Content area

Abstract

In this paper, we apply a skeletal frailty index (SFI) to a skeletal series representing two distinct socioeconomic (high and low) statuses living in London during the Postmedieval period and evaluate the biological impacts of social stratification considering the secularization hypothesis. In living populations, socioeconomic status (SES) is associated inversely with physiological and psychosomatic stress. While comparable links between SES and physiological stress are observed in archeological samples, bioarcheological research across Europe indicates skeletal “health” and frailty do not always adhere to this pattern. We compare 11-biomarker SFIs between ascribed high (Chelsea Old Church, N = 66; St. Bride’s Crypt, N = 111) and low (St. Bride’s Lower, N = 174) SES contexts. Results show significant differences in SFIs between socioeconomic groups in Postmedieval London, differences explained in part by both status and age. SFIs increase monotonically and significantly from the youngest to oldest age groups with males demonstrating significantly higher frailty scores than females overall, but not within SES groups. Between status groups, intrasexual disparities in frailty were significant only in male subgroups, with low-SES males exhibiting significantly higher SFI than high-SES males. Significantly higher skeletal frailty was observed in the low-SES St. Bride’s Lower sample, with notably higher frequencies of periosteal new bone, fractures, and osteoarthritis relative to high-SES samples. However, frailty disparities within the high-SES sample demonstrate how variability in health and mortality exists even within socioeconomic strata. Results allude to complex, multifactorial relationships among status, age, sex, and frailty across Postmedieval London’s socioeconomic settings, challenging frailty expectations of the secularization hypothesis.

Details

Title
Highs and lows of frailty: skeletal frailty differentials among socioeconomic groups in Postmedieval London
Author
Marklein, Kathryn E. 1 ; Crews, Douglas E. 2 

 University of Louisville, Department of Anthropology, Louisville, USA (GRID:grid.266623.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 1622); University of Louisville, Center for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, Louisville, USA (GRID:grid.266623.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 1622) 
 The Ohio State University, Department of Anthropology, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.261331.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 7943); The Ohio State University, School of Public Health, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.261331.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 7943) 
Pages
43
Publication year
2022
Publication date
Mar 2022
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
18669557
e-ISSN
18669565
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2628213322
Copyright
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022.