Abstract
Gamification refers to the attempt to transform different kinds of systems to be able to better invoke positive experiences such as the flow state. However, the ability of such intervention to invoke flow state is commonly believed to depend on several moderating factors including the user’s traits. Currently, there is a dearth of research on the effect of user traits on the results of gamification. Gamer types (personality traits related to gaming styles and preferences) are considered some of the most relevant factors affecting the individual’s susceptibility to gamification. Therefore, in this study we investigate how gamer types from the BrainHex taxonomy (achiever, conqueror, daredevil, mastermind, seeker, socializer and survivor) moderate the effects of personalized/non-personalized gamification on users’ flow experience (challenge-skill balance, merging of action and awareness, clear goals, feedback, concentration, control, loss of self-consciousness and autotelic experience), enjoyment, perception of gamification and motivation. We conducted a mixed factorial within-subject experiment involving 121 elementary school students comparing a personalized version against a non-personalized version of a gamified education system. There were no main effects between personalization and students’ flow experience, perception of gamification and motivation, and enjoyment. Our results also indicate patterns of characteristics that can lead students to the high flow experience (e.g., those who prefer to play multiplayer have a high flow experience in both personalized and non-personalized versions). Based on our results, we provided recommendations to advance the design of gamifed educational systems.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Hamari Juho 2
; Sivaldo, Joaquim 3
; Toda, Armando M 4
; Palomino, Paula T 5
; Vassileva Julita 6
; Isotani Seiji 5
1 University of São Paulo, Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, São Carlos, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722); Tampere University, Gamification Group, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere, Finland (GRID:grid.502801.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2314 6254)
2 Tampere University, Gamification Group, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere, Finland (GRID:grid.502801.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2314 6254)
3 Federal University of Alagoas, Education Center, Maceió, Brazil (GRID:grid.411179.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2154 120X)
4 University of São Paulo, Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, São Carlos, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722); Durham University, Department of Computer Science, Durham, UK (GRID:grid.8250.f) (ISNI:0000 0000 8700 0572)
5 University of São Paulo, Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, São Carlos, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722)
6 University of Saskatchewan, Department of Computer Science, Saskatoon, Canada (GRID:grid.25152.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2154 235X)




