It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
A clearer understanding of the prognostic implications of t(11;14) in multiple myeloma (MM) is needed to inform current and future therapeutic options. We utilized real-world data from a US database to examine treatment patterns and outcomes in patients by t(11;14) status compared with high- and standard-risk subgroups across different lines of therapy (LoT). This retrospective, observational cohort study used de-identified patient-level information from adults with MM and first-line treatment initiation between January 2011 and January 2020, followed until February 2020. The high-risk cohort comprised patients with high-risk genetic abnormalities per mSMART criteria (including those with co-occurring t(11;14)). Among 6138 eligible patients, 6137, 3160, and 1654 received first-, second-, and third-line treatments, respectively. Of 645 patients who had t(11;14), 69.1% had t(11;14) alone, while 30.9% had co-occurring high-risk abnormalities. Altogether, 1624 and 2544 patients were classified as high- and standard-risk, respectively. In the absence of biomarker-driven therapy, treatment patterns remain similar across LoT in high-risk, t(11;14)+, and standard-risk subgroups. Across all LoT, patient outcomes in the high-risk subgroup were less favorable than those in the t(11;14)+ and standard-risk subgroups. Thus, there is an opportunity for novel therapeutics targeted to t(11;14) and other defined subgroups to personalize MM therapy and optimize patient outcomes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Levine Cancer Institute-Morehead (Hematology), Charlotte, USA (GRID:grid.468189.a)
2 Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, UK (GRID:grid.419227.b)
3 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland (GRID:grid.417570.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0374 1269)
4 Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, USA (GRID:grid.418158.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0534 4718)
5 AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.431072.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0572 4227)
6 Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, USA (GRID:grid.418158.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0534 4718); Imago BioSciences, South San Francisco, USA (GRID:grid.418158.1)
7 Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA (GRID:grid.417467.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0443 9942)