It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aims
Heart failure (HF) involves complex remodelling leading to electrical and mechanical dysfunction. We hypothesized that machine learning approaches incorporating data obtained from different investigative modalities including atrial and ventricular measurements from electrocardiography and echocardiography, blood inflammatory marker [neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR)], and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) will improve risk stratification for adverse outcomes in HF compared to logistic regression.
Methods and results
Consecutive Chinese patients referred to our centre for transthoracic echocardiography and subsequently diagnosed with HF, between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016, were included in this study. Two machine learning techniques, multilayer perceptron and multi‐task learning, were compared with logistic regression for their ability to predict incident atrial fibrillation (AF), transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/stroke, and all‐cause mortality. This study included 312 HF patients [mean age: 64 (55–73) years, 75% male]. There were 76 cases of new‐onset AF, 62 cases of incident TIA/stroke, and 117 deaths during follow‐up. Univariate analysis revealed that age, left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) and contractile strain (LACS) were significant predictors of new‐onset AF. Age and smoking predicted incident stroke. Age, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, mitral or aortic regurgitation, P‐wave terminal force in V1, the presence of partial inter‐atrial block, left atrial diameter, ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, serum creatinine and albumin, high NLR, low PNI, and LARS and LACS predicted all‐cause mortality. Machine learning techniques achieved better prediction performance than logistic regression.
Conclusions
Multi‐modality assessment is important for risk stratification in HF. A machine learning approach provides additional value for improving outcome prediction.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Zhou, Jiandong 2 ; Woo, Samuel Won Dong 3 ; Ko, Ching Ho 3 ; Lai, Rachel Wing Chuen 3 ; Liu, Tong 4 ; Liu, Yingzhi 5 ; Leung, Keith Sai Kit 6 ; Li, Andrew 7 ; Lee, Sharen 3 ; Li, Ka Hou Christien 8 ; Lakhani, Ishan 4 ; Zhang, Qingpeng 2 1 Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic‐Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, GU2 7AL, Guildford, UK
2 School of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
3 Laboratory of Cardiovascular Physiology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Hong Kong, China
4 Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic‐Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
5 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
6 Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
7 Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
8 Faculty of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK





