common pre-analytical cause of lipemic samples is an inadequate blood sampling interval after the meal or parenteral administration of synthetic lipid emulsions [22]. We found that the incidence rate of lipemia was 0.53% after removing related influence factors. The Neonatology Department had the highest incidence of lipemia (2.32%) with an OR 4.62, whereas the AOR adjusted by gender, age, transfer time, detection time, hemolysis, and icterus was insignificant decreased (AOR = 1.17, 95%CI: 0.91–1.51, P = 0.217). On the contrary, Gastrointestinal Surgery had the second higher incidence of lipemia (2.05%) with an OR of 4.22 and an increased AOR of 4.76 (95%CI: 4.70–5.53, P<0.001). Intravenous lipid emulsion infusion is a widely used way for total parenteral nutrition, an antidote for poisonings of local anesthetics, or the diluent for poorly water-soluble medications (e.g., propofol), and patients of all ages with feeding and gastrointestinal issues [22–24]. Blood collection in patients who have recently received intravenous lipid emulsion therapy, and drug therapy (e.g., glucocorticoids, antiretroviral medications, protease inhibitors, and non-selective beta-adrenergic antagonists), can indirectly cause lipemia [25]. Additionally, increasing lipid concentrations have been associated with hemolysis frequency [26]. In this study, we randomly selected 901 lipemic serum samples from 1,022 lipemic patients in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery. We reviewed electronic medical records, and the results indicated that the proportion of patients who received parenteral nutrition solution (containing amino acids and fat emulsion) before or after surgery was 79.4% (715/901). Therefore, our data revealed that the most common causes of the markedly elevated lipemic index in Gastrointestinal Surgery were lipid emulsions before or after surgery. Currently, the management of lipemic specimens in the clinical laboratory is not standardized, and analytical methods for measuring lipemia are also heterogeneous [27]. Thus, the HIL index may provide more advice for further specimen preparation, especially the process of ultracentrifugation of lipid specimens to provide more accurate results to the clinical laboratory and benefit patients [28].
Icterus is a yellowish pigmentation of the skin and mucous membrane, mainly caused by an increased bilirubin level and its overproduction in the liver. Neonatal jaundice is a relatively prevalent disease in neonates, and more than half of newborns and 80% of preterm children develop clinical symptoms of jaundice [29]. Neonatal jaundice occurs mainly in premature infants, and the main clinical manifestations are yellow stains on the sclera, skin, and mucosa membranes of infants. This study found that the Neonatology department had the highest incidence of icterus (30.1%), similar to the previous report in Turkish, 31% [30]. Many pathogenic processes can cause jaundice, especially sepsis, hepatic necrosis, intrahepatic biliary obstruction, and alcoholic liver disease [31, 32]. Commonly, jaundice is a late event in the course of severe sepsis, whereas it can appear at an early stage of sepsis, even in the absence of fever or leukocytosis [33]. The incidence of jaundice was approximately 34% in septic patients, and the overall mortality rate of these patients was 61% [34]. Bile duct tumor thrombus is a significant cause of hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with obstructive jaundice, and its incidence is 1.2% to 9.0% [35]. This study found that the Infectious Diseases department and Hepatology Surgery department caused a high incidence of icterus, ranging from 13.6% to 16.7%, similar to previous studies.
Automated biochemical analyzers and reagents were recently used to minimize HIL interferences, whereas the results were not satisfying. Typically, a sample should be rejected when there is a high risk of reporting an unreliable result [9]. However, blood collection or re-correction is challenging in clinical practice, especially in newborns, young children, and other patients whose venous access is difficult (i.e., elderly or critically ill) [36, 37]. Therefore, educating doctors and nurses who collect the samples may minimize the frequency of unsuitable specimens. Besides, re-testing the specimens using another chemical analyzer or detection methods unaffected by the HIL may also minimize the hemolysis and icterus interference effects [38, 39].
This study has some limitations. Firstly, it is hard to ensure each specimen is fasting though we try our best to decrease the influence of diet for the measurements of routine serum biochemical specimens. Secondly, we did not assess the effect of hemolysis, lipemia, and jaundice on biochemical index results. Finally, we found that male patients had a significantly elevated incidence of hemolysis, lipemia, and icterus than female patients, whereas we cannot explain potential reasons and influence factors.
5. Conclusions
Our results indicated that the incidence of hemolysis, lipidemia and icterus was related to age, gender, transfer time, detection time, and patients’ department. The HIL index is a valuable tool for evaluating HIL incidence in fasting serum biochemistry specimens. These findings are crucial for estimating the accuracy of results and optimizing the whole analytical process to provide adequate quality assurance in laboratory tests.
Supporting information
S1 Data.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748.s001
(XLSX)
Citation: Tian G, Wu Y, Jin X, Zeng Z, Gu X, Li T, et al. (2022) The incidence rate and influence factors of hemolysis, lipemia, icterus in fasting serum biochemistry specimens. PLoS ONE 17(1): e0262748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262748
1. Asmelash D, Worede A, Teshome M. Extra-Analytical Clinical Laboratory Errors in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. EJIFCC. 2020; 31: 208–224. pmid:33061876
2. Vermeer HJ, Steen G, Naus A, Goevaerts B, Agricola PT, Schoenmakers C. Correction of patient results for Beckman Coulter LX-20 assays affected by interference due to hemoglobin, bilirubin or lipids: a practical approach. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007; 45:114–119. pmid:17243928
3. Monneret D, Mestari F, Atlan G, Corlouer C, Ramani Z, Jaffre J, et al. Hemolysis indexes for biochemical tests and immunoassays on Roche analyzers: determination of allowable interference limits according to different calculation methods. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015; 75:162–169. pmid:25608598
4. Epner PL, Gans JE, Graber ML. When diagnostic testing leads to harm: a new outcomes-based approach for laboratory medicine. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013; 22 Suppl 2: ii6–ii10. pmid:23955467
5. Lippi G, Luca Salvagno G, Blanckaert N, Giavarina D, Green S, Kitchen S, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the hemolysis index in automated clinical chemistry systems. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009; 47:934–939. pmid:19548845
6. Wan Azman WN, Omar J, Koon TS, Tuan Ismail TS. Hemolyzed Specimens: Major Challenge for Identifying and Rejecting Specimens in Clinical Laboratories. Oman Med J. 2019; 34:94–98. pmid:30918601
7. Glick MR, Ryder KW, Glick SJ, Woods JR. Unreliable visual estimation of the incidence and amount of turbidity, hemolysis, and icterus in serum from hospitalized patients. Clin Chem. 1989; 35:837–839. pmid:2720981
8. Birhanu MY, Workineh AA, Molla Y, Abebaw E, Arora A, Bazezew Y. Rate and Predictors of Neonatal Jaundice in Northwest Ethiopia: Prospective Cohort Study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14: 447–457. pmid:33654404
9. Shin DH, Kim J, Uh Y, Lee SI, Seo DM, Kim KS, et al. Development of an integrated reporting system for verifying hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia in clinical chemistry results. Ann Lab Med. 2014; 34: 307–312. pmid:24982836
10. Tóth J, Oláh AV, Petercsák T, Kovács T, Kappelmayer J. Detection of haemolysis, a frequent pre-analytical problem in the serum of newborns and adults. EJIFCC. 2020; 31: 6–14. pmid:32256284
11. Du Z, Liu J, Zhang H, Bao B, Zhao R, Jin Y. Determination of hemolysis index thresholds for biochemical tests on Siemens Advia 2400 chemistry analyzer. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019; 33:e22856. pmid:30779463
12. Njoroge SW, Nichols JH. Risk management in the clinical laboratory. Ann Lab Med. 2014; 34: 274–278. pmid:24982831
13. Van den Bossche D, Schiettecatte J, Vekens E, De Smet D, Gorus FK, Martens GA. Enzymatic pyruvate measurement by Cobas 6000 open channel assay. Clin Lab. 2012; 58:1091–1095. pmid:23163130
14. Agarwal S, Vargas G, Nordstrom C, Tam E, Buffone GJ, Devaraj S. Effect of interference from hemolysis, icterus and lipemia on routine pediatric clinical chemistry assays. Clin Chim Acta. 2015; 438: 241–245. pmid:25128720
15. Giménez-Marín A, Rivas-Ruiz F, Pérez-Hidalgo Mdel M, Molina-Mendoza P. Pre-analytical errors management in the clinical laboratory: a five-year study. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014; 24: 248–257. pmid:24969918
16. Tolan NV, Kaleta EJ, Fang JL, Colby CE, Carey WA, Karon BS, et al. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Quality Initiative: Identifying Pre-analytical Variables Contributing to Specimen Hemolysis and Measuring the Impact of Evidence-Based Practice Interventions. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016; 146:113–118. pmid:27357290
17. Streichert T, Otto B, Schnabel C, Nordholt G, Haddad M, Maric M, et al. Determination of hemolysis thresholds by the use of data loggers in pneumatic tube systems. Clin Chem. 2011; 57:1390–1397. pmid:21836074
18. Lippi G, Plebani M, Di Somma S, Cervellin G. Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2011; 48:143–153. pmid:21875312
19. Bush RA, Mueller T, Sumwalt B, Cox SA, Hilfiker ML. Assessing pediatric trauma specimen integrity. Clin Lab Sci. 2010; 23: 219–222. pmid:21140795
20. Strauss RG, Bell EF, Snyder EL, Elbert C, Crawford G, Floss A, et al. Effects of environmental warming on blood components dispensed in syringes for neonatal transfusions. J Pediatr. 1986; 109:109–113. pmid:3723229
21. Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, Green S, Kitchen S, Palicka V, et al. Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008; 46:764–772. pmid:18601596
22. Nikolac N. Lipemia: causes, interference mechanisms, detection and management. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014; 24:57–67. pmid:24627715
23. Khasawneh W, Bani Hani S. Intravenous Lipid Emulsion Overdose in Infancy: A Case Report and Overview of Opportunities, Challenges and Prevention. Drug Saf Case Rep. 2018; 5:13. pmid:29556886
24. Fahr A, Liu X. Drug delivery strategies for poorly water-soluble drugs. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2007; 4: 403–416. pmid:17683253
25. Zamani GR, Mohammadi M, Ashrafi MR, Karimi P, Mahmoudi M, Badv RS, et al. The effects of classic ketogenic diet on serum lipid profile in children with refractory seizures. Acta Neurol Belg. 2016; 116: 529–534. pmid:26791878
26. Dimeski G, Mollee P, Carter A. Increased lipid concentration is associated with increased hemolysis. Clin Chem. 2005; 51: 2425. pmid:16306120
27. Nikolac N, Simundic AM, Miksa M, Lima-Oliveira G, Salvagno GL, Caruso B, et al. Heterogeneity of manufacturers’ declarations for lipemia interference—an urgent call for standardization. Clin Chim Acta. 2013; 426: 33–40. pmid:23981842
28. Mainali S, Davis SR, Krasowski MD. Frequency and causes of lipemia interference of clinical chemistry laboratory tests. Pract Lab Med. 2017; 8:1–9. pmid:28856220
29. Mitra S, Rennie J. Neonatal jaundice: aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2017; 78:699–704. pmid:29240507
30. Sarici SU. Incidence and etiology of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. J Trop Pediatr. 2010; 56:128–129. pmid:19502601
31. Singh V, Bhalla A, Sharma N, Mahi SK, Lal A, Singh P. Pathophysiology of jaundice in amoebic liver abscess. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008; 78:556–559. pmid:18385348
32. Janghel V, Patel P, Chandel SS. Plants used for the treatment of icterus (jaundice) in Central India: A review. Ann Hepatol. 2019; 18:658–672. pmid:31178344
33. Famularo G, De Simone C, Nicotra GC. Jaundice and the sepsis syndrome: a neglected link. Eur J Intern Med. 2003; 14:269–271. pmid:12919846
34. Wang D, Yin Y, Yao Y. Advances in sepsis-associated liver dysfunction. Burns Trauma. 2014; 2:97–105. pmid:27602369
35. Peng BG, Liang LJ, Li SQ, Zhou F, Hua YP, Luo SM. Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct tumor thrombi. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11:3966–3969. pmid:15991304
36. Meibohm B, Läer S, Panetta JC, Barrett JS. Population pharmacokinetic studies in pediatrics: issues in design and analysis. AAPS J. 2005; 7:E475–487. pmid:16353925
37. Brouillette RT, Waxman DH. Evaluation of the newborn’s blood gas status. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. Clin Chem. 1997; 43:215–221. pmid:8990256
38. Ji JZ, Meng QH. Evaluation of the interference of hemoglobin, bilirubin, and lipids on Roche Cobas 6000 assays. Clin Chimica Acta. 2011; 412:1550–1553.
39. Szoke D, Braga F, Valente C, Panteghini M. Hemoglobin, bilirubin, and lipid interference on Roche Cobas 6000 assays. Clin Chimica Acta. 2012, 413:339–341.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 Tian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Objective
Hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia (HIL) of blood samples have been a concern in hospitals because they reflect pre-analytical processes’ quality control. However, very few studies investigate the influence of patients’ gender, age, and department, as well as sample-related turnaround time, on the incidence rate of HIL in fasting serum biochemistry specimens.
Methods
A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted to investigate the incidence rate of HIL based on the HIL index in 501,612 fasting serum biochemistry specimens from January 2017 to May 2018 in a tertiary university hospital with 4,200 beds in Sichuan, southwest China. A subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the differences in the HIL incidence rate by gender, age and department of patients, and turnaround time of specimens.
Results
The incidence rate of hemolysis, lipemia and icterus was 384, 53, and 612 per 10,000 specimens. The male patients had a significantly elevated incidence of hemolysis (4.13% vs. 3.54%), lipemia (0.67% vs. 0.38%), and icterus (6.95% vs. 5.43%) than female patients. Hemolysis, lipemia, and icterus incidence rate were significantly associated with the male sex with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.174 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.140–1.208], 1.757 (95%CI: 1.623–1.903), and 1.303 (95%CI: 1.273–1.333), respectively, (P<0.05). The hospitalized patients had a higher incidence of hemolysis (4.03% vs. 3.54%), lipemia (0.63% vs. 0.36%), and icterus (7.10% vs. 4.75%) than outpatients (P<0.001). Specimens with relatively longer transfer time and/or detection time had a higher HIL incidence (P<0.001). The Pediatrics had the highest incidence of hemolysis (16.2%) with an adjusted OR (AOR) of 4.93 (95%CI, 4.59–5.29, P<0.001). The Neonatology department had the highest icterus incidence (30.1%) with an AOR of 4.93 (95%CI: 4.59–5.29, P<0.001). The Neonatology department (2.32%) and Gastrointestinal Surgery (2.05%) had the highest lipemia incidence, with an AOR of 1.17 (95%CI: 0.91–1.51) and 4.76 (95%CI: 4.70–5.53), both P-value <0.001. There was an increasing tendency of hemolysis and icterus incidence for children under one year or adults aged more than 40.
Conclusion
Evaluation of HIL incidence rate and HIL-related influence factors in fasting serum biochemistry specimens are impartment to interpret the results more accurately and provide better clinical services to patients.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer