It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The human ability to adaptively implement a wide variety of tasks is thought to emerge from the dynamic transformation of cognitive information. We hypothesized that these transformations are implemented via conjunctive activations in “conjunction hubs”—brain regions that selectively integrate sensory, cognitive, and motor activations. We used recent advances in using functional connectivity to map the flow of activity between brain regions to construct a task-performing neural network model from fMRI data during a cognitive control task. We verified the importance of conjunction hubs in cognitive computations by simulating neural activity flow over this empirically-estimated functional connectivity model. These empirically-specified simulations produced above-chance task performance (motor responses) by integrating sensory and task rule activations in conjunction hubs. These findings reveal the role of conjunction hubs in supporting flexible cognitive computations, while demonstrating the feasibility of using empirically-estimated neural network models to gain insight into cognitive computations in the human brain.
The brain dynamically transforms cognitive information. Here the authors build task-performing, functioning neural network models of sensorimotor transformations constrained by human brain data without the use of typical deep learning techniques.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Rutgers University, Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Newark, USA (GRID:grid.430387.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8796); Rutgers University, Behavioral and Neural Sciences PhD Program, Newark, USA (GRID:grid.430387.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8796); Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, USA (GRID:grid.47100.32) (ISNI:0000000419368710)
2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786); Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786); Columbia University, Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, New York, USA (GRID:grid.21729.3f) (ISNI:0000000419368729)
3 Independent Researcher, San Diego, USA (GRID:grid.21729.3f)
4 University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, Lincoln, USA (GRID:grid.24434.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0060)
5 Rutgers University, Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Newark, USA (GRID:grid.430387.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8796)