It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The identification of movement and behaviour patterns, as well as inter- and intra-population connectivity is crucial in order to implement effective and functional management and conservation measures for threatened migratory species such as tope (Galeorhinus galeus). Yet, previous studies struggled to elucidate clear and consistent movement and depth usage patterns of adult tope in the Northeast Atlantic, suggesting a high plasticity in the migration and behaviour. We deployed pop-up satellite archival tags on adult tope during their seasonal summer aggregations in the inner German Bight of the south-eastern North Sea and near a presumed mating site in southwest Scotland. Depth distribution and migration pathways were derived from time series data with location processing. Four individuals followed migration trajectories leaving coastal areas and crossed the European shelf slope into oceanic areas of the Northeast Atlantic, remaining fully pelagic for the rest of the deployment duration. These sharks showed far-ranging migration trajectories and undertook regular and frequent diel vertical migrations, reaching daytime depths of over 700 m. Vertical migration patterns closely overlapped with biological mesopelagic habitat structures and closely tracked the diel migration of organisms from deep scattering layers derived from hydroacoustic recordings. It is hypothesized that adult tope regularly utilize oceanic habitats, foraging on mesopelagic layers in an environment generally considered of low prey density.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Bremerhaven, Germany (GRID:grid.11081.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0550 8217)
2 Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Bremerhaven, Germany (GRID:grid.11081.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0550 8217); University of California, San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242)
3 Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Helgoland, Germany (GRID:grid.10894.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 1033 7684)
4 Centro Oceanográfico de Baleares (IEO, CSIC), Palma de Mallorca, Spain (GRID:grid.4711.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2183 4846)
5 Wageningen Marine Research (WMR), Ijmuiden, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666)
6 University of St. Andrews, Coastal Resource Management Group, Scottish Oceans Institute, St. Andrews, UK (GRID:grid.11914.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0721 1626)