Abstract

At-home sampling is key to large scale seroprevalence studies. Dried blood spot (DBS) self-sampling removes the need for medical personnel for specimen collection but facilitates specimen referral to an appropriately accredited laboratory for accurate sample analysis. To establish a highly sensitive and specific antibody assay that would facilitate self-sampling for prevalence and vaccine-response studies. Paired sera and DBS eluates collected from 439 sero-positive, 382 sero-negative individuals and DBS from 34 vaccine recipients were assayed by capture ELISAs for IgG and IgM antibody to SARS-CoV-2. IgG and IgM combined on DBS eluates achieved a diagnostic sensitivity of 97.9% (95%CI 96.6 to 99.3) and a specificity of 99.2% (95% CI 98.4 to 100) compared to serum, displaying limits of detection equivalent to 23 and 10 WHO IU/ml, respectively. A strong correlation (r = 0.81) was observed between serum and DBS reactivities. Reactivity remained stable with samples deliberately rendered inadequate, (p = 0.234) and when samples were accidentally damaged or ‘invalid’. All vaccine recipients were sero-positive. This assay provides a secure method for self-sampling by DBS with a sensitivity comparable to serum. The feasibility of DBS testing in sero-prevalence studies and in monitoring post-vaccine responses was confirmed, offering a robust and reliable tool for serological monitoring at a population level.

Details

Title
Simple, sensitive, specific self-sampling assay secures SARS-CoV-2 antibody signals in sero-prevalence and post-vaccine studies
Author
Khan, Maryam 1 ; Rosadas Carolina 1 ; Katsanovskaja Ksenia 1 ; Weber, Isaac D 1 ; Shute, Justin 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Ijaz Samreen 2 ; Marchesin Federica 1 ; McClure, Eleanor 1 ; Salem, Elias 1 ; Flower Barnaby 1 ; Gao, He 1 ; Quinlan, Rachael 1 ; Short, Charlotte 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Annachiara, Rosa 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Roustan Chloe 3 ; Maya, Moshe 1 ; Taylor, Graham P 4 ; Elliott, Paul 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Cooke, Graham S 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Cherepanov, Peter 3 ; Parker, Eleanor 1 ; McClure, Myra O 1 ; Tedder, Richard S 1 

 Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111) 
 Public Health England, London, UK (GRID:grid.271308.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 5909 016X) 
 Francis Crick Institute, London, UK (GRID:grid.451388.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1795 1830) 
 Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Paddington, London, UK (GRID:grid.417895.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0693 2181) 
 Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Paddington, London, UK (GRID:grid.417895.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0693 2181); Imperial College London, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, MRC Centre for Environment and Health, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); Imperial College London, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111) 
Publication year
2022
Publication date
2022
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2625125448
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.