Analyzing Machine Learning Enabled Fake News Detection Techniques for Diversified Datasets

Abstract

Fake news, or fabric which appeared to be untrue with point of deceiving the open, has developed in ubiquity in current a long time. Spreading this kind of data undermines societal cohesiveness and well by cultivating political division and doubt in government. Since of the sheer volume of news being disseminated through social media, human confirmation has ended up incomprehensible, driving to the improvement and arrangement of robotized strategies for the recognizable proof of wrong news. Fake news publishers use a variety of stylistic techniques to boost the popularity of their works, one of which is to arouse the readers’ emotions. Due to this, text analytics’ sentiment analysis, which determines the polarity and intensity of feelings conveyed in a text, is now being utilized in false news detection methods, as either the system’s foundation or as a supplementary component. This assessment analyzes the full explanation of false news identification. The study also emphasizes characteristics, features, taxonomy, different sorts of data in the news, categories of false news, and detection approaches for spotting fake news. This research recognized fake news using the probabilistic latent semantic analysis approach. In particular, the research describes the fundamental theory of the related work to provide a deep comparative analysis of various literature works that has contributed to this topic. Besides this, a comparison of different machine learning and deep learning techniques is done to assess the performance for fake news detection. For this purpose, three datasets have been used.

This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

1. Introduction

Fake news detection (FND) has recently picked the attention of a large number of academics, with many sociological studies demonstrating the effect of fake news and how people respond to it. To describe fake news as any material capable of making readers believe in information that is not real, one must first define what false news is [1]. Spreading false news widely harms society and the person. Initially, this kind of false news has the potential to change or destroy the authenticity balance in the news ecosystem. Because of the features of fake news, people are coerced into accepting incorrect or skewed ideas they would otherwise reject [2]. Political messages or influence is often communicated via the use of false news and propagandists [3]. Fake news has a lasting impact on how people interact with and react to genuine news this. To reduce the harmful impacts of false news, it is critical to develop a system that can automatically detect it when it appears on social media [4]. However, there are several difficult research issues with fake news detection on different social platforms. A variety of research objectives observed in this regard includes the identification of the source of origin or uploading of the particular news or data on the social network, to understand the actual intention or meaning of the data uploaded and to determine the extent of authenticity and validate it to make decision so as to consider it as genuine or fake. The peculiarities of news make automated fake news detection a difficult task. To begin with, readers are duped by false news, making it impossible to tell the difference between real and fraudulent information [5].

When it comes to fake news, there is a wide range of formats and subjects to choose from. These false reports attempted to distort the facts by using various language approaches [6]. Existing knowledge bases fail to validate false news effectively when it is linked to time-critical events because there are not enough supporting claims or facts to back them up [7]. The data (i.e., unstructured, noisy, unfinished, and large data) generated by false news is also on social media [8]. Researchers have attempted in recent years to uncover problems with false news, their trustworthiness on social media, especially Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, and television [9]. Data are used to evaluate political/product views, user emotions, natural phenomena in process, global events, and satisfaction with health care service consumers [10]. Due to these network interactions, it is possible to extract valuable post features while also taking advantage of the network’s interactions. Fake news has characteristics, kinds, and detection methods, and all of which are discussed in this study. Further research on fake news detection apps will be guided by appropriate explanations regarding false news. The benefits and limits of conventional fake news detection are addressed, as well as the difficulties posed by false news on social media. However, there are several problems with the fake news detection social media presence that need additional study. This analysis will ultimately help in the selection of appropriate techniques to be applied for identification of the fake data from the corresponding real time social media dataset globally and will make the users well aware while sharing information and communicating during using variety of social media platforms.

1.1. Need and Motivation

There is a vital need to deal with the fake data spread across online platforms since it creates hassles for users in terms of rumors, identity theft, lack of authenticity and confidentiality, fake profiles etc. The dissemination of false information through social media as possible undermines trust in the news ecosystem, harms the reputations of individuals and organizations, and causes fear in the public at large, all of which have the potential to undermine societal stability. False news that has been generated is very difficult to spot since the terminology used in the news is comparable to that used in real news, and fake news is produced with the goal of instilling confidence in the public. As a result, false news identification is required.

1.2. Challenges

The most difficult aspect of detecting false news is determining whether or not a bit of information is based on factual facts. A fact is merely a fundamental notion made up of anything that has occurred at some point in the past, someplace, and eventually with or to someone. Recognizing the importance of information does not appear to be something computers should be able to accomplish easily if they are given total control over what information is delivered to whom, when, and through what channel. This is important us numerous social media posts follow the fundamental idea of describing something. So it is necessary to collect the journalistic criteria core.

2. Fake News Detection

2.1. Definition

Fake news is deliberately written misleading material meant to deceive the public. Authenticity and purpose are the two most important aspects of this concept. Fake news has two characteristics: firstly, it contains incorrect material that could be confirmed as such, but secondly, it is produced with the dishonest goal of misleading readers. The distribution of false material through social media may have important implications, such weakening public faith in the news ecosystem, hurting an individual’s or organization’s reputation, or causing fear among the general public, all of which can affect society’s stability. The data may be represented as a collection of tuples consisting of headlines and text from a certain number of news articles, with $A=A^H,A^T$. It determines not whether a piece of info is fake in the fake news identification issue [11].

The methods used to manipulate information differentiate real news from fake news. Alternatively, news material may use deceptive tactics such as fabricating facts to make the customer believe something they do not want to believe. It is also possible to impose material that seems to be from reputable sources, but the sources are not. Additionally, fraudulent features of fake news include the use of altered material, such as headlines and pictures that do not match the information delivered or the contextualization of fake news using real components and information but in a misleading context (Table 1).

Table 1

Seven types of fake news [12].

S. no.	Type	Details
1.	False connection	If the information is not supported by the headlines, images, or captions.
2.	False context	If authentic material is accompanied by erroneous metadata.
3.	Manipulated content	Real info or images that has been tampered with to mislead the public.
4.	Satire	No malicious purpose, yet it has the ability to deceive.
5.	$\ast$Misleading content	Using information to help clarify a problem.
6.	Imposter content	If real sources are impersonated.
7.	Fabricated content	New material which is blatantly misleading and intended to hurt people.

2.2. Types

Fake news detection may be split into three categories as follows:

(a) Fabrication: fabricated news is a deliberate omission of information that typically only comes from a single source. The source is likely aware of the story’s inaccuracy. Clickbait is critical to the success of fake news stories

(b) Hoax: this kind of reporting employs more complex deception techniques to mislead the public. Multiple outlets disseminate fake news. It is possible that some people consider the tale to be real. This kind of news may be found on a variety of sites, such as the fake news about Donald Trump that circulated throughout the election on different social media platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, and blogs, so the general public is more likely to believe it

(c) Satire: faked news that is presented as humorous by the source. In the case of sharing satire with individuals who are not acquainted with the material’s origins. Some people may mistakenly believe it to be true

2.3. Approaches

The following are the results of a false news detection study carried out by a variety of researchers using a variety of approaches:

(a) Knowledge-based: approaches based on knowledge, such as fact-checking in news reports with the assistance of additional sources owing to fact-checking, an article’s statements may ascribe a correct value in light of the mitigating circumstances. Approaches to fact-checking may be divided into three types: expert-driven, crowd sourcing-driven, and computationally-driven

(b) Style-based: based on the writing style, style-based methods identify false news. For the most part, there are two major types of style-based methods: one that is deception-oriented and the other of which is objectivity-oriented. Deception-oriented is concerned with assertions or claims in news material that are false or misleading. Approaches that focus on objectivity look for style cues that suggest that news reporting have skewed toward sensationalism and bias

(c) Stance-based: stance-based methods leverage customers’ views from appropriate post contents to verify the authenticity of the actual news reports. When representing the stance of customers, one has the option of using explicit or implicit methods. Approaches based on stance in a social setting

(d) Propagation-based: based on propagation, these methods looked at how misinformation propagated on social media and the relationships between postings to estimate news credibility. Approaches focused on propagation in a social environment [13]

3. Fake News, Deception, and Clickbait Characteristics

Examining the findings of several research shows that false news, deceit, and click bait all have their unique features.

3.1. Fake News

For the most part, the existing study concentrates on analyzing the trends and characteristics of fake news distribution in contrast to the dissemination of correct info. From 2006 to 2017, Vosoughi et al. looked and examined how accurate and false news articles spread on Twitter, with the data coming from 126 K stories shared by 3 M individuals and tweeted over 4.5 M times. Fake news spreads quicker, further, and to a wider audience than reality does, according to the authors. False news stories on terrorism, natural catastrophes, science, urban legends, and financial information had less of these impacts than do stories about fake political news, according to the researchers. In a recent study, Shubha Mishra found that those who disseminate false news had a denser social network than people who spread real news [14].

3.2. Deception

Disinformation (deception) is the dissemination of incorrect information on purpose. Most studies use the term “fake” or “deceptive” statements and reasons to describe different types of deception. Psychological and social science ideas have shown certain language signals that indicate whether someone is telling truth or lying [5]. This hypothesis asserts that statements of fact vary from fantasy ones in information fashion and quality; fact tracking demonstrates that real events have greater levels of sensory info. The four-factor theory stated that untruths are explained separately in words of feelings or cognitive processes than truth, or the info modification theorist validates that extreme data quantities commonly occur.

3.3. Clickbait

Clickbait headlines are those written with the express aim of luring readers in and enticing them to follow an association to a certain Web page. Such clickbait is as follows: “33 Heartbreaking Photos Taken Just Earlier Death,” People are saying, “You won’t trust what Obama did!” The worst has happened: Hillary’s ISIS emails have been leaked, and it is worse than anybody imagined. Clickbait authors go to tremendous pain to establish an information gap between their headlines and the understanding of the ordinary reader to accomplish their purpose. When there are knowledge gaps, people experience a sense of curiosity, which drives them to seek out the information they are lacking to alleviate this sensation.

4. Features for Fake News Detection

Numerous studies have used feature-based classification to better identify false news stories. False information may be detected with ease using textual characteristics. The following sections go through a few of the features [15].

(a) Semantic features: semantic features capture the semantic (meaning) aspect of the text. These features derive a meaningful pattern from the data

(b) Lexical features: lexical features are mainly used in tf-idf vectorization for summarizing the total number of unique words and the frequency of the word. Lexical features include pronouns, verbs, hash tags, and punctuation

(c) Sentence-level features: these features include a bag-of-word approach, part-of-speech, and n-gram approach. Sentence level features are the language feature which is mostly used in text classification

(d) Psycholinguistic features: these features and word count is based on dictionary-based text mining software

5. Taxonomy of Fake News Detection

Fake news is exposed to use a variety of detecting methods drawn from different networks and databases. First, a breakdown of the different networks is provided:

5.1. Platforms

Carrier platforms are used to offer fresh material to end consumers, and a list of the most prominent carriers is given in this section. The most popular operating systems are shown as follows:

(a) Standalone website: any website can submit new tales, and everyone will have its URL. These URLs are being used directly by users if they wish to share or publish a social media post. Most websites fall into one of the three categories: blogs, media, or prominent news websites. Famous new sites, with their very own social media presence, are the ones that provide genuine material. Blog sites, that heavily rely on user-generated material and unsupervised content, are prime locations for spreading misinformation. In accordance with media-rich content, media sites enable customers to create their websites by creating material depending on style and customer interests

(b) Social media: a most popular method for disseminating the information on these websites is via the spreading of it. A daily news source is shared by almost 70% of its consumers. Consumers distribute the data using the most popular social networking platforms, like Twitter, Facebook, and WhatsApp. You may reach a bigger audience using false information if you produce sponsored advertisements for every Facebook post in which users submit messages of restricted character length and then distribute them with the other Twitter users by tweeting them back to them

(c) Emails: users trust email as a reliable medium for receiving news; however, verifying the legitimacy of news emails is a difficult problem

(d) Broadcast networks (Podcast): just a tiny percentage of people use podcasting for anything other than news, making it a specialized subset of sound multimedia

(e) Radio service: the verification of sound veracity is a significant challenge for radio services since these services are efficient news sources for the community

6. Different Types of Data in News

The novel story is constructed using a variety of various kinds of data, all of which are explored in the next section. Consumers often consume news in one of four forms, which are detailed in the following:

(a) Text: language is being utilized to examine the content of a string of text, with particular attention paid to text as a means of interaction. Grammatic, tone, and pragmatics are all used in discourse analysis since language is more than just words and phrases

(b) Multimedia: it is possible to use music, picture, video, and graphics together in a single project since multimedia is used. Because of its visual depiction, it immediately grabs the attention of an audience

(c) Embedded content or hyperlinks: it is possible for users to connect off to different sources by using hypertext links, and the premise of a news article is utilized to win readers’ confidence. Authors use the advent of social media to incorporate a snapshot of important social media postings like a tweet, a sound cloud clip, a Facebook post, a YouTube video, and so on

(d) Audio: the audio is one of a component of the multimedia category; it is a stand-alone medium for news sources. This medium, which includes different media like radio services, podcasts, and broadcast networks, is used to transmit news to a larger audience

7. Types of Fake News

Researchers in the social sciences examine fake news from a variety of angles before coming up with a broad classification of different kinds of fake news. This classification was given in the following statement:

(a) Visual-based: the types of fake news are described in the material using a graphical depiction of video or photo shopped pictures or a mix of both [10]

(b) User-based: using this method, the intended audience could be attracted by establishing fictitious accounts that reflect certain demographics such as gender, age, and culture [16]

(c) Post-based: social media sites like Facebook posts with video or picture captions, memes, tweets, and so on are the common places for this kind of fake news to emerge [17]

(d) Network-based: there are some people of an organization who are linked to this type of fake news, where this concept is primarily used to groups of linked persons on LinkedIn and friends-of-friends on Facebook [18]

(e) Knowledge-based: these new articles will be created using articles that provide plausible explanations or scientific knowledge about an unsolved problem to disseminate false info [19]

(f) Style-based: false news may be produced by anybody with the ability to write in a variety of styles, but this style-based news was only concerned with how the false info was presented to end consumers [20]

Some ways for determining whether or not a piece of news is false are shown in the Figure 1 or the techniques described below.

[figure omitted; refer to PDF]

Figures 3, 4, and 5 illustrated the pie chart to represent the accuracy ratio using different machine learning and deep learning algorithms. Figure 3 represents the pie chart for the liar dataset, while Figure 4 represents the pie chart for the fake news dataset, and Figure 5 represents the pie chart for the corpus dataset.

[figure omitted; refer to PDF][figure omitted; refer to PDF][figure omitted; refer to PDF]

13. Conclusion

Even though the probability latent semantic analysis has a high rate of success in detecting false news and postings, nevertheless, the constantly shifting qualities and features of false news on social media networks make it difficult to classify. DL, on the other hand, is characterized by the ability to calculate hierarchical characteristics. With the deployment of DL research and applications in the current past, many research works will apply DL techniques including CNNs, deep Boltzmann machines, DNN, and deep autoencoder models in different apps, including such audio and voice processing, NLP but rather modeling, info retrieval, objective recognition, and computer vision, and also implementing DNNs. In this comprehensive study, the basic concept of fake news detection has been described in detail with their types, features, and characteristics, and also the taxonomy for the fake news detection model has been described. Various fake detection methods have been implemented to identify user behavior by spreading rumors or fake news. The comparison has been made for numerous traditional machine learning and deep learning techniques on three liars, fake news, and corpus datasets. This comparison found that deep learning techniques outperformed traditional machine learning techniques. In this comparison, Bi-LSTM has achieved the best detection rate for fake news and obtained 95% accuracy and F1 score. This study will be helpful for further research in identifying fake news and the development of new models or tools for early detection. Another useful outcome is the fact that this research can be utilized by the cyber cell of police department and will be helpful in adopting appropriate means and method for dealing with fake data resulting in the betterment of the society. The only limitation that can be observed is that the analysis is performed on textual data, but in future, it can be elaborated for image data as well along with text to produce analysis results in a much wide and heterogeneous dataset.

References

[1] K. S. Adewole, T. Han, W. Wu, H. Song, A. K. Sangaiah, "Twitter spam account detection based on clustering and classification methods," The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 76 no. 7, pp. 4802-4837, DOI: 10.1007/s11227-018-2641-x, 2020.

[2] M. Z. Asghar, A. Ullah, S. Ahmad, A. Khan, "Opinion spam detection framework using hybrid classification scheme," Soft Computing, vol. 24 no. 5, pp. 3475-3498, DOI: 10.1007/s00500-019-04107-y, 2020.

[3] C. Boididou, S. Papadopoulos, M. Zampoglou, L. Apostolidis, O. Papadopoulou, Y. Kompatsiaris, "Detection and visualization of misleading content on Twitter," International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, vol. 7 no. 1, pp. 71-86, DOI: 10.1007/s13735-017-0143-x, 2018.

[4] K. Dhingra, S. K. Yadav, "Spam analysis of big reviews dataset using Fuzzy Ranking Evaluation Algorithm and Hadoop," International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 10 no. 8, pp. 2143-2162, DOI: 10.1007/s13042-017-0768-3, 2019.

[5] Y. Boshmaf, Logothetis, Siganos, Lería, Lorenzo, Ripeanu, Beznosov, Halawa, Íntegro: veveraging victim prediction for robust fake account detection in large scale OSNs, vol. 61,DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2016.05.005, 2016.

[6] B. Jang, S. Jeong, C. K. Kim, "Distance-based customer detection in fake follower markets," Information Systems, vol. 81, pp. 104-116, DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2018.12.001, 2019.

[7] E. Kauffmann, J. Peral, D. Gil, A. Ferrández, R. Sellers, H. Mora, "A framework for big data analytics in commercial social networks: a case study on sentiment analysis and fake review detection for marketing decision-making," Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 90, pp. 523-537, DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.08.003, 2020.

[8] D. Plotkina, A. Munzel, J. Pallud, "Illusions of truth—experimental insights into human and algorithmic detections of fake online reviews," Journal of Business Research, vol. 109, pp. 511-523, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.009, 2020.

[9] H. Allcott, M. Gentzkow, "Social media and fake news in the 2016 election," Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 31 no. 2, pp. 211-236, DOI: 10.1257/jep.31.2.211, 2017.

[10] C. S. Atodiresei, A. Tǎnǎselea, A. Iftene, "Identifying fake news and fake users on Twitter," Procedia Computer Science, vol. 126, pp. 451-461, DOI: 10.1016/j.procS.2018.07.279, 2018.

[11] M. L. Della Vedova, E. Tacchini, S. Moret, G. Ballarin, M. Dipierro, L. De Alfaro, "Automatic online fake news detection combining content and social signals," 2018 22nd Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT),DOI: 10.23919/FRUCT.2018.8468301, .

[12] A. Pathak, R. K. Srihari, "BREAKING! Presenting fake news corpus for automated fact checking," Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop, pp. 357-362, DOI: 10.18653/v1/p19-2050, .

[13] K. Shu, A. Sliva, S. Wang, J. Tang, H. Liu, "Fake news detection on social Media," ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 19 no. 1, pp. 22-36, DOI: 10.1145/3137597.3137600, 2017.

[14] S. Mishra, "Sentiment analysis of movie reviews," 35th MP Young Scientist Congress, 2020.

[15] P. B. Petkar, "Fake news detection: a survey of techniques," International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, vol. 9 no. 9, pp. 383-386, DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.i7098.079920, 2020.

[16] S. Mishra, "Analysis of user sentiments using machine learning algorithms," 34th MP Young Scientist Congress, 2019.

[17] D. Bright, R. Brewer, C. Morselli, "Using social network analysis to study crime: navigating the challenges of criminal justice records," Social Networks, vol. 66, pp. 50-64, DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2021.01.006, 2021.

[18] T. T. Aurpa, R. Sadik, M. S. Ahmed, "Abusive Bangla comments detection on Facebook using transformer-based deep learning models," Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 12 no. 1,DOI: 10.1007/s13278-021-00852-x, 2022.

[19] J. F. de Oliveira, H. T. Marques-Neto, M. Karsai, "Measuring the effects of repeated and diversified influence mechanism for information adoption on twitter," Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 12 no. 1,DOI: 10.1007/s13278-021-00844-x, 2022.

[20] H. Alzahrani, S. Acharya, P. Duverger, N. P. Nguyen, "Contextual polarity and influence mining in online social networks," Computational Social Networks, vol. 8 no. 1,DOI: 10.1186/s40649-021-00101-3, 2021.

[21] S. Mishra, P. K. Shukla, R. Agarwal, "Location wise opinion mining of real time Twitter data using Hadoop to reduce cyber crimes," 2nd International Conference on Data, Engineering and Applications (IDEA),DOI: 10.1109/IDEA49133.2020.9170700, .

[22] G. Shrivastava, P. Kumar, R. P. Ojha, P. K. Srivastava, S. Mohan, G. Srivastava, "Defensive modeling of fake news through online social networks," IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 7 no. 5, pp. 1159-1167, DOI: 10.1109/TCSS.2020.3014135, 2020.

[23] Y. Qin, D. Wurzer, C. Tang, "Predicting future rumours," Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 27 no. 3, pp. 514-520, DOI: 10.1049/cje.2018.03.008, 2018.

[24] K. Zaamout, T. Arjannikov, K. Barker, "Corrections to “a social crowdsourcing community case study: interaction patterns, evolution, and factors that affect them” [Jun 20 659-671]," IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 7 no. 5, pp. 1317-1317, DOI: 10.1109/TCSS.2020.3026515, 2020.

[25] S. Mishra, P. Shukla, R. Agrawal, "A survey paper on classification of Sybil activities on online social network using machine learning algorithms," International Conference on Recent Advances in Smart Innovative ideas with Multidisciplinery Research (IC-RASIMR), pp. 133-136, .

[26] C. Chen, F. Shen, J. Xu, R. Yan, "Probabilistic latent semantic analysis-based gear fault diagnosis under variable working conditions," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 69 no. 6, pp. 2845-2857, DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2019.2925410, 2020.

[27] A. Farahat, F. Chen, "Improving probabilistic latent semantic analysis with principal component analysis," 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, .

[28] C. Hong, W. Chen, W. Zheng, J. Shan, Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, "Parallelization and characterization of probabilistic latent semantic analysis," 2008 37th International Conference on Parallel Processing,DOI: 10.1109/ICPP.2008.8, .

[29] T. Hofmann, "Probabilistic latent semantic analysis," 2013. http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6705

[30] I. E. Faculty, M. Engineering, Analysis of Different Machine Learning Master thesis, 2020. https://www.uib.no/en/rg/ml/128703/available-masters-thesis-topics-machine-learning

[31] L. Singh, "Fake news detection using machine learning," International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, vol. 9 no. 5, pp. 980-983, DOI: 10.22214/ijraset.2021.34363, 2021.

[32] B. E. Boser, I. M. Guyon, V. N. Vapnik, "A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers," COLT '92: Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory,DOI: 10.1145/130385.130401, .

[33] G. Revathya, R. M. Ariethb, D. Kalaiabiramic, R. Arunad, "Revelation of diabetics by inadequate balanced SVM," Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, vol. 12 no. 2, pp. 2482-2486, DOI: 10.17762/turcomat.v12i2.2084, 2021.

[34] M. R. Islam, S. Liu, X. Wang, G. Xu, "Deep learning for misinformation detection on online social networks: a survey and new perspectives," Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 10 no. 1,DOI: 10.1007/s13278-020-00696-x, 2020.

[35] L. Alekya, L. Lakshmi, G. Susmitha, S. Hemanth, "A survey on fake news detection in social media using deep neural networks," International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 9 no. 3, 2020.

[36] J. A. Nasir, O. S. Khan, I. Varlamis, "Fake news detection: a hybrid CNN-RNN based deep learning approach," International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, vol. 1 no. 1, article 100007,DOI: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2020.100007, 2021.

[37] D. H. Lee, Y. R. Kim, H. J. Kim, S. M. Park, Y. J. Yang, "Fake news detection using deep learning," Journal of Information Processing Systems, vol. 15 no. 5, pp. 1119-1130, DOI: 10.3745/JIPS.04.0142, 2019.

[38] G. Sansonetti, F. Gasparetti, G. D’aniello, A. Micarelli, "Unreliable users detection in social media: deep learning techniques for automatic detection," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 213154-213167, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3040604, 2020.

[39] W. Antoun, F. Baly, R. Achour, A. Hussein, H. Hajj, "State of the art models for fake news detection tasks," 2020 IEEE international conference on informatics, IoT, and enabling technologies (ICIoT), pp. 519-524, DOI: 10.1109/ICIoT48696.2020.9089487, .

[40] S.-X. Lin, B.-Y. Wu, T.-H. Chou, Y.-J. Lin, H.-Y. Kao, "Bidirectional perspective with topic information for stance detection," 2020 International Conference on Pervasive Artificial Intelligence (ICPAI),DOI: 10.1109/ICPAI51961.2020.00009, .

[41] P. M. Konkobo, R. Zhang, S. Huang, T. T. Minoungou, J. A. Ouedraogo, L. Li, "A deep learning model for early detection of fake news on social media ∗," 2020 7th International Conference on Behavioural and Social Computing (BESC),DOI: 10.1109/BESC51023.2020.9348311, .

[42] Y.-F. Huang, P.-H. Chen, "Fake news detection using an ensemble learning model based on self-adaptive harmony search algorithms," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 159, article 113584,DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113584, 2020.

[43] Y. Yanagi, R. Orihara, Y. Sei, Y. Tahara, A. Ohsuga, "Fake news detection with generated comments for news articles," 2020 IEEE 24th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES),DOI: 10.1109/INES49302.2020.9147195, .

[44] M. Paixão, R. Lima, B. Espinasse, "Fake news classification and topic modeling in Brazilian Portuguese," 2020 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), pp. 427-432, DOI: 10.1109/WIIAT50758.2020.00063, .

[45] C. Song, N. Ning, Y. Zhang, B. Wu, "A multimodal fake news detection model based on crossmodal attention residual and multichannel convolutional neural networks," Information Processing & Management, vol. 58 no. 1, article 102437,DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102437, 2021.

[46] Y. Ren, J. Zhang, "Fake news detection on news-oriented heterogeneous information networks through hierarchical graph attention," 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN),DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9534362, .

[47] L. Ying, H. Yu, J. Wang, Y. Ji, S. Qian, "Fake news detection via multi-modal topic memory network," IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 132818-132829, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3113981, 2021.

[48] P. Meel, D. K. Vishwakarma, "HAN, image captioning, and forensics ensemble multimodal fake news detection," Information Sciences, vol. 567, pp. 23-41, DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.03.037, 2021.

[49] J. Y. Khan, M. T. I. Khondaker, S. Afroz, G. Uddin, A. Iqbal, "A benchmark study of machine learning models for online fake news detection," Machine Learning with Applications, vol. 4, article 100032,DOI: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100032, 2021.

[50] J.-S. Shim, Y. Lee, H. Ahn, "A link2vec-based fake news detection model using web search results," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 184, article 115491,DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115491, 2021.

[51] M. Samadi, M. Mousavian, S. Momtazi, "Deep contextualized text representation and learning for fake news detection," Information Processing & Management, vol. 58 no. 6, article 102723,DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102723, 2021.

[52] S. Mhatre, A. Masurkar, "A hybrid method for fake news detection using cosine similarity scores," 2021 International Conference on Communication information and Computing Technology (ICCICT),DOI: 10.1109/ICCICT50803.2021.9510134, .