1. Introduction
In convex functions theory, the Hermite–Hadamard (HH) inequality is very important, which was discovered by C. Hermite and J. Hadamard independently (see [1] (p. 137)).
(1)
where is a convex function. In the case of concave mappings, the above inequality is satisfied in reverse order. For more recent refinements of Inequality (1), one can consult [2,3].On the other hand, several works in the field of q-analysis are being carried out, beginning with Euler, in order to achieve mastery of the mathematics that drives quantum computing. The link between physics and mathematics is referred to as q-calculus. It has a wide range of applications in mathematics, including number theory, combinatorics, orthogonal polynomials, basic hypergeometric functions, and other disciplines, as well as mechanics, relativity theory, and quantum theory [4,5]. Quantum calculus also has many applications in quantum information theory, which is an interdisciplinary area that encompasses computer science, information theory, philosophy, and cryptography, among other areas [6,7]. Euler is thought to be the inventor of this significant branch of mathematics. In Newton’s work on infinite series, he used the q-parameter. Jackson [8,9] was the first to present the q-calculus, who knew calculus without limits in a methodical manner. In 1966, Al-Salam [10] introduced a q-analogue of the q-fractional integral and q-Riemann–Liouville fractional. Since then, the related research has gradually increased. In particular, in 2013, Tariboon introduced the -difference operator and -integral in [11]. In 2020, Bermudo et al. introduced the notion of the -derivative and -integral in [12]. Sadjang generalized to quantum calculus and introduced the notions of post-quantum calculus or simply -calculus in [13]. Soontharanon et al. [14] studied the concepts of fractional -calculus later on. In [15], Tunç and Göv gave the post-quantum variant of the -difference operator and -integral. Recently, in 2021, Chu et al. introduced the notions of the -derivative and -integral in [16].
Many integral inequalities have been studied using quantum and post-quantum integrals for various types of functions. For example, in [17,18,19,20,21,22], the authors used -derivatives and -integrals to prove HH integral inequalities and their left-right estimates for convex and coordinated convex functions. In [23], Noor et al. presented a generalized version of quantum integral inequalities. For generalized quasi-convex functions, Nwaeze et al. proved certain parameterized quantum integral inequalities in [24]. Khan et al. proved the quantum HH inequality using the Green function in [25]. Budak et al. [26], Ali et al. [27], and Vivas-Cortez et al. [28] developed new quantum Simpson and quantum Newton-type inequalities for convex and coordinated convex functions. For quantum Ostrowski inequalities for convex and coordinated convex functions, one can consult [29,30]. Kunt et al. [31] generalized the results of [19] and proved HH-type inequalities and their left estimates using the -difference operator and -integral. Recently, Latif et al. [32] found the right estimates of the HH-type inequalities proven by Kunt et al. [31]. To prove Ostrowski’s inequalities, Chu et al. [16] used the concepts of the -difference operator and -integral. Recently, Vivas-Cortez et al. [33] generalized the results of [12] and proved the HH-type inequalities and their left estimates using the -difference operator and -integral.
Inspired by the ongoing studies, we use the -integral to develop some new post-quantum midpoint-type inequalities for -differentiable convex functions. We also show that the newly developed inequalities are extensions of some previously known inequalities.
The following is the structure of this paper: Section 2 provides a brief overview of the fundamentals of q-calculus, as well as other related studies in this field. In Section 3, we go over the concepts of -calculus, as well as some recent research in this field. The midpoint-type inequalities for twice -differentiable functions via -integrals are described in Section 4. The relationship between the findings reported here and similar findings in the literature is also taken into account. Section 5 concludes with some recommendations for future research.
2. Quantum Derivatives and Integrals
In this portion, we recall a few known definitions in q-calculus. Throughout the paper, we use real numbers p and q such that Set the following notation (see [5]):
The q-Jackson integral of a mapping from zero to was given by Jackson [9], which is defined as:
(2)
provided that the sum converges absolutely. Moreover, over the interval he gave the following integral of a mapping :([11]). The -derivative of mapping is defined as:
(3)
For , we state if it exists and it is finite.
([12]). The -derivative of mapping is given as:
(4)
For , we state if it exists and it is finite.
([11]). The -definite integral of mapping on is defined as:
(5)
On the other side, the following concept of the q-definite integral was stated by Bermudo et al. [12]:
([12]). The -definite integral of mapping on is given as:
(6)
3. Post-Quantum Derivatives and Integrals
In this section, we review some fundamental notions and notations of -calculus.
We set the notation (see [13]):
The , and are called the ()-factorial, ()-binomial and -power, respectively, and are expressed as (see [13]):
and:([13]). The -derivative of mapping is given as:
(7)
([15]). The -derivative of mapping is given as:
(8)
For , we state if it exists and it is finite.
([16]). The -derivative of mapping is given as:
(9)
For , we state if it exists and it is finite.
It is clear that if we use in (8) and (9), then the equalities (8) and (9) reduce to (3) and (4), respectively.
([13]). The definite ()-integral of mapping Π on is stated as:
(10)
Moreover, the definite ()-integral of mapping Π on is stated as:
([15]). The definite ()-integral of mapping on is stated as:
(11)
([16]). The definite ()-integral of mapping on is stated as:
(12)
It is evident that if we pick in (11) and (12), then the equalities (11) and (12) change into (5) and (6), respectively.
If we take and in (11), then we have:
Similarly, by taking and in (12), then we obtain that:
([33]). We have the following equalities:
where4. Post-Quantum Midpoint-Type Inequalities
In this section, we prove some new midpoint-type inequalities for twice--differentiable mappings via the -integral.
Let us begin with the following lemma.
Let be a -differentiable function on the interior of I. If is continuous and integrable on then the following equality holds:
(13)
Consider from Definition 7:
From Definition 8, we have:
We calculate the integrals and by using the Definition 10. Let us consider:
Now, consider:
Thus, the proof is complete. □
In Lemma 2, if we set , then we obtain the following identity:
This was proven by Ali et al. in [18] (Lemma 5).
Suppose that the assumptions of Lemma 2 hold. If is convex on then we have the inequality:
(14)
where:
By taking the modulus of (13), we have:
Now, by using the convexity of we have:
(15)
Now, we compute the integrals appearing on the right side of (15) using Lemma 1. We have:
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
Thus, we obtain the required inequality (14) by using the calculated integrals (16)–(19) in (15). □
In Theorem 1, if we set , then we obtain the following inequality:
This was proven by Ali et al. [18] (Theorem 3).
Suppose that the assumptions of Lemma 2 hold. If , is convex on then we have the inequality:
where:
By taking the modulus of (13) and applying the power mean inequality, we have:
Applying the convexity of , , we have:
Thus, the proof is complete. □
In Theorem 2, if we set , then Theorem 2 becomes Theorem 5 in [18].
Suppose that the assumptions of Lemma 2 hold. If , is convex on then we have the inequality:
where
and:
By taking the modulus of (13) and applying Hölder’s inequality, we have:
Applying the convexity of , , we have:
Thus, the proof is complete. □
In Theorem 3, if we set , then Theorem 3 becomes Theorem 4 in [18].
5. Concluding Remarks
In this work, we established some new midpoint-type -integral inequalities for twice--differentiable convex functions. In the last twenty-five years, quantum calculus (or q-calculus) has served as a link between mechanics and physics. Physicists make up the majority of scientists who utilize q-calculus today. Many scientists, in fact, employ q-calculus as a mathematical model in their studies. In the theory of quantum gravity, q can be thought of as a parameter connected to the exponential of the cosmological constant. Quantum gravity can be divided into two types:
(i). There is no gravity when , which is the situation of classical quantum mechanics;
(ii). When , we have quantum mechanics, in which the energy density of the vacuum is non-zero.
Other areas of study in physics and related fields where q-calculus is being employed include: (1) the q-Coulomb problem and the q-hydrogen atom; (2) quantum hydrodynamics; (3) the Wess–Zumino model; (4) string theory; (5) Electroweak interaction; (6) Knot theory; (7) quantum cardiodynamics; (8) special relativity; (9) Newtonian quantum gravity; (10) quantum field theory; (11) elementary particle physics and chemical physics; (12) molecular and nuclear spectroscopy; (13) general relativity.
For several other applications of q-calculus in physics, one can read [4]. A good book on “Quantum Gravity” [34] is recommended for those interested in these topics. The fact that fluid dynamics resemble quantum physics is no coincidence. In truth, quantum physics and classical physics can both reflect various parts of the same physical process; for example, see [35].
Conceptualization, T.S., G.M., M.A.A., C.P., I.B.S. and P.A.; methodology, T.S., G.M., M.A.A., C.P., I.B.S. and P.A.; validation, T.S., G.M., M.A.A., C.P., I.B.S. and P.A.; investigation, T.S., G.M., M.A.A., C.P., I.B.S. and P.A.; writing—original draft preparation, T.S., G.M., M.A.A., C.P., I.B.S. and P.A.; writing—review and editing, T.S., G.M., M.A.A., C.P., I.B.S. and P.A.; supervision, T.S. and M.A.A.; funding acquisition, T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research was funded by King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Contract No. KMUTNB-63-KNOW-22.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
We thank the Referees and Editor for their valuable comments. The third author is thankful to Ch. Sohail Tariq (Project Director GCUF Sahiwal Campus) and Ch. Faraz Hanif (Project Director GCUF Sahiwal Campus) for providing good research environment at GCUF Sahiwal Campus.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
1. Pečarić, J.E.; Proschan, F.; Tong, Y.L. Convex Functions, Partial Orderings and Statistical Applications; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1992.
2. Khan, M.B.; Zaini, H.G.; Treanta, S.; Soliman, M.S.; Nanlaopon, K. Riemann-Liouville Fractional Integral Inequalities for Generalized Pre=Invex Functions of Interval-Valued Settings Based upon Pseudo Order Relation. Mathematics; 2022; 10, 204. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math10020204]
3. Khan, M.B.; Treanta, S.; Soliman, M.S.; Zaini, H.G.; Nanlaopon, K. Some Hadamard-Fejer Type Inequalities for LR-Convex Interval-Valued Functions. Fractal Fract.; 2022; 6, 6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6010006]
4. Ernst, T. A Comprehensive Treatment of q-Calculus; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2012.
5. Kac, V.; Cheung, P. Quantum Calculus; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001.
6. Benatti, F.; Fannes, M.; Floreanini, R.; Petritis, D. Quantum Information, Computation and Cryptography: An Introductory Survey of Theory, Technology and Experiments; Springer Science and Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010.
7. Bokulich, A.; Jaeger, G. Philosophy of Quantum Information Theory and Entaglement; Cambridge Uniersity Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010.
8. Ernst, T. The History of Q-Calculus And New Method; Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2000.
9. Jackson, F.H. On a q-definite integrals. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math.; 1910; 41, pp. 193-203.
10. Al-Salam, W. Some fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc.; 1966; 15, pp. 135-140. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0013091500011469]
11. Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. Quantum calculus on finite intervals and applications to impulsive difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ.; 2013; 2013, pp. 1-19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-282]
12. Bermudo, S.; Kórus, P.; Valdés, J.N. On q-Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for general convex functions. Acta Math. Hung.; 2020; 162, pp. 364-374. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10474-020-01025-6]
13. Sadjang, P.N. On the fundamental theorem of (p,q)-calculus and some (p,q)-Taylor formulas. Results Math.; 2018; 73, pp. 1-21.
14. Soontharanon, J.; Sitthiwirattham, T. On Fractional (p,q)-Calculus. Adv. Differ. Equ.; 2020; 2020, pp. 1-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-2512-7]
15. Tunç, M.; Göv, E. Some integral inequalities via (p,q)-calculus on finite intervals. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll.; 2016; 19, pp. 1-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2298/FIL2105421T]
16. Chu, Y.-M.; Awan, M.U.; Talib, S.; Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I. New post quantum analogues of Ostrowski-type inequalities using new definitions of left–right (p,q)-derivatives and definite integrals. Adv. Differ. Equ.; 2020; 2020, pp. 1-15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03094-x]
17. Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Abbas, M.; Chu, Y.-M. Quantum Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for functions with convex absolute values of second qb-derivatives. Adv. Differ. Equ.; 2021; 2021, pp. 1-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03163-1]
18. Ali, M.A.; Alp, N.; Budak, H.; Chu, Y.-M.; Zhang, Z. On some new quantum midpoint type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable convex functions. Open Math.; 2021; 19, pp. 427-439. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/math-2021-0015]
19. Alp, N.; Sarikaya, M.Z.; Kunt, M.; İşcan, İ. q-Hermite Hadamard inequalities and quantum estimates for midpoint type inequalities via convex and quasi-convex functions. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci.; 2018; 30, pp. 193-203. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2016.09.007]
20. Budak, H. Some trapezoid and midpoint type inequalities for newly defined quantum integrals. Proyecciones; 2021; 40, pp. 199-215. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22199/issn.0717-6279-2021-01-0013]
21. Budak, H.; Ali, M.A.; Tarhanaci, M. Some new quantum Hermite–Hadamard-like inequalities for coordinated convex functions. J. Optim. Theory Appl.; 2020; 186, pp. 899-910. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10957-020-01726-6]
22. Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I.; Awan, M.U. Some quantum estimates for Hermite–Hadamard inequalities. Appl. Math. Comput.; 2015; 251, pp. 675-679. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.11.090]
23. Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I.; Awan, M.U. Some quantum integral inequalities via preinvex functions. Appl. Math. Comput.; 2015; 269, pp. 242-251. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.07.078]
24. Nwaeze, E.R.; Tameru, A.M. New parameterized quantum integral inequalities via η-quasiconvexity. Adv. Differ. Equ.; 2019; 2019, pp. 1-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2358-z]
25. Khan, M.A.; Noor, M.; Nwaeze, E.R.; Chu, Y.-M. Quantum Hermite–Hadamard inequality by means of a Green function. Adv. Differ. Equ.; 2020; 2020, pp. 1-20.
26. Budak, H.; Erden, S.; Ali, M.A. Simpson and Newton type inequalities for convex functions via newly defined quantum integrals. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci.; 2020; 44, pp. 378-390. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.6742]
27. Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Zhang, Z.; Yildrim, H. Some new Simpson’s type inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions in quantum calculus. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci.; 2021; 44, pp. 4515-4540. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.7048]
28. Vivas-Cortez, M.; Ali, M.A.; Kashuri, A.; Sial, I.B.; Zhang, Z. Some New Newton’s Type Integral Inequalities for Co-Ordinated Convex Functions in Quantum Calculus. Symmetry; 2020; 12, 1476. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym12091476]
29. Ali, M.A.; Chu, Y.-M.; Budak, H.; Akkurt, A.; Yildrim, H. Quantum variant of Montgomery identity and Ostrowski-type inequalities for the mappings of two variables. Adv. Differ. Equ.; 2021; 2021, pp. 1-26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03195-7]
30. Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Akkurt, A.; Chu, Y.-M. Quantum Ostrowski type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable functions in quantum calculus. Open Math.; 2021; 19, pp. 440-449. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/math-2021-0020]
31. Kunt, M.; İşcan, İ.; Alp, N.; Sarikaya, M.Z. (p,q)-Hermite–Hadamard inequalities and (p,q)-estimates for midpoint inequalities via convex quasi-convex functions. Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Físicas Nat. Ser. A Matemáticas; 2018; 112, pp. 969-992. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13398-017-0402-y]
32. Latif, M.A.; Kunt, M.; Dragomir, S.S.; İşcan, İ. Post-quantum trapezoid type inequalities. AIMS Math.; 2020; 5, pp. 4011-4026. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2020258]
33. Vivas-Cortez, M.; Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Kalsoom, H.; Agarwal, P. Some New Hermite–Hadamard and Related Inequalities for Convex Functions via (p,q)-Integral. Entropy; 2021; 23, 828. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23070828] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209714]
34. Rovelli, C. Quantum Gravity; Cambridge Monograph on Mathematical Physics Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004.
35. Sengar, R.S.; Sharma, M.; Trivedi, A. Fractional calculus applied in solving instability phenomenon in fluid dynamics. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol.; 2015; 6, pp. 34-44.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
In this study, first we establish a
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Mathematics Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok 10300, Thailand
2 Department of Mathematics, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54700, Pakistan;
3 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for NSLSCS, School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
4 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand;
5 School of Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China;
6 Department of Mathematics, Anand International College of Engineering, Jaipur 302020, India;