It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The use of system dynamics as a learning tool for developing sustainable energy strategies and environmental education has advanced in recent years with the availability of new modelling software and webtools. Among the existing models, we highlight the online 2050 Calculators, which aim at simulating scenarios for greenhouse gas emissions, energy planning, sustainable land use, and food consumption. The objective of this study is to assess the available calculators and their contribution to an interdisciplinary education via systems thinking. We carried out a review of the existing models worldwide and ran some of the tools with students from three different postgraduate programmes at master’s level at Imperial College London (United Kingdom) and IFP School (France), whilst also assessing their individual views afterwards. The assessments were conducted once a year during three subsequent years: 2019, 2020, and 2021. The results are discussed under the epistemology of critical pedagogy, showing that the use of webtools, such as the 2050 Calculators, can significantly contribute to the students’ environmental awareness and political engagement, providing important lessons about the use of system dynamics for policy and science education.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X); Imperial College London, Centre for Environmental Policy, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111)
2 University of Brasilia (UnB), Institute of Physics, Brasilia, Brazil (GRID:grid.7632.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2238 5157)
3 University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), College of Engineering, El Paso, USA (GRID:grid.267324.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 0420)
4 Imperial College London, Centre for Environmental Policy, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111)