It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aims
Elevated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the N‐terminal fragment of its pro‐hormone (NT‐proBNP) have become established biomarkers for heart failure and are associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Investigating sources of inter‐individual heterogeneity, particularly genetic factors, could help better identify patients at risk of future cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to estimate the heritability of circulating NT‐proBNP levels, to perform a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) and gene‐candidate analysis focused on NPPB–NPPA genes on these levels, and to examine their association with cardiovascular or metabolic outcomes.
Methods and results
A total of 1555 individuals from the STANISLAS study were included. The heritability of circulating NT‐proBNP levels was estimated at 15%, with seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reaching the significant threshold in the GWAS. All above SNPs were located on the same gene cluster constituted of MTHFR, CLCN6, NPPA, NPPB, and C1orf167. NPPA gene expression was also associated with NT‐proBNP levels. Moreover, six other SNPs from NPPA–NPPB genes were associated with diastolic function (lateral e′ on echocardiography) and metabolic features (glycated haemoglobin).
Conclusions
The heritability of natriuretic peptides appears relatively low (15%) and mainly based on the same gene cluster constituted of MTHFR, CLCN6, NPPA, NPPB, and C1orf167. Natriuretic peptide polymorphisms are associated with natriuretic peptide levels and diastolic function. These results suggest that natriuretic peptide polymorphisms may have an impact in the early stages of cardiovascular and metabolic disease.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Rouget, Raphaël 2 ; Vodovar, Nicolas 3 ; Le Floch, Edith 4 ; Dandine‐Roulland, Claire 4 ; Wagner, Sandra 1 ; Bacq‐Daian, Delphine 4 ; Thuillier, Quentin 2 ; Boivin, Jean‐Marc 2 ; Branlant, Christiane 2 ; Deleuze, Jean‐François 4 ; Behm‐Ansmant, Isabelle 2 ; Zannad, Faiez 1 ; Rossignol, Patrick 1 ; Girerd, Nicolas 1 1 Université de Lorraine, INSERM, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique 1433, INSERM 1116, CHRU de Nancy, FCRIN INI‐CRCT, Nancy, France
2 Université de Lorraine, CNRS, UMR 7365, IMoPA, Nancy, France
3 Inserm UMR‐S 942, Université de Paris, Paris, France
4 Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris‐Saclay, Evry, France





