1. Introduction
Plants are sessile organisms, and they have evolved sophisticated regulatory mechanisms to maintain their development and overcome environmental stress, such as high and low temperatures, UV (Ultraviolet) radiation, drought, and salinity [1,2]. The functional genes determine the plants’ growth, development, and adaption to abiotic stresses. During the process of gene expression, only approximately 2% of transcribed RNA in the eukaryotic genome encodes functional proteins [3]. With the development of functional genomics and transcriptome sequencing by RNA-seq, a large number of RNAs that do not code functional proteins, known as non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) (rRNA, tRNA, and snRNA in spliceosome; and regulatory ncRNAs), have been identified to be involved in various developmental and stress responses [4,5,6]. The regulatory ncRNAs are classified as microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), and long ncRNAs (lncRNAs, >200 nt long) in plants [7]. MiRNAs can target lncRNAs to produce phased small interfering RNAs (phasiRNAs). Conversely, lncRNAs can also serve as the origin of miRNAs or regulate the expression of miRNAs [8].
Recently, thousands of ncRNAs have been identified in plants such as Arabidopsis [9,10], Brachypodium [11], Ginseng rusty root symptom [12], sugar beet [13,14], rice [15,16], maize [17,18], wheat [19,20], soybean [21,22], tomato [23,24], and Brassica [25,26]. In Arabidopsis, tasiRNA-ARF (Trans-acting short-interfering RNA-auxin response factor) maintains the normal morphogenesis of flowers under drought and high-salinity stress conditions [27]. In Brassica rapa, two lncRNAs target miR160 and function in pollen development [25]. In pigeonpea, Csa-lncRNA_1231 targets Csa-miRNA-156b and regulate the expression of SPL-12 (SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE 12), which is involved in flower development regulation [28]. In Prunus mume, lncRNA XR_514690.2 downregulates ppe-miR172d, and it upregulates AP2 (APETALA2), which is related to flower development [29]. In addition, the expression of lncRNA973 in cotton increases under salt-stress conditions, and in lncRNA973-overexpressed Arabidopsis, the tolerance of salt stress is also enhanced [30]. Moreover, miR393a, miR156d, and miR172b regulating HvTIR1/HvAFB2 (TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE 1/AUXIN SIGNALING F-BOX 2), UGTs (UDP-SUGAR GLYCOSYLTRANSFERASES), and HvAP2 are responsible for salt tolerance in the roots of barley, and miR319a/miR396e module, miR159a and miR172b regulating GRFs (GROWTH-REGULATING FACTORS), MYB33, and HvAP2 might also contribute to salt tolerance in the shoots of barley [31]. Thus, the ncRNAs, acting as important regulators, are involved in the interplay of molecular regulatory pathway of plant development and abiotic stress responses.
With the development of molecular biology and high-throughput sequencing technology, numerous functional genes involved in plant development and abiotic stress responses have been identified, and the mysterious veil of ncRNAs is also being gradually uncovered. Many ncRNAs have been the focus of several review articles published in recent years [4,32,33,34,35,36]. Understanding ncRNA-guided development and stress regulatory networks can provide new insights to improve plant tolerance to environmental stresses. However, the plant ncRNA regulatory pathways are complex interaction networks and the identical ncRNA may serve as important regulator in both plant development and various abiotic stress responses. The molecular mechanisms and the various regulatory roles of ncRNAs and their targets remain to be deciphered. Recent studies have revealed that the genetic transformation of ncRNAs and their target genes can change the phenotypes and tolerance of abiotic stresses in plants. In this review, we summarize the current advances on ncRNAs, with a focus on classification, molecular regulation mechanism, and the regulatory network in the development and abiotic stress response in plants.
2. Classification and Action of Plant ncRNAs
Plant ncRNAs originate in the intergenic or intronic regions of chromosomal DNA and regulate the expression of growth and development; and biotic- and abiotic-stress-response-related genes at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and epigenetic level in plants [5,37]. According to the molecular structure, plant ncRNAs are classified into linear ncRNAs and circular ncRNAs. Linear ncRNAs can be divided into housekeeping ncRNAs, which include ribosomal RNA (rRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), small nuclear RNA (snRNA), and small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) and regulatory ncRNAs, which comprise small RNAs (sRNAs) and long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) according to molecular function [37]. In plants, sRNAs comprise miRNAs, natural antisense transcript-derived small interfering RNAs (nat-siRNAs), heterochromatic small interfering RNAs (hc-siRNAs), trans-acting siRNAs (tasiRNAs), and repeat-associated siRNAs (rasi-RNAs) [38,39]. Based on the genomic location relative to protein-coding genes, lncRNAs consist of long intergenic ncRNAs, intron ncRNAs, antisense ncRNAs (ancRNAs), and sense ncRNAs (slncRNAs), which are potent cis-/trans-regulators to influence the transcriptional activity of their target loci [24,40]. Meanwhile, circRNAs can be divided into exonic circRNAs, intronic circRNAs, UTR circRNAs, intergenic circRNAs, and other circRNAs deriving from two or more genes [37] (Table 1).
2.1. The Expression and Targeting Action Mode of Small Non-Coding RNAs
In plants, MIR genes transcribe to primary miRNAs by RNA polymerase Ⅱ and form special hairpin structures [41]. Then the single-strand hairpin pri-miRNAs are cleaved in two steps to generate a stem–loop intermediate (precursor miRNAs) and the miRNA/miRNA* duplex by Dicer-like 1(DCL1) and Hyponastic Leaves 1 (HYL1) protein in the nucleus [42,43]. Next, the miRNA/miRNA* duplex is methylated by HUA ENHANCER 1 (HEN1) and transported to the cytoplasm by HASTY (HST) protein. Within the cytoplasm, the miRNA duplex is unwound, and the miRNA, but not miRNA*, is incorporated in the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Then miRNA interacts with the complementary target mRNA and activates the catalytic RISC with the assistance of Argonaute 1 (AGO1) [44]. AGO proteins consist of PAZ (Piwi Argonaut and Zwille), MID (Middle), and PIWI (P-element-induced wimpy testis) domains to bind sRNA [45,46]. The PAZ domain can attach to the 3′ nucleotide of the guide strand [47], and the PIWI domain with RNaseH-like activity can cleave the target RNA, while the MID domain can sense the identity of the 5′ nucleotide of sRNA [48,49] (Figure 1).
Plant miRNA target sites have been found within ORFs (open reading frames), 5′UTRs (5′ Untranslated Regions), and 3′UTRs, as well as noncoding transcripts [50]. MiRNAs mainly inhibit gene expression at the post-transcriptional level through directing cleavage of mRNA targets for cleavage or repress translation with the participation of VARICOSE (VCS), AGO1, and AGO10 protein [51,52]. The transcription of miRs is determined by Cis-regulatory elements and trans-acting regulators or by epigenetic modification. In Arabidopsis, AGL15 and AGL18 (AGAMOUS-like proteins) form heterodimer and bind to the CArG (CC (A+T-rich) 6 GG) motifs of the MIR156 promoter to activate the MIR156 expression [53]. Moreover, SPL9 and SPL15 which are regulated by miR156 directly promote the transcription of miR172 [54]. Moreover, in Arabidopsis, the null mutants of HESO1 (HEN1 SUPPRESSOR1), which can uridylate the unmethylated miRNAs, increased the transcription of miR166/165, miR169, miR171/170, and miR172 [55]. Numerous miRNA-targets, such as miR156/SPL [56,57], miR172/IDS1 [58], miR393/(TIR1/AFB2) [59], miR160/(ARF10/ARF16/ARF17) [60], and miR159/(MYB33/MYB65) [61], have been identified to affect plant growth, development, and abiotic stress responses through directly regulating their targeting mRNA level. Furthermore, miRNA172 targets the APETALA2 transcription factor SlAP2a to control the fruit development in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) [62].
MiRNAs regulate plant development and abiotic-stress response through targeting functional genes transcript cleavage and translation repression [63,64]. In plants, miRNA recognizes target binding sites of mRNA through exact or nearly exact sequence complementarity that results in the cleavage at the tenth nucleotide of miRNA complementary sites [65] or translational inhibition [66]. MiRNAs also inhibit the translation of target mRNAs through partially mismatched sequences in their 3′ UTR without degrading the mRNA. Moreover, miRNAs control translation initiation by inhibiting eukaryotic initiation factor 4E/cap and poly(A) tail function [67]. The functions of miRNAs are determined by their binding regulatory targets, and the miRNA complementary sites within the mRNA targets for miRNA binding are relatively conserved and important [68]. Due to the nature of miRNA:mRNA base pairing in plants, many of the targets are members of the same gene families; however, the fraction of the gene family members with miRNA complementary sites varies considerably. In Arabidopsis, 10 of the 16 Squamosa-promoter Binding Protein (SBP)-like genes have miR156 complementary sites, while only 5 of over 100 MYB and NAC (NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2) family genes have sites complementary to miR159 or miR164, respectively [69]. Furthermore, the targets of the same miRNA can be different gene family members; conversely, different unrelated miRNAs can be complementary to different members of the same gene family. For example, miR319 can target not only the MYB family member, but also the TCP (Teosinte branched1/Cycloidea/proliferating cell factors) genes [70], while miR160, miR167, and miR390 can target different members of the Auxin Response Factor family [60,71,72]. The specific binding sites’ recognition and regulation cause miRNAs to be involved in multi-metabolic pathways. In rice, miR319 can positively regulate cold tolerance by targeting OsPCF6 (Proliferating cell factor 6) and OsTCP21 [73], and miR319-targeted OsTCP21 and OsGAMYB also regulate the tillering and grain yield [70]. In addition, miR319 targets TCPs to regulate leaf development in Arabidopsis [74] and promotes the transition from cell elongation to wall thickening in cotton fiber [75]. Moreover, miR319a-targeted PtoTCP20 can regulate secondary growth via interactions with PtoWOX4 (WUSCHEL-related homeobox 4) and PtoWND6 (wood-associated NAC domain 6) in Populus tomentosa [76]. It is noteworthy that the specific binding site of target mRNA is not the only factor for miRNA to bind and splice in regulating the abundance of the target mRNAs. For instance, almost 100 potential miR159 targets with four or fewer mismatches can be obtained by using the standard target prediction program, psRNATarget, in Arabidopsis [77], but among the top twenty targets, which include eight MYB genes with highly conserved miR159 binding sites, only MYB33 and MYB65 are strongly downregulated by miR159-mediated cleavage [78]. Similarly, in Brassica rapa, only 4 of 13 SPL candidate targets with highly conserved binding sites of miR156/157 were cleaved [79], and three of seven candidate targets of miR828 were proved to be spliced by RLM-5′RACE [80]. Furthermore, the differential miR159-mediated silencing has been proved to be correlated with the differential RNA secondary structure of miR159 targets and physically spatial and/or temporal separation of miR159 and targets in plant tissues [78]. Then dynamic RNA secondary structures in vivo may be operating as a riboswitch, with certain formations facilitating silencing of specific miRNA targets [78].
Except for directly regulating the expression of targets, primary miRNAs of miR171b in Medicago truncatula and miR165a in Arabidopsis thaliana have been reported to produce the peptides miPEP171b and miPEP165a, which increase the transcription of pri-miRNA and the accumulation of miR171b and miR165a in a positive feedback loop and lead to the reduction of lateral root development and stimulation of main root growth, respectively. The pri-miRNAs possess both protein-coding and non-coding roles [81]. In soybean (Glycine max), miPEP172c also takes a positive role in miR172c accumulation, resulting in an increase in nodule formation [82]. In addition, miPEP858a in Arabidopsis regulated the expression of pri-miR858a and associated target genes to control plant development and the phenylpropanoid pathway [83].
Moreover, plant miRNAs can act as transmitters to transport from cell to cell and between distant organs via the long-distance to communicate with environments for metabolism, growth, reproduction, and defense reactions [84,85]. The exogenous miRNAs miR156 and miR399 have been demonstrated to repress the mRNA level of their targets via an RNAi mechanism when transferring between neighboring plants [86]. The root-derived Nb-miR164 can modify the scion trait via long-distance movement in Arabidopsis/Nicotiana interfamilial heterograft [87]. Moreover, miRNAs have also been shown to play a crucial role in extracellular vesicles to fungal pathogen to silence virulence genes and in shoot meristems and root vascular systems [88,89,90]. Additionally, miRNAs can realize communication crossing species to mediate co-evolution between species. For example, plant miRNAs enriched in beebread but not in royal jelly lead to delayed development and decreased body and ovary size in honeybees, preventing larval differentiation into queens [91]. Moreover, miR2911, identified in Traditional Chinese Medicine honeysuckle (HS), can directly target Influenza A viruses (IAVs) with a broad spectrum to suppress viral infection [92]. Furthermore, plant miRNAs have also been reported to reduce cancer-cell proliferation by targeting MALAT1 (Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1) and NEAT1 (Nuclear-enriched abundant transcript 1) [93]. Therefore, the “mobile” role of miRNAs from different origins under specific environments and cross-species transmission to produce “amplified” secondary siRNAs enhance the potential effect on their targets and downstream developmental pathways.
Similar to the biogenesis pathway of miRNAs, siRNAs are derived from perfectly double-stranded RNAs, which are transcribed from inverted repeats, natural cis-antisense transcript pairs, and single-stranded RNA through the action of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RDRs). The DCLs proteins cleave dsRNAs into 21-to-24 nt siRNAs, which are loaded into AGO protein to form RISC that guides target regulation at the posttranscriptional level or the transcriptional level through RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) [39]. In plants, DICER-LIKE PROTEIN 3 (DCL3) produces 24-nucleotide (nt) small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that determine the specificity of the RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway [94]. While the endogenous 22-nucleotide siRNAs are generated by the DCL2 protein. The 22 nt siRNAs derived from NIA1/2 (nitrate reductases) can mediate translational repression, inhibiting plant growth and enhancing stress responses [95]. Moreover, DCL4 generates 21 nt siRNAs from double-stranded RNAs responsible for degrading TE (transposable element) mRNAs in the somatic plant body, and the siRNAs have specifically been shown to participate in cell-to-cell silencing [96,97]. Not only can siRNA mediate transcriptional gene silencing through RNA-directed DNA methylation, but they can also perform post-transcriptional gene silencing through cleavage and translational inhibition without changing the DNA sequence [98,99]. While the biogenesis and regulatory role of siRNAs have been reported and reviewed in detail [33,39,98,99,100,101], the function of siRNAs involved in plant development and abiotic stress response still needs to be explored.
2.2. Types of Long Non-Coding RNA and Their Actions in Gene Expression
In eukaryotes, almost 90% of the genome was found to be transcribed by using high-throughput sequencing technology, but only approximately 2% corresponds to protein-coding mRNAs [3,102]. Plant lncRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerases PolⅡ, PolⅣ, and PolⅤ, which are involved in the regulation of gene expression [6]. LncRNAs may be transcribed in a stand-alone unit from enhancers, promoters, and introns of genes; from pseudogenes; or from antisense to other genes with varying degrees of overlap [102]. According to the location relative to protein-coding genes in the genome, lncRNAs can be defined as natural antisense transcripts (lncNATs), intronic lncRNAs, intergenic lncRNAs (lincRNAs), and sense lncRNAs. LncNATs initiate inside or 3′ to a protein-coding gene and show either in concordance with the sense strand transcripts or in a discordant manner, which can mediate the transcriptional or post-transcriptional regulation of genes transcribed from sense strand [103]. Intronic lncRNAs are transcribed in either direction from an intron of a protein-coding gene, without overlapping with an exon, while sense lncRNAs share the same promoter with the protein-coding gene and transcribe from a region overlapping an exon [104]. Intergenic lncRNAs are independent transcriptional units and are located outside protein-coding genes [105]. Compared with mRNAs, lncRNA transcripts are shorter and lack many motifs, such as ORFs and Kozak consensus sequences [106]. Similar to mRNA, lncRNAs have a 5′ m7G cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail and are processed as mRNA mimics [107] (Figure 2A). However, lncRNAs have shown low conservation in sequences among species and have low expression levels with tissue-specific expression patterns responding to various stresses in plants [108].
In Arabidopsis, over 40,000 candidate lncRNAs have been identified [109], and among them, about 75% are lncNATs [103], the lincRNAs are about 15% [110], and only 2708 lincRNAs (less than 50%) were detected in transcription level by RNA-seq experiments [6]. The increasing evidence indicates that the transcription levels of lncRNAs are correlated with plant growth, development, and abiotic- and biological-stress response [111,112,113,114]. Functional analyses of lncRNAs have revealed that they act as scaffolds, guides, and decoys in cis or trans to regulate gene expression through transcription, epigenetic modification, and post-transcriptional gene regulatory mechanisms [3,115,116] (Figure 2B). As scaffolds, lncRNAs with sequences complementary to RNA or DNA can be recognized via specific sequence motifs or secondary/tertiary structures [116]. LncRNAs can also bind to histone-modifying complexes and DNA-binding proteins (including transcription factors) and control gene expression by modifying chromatin accessibility, transcription, splicing, and translation levels. In Arabidopsis, lncRNA HID1 (HIDDEN TREASURE 1) binds to the promoter of the PIF3 gene to downregulate its expression and affect the photomorphogenic process [117]. In addition, the guiding lncRNAs interact with transcriptional co-regulators or chromatin regulatory protein complexes and recruit them to a specific DNA region to modulate transcription. For instance, in the early vernalization process of plants, lncRNA COLDAIR recruits PRC2 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2) in the first intron region of FLC (FLOWERING LOCUS C) and leads to the H3K27me3 modification of histones [118]. Moreover, as decoys, lncRNAs bind miRNAs, such as ceRNAs (competing endogenous RNAs), or proteins in the nuclei to mimic and compete with their consensus DNA-binding motifs to control the functions of regulatory miRNAs or proteins [119]. For example, in the tomato, lncRNAs have been identified as ceRNAs and predicted to decoy 46 miRNAs, and among them, lncRNA42705 and lncRNA08711 show a negative correlation with the expression of miR159 and a positive correlation with the expression levels of MYB genes upon Phytophthora infestans infection [120]. Similarly, in maize, the lncRNA PILNCR1 (Pi-deficiency-induced long-noncoding RNA1) also serves as mimic to sponge miR399 and releases the PHO2 (Phosphate 2) mRNA, which negatively regulates phosphate transporters [121].
LncRNAs are usually long, and their sequences are not fully complementary to the target sequences that are involved in splicing, gene inactivation, and translation [122,123] through interactions with proteins, DNA, or other RNA molecules [124]. LncRNAs take advantage of intermolecular interaction-controlling gene expression and protein activity to regulate plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, flowering, and lateral root development [125]. First, lncRNAs participate in forming ribonucleoprotein complexes to modulate the subcellular localization and the molecular activity of their protein partners [126]. For example, the lncRNA ELF18-INDUCED LONG-NONCODING RNA1 (ELENA1) can recruit the transcriptional coactivator Mediator subunit 19a to activate the transcription of the PATHOGENESIS-RELATED 1 gene to enhance the resistance against pathogenic bacteria in Arabidopsis [127]. Moreover, lncRNA HIDDEN TREASURE 1 (HID1) can also interact with ribonucleoprotein to bind the first intron of PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 3 and repress its transcription, promoting photomorphogenesis in continuous red light [117]. Another two lncRNAs, COLDAIR and AG-intron-4, also interact with the Polycomb repressive complex-2 (PRC2) in Arabidopsis to inhibit the transcription of FLC (FLOWERING LOCUS C) and AGAMOUS, which are involved in the regulation of flowering [118,128]. Second, lncRNAs participate in forming RNA–DNA hybrids to control the expression of neighbor genes in cis/trans or to influence chromatin conformation of target regions [126]. In Arabidopsis, lncRNA APOLO was identified to recognize multiple spatially unrelated loci in the genome via sequence complementarity and R-loop formation, and most of the targets are auxin-responsive genes involved in lateral root development [129]. Third, lncRNAs participate in forming RNA–RNA duplexes to regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. LncNATs (natural antisense transcripts) can pair with target RNAs at specific regions of complementarity to control their stability or their translation [126]. For instance, 70% of annotated mRNAs were found to associate with detectable lncNATs in Arabidopsis [103]. In Petunia hybrida, a cis-lncNAT (the antisense transcript of the SHO gene) triggers the production of double-stranded RNA-derived small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), leading to the degradation of the SHO (Shooting, Cytokinins-producing gene) RNA in a tissue-specific manner in cytokinin regulation [130]. In Arabidopsis, the lncRNA INDUCED BY PHOSPHATE STARVATION 1 (IPS1) was also identified to act as target mimics for miR399 by forming a lncRNA-miRNA duplex with a mismatched loop at the miRNA cleavage site, leading to the non-cleavage of IPS1 as a miRNA sponge [131]. Thus, plant lncRNAs participate in forming ribonucleoprotein complexes, RNA–DNA hybrids, or RNA–RNA duplexes to exercise their regulation function.
3. Regulation Role of ncRNAs in Plant Development
3.1. miRNAs Involved in Plant Development
Plant development is composed of growth and differentiation, which include all changes that an organism goes through during its life cycle, from the germination of the seed to senescence. Plant development processes are determined by many proteins and phytohormones, whose expression levels could be directly or indirectly regulated by some non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) [132]. MiRNAs are key regulators and play important roles in plant development, such as seed development and germination, shoot apical meristem (SAM) maintenance, floral organ identity, leaf morphogenesis, root initiation, and development.
3.1.1. miRNAs in Seed Development and Germination
Germination depends on the seed’s physiological state (dormancy), which is determined by the balance of the ABA/GA (abscisic acid/gibberellins) ratio [133]. In Arabidopsis, the overexpression of miR160 caused hyposensitivity to abscisic acid (ABA) during the seed germination process [134]. ARF10 and ARF16, two of the miR160 targets, regulate ABI3 expression to induce seed dormancy [135]. In cotton, the miR160/ARF axis also influences seed size by directly or indirectly regulating seed development-associated genes [136]. Additionally, miR159 is involved in the regulation of seed dormancy and germination because the overexpression of MIR159 renders seeds hyposensitive to ABA and consistently suppresses transcript levels of MYB33 and MYB101, which are positive regulators of ABA responses and targeted by miR159 [137]. Then there is crosstalk between ABA and auxin in seeds’ germination, and the downregulation of a component for auxin signal transduction by miR160 may be a regulatory step to decrease ABA sensitivity in mature seeds and to switch to the germination mode [138]. Moreover, miR393 can affect seed development by targeting two genes encoding the auxin receptors TIR1/AFBs in barley. Overexpression and target mimic (MIM393)-mediated inhibition of miR393 both affect the development of seeds [139]. Furthermore, mir156 mutations enhance seed dormancy by suppressing the gibberellin (GA) pathway through de-repression of the miR156 target gene Ideal Plant Architecture 1 (IPA1), which directly regulates multiple genes in the GA pathway [140]. The miR156-targeted SPL9 was also reported to directly activate the expression of ABA-responsive genes through binding to their promoters and to physically interact with ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 5 (ABI5) [141]. Then miR156, miR159, miR160, and miR393 are involved in the regulation of seed development and germination through the auxin, ABA, and GA pathway. Moreover, a miR164-dependent regulatory pathway, miR164-NAC32/NAC40-EXPB14/EXPB15, has also been characterized to participate in maize seed expansion [142] (Figure 3).
3.1.2. miRNAs in Shoot Development and Apical Meristem (SAM) Maintenance
The shoot apical meristem (SAM) is the main plant meristem and consists of a group of dividing cells that develops to plant lateral organs, such as leaves. WUSHEL (WUS) and CLAVATA3 (CLV3) are essential regulators of meristem maintenance and differentiation, and miR394 can target and downregulate the expression of the LEAF CURLING RESPONSIVENESS (LCR) gene, which affects the WUS–CLV3 pathway in Arabidopsis [90]. In addition, miR394 can function as a mobile signal to move from the outer cell layer L1 (protoderm) to L3 (organizing center) layer, where WUS protein is located, restricting the expression of the target LCR and maintaining the shoot stem-cell niche in the SAM region [90,143]. Two other miRNAs, miR165 and miR166, are characterized to target class III HOMEODOMAINLEUCINE ZIPPER (HD-ZIP III) family genes, including PHABULOSA (PHB)/ATHB14, PHAVOLUTA (PHV)/ATHB9, INTERFASCICULAR FIBERLESS/REVOLUTA (IFL1/REV), INCURVATA4/CORONA/ATHB15, and ATHB8, which are involved in SAM-related development [144]. However, AGO10 can act as a decoy for miR165 and miR166 to compete with AGO1 and prevent their repressive function on HD-ZIP III genes and maintain the SAM development [144,145].
3.1.3. miRNAs in Floral Development
A number of miRNAs and their target genes have been identified to be involved in the transition from the vegetative to reproductive phase, namely plant floral transition. In Arabidopsis, the overexpression of miR172 accelerates flowering through translational inhibition of floral homeotic gene APETALA2 (AP2) [66,146], whereas ectopic expression of a MIM172 mimicry constructs delays flowering [147]. MiR172 has been identified to be regulated by several members of the SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) TF family [54] that are targeted by miR156 and contribute to juvenile to adult vegetative phase transition and the age-dependent pathway to flowering [148,149]. SPL9, a transcriptional activator of MIR172 [150], also directly regulates the expression of AP1, FUL, AGL24, and SOC1 through binding to their respective promoters [148]. Thus, miR172 and miR156 always display some degree of opposite correlation in expression patterns and regulatory functions. The research on the miR172 family demonstrated that, in Arabidopsis leaves, miR172A and miR172B are the major mediators that promote flowering under long days, while, in the SAM, miR172D takes a major role in promoting flowering under short days [146,149,151]. In contrast, the transcription level of MIR156 gradually decreases from the seedling stage to the adult stage, and the overexpression of miR156 results in delayed floral transition [152]. In addition, miR390 represses flowering by inhibiting the activity of ARF3 and ARF4, which results in prolonging the juvenile phase [153]. MiR172-targeted AP2 represses the ARF3 expression by directly binding to its promoter [154], while ARF3/4 regulates the expression of miR156-targeted SPL3 [153]. Then a crosslink among miR156, miR172, and miR390 is involved in the regulation of the juvenile-to-floral transition. Moreover, miR159 targets GA-specific transcriptional regulator GAMYB-related proteins (MYB33, MYB65, and MYB101), which are involved in the GA-promoted activation of LEAFY. The overexpression of miR159 causes reduced expression of LEAFY (LFY) and delays flowering time [14]. In Arabidopsis and rice, miR159 is highly expressed in anthers, and its overexpression can cause male sterility, resulting from the failure of pollen release [155]. Another miRNA involved in flowering time is miR169, and the main target of miR169 is the NUCLEAR FACTORY, SUBUNIT A (NF-YA) TF gene family, which can bind to the promoter of FLC to induce its expression [156]. The miR169d overexpression in Arabidopsis exhibits early flowering, and, in contrast, the overexpression of the rNF-YA2 accounts for late flowering [157]. Furthermore, miR399 plays a crucial role in regulating flowering time by downregulating the expression levels of PHOSPHATE 2 (PHO2). Both miR399 overexpression and loss-of-function pho2 mutants show early flowering phenotypes [158]. Besides miR156-SPL, miR172-AP2, miR159-MYB, miR390-ARF, miR169-NF-YA, and miR399-PHO2 participating in flowering time control, miR164-CUC1/2 (CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON) and miR319-TCP (TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA, AND PCF) also function in the establishment of organ boundaries during floral development [159,160,161]. The overexpression of miR164 or loss of function of its target CUC1/2 leads to fused sepals and stamens and the loss of petals [162]. Meanwhile, the overexpression of miR319 in Arabidopsis causes stamen and male sterility defects, whereas the miR319 loss-of-function mutant shows narrower petals and defective anther development [163]. These miRNA-target pathways indicate that a complex network mediated by different plant hormones and development transcription factors is involved in the plant floral development (Figure 4).
3.1.4. miRNAs in Leaf Development
Plant leaf initiated from an undifferentiated cell in SAM peripheral region is the major photosynthetic organ and plays a dominant role in plant biomass production. MiR164 and their targets CUC1 and CUC2 have been demonstrated to regulate organ boundaries in leaf development in Arabidopsis [153]. In strawberries, FveCUC2a targeted by FvemiR164a regulates leaf serrations, because the overexpression of FveMIR164A produces simple leaves with smooth margins, resembling the leaf phenotype of fvecuc2a [164]. Additionally, single mutations in the MIR319A or MIR319B gene inhibit the formation of leaf serrations in Arabidopsis, and double mutations of MIR319A and MIR319B increase the extent of this inhibition and result in the formation of smooth leaves. However, gain-of-function mutations in the TCP4 gene can impair the cotyledon boundary and leaf serration formation [165]. Moreover, miR396-targeted AtGRF transcription factors regulate cell division and differentiation during leaf development in Arabidopsis [166]. In lettuce, smaller leaves were also observed in LsamiR396a overexpression lines, in which LsaGRF5 was downregulated, while overexpressing LsaGRF5 exhibited larger leaves [167]. For another, miR393 regulates the expression of the TIR1/AFB2 auxin receptor involved in auxin-related development of Arabidopsis leaves [168]. In rice, overexpression of miR393 also leads to an enlarged flag leaf, which is related to the auxin signaling regulated by target TIR1 homolog [169]. Furthermore, in Arabidopsis, miR165/166 negatively regulates HD-ZIP IIIs (Class-III homeodomain-leucine zipper) to maintain the abaxial–adaxial polarity of the leaf [170,171]. Moreover, SlymiR208 is identified as a positive regulator in leaf senescence through negatively regulating CK (Cytokinin) biosynthesis via targeting SlIPT2 and SlIPT4 (Isopentenyltransferases) in tomato [172].
3.1.5. miRNAs in Root Development
Roots are essential for plant fixation, nutrient, and water uptake, and several miRNAs have been identified to regulate root growth and patterning by targeting different transcription factors or genes [173]. NAC1 targeted by miR164 has been demonstrated to provide a homeostatic mechanism to a downregulated auxin signal for lateral root development in Arabidopsis [174]. Nevertheless, the formation of adventitious roots is also regulated by auxin-related miRNAs through various ARF transcription factors [175]. Thus, ARF6 and ARF8 transcripts targeted by miR167 serve as negative regulators of adventitious root development in Arabidopsis [176]. In addition, crown root development in rice is regulated by CRD1 (Crown Root Defect 1) via the CRD1-miR156-SPL pathway [177]. In MIR156OE Arabidopsis plants, SPL10 is significantly downregulated, and the expression of AGL79 (AGAMOUS-like MADS-box protein 79), which is directly regulated by SPL10, is also reduced to repress lateral root growth. This suggests a role for the miR156-SPL10-AGL79 module in plant lateral root growth [178]. Moreover, the NF-YA2 TF (transcription factor) targeted by miR169 has been recognized to control the root architecture, and loss-of-function miR169 can lead to improper root initiation [179]. Furthermore, in tomatoes, the miR171-GRAS module participates in a series of developmental processes, including root length, through modulating gibberellin and auxin signaling [180]. In grapevine (Vitis vinifera), the small peptide vvi-miPEP171d1 encoded by primary-miR171d can increase the transcription of vvi-MIR171d and promote adventitious root development. Similarly, in Arabidopsis, ath-miPEP171c inhibits the growth of primary roots and induced the early initiation of lateral and adventitious roots, but the exogenous application of vvi-miPEP171d1 cannot result in any phenotypic changes in Arabidopsis, and ath-miPEP171c has no effect on grape root development [181]. Thus, miPEP171d1 regulates root development by promoting vvi-MIR171d expression in a species-specific manner [181]. Additionally, in apples, mdm-MIR393b is involved in mediating auxin signaling and inducing adventitious root formation by targeted regulation of MdTIR1A expression in apple rootstock [182]. In rice, miR393 has also been identified to negatively regulate the miR390-mediated growth of lateral roots under stress [183]. Another miRNA that regulates auxin-related pathways in root development is miR847, and miR847 targets IAA28 (an IAA/ARF transcriptional repressor), which can interact with ARF proteins and promote lateral root formation [184,185]. Then miRNAs involved in multi-signaling pathways regulate plant root development (Figure 5).
3.1.6. miRNAs in Shaping the Fruit/Grain Size and Maturation
Fruits and seeds are important productions for plants to propagate offspring, and they also supply crop yields for global creatures. Phytohormones take important roles in shaping the fruit/grain size and maturation. NcRNAs have been reported to be involved in the regulation of the phytohormones-mediated pathways. For instance, auxin-GA crosstalk via ARFs can be regulated by miR160 and miR167 to influence the duration of fruit development by affecting ABA accumulation [186]. For fruit ripening, ethylene plays a clear role in climacteric fruits, such as the tomato, whereas non-climacteric ripening fruits, such as the strawberry, are generally associated with ABA. Moreover, NAC transcription factors respond to ABA and ethylene [187,188] and can be targeted by miR164 to control the ripening of the strawberry [189] and kiwifruit [190]. Additionally, in the tomato, SlymiR157 has been reported to affect LeSPL-CNR (SQUAMOSA Promoter Binding Protein-like) expression and influence fruit ripening [191]. The level of the intact messenger of AP2a (APETALA2a) is also actively modulated by miR172 during the fruit ripening of the tomato [192]. Furthermore, the overexpression of miRNA172p reduces the fruit size of apple “Royal Gala”, while reduced expression of miRNA172 by a transposon insertion associates with large fruit. The expression patterns of miRNA172p and AP2 genes in fruit and the target site of miRNA172 in AP2 genes indicate that miRNA172p could modulate levels of AP2 proteins to influence apple fruit development [193]. In strawberry, miR159 is also identified to target and regulate the expression of Fa-GAMYB during berry receptacle development and cooperatively changed GA endogenous levels [194]. Another miRNA, miR397, could increase grain size and promote panicle branching when OsmiR397 is overexpressed and downregulates its target OsLAC, which is involved in the sensitivity of rice plants to brassinosteroids [195]. Additionally, in rice, OsPIL15 (phytochrome-interacting factor-like 15) also activates the expression of OsMIR530, which targets OsPL3 (PLUS3 domain-containing protein) to regulate grain yield. Overexpressed OsMIR530 or knocking out OsPL3 decreases the rice yield by altering the grain size and panicle architecture, whereas blocking OsmiR530 increases grain yield [196]. Then miR160, miR167, miR164, miR157, miR172, miR159, and miR397 are all involved in the regulation of the fruit/grain size and maturation through the phytohormone pathway; however, OsmiR530 has not been identified to be related to phytohormones.
3.2. LncRNAs Involved in Plant Development
In plants, lncRNAs have been shown to participate in the regulation of developmental processes (Table 2). The expression of the major flowering repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) involved in vernalization is tightly fine-tuned by lncRNAs, such as COOLAIR, COLDAIR, ANTISENSE LONG (ASL), and COLDWRAP. COOLAIR is natural antisense transcript originating from the 3′end of the FLC locus and represses FLC through increasing the level of histone demethylase FLD, leading to H3K4me2 demethylation of FLC [197,198]. Additionally, COLDAIR transcribed from the second FLC intron can bind PRC2 complex protein CURLY LEAF (CLF) to recruit PRC2 to the FLC locus allowing deposition of the repressive H3K27me3 chromatin mark to repress FLC [118,199]. Moreover, COLDWRAP is associated with the promoter of FLC, which also interacts with CLF to form an intragenic chromatin loop and to confer FLC repression [128]. However, ASL, a non-polyadenylated antisense transcript with an unknown function, is also transcribed from the FLC locus [200]. Another natural antisense lncRNA, MAS, originated from the MADS AFFECTING FLOWERING4 (MAF4) locus also involved in vernalization and regulates MAF4 via interacting with histone-modifying enzyme WDR5a (WD40-REPEAT 5a) [201].
Apart from regulating vernalization, LncRNAs take important roles in floral organ identity and flowering time control. Through RNA-seq technology, the long intergenic noncoding RNAs LINC-AP2 has been identified to regulate the floral structure of shorter stamen filaments by anti-cis downregulating AP2 gene in TCV-infected Arabidopsis plants [202]. In addition, bra-eTM160-1 and bra-eTM160-2 are also identified to be functional target mimics for miR160 through the miR160-ARF pathway regulating pollen development and fertilization in Brassica rapa [25]. Other lncRNAs such as FLOWERING LONG INTERGENIC NON CODING RNA (FLINC), CDF5 LONG NONCODING RNA (FLORE), LONG-DAY SPECIFIC MALE-FERTILITY-ASSOCIATED RNA (LDMAR), PHOTOPERIOD-SENSITIVE GENIC MALE STERILITY 1 (PMS1T), and EARLY FLOWERING-COMPLETELY DOMINANT (Ef-cd) are flowering time-related lncRNAs. FLINC has been reported to regulate FT (FLOWERING LOCUS T) expression involved in flowering [203]. In addition, FLORE, the antisense to CDF5 (CYCLING DOF FACTOR 5), can improve photoperiodic flowering by repressing the transcription of CDFs and increasing FT activity to promote flowering [204]. Whereas in rice, sufficient transcripts of LDMAR are required for normal pollen development of plants grown under long-day conditions, but the change of secondary structure of LDMAR due to a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mutation can increase methylation in the promoter of LDMAR and reduced the transcription of LDMAR, resulting in photoperiod-sensitive male sterility (PSMS) [205]. Similarly, PMS1T also contributes to photoperiod-sensitive male sterility by producing phase-siRNAs in a miR2118-dependent manner under long-day conditions [206]. However, Ef-cd originated from the antisense strand of the flowering activator OsSOC1 locus, recruits SDG724 complex to increase the H3K36me3 level in the OsSOC1 locus, and positively regulates the expression of OsSOC1, reducing the time-span for plant maturity [207]. Besides, in rice, the parent-of-origin lncRNA MISSEN has also been proved to function by hijacking a helicase family protein (HeFP), leading to abnormal cytoskeleton polymerization during endosperm development [208]. Moreover, circRNAs derived from exon 6 of the SEPALLATA3 (SEP3) gene increase the abundance of the cognate exon-skipped AS variant (SEP3.3 which lacks exon 6) through R-loop formation, in turn driving floral homeotic phenotypes of Arabidopsis [209].
Furthermore, for leaf development, the plant photomorphogenesis-related lncRNA, HIDDEN TREASURE 1 (HID1), modulates the chromatin structure in the PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 3 (PIF3) promoter and represses the transcriptional activity of PIF3, inhibiting hypocotyl elongation of Arabidopsis seedlings [117]. Additionally, the AG-incRNA4 can associate with CLF to repress AG expression in leaf tissues through H3K27me3-mediated repression and to autoregulate its expression level [210]. Moreover, the antisense long noncoding RNA, TWISTED LEAF, maintains leaf-blade flattening by mediating chromatin modifications of OsMYB60 and suppressing its expression in rice [211].
Another lncRNA, AUXIN-REGULATED PROMOTER LOOP (APOLO), regulated by ARF7 participates in the genetic regulatory network governing lateral root development through polar auxin transport by controlling chromatin loop dynamics [212]. APOLO regulates two homolog genes, namely serine/threonine protein kinases PINOID (PID) and WAG2, by affecting local chromatin loop formation [129]. Moreover, APOLO interacts with the transcription factor WRKY42 and directly recognizes the locus encoding the root hair (RH) master regulator ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE 6 (RHD6), modulating its transcriptional activation and leading to low-temperature-induced RH elongation [213]. Even further, APOLO and WRKY42 can positively control the expression of several cell wall EXTENSIN (EXT) encoding genes, including EXT3, regulating RH development and growth [214].
Moreover, a lncRNA LAIR transcribed from the antisense strand of the neighboring gene LRK (leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase) cluster can regulate the neighboring gene cluster expression in rice. LAIR overexpression increases rice grain yield and upregulates the expression of several LRK genes through binding histone modification proteins OsMOF and OsWDR5 to enrich H3K4me3 and H4K16ac at the activated LRK1 genomic region and the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions of LRK1 gene [215].
4. Function of ncRNAs in Plant Abiotic Stress Response
4.1. miRNAs Play Important Roles in Heat and Cold Stress
Plants are constantly exposed to various environmental stresses, such as extreme temperatures, high salinity, and drought. These abiotic stresses significantly affect plant growth and productivity. Then plant miRNAs involved in a variety of stress responses also play essential roles in plant development.
Heat is one of the most serious stresses affecting plant growth, development, and crop yields. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) and heat stress transcription factors (HSFs) have been identified to be involved in responses to heat stress in plants [216]. In Arabidopsis, heat stress induces the transcription of miR160, and represses the expression of ARF10, 16, and 17, regulating the high expression level of HSP genes, resulting in the thermotolerance of plants [217]. MiR393 is also involved in auxin-related development in plants, and overexpression of osa-miR393a in transgenic creeping bentgrass increases heat tolerance by repressing its targets AsAFB2 and AsTIR1 and inducing expression of HSPs [218]. Additionally, TamiR159-targeted cleavage of TaGAMYB regulates anther development and heat response possibly through the GAMYB-amylase pathway for starch degradation in wheat [219]. MiR319, with a high degree of sequence identity to miR159, targeting TCP and MYB genes, can regulate transcription levels of heat-stress-responsive genes and conferred heat stress tolerance in miR319-overexpressed Solanum Lycopersicum [220]. Similarly, in Arabidopsis, during recovery from heat stress (HS), the miR156-SPL module sustains the expression of HS-responsive genes (e.g., HSFA2 and HSPs) and mediates the response to recurring heat stress, and thus may also integrate stress responses with development [221]. Conversely, miR398 is rapidly induced in response to HS, downregulating its target genes (CSD1/2, copper/zinc superoxide dismutase1/2; CCS, copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase) and resulting in ROS (reactive oxygen species) accumulation and increased HSF and HSP levels, which can regulate miR398 with a regulatory loop again [222]. Moreover, miR396 downregulates HaWRKY6 during early responses to high temperature in sunflower, and heterologous Arabidopsis plants expressing a miR396-resistant HaWRKY6 gene exhibited sensibility to high-temperature damage [223]. Furthermore, in rice, both miR166 and miR169 can target SGT1 (the G2 allele of skp1), which could bind to HSP90 and HSP70 and regulate the rice response to thermal stress during flowering [224]. Another osa-miR5144 has also been identified to be involved in HS tolerance of rice by mediating the expression of OsPDIL1;1 (protein disulfide isomerase), which regulates the formation of protein disulfide bonds [225]. For the MIR400 family, a heat-stress-induced alternative splicing in the intron of MIR400, increasing accumulation of miR400 primary transcripts and reducing the level of mature miR400, leads to miR400 acting as a negative regulator in plant heat-stress resistance [226]. Therefore, the hormone/development/alternative splicing/ROS/HSPs and HSFs-related miRNAs are involved in heat stress responses in plants (Figure 6).
Continuous cold stress affects plant growth and development by altering cell structure and physiological and biochemical metabolism [227,228]. During cold stress, ICE (Inducer of CBF expression) is activated by ABA-independent pathway which activates downstream transcription factor CBF/DREB1 that binds to C-repeat elements (CRT)/low-temperature-response elements (LTRE) and induces the expression of cold-responsive (COR) genes [229,230]. Numerous miRNAs have been reported to play an active role during cold stress in plants. In rice, the expression of Osa-miR319b is downregulated by cold stress, but the overexpression of Osa-miR319b causes downregulation of its targets OsPCF6 and OsTCP21 and upregulating cold stress-responsive genes such as DREB1/CBF (Dehydration Responsive Element Binding Protein/C-repeat Binding Factor), DREB2A, and TPP1/2 (Trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase 1/2), leading to enhanced tolerance to cold stress [73]. Additionally, genetically downregulating the expression of miR319-targeted genes, OsPCF5 and OsPCF8, also results in enhanced cold tolerance after chilling acclimation in rice [231]. Moreover, OsWRKY71 can be positively regulated by the target of OsmiR156, OsSPL3, and OsWRKY71 negatively regulate the transcription factors OsMYB2 and OsMYB3R-2, which counteracts cold stress by activating the expression of the stress-response genes OsLEA3, OsDREB2A, OsCTP1, etc. [232]. Furthermore, overexpressing miR394 in Arabidopsis downregulates the expression of its target LCR (LEAF CURLING RESPONSIVENESS) and activates cold-responsive genes CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 to be involved in plant cold tolerance [233,234]. Under cold stress, transcription factors involved in the auxin metabolic pathway play an important role. The miRNA-target pair miR169/NF-YA module in Arabidopsis have been identified to function in the Aux/IAA14-mediated cold stress response [235]. Another miR167 and tasiRNA-ARF in wheat also play roles in regulating the auxin-signaling pathway and possibly in the developmental response to cold stress [236]. For miR408 and miR397, they both target different members of laccases involved in low-temperature stress responses. MiR408 primarily targets the phytocyanin family of proteins and laccases, and miR408-OE Arabidopsis lines are reported to exhibit enhanced LT tolerance by modulating ROS homeostasis and lignin biosynthetic pathway [237,238]. Whereas, miR397 targets three laccases (LAC2, LAC17, and LAC4) and a casein kinase β subunit 3 and miR397-OE plants have been shown an increased freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis through the lignin biosynthesis pathway [237,239] (Figure 6).
4.2. miRNAs Mediate Salinity Stress Tolerance
Salinity, as a major environmental stress, affects plant growth and development. The regulatory roles of plant miRNAs and their target genes under salt stress have been gradually revealed. The expression levels of miRNA are up- or downregulated by salinity stress. The expression of miR160 and its ARF target gene is induced by salt stress in peanuts, and the miR160 overexpression mediated ARF18 pathway protects seedling development against the effects of ROS under salt stress [240]. In addition, overexpressing miR156a weakens salt resistance in apples, whereas its target gene, MdSPL13, strengthens salt resistance [241]. Moreover, the same miRNA or different miRNA from the same miRNA family have different promotion or inhibition effects on salt tolerance in different plants. For instance, overexpressing Osa-miR393 in rice and Arabidopsis reduces tolerance to salt [242,243], and the overexpressing miR393-resistant form mTIR1 in Arabidopsis enhances salt tolerance [244]. Conversely, overexpressing Osa-miR393a in creeping bentgrass increases the uptake of potassium and improves salt-stress tolerance [218]. Similarly, overexpressing Osa-miR396c, which targets GRF, decreases salt and alkali stress tolerance in rice and Arabidopsis [245] but enhances salt tolerance in transgenic creeping bentgrass through salinity overly sensitive 1 (AsSOS1)-mediated Na+ exclusion [246]. Furthermore, overexpression of PeNAC070 targeted by miR164 in Arabidopsis increases sensitivity to salt stresses [247], and so does overexpressing the target gene GmNFYA3 of miR169 [248]. Another miR414c and its target GhFSD1 (Iron Superoxide Dismutase 1) are also involved in the salt tolerance of cotton. Overexpressing miR414c can decrease the expression of GhFSD1 and increase sensitivity to salinity stress by regulating reactive oxygen species metabolism [249]. Likewise, constitutively expressing miRNVL5, which targets GhCHR (Cys/His-rich DC1/PHD domains), displays hypersensitivity to salt stress by repressing CBF (C-repeat binding factor), ERF (Ethylene-responsive element binding factor), etc. [250] (Figure 7).
4.3. miRNAs Are Involved in Drought Stress Response
Drought stress is one of the major natural challenges that restricts the growth, development, and yield of plants. Many miRNAs participate in drought stress response in plants via auxin signaling, ABA-mediated regulation, and scavenging of antioxidants [251,252]. In apple trees, Mdm-miR160 can move from the scion to the rootstock in apples and tomatoes (Solanum Lycopersicum) to improve root development and drought tolerance of the rootstock. Additionally, MdARF17 targeted by miR160 can interact with MdHYL1 (HYPONASTIC LEAVES 1) and bind the promoter of MdHYL1 and MIR160 to activate their expression, forming a positive feedback loop regulation [253]. However, miR165/166-mediated HD-ZIP IIIs regulation confers drought tolerance through ABA signaling in Arabidopsis, while HD-ZIP IIIs activate the expression of ARF, which is targeted by miR160; thus, drought tolerance is mediated by miR160 and miR165/166 interactions. This interaction also triggers differential expressions of IAA- and ABA-signaling-related genes to drought tolerance of Arabidopsis [254]. Moreover, both the STTM166 plants and overexpressing a miR166-resistant form of OsHB4 (HOMEODOMAIN CONTAINING PROTEIN4) plants show high drought tolerance in rice, due to reduced stomatal conductance and transpiration rates [255]. Another two rice auxin receptor gene homologs (OsTIR1 and OsAFB2) are downregulated in OsmiR393-overexpressing rice and reduce tolerance to drought stress and hyposensitivity to auxin [243]. Furthermore, in miR156OE alfalfa plants, the reduced expression of miR156-targeted SPL13 increases WD40-1 to fine-tune DFR expression for enhanced anthocyanin biosynthesis, improving drought tolerance [256,257]. Apart from the above miRNAs and targets, the miR159-MYB module and miR169-NFYA module also participate in an ABA-dependent pathway to regulate drought responses in plants [258]. In Arabidopsis, miR159 accumulates and mediates cleavage of MYB33 and MYB101 in response to ABA and drought during seed germination [137]. Similarly, in the tomato, sly-miR159 targeting of SlMYB33 transcription factor transcript correlated with the accumulation of the osmoprotective compounds proline and putrescine to promote drought tolerance [259]. However, miR169 is downregulated by drought stress through an ABA-dependent pathway. The nfya5 knockout and overexpressing miR169a Arabidopsis show sensitivity to drought stress, while overexpressing NFYA5 displays tolerance to drought stress [260]. Likewise, gma-miR169c targeted AtNFYA1 and AtNFYA5 in soybean, and miR169n targeted NF-γAδ in Brassica napus, negatively regulating the drought-stress response by inhibiting the transcript levels of the stress response genes [261,262] (Figure 8).
4.4. LncRNAs Are Involved in Plant Abiotic Stress Response
LncRNAs affect the abiotic stress response by recruiting complex mechanisms based on eTM, antisense transcription-mediated modulation, chromatin modulation, or directly regulating the transcription of various abiotic-responsive genes. In Brassica rapa, lncRNA (TCONS_00048391) has been identified to be an eTM of bra-miR164a and could be a ceRNA for the target gene (NAC1, Bra030820) of miR164a involved in heat tolerance in Chinese cabbage [263]. Moreover, in cassava, the expression of miR164-targeted NAC (NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2) genes greatly decreases due to the cold-repressive lincRNA159, which is the miRNA164 target mimics, and upregulates the expression of miR164 under cold treatment [264]. Conversely, the expression of lincRNA340 is induced by drought stress, accompanied by an increase of miR169-targeted NUCLEAR FACTOR Y (NF-Y) genes after drought treatment [264]. Additionally, the lncRNA DROUGHT-INDUCED LNCRNA (DRIR) in Arabidopsis positively regulates ABA-mediated drought and salt-stress responses. Plants overexpressing DRIR display enhanced salt and drought tolerance through functioning at or upstream of the stage of gene transcription in the stress or ABA signal transduction pathways [265]. Furthermore, in cotton, lncRNA973 affects miR399 and its target PHO2 expression involved in response to salt stress, and lncRNA973 can also modulate the expression of reactive-oxygen-species-scavenging genes, transcription factors, and genes involved in salt-stress-related processes [30]. However, lncRNA354 functions as a competing endogenous RNA of miR160b to regulate GhARF17/18 genes, modulating auxin signaling in response to salt stress in cotton [266]. Another LncRNA XH123 of cotton is involved in the tolerance of cold stress. The XH123-silenced plants are sensitive to cold stress, which displays chloroplast damage and increases the endogenous levels of reactive oxygen species [267]. In addition, transcriptional read-through of the lncRNA SVALKA results in the expression of a cryptic antisense CBF1 lncRNA (asCBF1), which suppresses the expression of CBF1 and decreases tolerance to freezing temperatures of Arabidopsis [268]. Moreover, lncRNA APOLO, which interacts with the TF WRKY42, activates RHD6 (ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE 6) transcription by modulating the formation of a local chromatin loop encompassing its promoter region to induce RH growth in response to low temperatures [213].
Despite a great number of lncRNAs having been obtained through RNA-seq, the biological role and mechanisms of action in abiotic stress response remain poorly understood. With the increasing availability of reference genome sequences and the development of molecular biology in plants, the function of various lncRNAs involved in abiotic stress response will be explored by comparative genome analysis and genetic transformation analysis.
5. Conclusions and Perspectives
NcRNAs do not function directly in plant growth and development or in plant response to environmental stress. Instead, ncRNAs are involved in plant development and response to abiotic stresses through regulating key components of complex gene networks, including various phytohormone signaling pathways, transcription factors (TFs), and metabolism-related genes. Previous research has indicated that ncRNAs respond to development and environmental stresses in an ncRNA-, stress-, tissue-, and genotype-dependent manner [116,132,269]. Moreover, even to the extent that the same ncRNA displays different expression trends in different plant species, and the opposite effect on the same abiotic stress in different plants. The possible reason is related to the multi-targets of ncRNA, resulting in multi-functions. For instance, miR858 inhibits the expression of MYBL2 and positively regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis seedlings [270], whereas miR858 negatively regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis by repressing AaMYBC1 expression in kiwifruit [271]. Moreover, different ncRNAs with distinct types of targets can interact and co-participate in the same or different metabolic pathway regulation, and the expression of these ncRNAs and their targets is upregulated or downregulated to be involved in positive or negative regulation in one metabolic pathway. The further research field is how the development and stress signals are sensed to promote the expression of ncRNAs and transduced to specially regulate the transcription of target genes in different metabolic pathways. Then the functions of ncRNAs in various plant species, organs, and tissues, and in response to different abiotic stress, need to be further explored with functional genomics experiments.
The “C-value paradox” shows the no-obvious correlation between DNA amount [272] and organism complexity, and the discovery that much of the genome does not encode protein-coding genes gives the paradox an “explanation”. Moreover, the functional research of non-coding RNA indicates that the termed “junk DNA” of noncoding space in a genome can be transcribed and has important regulatory roles in plant development and environmental response. Then the central role of ncRNAs in the plant constitutes a major characteristic feature of the plant kingdom, although the characteristics and function of the majority of ncRNAs are currently not known. Unraveling the complexity, biogenesis, and action of plant ncRNAs remains an important challenge. We must also keep in mind that the genome of plants has been evolved to be a sophisticated and accurate regulation system by natural selection, and the unilateral explanation to gene expression regulation from structure, function, and mechanism is not adequate. Functional proteins, transcription factors, ncRNAs, small peptides, and epigenetic modification interact to form complex and fine regulating networks of gene expression during plant development or stress responses. Therefore, perspective research in the role of ncRNAs in plants needs to focus on functional analysis and on developing transgenic abiotic-stress-resistant, top-quality, and high-yield crop plants.
X.M. collected the literature and wrote part of the manuscript; F.Z. amended the manuscript; B.Z. wrote the manuscript and took part in the literature collection. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2572020DY21) and the Grant from Science and Technology Program of Shandong Province (2017LZN015).
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Transcription of miRNA and its regulatory role in plant cell. miRNAs are transcribed by RNA PolyII to produce pri-miRNAs (hairpin structures) in the nucleus that are processed to methylated miRNA/miRNA* duplex and are then transported to the cytoplasm to form the RISC complex. The complex can either inhibit the translation or degrade the mRNA target, depending on incomplete or complete complementarity to the target mRNA sequence.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Transcription of lncRNA and its regulatory role in plant cell. (a) Plant lncRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerases PolⅡ, PolⅣ, and PolⅤ from ① enhancers, ② promoters, ③ introns of genes, or ④ antisense of genes. (b) The lncRNAs act as scaffolds, guides, and decoys to regulate gene expression through interacting with DNA, RNA, protein and miRNAs.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Pathway of miRNAs involved in seed germination and development. MiR156, miR159, miR160, and miR393 targeted transcription factors regulate seed development and germination through auxin, ABA, and GA pathway. Note: → represents positive regulation, and ┤ represents negative regulation.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Pathway of miRNAs involved in plant floral development. MiR156, miR172, miR390, and their targets interact to form a complex network mediated by transcription factors. Note: → represents positive regulation, and ┤ represents negative regulation.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. Pathway of miRNAs involved in root development of plant. MiR164, miR167, miR393, and miR171 targeted transcription factors regulate root development through auxin and the GA signaling pathway. MiR156, miR847, and miR169 also participate in regulating root development by targeting special transcription factors. Note: → represents positive regulation, and ┤ represents negative regulation.
Enlarge this image.Figure 6. Pathway of miRNAs involved in abnormal temperature stress response in plants. MiR160, miR393, miR159, miR319, miR156, miR398, miR166/169 regulate heat stress responses in plants through the hormone/development/alternative splicing/ROS/HSPs and HSFs-related pathways. MiR319b, miR156, miR394, miR169, miR167, and miR408 also regulate cold stress responses in plants with their targets.
Enlarge this image.Figure 7. Pathway of miRNAs involved in salinity stress response. MiR156-SPL13, miR160-ARF18, miR164-NAC070, miR169-NFYA3, and miR414c-FSD1 modules regulate plant salinity stress tolerance. MiR393 and miR396c can positively or negatively regulate salinity stress response of plant through different pathways.
Enlarge this image.Figure 8. Pathway of miRNAs involved in drought stress response. MiR159, miR165/166, miR160, miR169, miR393, and miR156 participate in drought stress response in plants via auxin signaling, ABA-mediated regulation, and scavenging of antioxidants.
Classification and composition of non-coding RNAs.
| Classification | Composition | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circular ncRNAs | Exonic circRNAs | Intronic circRNAs | UTR circRNAs | Intergenic circRNAs | Other circRNAs | ||
| Linear ncRNAs | Housekeeping ncRNAs | Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) | Transfer RNA (tRNA) | Small nuclear RNA (snRNA) | Small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) | ||
| Regulatory ncRNAs | sRNAs | MicroRNAs (miRNAs) | Natural antisense transcript-derived small interfering RNAs (nat-siRNAs) | Trans-acting siRNAs (tasiRNAs) | Repeat-associated siRNAs (rasi-RNAs) | Heterochromatic small interfering RNAs (hc-siRNAs) | |
| Long ncRNAs | Intergenic ncRNAs | Intron ncRNAs | Sense ncRNAs (slncRNAs) | Antisense ncRNAs (ancRNAs) | |||
List of plant lncRNAs associated with plant development.
| LncRNAs | Targeted Gene/Protein | Description and Function | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| COOLAIR | FLD, FLC | Leading to H3K4me2 demethylation of FLC involved in vernalization and flowering. | [ |
| COLDAIR | CLF, PRC2, FLC | Recruiting PRC2 to the FLC locus to add H3K27me3, repressing FLC to regulate flowering. | [ |
| ANTISENSE LONG (ASL) | unknown | A non-polyadenylated antisense transcript from FLC locus, with unknown function. | [ |
| COLDWRAP | CLF | Forming an intragenic chromatin loop to confer FLC repression and regulate flowering. | [ |
| MAS | WDR5a | Regulating MAF4 involved in vernalization. | [ |
| LINC-AP2 | AP2 | Regulating the floral structure of shorter stamen filaments. | [ |
| Bra-eTM160-1/2 | MiR160 | Regulating pollen development and fertilization through the miR160-ARF pathway. | [ |
| FLINC | FT | Regulating flowering. | [ |
| FLORE | CDFs, FT | Regulating flowering. | [ |
| LDMAR | unknown | Regulating normal pollen development | [ |
| PMS1T | miR2118 | Regulating photoperiod-sensitive male sterility. | [ |
| Ef-cd | SDG724, OsSOC1 | Increase the H3K36me3 level of the OsSOC1 and reducing the time-span for plant maturity. | [ |
| MISSEN | HeFP | Regulating cytoskeleton polymerization during endosperm development. | [ |
| CIRCRNA (SEP3) | SEP3 | Driving floral homeotic phenotypes through exon-skipped AS variant of SEP3. | [ |
| HID1 | PIF3 | Inhibiting hypocotyl elongation by modulating the chromatin structure of the promoter of PIF3. | [ |
| AG-incRNA4 | CLF, AG | Regulating leaf development through H3K27me3-mediated repression of AG. | [ |
| TWISTED LEAF | OsMYB60 | Regulating leaf blade flattening through chromatin modifications of OsMYB60. | [ |
| APOLO | PID, WAG2, WRKY42 | Regulating lateral root development through polar auxin transport by controlling chromatin loop dynamics and leading to low temperature-induced root hair elongation. | [ |
| LAIR | LRK, OsMOF and OsWDR5 | Regulating rice grain yield by chromatin modification and activating promoters of the LRKs gene. | [ |
References
1. Kumar, A.A.; Mishra, P.; Kumari, K.; Panigrahi, K.C. Environmental stress influencing plant development and flowering. Front. Biosci.; 2012; 4, pp. 1315-1324. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2741/s333]
2. Chen, Z.H.; Soltis, D.E. Evolution of environmental stress responses in plants. Plant Cell. Environ.; 2020; 43, pp. 2827-2831. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.13922] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33103798]
3. Rai, M.I.; Alam, M.; Lightfoot, D.A.; Gurha, P.; Afzal, A.J. Classification and experimental identification of plant long non-coding RNAs. Genomics; 2019; 111, pp. 997-1005. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.04.014] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29679643]
4. Jha, U.C.; Nayyar, H.; Jha, R.; Khurshid, M.; Zhou, M.; Mantri, N.; Siddique, K.H.M. Long non-coding RNAs: Emerging players regulating plant abiotic stress response and adaptation. BMC Plant Biol.; 2020; 20, 466. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02595-x]
5. Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y. Plant Noncoding RNAs: Hidden Players in Development and Stress Responses. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol.; 2019; 35, pp. 407-431. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125218]
6. Ariel, F.; Romero-Barrios, N.; Jegu, T.; Benhamed, M.; Crespi, M. Battles and hijacks: Noncoding transcription in plants. Trends Plant Sci.; 2015; 20, pp. 362-371. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.003]
7. Li, S.; Castillo-Gonzalez, C.; Yu, B.; Zhang, X. The functions of plant small RNAs in development and in stress responses. Plant J.; 2017; 90, pp. 654-670. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13444]
8. Meng, X.X.; Li, A.X.; Yu, B.; Li, S.J. Interplay between miRNAs and lncRNAs: Mode of action and biological roles in plant development and stress adaptation. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol.; 2021; 19, pp. 2567-2574. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.062]
9. Ashutosh,; Sharma, B.; Shinada, T.; Kifuji, Y.; Kitashiba, H.; Nishio, T. Molecular mapping of a male fertility restorer locus of Brassica oleracea using expressed sequence tag-based single nucleotide polymorphism markers and analysis of a syntenic region in Arabidopsis thaliana for identification of genes encoding pentatricopeptide repeat proteins. Mol. Breed.; 2012; 30, pp. 1781-1792.
10. Meng, X.W.; Zhang, P.J.; Chen, Q.; Wang, J.J.; Chen, M. Identification and characterization of ncRNA-associated ceRNA networks in Arabidopsis leaf development. BMC Genom.; 2018; 19, 607. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4993-2]
11. Zhdanov, V.P. Stochastic bursts in the kinetics of gene expression with regulation by long non-coding RNAs. JETP Lett.; 2010; 92, pp. 410-415. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0021364010180104]
12. Bian, X.B.; Yu, P.C.; Dong, L.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, H.; Han, Y.Z.; Zhang, L.X. Regulatory role of non-coding RNA in ginseng rusty root symptom tissue. Sci. Rep.; 2021; 11, 9211. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88709-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33911151]
13. Zou, C.L.; Wang, Y.B.; Wang, B.; Liu, D.; Liu, L.; Gai, Z.J.; Li, C.F. Long non-coding RNAs in the alkaline stress response in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). BMC Plant Biol.; 2020; 20, 227. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02437-w] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32434543]
14. Achard, P.; Herr, A.; Baulcombe, D.C.; Harberd, N.P. Modulation of floral development by a gibberellin-regulated microRNA. Development; 2004; 131, pp. 3357-3365. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.01206]
15. Zhou, R.; Sanz-Jimenez, P.; Zhu, X.T.; Feng, J.W.; Shao, L.; Song, J.M.; Chen, L.L. Analysis of Rice Transcriptome Reveals the LncRNA/CircRNA Regulation in Tissue Development. Rice; 2021; 14, 14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12284-021-00455-2]
16. Leng, Y.; Sun, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, H.; Zou, D. Genome-wide lncRNAs identification and association analysis for cold-responsive genes at the booting stage in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Genome; 2020; 13, e20020. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20020]
17. Zhang, W.; Han, Z.; Guo, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, F.; Jin, W. Identification of maize long non-coding RNAs responsive to drought stress. PLoS ONE; 2014; 9, e98958. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098958]
18. Li, D.; Qiao, H.; Qiu, W.; Xu, X.; Liu, T.; Jiang, Q.; Liu, R.; Jiao, Z.; Zhang, K.; Bi, L. et al. Identification and functional characterization of intermediate-size non-coding RNAs in maize. BMC Genom.; 2018; 19, 730. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5103-1]
19. Yao, Y.; Sun, Q. Exploration of small non coding RNAs in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Mol. Biol.; 2012; 80, pp. 67-73. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-011-9835-4]
20. Zhang, H.; Hu, W.G.; Hao, J.L.; Lv, S.K.; Wang, C.Y.; Tong, W.; Wang, Y.J.; Wang, Y.Z.; Liu, X.L.; Ji, W.Q. Genome-wide identification and functional prediction of novel and fungi-responsive lincRNAs in Triticum aestivum. BMC Genom.; 2016; 17, 238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2570-0]
21. Ma, B.; Zhang, A.; Zhao, Q.; Li, Z.; Lamboro, A.; He, H.; Li, Y.; Jiao, S.; Guan, S.; Liu, S. et al. Genome-wide identification and analysis of long non-coding RNAs involved in fatty acid biosynthesis in young soybean pods. Sci. Rep.; 2021; 11, 7603. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87048-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828134]
22. Chen, R.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.Y.; Duan, L.J.; Sun, X.J.; Jiang, Q.Y.; Zhang, H.; Hu, Z. Continuous salt stress-induced long non-coding RNAs and DNA methylation patterns in soybean roots. BMC Genom.; 2019; 20, 730. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6101-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31606033]
23. Bokszczanin, K.L.; Krezdorn, N.; Fragkostefanakis, S.; Muller, S.; Rycak, L.; Chen, Y.Y.; Hoffmeier, K.; Kreutz, J.; Paupiere, M.J.; Chaturvedi, P. et al. Identification of novel small ncRNAs in pollen of tomato. BMC Genom.; 2015; 16, 714. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1901-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26385469]
24. Wang, M.H.; Zhao, W.H.; Gao, L.; Zhao, L.X. Genome-wide profiling of long non-coding RNAs from tomato and a comparison with mRNAs associated with the regulation of fruit ripening. BMC Plant Biol.; 2018; 18, 75. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1300-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29728060]
25. Huang, L.; Dong, H.; Zhou, D.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Feng, Y.; Yu, D.; Lin, S.; Cao, J. Systematic identification of long non-coding RNAs during pollen development and fertilization in Brassica rapa. Plant J.; 2018; 96, pp. 203-222. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14016]
26. Shen, E.; Zhu, X.; Hua, S.; Chen, H.; Ye, C.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, Q.H.; Fan, L.; Chen, X. Genome-wide identification of oil biosynthesis-related long non-coding RNAs in allopolyploid Brassica napus. BMC Genom.; 2018; 19, 745. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5117-8]
27. Matsui, A.; Mizunashi, K.; Tanaka, M.; Kaminuma, E.; Nguyen, A.H.; Nakajima, M.; Kim, J.M.; Van Nguyen, D.; Toyoda, T.; Seki, M. tasiRNA-ARF Pathway Moderates Floral Architecture in Arabidopsis Plants Subjected to Drought Stress. Biomed. Res. Int.; 2014; 2014, 303451. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/303451]
28. Das, A.; Saxena, S.; Kumar, K.; Tribhuvan, K.U.; Singh, N.K.; Gaikwad, K. Non-coding RNAs having strong positive interaction with mRNAs reveal their regulatory nature during flowering in a wild relative of pigeonpea (Cajanus scarabaeoides). Mol. Biol. Rep.; 2020; 47, pp. 3305-3317. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05400-y]
29. Wu, X.X.; Shi, T.; Iqbal, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Gao, Z.H. Genome-wide discovery and characterization of flower development related long non-coding RNAs in Prunus mume. BMC Plant Biol.; 2019; 19, 64. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1672-7]
30. Zhang, X.P.; Dong, J.; Deng, F.N.; Wang, W.; Cheng, Y.Y.; Song, L.R.; Hu, M.J.; Shen, J.; Xu, Q.J.; Shen, F.F. The long non-coding RNA lncRNA973 is involved in cotton response to salt stress. BMC Plant Biol.; 2019; 19, 459. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2088-0]
31. Kuang, L.H.; Shen, Q.F.; Wu, L.Y.; Yu, J.H.; Fu, L.B.; Wu, D.Z.; Zhang, G.P. Identification of microRNAs responding to salt stress in barley by high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. Environ. Exp. Bot.; 2019; 160, pp. 59-70. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.01.006]
32. Wang, J.; Meng, X.; Dobrovolskaya, O.B.; Orlov, Y.L.; Chen, M. Non-coding RNAs and Their Roles in Stress Response in Plants. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform.; 2017; 15, pp. 301-312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2017.01.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29017967]
33. Waititu, J.K.; Zhang, C.; Liu, J.; Wang, H. Plant Non-Coding RNAs: Origin, Biogenesis, Mode of Action and Their Roles in Abiotic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 18401. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218401] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33182372]
34. Ahmed, W.; Xia, Y.; Li, R.; Bai, G.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Guo, P. Non-coding RNAs: Functional roles in the regulation of stress response in Brassica crops. Genomics; 2020; 112, pp. 1419-1424. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.08.011]
35. Singh, P.; Dutta, P.; Chakrabarty, D. miRNAs play critical roles in response to abiotic stress by modulating cross-talk of phytohormone signaling. Plant Cell. Rep.; 2021; 40, pp. 1617-1630. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-021-02736-y]
36. Noman, A.; Fahad, S.; Aqeel, M.; Ali, U.; Amanullah,; Anwar, S.; Baloch, S.K.; Zainab, M. miRNAs: Major modulators for crop growth and development under abiotic stresses. Biotechnol. Lett.; 2017; 39, pp. 685-700. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-017-2302-9]
37. Liu, D.G.; Mewalal, R.; Hu, R.B.; Tuskan, G.A.; Yang, X.H. New technologies accelerate the exploration of non-coding RNAs in horticultural plants. Hortic. Res.; 2017; 4, 17031. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.31]
38. Contreras-Cubas, C.; Palomar, M.; Arteaga-Vazquez, M.; Reyes, J.L.; Covarrubias, A.A. Non-coding RNAs in the plant response to abiotic stress. Planta; 2012; 236, pp. 943-958. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1693-z]
39. Khraiwesh, B.; Zhu, J.K.; Zhu, J. Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses of plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta; 2012; 1819, pp. 137-148. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.05.001]
40. Kim, E.D.; Sung, S. Long noncoding RNA: Unveiling hidden layer of gene regulatory networks. Trends Plant Sci.; 2012; 17, pp. 16-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.10.008]
41. Nozawa, M.; Miura, S.; Nei, M. Origins and evolution of microRNA genes in plant species. Genome Biol. Evol.; 2012; 4, pp. 230-239. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evs002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22223755]
42. Song, L.; Han, M.H.; Lesicka, J.; Fedoroff, N. Arabidopsis primary microRNA processing proteins HYL1 and DCL1 define a nuclear body distinct from the Cajal body. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2007; 104, pp. 5437-5442. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701061104] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17369351]
43. Kurihara, Y.; Watanabe, Y. Arabidopsis micro-RNA biogenesis through Dicer-like 1 protein functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2004; 101, pp. 12753-12758. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403115101] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15314213]
44. Koroban, N.V.; Kudryavtseva, A.V.; Krasnov, G.S.; Sadritdinova, A.F.; Fedorova, M.S.; Snezhkina, A.V.; Bolsheva, N.L.; Muravenko, O.V.; Dmitriev, A.A.; Melnikova, N.V. The Role of MicroRNA in Abiotic Stress Response in Plants. Mol. Biol.; 2016; 50, pp. 337-343. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0026893316020102]
45. Bologna, N.G.; Voinnet, O. The diversity, biogenesis, and activities of endogenous silencing small RNAs in Arabidopsis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.; 2014; 65, pp. 473-503. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035728]
46. Wang, J.; Mei, J.; Ren, G. Plant microRNAs: Biogenesis, Homeostasis, and Degradation. Front. Plant Sci.; 2019; 10, 360. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00360]
47. Hur, J.K.; Zinchenko, M.K.; Djuranovic, S.; Green, R. Regulation of Argonaute slicer activity by guide RNA 3′ end interactions with the N-terminal lobe. J. Biol. Chem.; 2013; 288, pp. 7829-7840. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.441030]
48. Wu, J.; Yang, J.; Cho, W.C.; Zheng, Y. Argonaute proteins: Structural features, functions and emerging roles. J. Adv. Res.; 2020; 24, pp. 317-324. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.04.017]
49. Singh, R.K.; Pandey, S.P. Evolution of structural and functional diversification among plant Argonautes. Plant Signal Behav.; 2015; 10, e1069455. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2015.1069455]
50. Munusamy, P.; Zolotarov, Y.; Meteignier, L.V.; Moffett, P.; Stromvik, M.V. De novo computational identification of stress-related sequence motifs and microRNA target sites in untranslated regions of a plant translatome. Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 43861. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43861]
51. Baulcombe, D. RNA silencing in plants. Nature; 2004; 431, pp. 356-363. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02874] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15372043]
52. Brodersen, P.; Sakvarelidze-Achard, L.; Bruun-Rasmussen, M.; Dunoyer, P.; Yamamoto, Y.Y.; Sieburth, L.; Voinnet, O. Widespread translational inhibition by plant miRNAs and siRNAs. Science; 2008; 320, pp. 1185-1190. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1159151] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18483398]
53. Serivichyaswat, P.; Ryu, H.S.; Kim, W.; Kim, S.; Chung, K.S.; Kim, J.J.; Ahn, J.H. Expression of the Floral Repressor miRNA156 is Positively Regulated by the AGAMOUS-like Proteins AGL15 and AGL18. Mol. Cells; 2015; 38, pp. 259-266. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.2311] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25666346]
54. Wu, G.; Park, M.Y.; Conway, S.R.; Wang, J.W.; Weigel, D.; Poethig, R.S. The Sequential Action of miR156 and miR172 Regulates Developmental Timing in Arabidopsis. Cell; 2009; 138, pp. 750-759. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.031] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19703400]
55. Ren, G.; Chen, X.; Yu, B. Uridylation of miRNAs by hen1 suppressor1 in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol.; 2012; 22, pp. 695-700. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.052] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22464191]
56. Zheng, C.F.; Ye, M.X.; Sang, M.M.; Wu, R.L. A Regulatory Network for miR156-SPL Module in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2019; 20, 46166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246166]
57. Wang, Y.M.; Liu, W.W.; Wang, X.W.; Yang, R.J.; Wu, Z.Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Hu, Z.B.; Guo, S.Y.; Zhang, H.L. et al. MiR156 regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis through SPL targets and other microRNAs in poplar. Hortic. Res.; 2020; 7, 118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41438-020-00341-w]
58. Cheng, X.L.; He, Q.; Tang, S.; Wang, H.R.; Zhang, X.X.; Lv, M.J.; Liu, H.F.; Gao, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Q. et al. The miR172/IDS1 signaling module confers salt tolerance through maintaining ROS homeostasis in cereal crops. New Phytol.; 2021; 230, pp. 1017-1033. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.17211]
59. Denver, B.; Ullah, H. miR393s regulate salt stress response pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana through scaffold protein RACK1A mediated ABA signaling pathways. Plant Signal. Behav.; 2019; 14, 1600394. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2019.1600394]
60. Dai, X.; Lu, Q.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Xiang, F.; Liu, Z. MiR160 and its target genes ARF10, ARF16 and ARF17 modulate hypocotyl elongation in a light, BRZ, or PAC-dependent manner in Arabidopsis: miR160 promotes hypocotyl elongation. Plant Sci.; 2021; 303, 110686. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110686]
61. Zhao, Y.S.; Wang, S.Y.; Wu, W.Y.; Li, L.; Jiang, T.; Zheng, B.L. Clearance of maternal barriers by paternal miR159 to initiate endosperm nuclear division in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun.; 2018; 9, 5011. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07429-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30479343]
62. Chung, M.Y.; Nath, U.K.; Vrebalov, J.; Gapper, N.; Lee, J.M.; Lee, D.J.; Kim, C.K.; Giovannoni, J. Ectopic expression of miRNA172 in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) reveals novel function in fruit development through regulation of an AP2 transcription factor. BMC Plant Biol.; 2020; 20, 283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02489-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560687]
63. Chen, X.M. Small RNAs and Their Roles in Plant Development. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev.; 2009; 25, pp. 21-44. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113417] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19575669]
64. Yu, Y.; Jia, T.R.; Chen, X.M. The “how” and “where” of plant microRNAs. New Phytol.; 2017; 216, pp. 1002-1017. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14834]
65. Addo-Quaye, C.; Eshoo, T.W.; Bartel, D.P.; Axtell, M.J. Endogenous siRNA and miRNA targets identified by sequencing of the Arabidopsis degradome. Curr. Biol.; 2008; 18, pp. 758-762. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.042]
66. Chen, X. A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science; 2004; 303, pp. 2022-2025. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1088060]
67. Humphreys, D.T.; Westman, B.J.; Martin, D.I.; Preiss, T. MicroRNAs control translation initiation by inhibiting eukaryotic initiation factor 4E/cap and poly(A) tail function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2005; 102, pp. 16961-16966. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506482102]
68. Rhoades, M.W.; Reinhart, B.J.; Lim, L.P.; Burge, C.B.; Bartel, B.; Bartel, D.P. Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell; 2002; 110, pp. 513-520. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00863-2]
69. Riechmann, J.L.; Heard, J.; Martin, G.; Reuber, L.; Jiang, C.; Keddie, J.; Adam, L.; Pineda, O.; Ratcliffe, O.J.; Samaha, R.R. et al. Arabidopsis transcription factors: Genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science; 2000; 290, pp. 2105-2110. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5499.2105]
70. Wang, R.; Yang, X.; Guo, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Fang, Z. MiR319-targeted OsTCP21 and OsGAmyb regulate tillering and grain yield in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol.; 2021; 63, pp. 1260-1272. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13097]
71. Li, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Wei, Y.; Qi, Y.; Wu, C. OsmiR167a-targeted auxin response factors modulate tiller angle via fine-tuning auxin distribution in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J.; 2020; 18, pp. 2015-2026. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13360] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32061119]
72. Wen, F.L.; Yue, Y.; He, T.F.; Gao, X.M.; Zhou, Z.S.; Long, X.H. Identification of miR390-TAS3-ARF pathway in response to salt stress in Helianthus tuberosus L. Gene; 2020; 738, 144460. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.144460] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32045659]
73. Wang, S.T.; Sun, X.L.; Hoshino, Y.; Yu, Y.; Jia, B.; Sun, Z.W.; Sun, M.Z.; Duan, X.B.; Zhu, Y.M. MicroRNA319 positively regulates cold tolerance by targeting OsPCF6 and OsTCP21 in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS ONE; 2014; 9, e91357. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091357] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24667308]
74. Bresso, E.G.; Chorostecki, U.; Rodriguez, R.E.; Palatnik, J.F.; Schommer, C. Spatial Control of Gene Expression by miR319-Regulated TCP Transcription Factors in Leaf Development. Plant Physiol.; 2018; 176, pp. 1694-1708. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00823]
75. Cao, J.F.; Zhao, B.; Huang, C.C.; Chen, Z.W.; Zhao, T.; Liu, H.R.; Hu, G.J.; Shangguan, X.X.; Shan, C.M.; Wang, L.J. et al. The miR319-Targeted GhTCP4 Promotes the Transition from Cell Elongation to Wall Thickening in Cotton Fiber. Mol. Plant; 2020; 13, pp. 1063-1077. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.05.006]
76. Hou, J.; Xu, H.; Fan, D.; Ran, L.; Li, J.; Wu, S.; Luo, K.; He, X.Q. MiR319a-targeted PtoTCP20 regulates secondary growth via interactions with PtoWOX4 and PtoWND6 in Populus tomentosa. New Phytol.; 2020; 228, pp. 1354-1368. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16782]
77. Dai, X.; Zhao, P.X. psRNATarget: A plant small RNA target analysis server. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2011; 39, pp. W155-W159. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr319]
78. Millar, A.A.; Lohe, A.; Wong, G. Biology and Function of miR159 in Plants. Plants; 2019; 8, 255. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants8080255]
79. Zhou, B.; Fan, P.; Li, Y.; Yan, H.; Xu, Q. Exploring miRNAs involved in blue/UV-A light response in Brassica rapa reveals special regulatory mode during seedling development. BMC Plant Biol.; 2016; 16, 111. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0799-z]
80. Zhou, B.; Leng, J.; Ma, Y.; Fan, P.; Li, Y.; Yan, H.; Xu, Q. BrmiR828 Targets BrPAP1, BrMYB82, and BrTAS4 Involved in the Light Induced Anthocyanin Biosynthetic Pathway in Brassica rapa. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 24326. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124326]
81. Lauressergues, D.; Couzigou, J.M.; Clemente, H.S.; Martinez, Y.; Dunand, C.; Becard, G.; Combier, J.P. Primary transcripts of microRNAs encode regulatory peptides. Nature; 2015; 520, pp. 90-93. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14346] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25807486]
82. Couzigou, J.M.; Andre, O.; Guillotin, B.; Alexandre, M.; Combier, J.P. Use of microRNA-encoded peptide miPEP172c to stimulate nodulation in soybean. New Phytol.; 2016; 211, pp. 379-381. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13991] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27105382]
83. Sharma, A.; Badola, P.K.; Bhatia, C.; Sharma, D.; Trivedi, P.K. Primary transcript of miR858 encodes regulatory peptide and controls flavonoid biosynthesis and development in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants; 2020; 6, pp. 1262-1274. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00769-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32958895]
84. Kehr, J. Systemic regulation of mineral homeostasis by micro RNAs. Front. Plant Sci.; 2013; 4, 145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00145]
85. Brosnan, C.A.; Mitter, N. miRNA communication on another level. Nat. Plants; 2021; 7, pp. 1328-1329. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-01006-9]
86. Betti, F.; Ladera-Carmona, M.J.; Weits, D.A.; Ferri, G.; Iacopino, S.; Novi, G.; Svezia, B.; Kunkowska, A.B.; Santaniello, A.; Piaggesi, A. et al. Exogenous miRNAs induce post-transcriptional gene silencing in plants. Nat. Plants; 2021; 7, pp. 1379-1388. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-01005-w]
87. Deng, Z.; Wu, H.; Li, D.; Li, L.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, W.; Xing, Y.A.-O.; Li, C.A.-O.; Liang, D. Root-to-Shoot Long-Distance Mobile miRNAs Identified from Nicotiana Rootstocks. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 12821. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312821]
88. Cai, Q.; Qiao, L.; Wang, M.; He, B.; Lin, F.M.; Palmquist, J.; Huang, S.D.; Jin, H. Plants send small RNAs in extracellular vesicles to fungal pathogen to silence virulence genes. Science; 2018; 360, pp. 1126-1129. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4142]
89. Carlsbecker, A.; Lee, J.Y.; Roberts, C.J.; Dettmer, J.; Lehesranta, S.; Zhou, J.; Lindgren, O.; Moreno-Risueno, M.A.; Vaten, A.; Thitamadee, S. et al. Cell signalling by microRNA165/6 directs gene dose-dependent root cell fate. Nature; 2010; 465, pp. 316-321. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08977]
90. Knauer, S.; Holt, A.L.; Rubio-Somoza, I.; Tucker, E.J.; Hinze, A.; Pisch, M.; Javelle, M.; Timmermans, M.C.; Tucker, M.R.; Laux, T. A protodermal miR394 signal defines a region of stem cell competence in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Dev. Cell; 2013; 24, pp. 125-132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.12.009]
91. Zhu, K.; Liu, M.; Fu, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Kong, Y.; Liang, H.; Lin, Z.; Luo, J.; Zheng, H.; Wan, P. et al. Plant microRNAs in larval food regulate honeybee caste development. PLoS Genet.; 2017; 13, e1006946. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006946] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28859085]
92. Zhou, Z.; Li, X.H.; Liu, J.X.; Dong, L.; Chen, Q.; Liu, J.L.; Kong, H.H.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Qi, X.; Hou, D.X. et al. Honeysuckle-encoded atypical microRNA2911 directly targets influenza A viruses. Cell. Res.; 2015; 25, pp. 39-49. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2014.130] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25287280]
93. Marzano, F.; Caratozzolo, M.F.; Consiglio, A.; Licciulli, F.; Liuni, S.; Sbisa, E.; D’Elia, D.; Tullo, A.; Catalano, D. Plant miRNAs Reduce Cancer Cell Proliferation by Targeting MALAT1 and NEAT1: A Beneficial Cross-Kingdom Interaction. Front. Genet.; 2020; 11, 552490. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.552490] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193626]
94. Wang, Q.; Xue, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhong, Z.; Feng, S.; Wang, C.; Xiao, L.; Yang, Z.; Harris, C.J.; Wu, Z. et al. Mechanism of siRNA production by a plant Dicer-RNA complex in dicing-competent conformation. Science; 2021; 374, pp. 1152-1157. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abl4546]
95. Wu, H.; Li, B.; Iwakawa, H.O.; Pan, Y.; Tang, X.; Ling-Hu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Sheng, S.; Feng, L.; Zhang, H. et al. Plant 22-nt siRNAs mediate translational repression and stress adaptation. Nature; 2020; 581, pp. 89-93. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2231-y]
96. Xie, Z.; Allen, E.; Wilken, A.; Carrington, J.C. DICER-LIKE 4 functions in trans-acting small interfering RNA biogenesis and vegetative phase change in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2005; 102, pp. 12984-12989. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506426102]
97. Dunoyer, P.; Himber, C.; Voinnet, O. DICER-LIKE 4 is required for RNA interference and produces the 21-nucleotide small interfering RNA component of the plant cell-to-cell silencing signal. Nat. Genet.; 2005; 37, pp. 1356-1360. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1675]
98. Borges, F.; Martienssen, R.A. The expanding world of small RNAs in plants. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.; 2015; 16, pp. 727-741. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm4085]
99. Tang, Y.; Yan, X.; Gu, C.; Yuan, X. Biogenesis, Trafficking, and Function of Small RNAs in Plants. Front. Plant Sci.; 2022; 13, 825477. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.825477]
100. Liu, L.; Wang, T. Male gametophyte development in flowering plants: A story of quarantine and sacrifice. J. Plant Physiol.; 2021; 258–259, 153365. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153365]
101. Tiwari, R.; Rajam, M.V. RNA- and miRNA-interference to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in plants. J. Plant Biochem. Biot.; 2022; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13562-022-00770-9]
102. Kung, J.T.Y.; Colognori, D.; Lee, J.T. Long Noncoding RNAs: Past, Present, and Future. Genetics; 2013; 193, pp. 651-669. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.146704] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23463798]
103. Wang, H.; Chung, P.J.; Liu, J.; Jang, I.C.; Kean, M.J.; Xu, J.; Chua, N.H. Genome-wide identification of long noncoding natural antisense transcripts and their responses to light in Arabidopsis. Genome Res.; 2014; 24, pp. 444-453. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.165555.113] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24402519]
104. Ma, L.; Bajic, V.B.; Zhang, Z. On the classification of long non-coding RNAs. RNA Biol.; 2013; 10, pp. 925-933. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.24604]
105. Bonasio, R.; Shiekhattar, R. Regulation of transcription by long noncoding RNAs. Annu. Rev. Genet.; 2014; 48, pp. 433-455. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092323]
106. Huo, C.; Zhang, B.; Wang, R. Research progress on plant noncoding RNAs in response to low-temperature stress. Plant Signal Behav.; 2021; 17, 2004035. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2021.2004035]
107. Wu, H.; Yang, L.; Chen, L.L. The Diversity of Long Noncoding RNAs and Their Generation. Trends Genet.; 2017; 33, pp. 540-552. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2017.05.004]
108. Liu, W.; Cui, J.; Luan, Y. Overexpression of lncRNA08489 enhances tomato immunity against Phytophthora infestans by decoying miR482e-3p. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 2022; 587, pp. 36-41. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.11.079]
109. Jin, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Wong, L.; Chua, N.H. PLncDB: Plant long non-coding RNA database. Bioinformatics; 2013; 29, pp. 1068-1071. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt107]
110. Liu, J.; Jung, C.; Xu, J.; Wang, H.; Deng, S.L.; Bernad, L.; Arenas-Huertero, C.; Chua, N.H. Genome-Wide Analysis Uncovers Regulation of Long Intergenic Noncoding RNAs in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell.; 2012; 24, pp. 4333-4345. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.102855]
111. An, N.; Fan, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Gao, C.; Zhang, D.; Han, M. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of long non-coding RNAs in different tissues of apple. Gene; 2018; 666, pp. 44-57. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.05.014] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29733967]
112. Ma, H.; Yang, T.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wu, T.; Song, T.; Yao, Y.; Tian, J. The long noncoding RNA MdLNC499 bridges MdWRKY1 and MdERF109 function to regulate early-stage light-induced anthocyanin accumulation in apple fruit. Plant Cell.; 2021; 33, pp. 3309-3330. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koab188] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34270784]
113. Wang, Y.X.; Gao, L.P.; Zhu, B.Z.; Zhu, H.L.; Luo, Y.B.; Wang, Q.; Zuo, J.H. Integrative analysis of long non-coding RNA acting as ceRNAs involved in chilling injury in tomato fruit. Gene; 2018; 667, pp. 25-33. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.05.030] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29753809]
114. Tao, X.Y.; Li, M.L.; Zhao, T.; Feng, S.L.; Zhang, H.L.; Wang, L.Y.; Han, J.; Gao, M.T.; Lu, K.N.; Chen, Q.J. et al. Neofunctionalization of a polyploidization-activated cotton long intergenic non-coding RNA DAN1 during drought stress regulation. Plant Physiol.; 2021; 186, pp. 2152-2168. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab179]
115. Wierzbicki, A.T.; Blevins, T.; Swiezewski, S. Long Noncoding RNAs in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.; 2021; 72, pp. 245-271. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-093020-035446]
116. Wang, H.V.; Chekanova, J.A. Long Noncoding RNAs in Plants. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.; 2017; 1008, pp. 133-154. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5203-3_5]
117. Wang, Y.; Fan, X.; Lin, F.; He, G.; Terzaghi, W.; Zhu, D.; Deng, X.W. Arabidopsis noncoding RNA mediates control of photomorphogenesis by red light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2014; 111, pp. 10359-10364. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409457111]
118. Heo, J.B.; Sung, S. Vernalization-mediated epigenetic silencing by a long intronic noncoding RNA. Science; 2011; 331, pp. 76-79. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1197349]
119. Salmena, L.; Poliseno, L.; Tay, Y.; Kats, L.; Pandolfi, P.P. A ceRNA hypothesis: The Rosetta Stone of a hidden RNA language?. Cell; 2011; 146, pp. 353-358. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.014]
120. Cui, J.; Jiang, N.; Hou, X.; Wu, S.; Zhang, Q.; Meng, J.; Luan, Y. Genome-Wide Identification of lncRNAs and Analysis of ceRNA Networks During Tomato Resistance to Phytophthora infestans. Phytopathology; 2020; 110, pp. 456-464. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-04-19-0137-R]
121. Du, Q.; Wang, K.; Zou, C.; Xu, C.; Li, W.X. The PILNCR1-miR399 Regulatory Module Is Important for Low Phosphate Tolerance in Maize. Plant Physiol.; 2018; 177, pp. 1743-1753. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.00034] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29967097]
122. Ben Amor, B.; Wirth, S.; Merchan, F.; Laporte, P.; d’Aubenton-Carafa, Y.; Hirsch, J.; Maizel, A.; Mallory, A.; Lucas, A.; Deragon, J.M. et al. Novel long non-protein coding RNAs involved in Arabidopsis differentiation and stress responses. Genome Res.; 2009; 19, pp. 57-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.080275.108] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18997003]
123. Liu, T.T.; Zhu, D.; Chen, W.; Deng, W.; He, H.; He, G.; Bai, B.; Qi, Y.; Chen, R.; Deng, X.W. A global identification and analysis of small nucleolar RNAs and possible intermediate-sized non-coding RNAs in Oryza sativa. Mol. Plant; 2013; 6, pp. 830-846. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss087] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22986792]
124. Lucero, L.; Fonouni-Farde, C.; Crespi, M.; Ariel, F. Long noncoding RNAs shape transcription in plants. Transcription; 2020; 11, pp. 160-171. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1764312] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32406332]
125. Wekesa, J.S.; Meng, J.; Luan, Y. Multi-feature fusion for deep learning to predict plant lncRNA-protein interaction. Genomics; 2020; 112, pp. 2928-2936. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.05.005]
126. Lucero, L.; Ferrero, L.; Fonouni-Farde, C.; Ariel, F. Functional classification of plant long noncoding RNAs: A transcript is known by the company it keeps. New Phytol.; 2021; 229, pp. 1251-1260. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16903]
127. Seo, J.S.; Sun, H.X.; Park, B.S.; Huang, C.H.; Yeh, S.D.; Jung, C.; Chua, N.H. ELF18-INDUCED LONG-NONCODING RNA Associates with Mediator to Enhance Expression of Innate Immune Response Genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell.; 2017; 29, pp. 1024-1038. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00886]
128. Kim, D.H.; Sung, S. Vernalization-Triggered Intragenic Chromatin Loop Formation by Long Noncoding RNAs. Dev. Cell.; 2017; 40, pp. 302-312.e304. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.12.021]
129. Ariel, F.; Lucero, L.; Christ, A.; Mammarella, M.F.; Jegu, T.; Veluchamy, A.; Mariappan, K.; Latrasse, D.; Blein, T.; Liu, C. et al. R-Loop Mediated trans Action of the APOLO Long Noncoding RNA. Mol. Cell.; 2020; 77, pp. 1055-1065.e1054. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.015]
130. Zubko, E.; Meyer, P. A natural antisense transcript of the Petunia hybrida Sho gene suggests a role for an antisense mechanism in cytokinin regulation. Plant J.; 2007; 52, pp. 1131-1139. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03309.x]
131. Franco-Zorrilla, J.M.; Valli, A.; Todesco, M.; Mateos, I.; Puga, M.I.; Rubio-Somoza, I.; Leyva, A.; Weigel, D.; Garcia, J.A.; Paz-Ares, J. Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity. Nat. Genet.; 2007; 39, pp. 1033-1037. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng2079] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17643101]
132. Jin, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, M. MicroRNAs and their cross-talks in plant development. J. Genet. Genom.; 2013; 40, pp. 161-170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2013.02.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23618399]
133. Carrera-Castano, G.; Calleja-Cabrera, J.; Pernas, M.; Gomez, L.; Onate-Sanchez, L. An Updated Overview on the Regulation of Seed Germination. Plants; 2020; 9, 703. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9060703]
134. Liu, P.P.; Montgomery, T.A.; Fahlgren, N.; Kasschau, K.D.; Nonogaki, H.; Carrington, J.C. Repression of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR10 by microRNA160 is critical for seed germination and post-germination stages. Plant J.; 2007; 52, pp. 133-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03218.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17672844]
135. Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Feng, Z.; Li, Q.; Yang, H.Q.; Luan, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.H. Auxin controls seed dormancy through stimulation of abscisic acid signaling by inducing ARF-mediated ABI3 activation in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2013; 110, pp. 15485-15490. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304651110]
136. Liu, N.; Wu, S.; Li, Z.; Khan, A.Q.; Hu, H.; Zhang, X.; Tu, L. Repression of microRNA 160 results in retarded seed integument growth and smaller final seed size in cotton. Crop J.; 2020; 8, pp. 602-612. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2019.12.004]
137. Reyes, J.L.; Chua, N.H. ABA induction of miR159 controls transcript levels of two MYB factors during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J.; 2007; 49, pp. 592-606. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02980.x]
138. Nonogaki, H. MicroRNA gene regulation cascades during early stages of plant development. Plant Cell. Physiol.; 2010; 51, pp. 1840-1846. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcq154]
139. Bai, B.; Shi, B.; Hou, N.; Cao, Y.; Meng, Y.; Bian, H.; Zhu, M.; Han, N. microRNAs participate in gene expression regulation and phytohormone cross-talk in barley embryo during seed development and germination. BMC Plant Biol.; 2017; 17, 150. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1095-2]
140. Miao, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yao, J.; Hua, K.; Liu, X.; Shi, H.; Zhu, J.K. The grain yield modulator miR156 regulates seed dormancy through the gibberellin pathway in rice. Nat. Commun.; 2019; 10, 3822. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11830-5]
141. Dong, H.; Yan, S.; Jing, Y.; Yang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, J. MIR156-Targeted SPL9 Is Phosphorylated by SnRK2s and Interacts With ABI5 to Enhance ABA Responses in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci.; 2021; 12, 708573. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.708573] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367226]
142. Zheng, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Gu, Y.; Huang, X.; Huang, H.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Hu, Y.; Li, Y. et al. The miR164-dependent regulatory pathway in developing maize seed. Mol. Genet. Genom.; 2019; 294, pp. 501-517. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00438-018-1524-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30607602]
143. Baumann, K. Plant cell biology: Mobile miRNAs for stem cell maintenance. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.; 2013; 14, 128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3529] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23385721]
144. Zhu, H.; Hu, F.; Wang, R.; Zhou, X.; Sze, S.H.; Liou, L.W.; Barefoot, A.; Dickman, M.; Zhang, X. Arabidopsis Argonaute10 specifically sequesters miR166/165 to regulate shoot apical meristem development. Cell; 2011; 145, pp. 242-256. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.024] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496644]
145. Zhou, Y.; Honda, M.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, X.; Li, T.; Li, Z.; Peng, X.; Nakajima, K.; Duan, L. et al. Spatiotemporal sequestration of miR165/166 by Arabidopsis Argonaute10 promotes shoot apical meristem maintenance. Cell. Rep.; 2015; 10, pp. 1819-1827. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.047] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25801022]
146. O’Maoileidigh, D.S.; van Driel, A.D.; Singh, A.; Sang, Q.; Le Bec, N.; Vincent, C.; de Olalla, E.B.G.; Vayssieres, A.; Romera Branchat, M.; Severing, E. et al. Systematic analyses of the MIR172 family members of Arabidopsis define their distinct roles in regulation of APETALA2 during floral transition. PLoS Biol.; 2021; 19, e3001043. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001043]
147. Todesco, M.; Rubio-Somoza, I.; Paz-Ares, J.; Weigel, D. A collection of target mimics for comprehensive analysis of microRNA function in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet.; 2010; 6, e1001031. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001031]
148. Wang, J.W.; Czech, B.; Weigel, D. miR156-regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell; 2009; 138, pp. 738-749. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.014]
149. Lian, H.; Wang, L.; Ma, N.; Zhou, C.M.; Han, L.; Zhang, T.Q.; Wang, J.W. Redundant and specific roles of individual MIR172 genes in plant development. PLoS Biol.; 2021; 19, e3001044. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001044]
150. Zhu, Q.H.; Helliwell, C.A. Regulation of flowering time and floral patterning by miR172. J. Exp. Bot.; 2011; 62, pp. 487-495. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq295]
151. Zhang, B.; Chen, X. Secrets of the MIR172 family in plant development and flowering unveiled. PLoS Biol.; 2021; 19, e3001099. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001099] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33556049]
152. Li, C.; Zhang, B. MicroRNAs in Control of Plant Development. J. Cell. Physiol.; 2016; 231, pp. 303-313. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.25125] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248304]
153. Rubio-Somoza, I.; Weigel, D. MicroRNA networks and developmental plasticity in plants. Trends Plant Sci.; 2011; 16, pp. 258-264. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.03.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21466971]
154. Yant, L.; Mathieu, J.; Dinh, T.T.; Ott, F.; Lanz, C.; Wollmann, H.; Chen, X.; Schmid, M. Orchestration of the floral transition and floral development in Arabidopsis by the bifunctional transcription factor APETALA2. Plant Cell.; 2010; 22, pp. 2156-2170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.075606]
155. Tsuji, H.; Aya, K.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Shimada, Y.; Nakazono, M.; Watanabe, R.; Nishizawa, N.K.; Gomi, K.; Shimada, A.; Kitano, H. et al. GAMYB controls different sets of genes and is differentially regulated by microRNA in aleurone cells and anthers. Plant J.; 2006; 47, pp. 427-444. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02795.x]
156. Waheed, S.; Zeng, L. The Critical Role of miRNAs in Regulation of Flowering Time and Flower Development. Genes; 2020; 11, 319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11030319]
157. Xu, M.Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.W.; Hu, X.L.; Wang, M.B.; Fan, Y.L.; Zhang, C.Y.; Wang, L. Stress-induced early flowering is mediated by miR169 in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot.; 2014; 65, pp. 89-101. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert353]
158. Kim, W.; Ahn, H.J.; Chiou, T.J.; Ahn, J.H. The role of the miR399-PHO2 module in the regulation of flowering time in response to different ambient temperatures in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cells; 2011; 32, pp. 83-88. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10059-011-1043-1]
159. Liu, H.; Yu, H.; Tang, G.; Huang, T. Small but powerful: Function of microRNAs in plant development. Plant Cell. Rep.; 2018; 37, pp. 515-528. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2246-5]
160. Palatnik, J.F.; Wollmann, H.; Schommer, C.; Schwab, R.; Boisbouvier, J.; Rodriguez, R.; Warthmann, N.; Allen, E.; Dezulian, T.; Huson, D. et al. Sequence and expression differences underlie functional specialization of Arabidopsis microRNAs miR159 and miR319. Dev. Cell.; 2007; 13, pp. 115-125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.04.012]
161. Liu, J.; Cheng, X.; Liu, P.; Li, D.; Chen, T.; Gu, X.; Sun, J. MicroRNA319-regulated TCPs interact with FBHs and PFT1 to activate CO transcription and control flowering time in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet.; 2017; 13, e1006833. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006833] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28558040]
162. Laufs, P.; Peaucelle, A.; Morin, H.; Traas, J. MicroRNA regulation of the CUC genes is required for boundary size control in Arabidopsis meristems. Development; 2004; 131, pp. 4311-4322. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.01320] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15294871]
163. Nag, A.; King, S.; Jack, T. miR319a targeting of TCP4 is critical for petal growth and development in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2009; 106, pp. 22534-22539. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908718106] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20007771]
164. Zheng, G.; Wei, W.; Li, Y.; Kan, L.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X.; Li, F.; Liu, Z.; Kang, C. Conserved and novel roles of miR164-CUC2 regulatory module in specifying leaf and floral organ morphology in strawberry. New Phytol.; 2019; 224, pp. 480-492. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15982] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179543]
165. Koyama, T.; Sato, F.; Ohme-Takagi, M. Roles of miR319 and TCP Transcription Factors in Leaf Development. Plant Physiol.; 2017; 175, pp. 874-885. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00732] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28842549]
166. Wang, L.; Gu, X.; Xu, D.; Wang, W.; Wang, H.; Zeng, M.; Chang, Z.; Huang, H.; Cui, X. miR396-targeted AtGRF transcription factors are required for coordination of cell division and differentiation during leaf development in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot.; 2011; 62, pp. 761-773. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq307] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21036927]
167. Zhang, B.; Tong, Y.; Luo, K.; Zhai, Z.; Liu, X.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, D.; Li, D. Identification of GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR transcription factors in lettuce (Lactuca sativa) genome and functional analysis of LsaGRF5 in leaf size regulation. BMC Plant Biol.; 2021; 21, 485. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03261-6]
168. Si-Ammour, A.; Windels, D.; Arn-Bouldoires, E.; Kutter, C.; Ailhas, J.; Meins, F., Jr.; Vazquez, F. miR393 and secondary siRNAs regulate expression of the TIR1/AFB2 auxin receptor clade and auxin-related development of Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol.; 2011; 157, pp. 683-691. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.180083]
169. Bian, H.; Xie, Y.; Guo, F.; Han, N.; Ma, S.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, M. Distinctive expression patterns and roles of the miRNA393/TIR1 homolog module in regulating flag leaf inclination and primary and crown root growth in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol.; 2012; 196, pp. 149-161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04248.x]
170. Zhou, G.K.; Kubo, M.; Zhong, R.; Demura, T.; Ye, Z.H. Overexpression of miR165 affects apical meristem formation, organ polarity establishment and vascular development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. Physiol.; 2007; 48, pp. 391-404. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcm008]
171. Williams, L.; Grigg, S.P.; Xie, M.; Christensen, S.; Fletcher, J.C. Regulation of Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem and lateral organ formation by microRNA miR166g and its AtHD-ZIP target genes. Development; 2005; 132, pp. 3657-3668. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.01942] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16033795]
172. Zhang, Y.; Yin, S.; Tu, Y.; Mei, H.; Yang, Y. A novel microRNA, SlymiR208, promotes leaf senescence via regulating cytokinin biosynthesis in tomato. Physiol. Plant; 2020; 169, pp. 143-155. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13068] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31985059]
173. Singh, A.; Gautam, V.; Singh, S.; Sarkar Das, S.; Verma, S.; Mishra, V.; Mukherjee, S.; Sarkar, A.K. Plant small RNAs: Advancement in the understanding of biogenesis and role in plant development. Planta; 2018; 248, pp. 545-558. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-018-2927-5]
174. Guo, H.S.; Xie, Q.; Fei, J.F.; Chua, N.H. MicroRNA directs mRNA cleavage of the transcription factor NAC1 to downregulate auxin signals for Arabidopsis lateral root development. Plant Cell.; 2005; 17, pp. 1376-1386. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.030841]
175. Guilfoyle, T. Plant biology: Sticking with auxin. Nature; 2007; 446, pp. 621-622. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/446621a] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17410164]
176. Gutierrez, L.; Bussell, J.D.; Pacurar, D.I.; Schwambach, J.; Pacurar, M.; Bellini, C. Phenotypic plasticity of adventitious rooting in Arabidopsis is controlled by complex regulation of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR transcripts and microRNA abundance. Plant Cell.; 2009; 21, pp. 3119-3132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.064758] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19820192]
177. Zhu, J.; Li, Y.; Lin, J.; Wu, Y.; Guo, H.; Shao, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, X.; Mo, X.; Zheng, S. et al. CRD1, an Xpo1 domain protein, regulates miRNA accumulation and crown root development in rice. Plant J.; 2019; 100, pp. 328-342. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14445]
178. Gao, R.; Wang, Y.; Gruber, M.Y.; Hannoufa, A. miR156/SPL10 Modulates Lateral Root Development, Branching and Leaf Morphology in Arabidopsis by Silencing AGAMOUS-LIKE 79. Front. Plant Sci.; 2017; 8, 2226. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02226]
179. Sorin, C.; Declerck, M.; Christ, A.; Blein, T.; Ma, L.; Lelandais-Briere, C.; Njo, M.F.; Beeckman, T.; Crespi, M.; Hartmann, C. A miR169 isoform regulates specific NF-YA targets and root architecture in Arabidopsis. New Phytol.; 2014; 202, pp. 1197-1211. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.12735]
180. Huang, W.; Peng, S.; Xian, Z.; Lin, D.; Hu, G.; Yang, L.; Ren, M.; Li, Z. Overexpression of a tomato miR171 target gene SlGRAS24 impacts multiple agronomical traits via regulating gibberellin and auxin homeostasis. Plant Biotechnol. J.; 2017; 15, pp. 472-488. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12646]
181. Chen, Q.J.; Deng, B.H.; Gao, J.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Chen, Z.L.; Song, S.R.; Wang, L.; Zhao, L.P.; Xu, W.P.; Zhang, C.X. et al. A miRNA-Encoded Small Peptide, vvi-miPEP171d1, Regulates Adventitious Root Formation. Plant Physiol.; 2020; 183, pp. 656-670. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.20.00197] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32241877]
182. Li, K.; Wei, Y.H.; Wang, R.H.; Mao, J.P.; Tian, H.Y.; Chen, S.Y.; Li, S.H.; Tahir, M.M.; Zhang, D. Mdm-MIR393b-mediated adventitious root formation by targeted regulation of MdTIR1A expression and weakened sensitivity to auxin in apple rootstock. Plant Sci.; 2021; 308, 110909. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.110909] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34034866]
183. Lu, Y.; Feng, Z.; Liu, X.; Bian, L.; Xie, H.; Zhang, C.; Mysore, K.S.; Liang, J. MiR393 and miR390 synergistically regulate lateral root growth in rice under different conditions. BMC Plant Biol.; 2018; 18, 261. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1488-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30373525]
184. De Rybel, B.; Vassileva, V.; Parizot, B.; Demeulenaere, M.; Grunewald, W.; Audenaert, D.; Van Campenhout, J.; Overvoorde, P.; Jansen, L.; Vanneste, S. et al. A novel aux/IAA28 signaling cascade activates GATA23-dependent specification of lateral root founder cell identity. Curr. Biol.; 2010; 20, pp. 1697-1706. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.007]
185. Wang, J.J.; Guo, H.S. Cleavage of INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID INDUCIBLE28 mRNA by microRNA847 upregulates auxin signaling to modulate cell proliferation and lateral organ growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell.; 2015; 27, pp. 574-590. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.15.00101]
186. Fenn, M.A.; Giovannoni, J.J. Phytohormones in fruit development and maturation. Plant J.; 2021; 105, pp. 446-458. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15112]
187. Ma, X.M.; Zhang, Y.J.; Tureckova, V.; Xue, G.P.; Fernie, A.R.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Balazadeh, S. The NAC Transcription Factor SlNAP2 Regulates Leaf Senescence and Fruit Yield in Tomato. Plant Physiol.; 2018; 177, pp. 1286-1302. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.00292]
188. Kou, X.H.; Zhou, J.Q.; Wu, C.E.; Yang, S.; Liu, Y.F.; Chai, L.P.; Xue, Z.H. The interplay between ABA/ethylene and NAC TFs in tomato fruit ripening: A review. Plant Mol. Biol.; 2021; 106, pp. 223-238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-021-01128-w]
189. Xu, X.B.; Yin, L.L.; Ying, Q.C.; Song, H.M.; Xue, D.W.; Lai, T.F.; Xu, M.J.; Shen, B.; Wang, H.Z.; Shi, X.Q. High-Throughput Sequencing and Degradome Analysis Identify miRNAs and Their Targets Involved in Fruit Senescence of Fragaria ananassa. PLoS ONE; 2013; 8, e70959. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070959]
190. Wang, W.Q.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.Y.; Li, D.W.; Allan, A.C.; Yin, X.R. Genome-wide analysis of coding and non-coding RNA reveals a conserved miR164-NAC regulatory pathway for fruit ripening. New Phytol.; 2020; 225, pp. 1618-1634. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16233]
191. Chen, W.W.; Kong, J.H.; Lai, T.F.; Manning, K.; Wu, C.Q.; Wang, Y.; Qin, C.; Li, B.; Yu, Z.M.; Zhang, X. et al. Tuning LeSPL-CNR expression by SlymiR157 affects tomato fruit ripening. Sci. Rep.; 2015; 5, 7852. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep07852] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25597857]
192. Karlova, R.; van Haarst, J.C.; Maliepaard, C.; van de Geest, H.; Bovy, A.G.; Lammers, M.; Angenent, G.C.; de Maagd, R.A. Identification of microRNA targets in tomato fruit development using high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. J. Exp. Bot.; 2013; 64, pp. 1863-1878. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert049] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23487304]
193. Yao, J.L.; Xu, J.; Cornille, A.; Tomes, S.; Karunairetnam, S.; Luo, Z.W.; Bassett, H.; Whitworth, C.; Rees-George, J.; Ranatunga, C. et al. A microRNA allele that emerged prior to apple domestication may underlie fruit size evolution. Plant J.; 2015; 84, pp. 417-427. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13021] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26358530]
194. Csukasi, F.; Donaire, L.; Casanal, A.; Martinez-Priego, L.; Botella, M.A.; Medina-Escobar, N.; Llave, C.; Valpuesta, V. Two strawberry miR159 family members display developmental-specific expression patterns in the fruit receptacle and cooperatively regulate Fa-GAMYB. New Phytol.; 2012; 195, pp. 47-57. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04134.x]
195. Zhang, Y.C.; Yu, Y.; Wang, C.Y.; Li, Z.Y.; Liu, Q.; Xu, J.; Liao, J.Y.; Wang, X.J.; Qu, L.H.; Chen, F. et al. Overexpression of microRNA OsmiR397 improves rice yield by increasing grain size and promoting panicle branching. Nat. Biotechnol.; 2013; 31, 848. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2646]
196. Sun, W.; Xu, X.H.; Li, Y.P.; Xie, L.X.; He, Y.N.; Li, W.; Lu, X.B.; Sun, H.W.; Xie, X.H. OsmiR530 acts downstream of OsPIL15 to regulate grain yield in rice. New Phytol.; 2020; 226, pp. 823-837. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16399]
197. Rosa, S.; Duncan, S.; Dean, C. Mutually exclusive sense-antisense transcription at FLC facilitates environmentally induced gene repression. Nat. Commun.; 2016; 7, 13031. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13031]
198. Wu, Z.; Fang, X.; Zhu, D.; Dean, C. Autonomous Pathway: FLOWERING LOCUS C Repression through an Antisense-Mediated Chromatin-Silencing Mechanism. Plant Physiol.; 2020; 182, pp. 27-37. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.01009]
199. Kim, D.H.; Xi, Y.; Sung, S. Modular function of long noncoding RNA, COLDAIR, in the vernalization response. PLoS Genet.; 2017; 13, e1006939. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006939]
200. Shin, J.H.; Chekanova, J.A. Arabidopsis RRP6L1 and RRP6L2 function in FLOWERING LOCUS C silencing via regulation of antisense RNA synthesis. PLoS Genet.; 2014; 10, e1004612. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004612]
201. Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Lian, B.; Gu, H.; Li, Y.; Qi, Y. Global identification of Arabidopsis lncRNAs reveals the regulation of MAF4 by a natural antisense RNA. Nat. Commun.; 2018; 9, 5056. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07500-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30498193]
202. Gao, R.; Liu, P.; Irwanto, N.; Loh, R.; Wong, S.M. Upregulation of LINC-AP2 is negatively correlated with AP2 gene expression with Turnip crinkle virus infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. Rep.; 2016; 35, pp. 2257-2267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-2032-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473526]
203. Severing, E.; Faino, L.; Jamge, S.; Busscher, M.; Kuijer-Zhang, Y.; Bellinazzo, F.; Busscher-Lange, J.; Fernandez, V.; Angenent, G.C.; Immink, R.G.H. et al. Arabidopsis thaliana ambient temperature responsive lncRNAs. BMC Plant Biol.; 2018; 18, 145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1362-x]
204. Henriques, R.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Boix, M.; Huang, L.F.; Chua, N.H. The antiphasic regulatory module comprising CDF5 and its antisense RNA FLORE links the circadian clock to photoperiodic flowering. New Phytol.; 2017; 216, pp. 854-867. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14703] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28758689]
205. Ding, J.; Lu, Q.; Ouyang, Y.; Mao, H.; Zhang, P.; Yao, J.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, Q. A long noncoding RNA regulates photoperiod-sensitive male sterility, an essential component of hybrid rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2012; 109, pp. 2654-2659. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121374109]
206. Fan, Y.; Yang, J.; Mathioni, S.M.; Yu, J.; Shen, J.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Cai, Z.; Xu, C. et al. PMS1T, producing phased small-interfering RNAs, regulates photoperiod-sensitive male sterility in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2016; 113, pp. 15144-15149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619159114] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965387]
207. Fang, J.; Zhang, F.; Wang, H.; Wang, W.; Zhao, F.; Li, Z.; Sun, C.; Chen, F.; Xu, F.; Chang, S. et al. Ef-cd locus shortens rice maturity duration without yield penalty. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2019; 116, pp. 18717-18722. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815030116]
208. Zhou, Y.F.; Zhang, Y.C.; Sun, Y.M.; Yu, Y.; Lei, M.Q.; Yang, Y.W.; Lian, J.P.; Feng, Y.Z.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, L. et al. The parent-of-origin lncRNA MISSEN regulates rice endosperm development. Nat. Commun.; 2021; 12, 6525. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26795-7]
209. Conn, V.M.; Hugouvieux, V.; Nayak, A.; Conos, S.A.; Capovilla, G.; Cildir, G.; Jourdain, A.; Tergaonkar, V.; Schmid, M.; Zubieta, C. et al. A circRNA from SEPALLATA3 regulates splicing of its cognate mRNA through R-loop formation. Nat. Plants; 2017; 3, 17053. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2017.53]
210. Wu, H.W.; Deng, S.; Xu, H.; Mao, H.Z.; Liu, J.; Niu, Q.W.; Wang, H.; Chua, N.H. A noncoding RNA transcribed from the AGAMOUS (AG) second intron binds to CURLY LEAF and represses AG expression in leaves. New Phytol.; 2018; 219, pp. 1480-1491. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15231]
211. Liu, X.; Li, D.; Zhang, D.; Yin, D.; Zhao, Y.; Ji, C.; Zhao, X.; Li, X.; He, Q.; Chen, R. et al. A novel antisense long noncoding RNA, TWISTED LEAF, maintains leaf blade flattening by regulating its associated sense R2R3-MYB gene in rice. New Phytol.; 2018; 218, pp. 774-788. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15023] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29411384]
212. Grones, P.; Abas, M.; Hajny, J.; Jones, A.; Waidmann, S.; Kleine-Vehn, J.; Friml, J. PID/WAG-mediated phosphorylation of the Arabidopsis PIN3 auxin transporter mediates polarity switches during gravitropism. Sci. Rep.; 2018; 8, 10279. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28188-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980705]
213. Moison, M.; Pacheco, J.M.; Lucero, L.; Fonouni-Farde, C.; Rodriguez-Melo, J.; Mansilla, N.; Christ, A.; Bazin, J.; Benhamed, M.; Ibanez, F. et al. The lncRNA APOLO interacts with the transcription factor WRKY42 to trigger root hair cell expansion in response to cold. Mol. Plant; 2021; 14, pp. 937-948. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2021.03.008] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33689931]
214. Pacheco, J.M.; Mansilla, N.; Moison, M.; Lucero, L.; Gabarain, V.B.; Ariel, F.; Estevez, J.M. The lncRNA APOLO and the transcription factor WRKY42 target common cell wall EXTENSIN encoding genes to trigger root hair cell elongation. Plant Signal Behav.; 2021; 16, 1920191. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2021.1920191] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33944666]
215. Wang, Y.; Luo, X.J.; Sun, F.; Hu, J.H.; Zha, X.J.; Su, W.; Yang, J.S. Overexpressing lncRNA LAIR increases grain yield and regulates neighbouring gene cluster expression in rice. Nat. Commun.; 2018; 9, 3516. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05829-7]
216. Kotak, S.; Larkindale, J.; Lee, U.; von Koskull-Doring, P.; Vierling, E.; Scharf, K.D. Complexity of the heat stress response in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.; 2007; 10, pp. 310-316. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.011]
217. Lin, J.S.; Kuo, C.C.; Yang, I.C.; Tsai, W.A.; Shen, Y.H.; Lin, C.C.; Liang, Y.C.; Li, Y.C.; Kuo, Y.W.; King, Y.C. et al. MicroRNA160 Modulates Plant Development and Heat Shock Protein Gene Expression to Mediate Heat Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci.; 2018; 9, 68. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00068]
218. Zhao, J.; Yuan, S.; Zhou, M.; Yuan, N.; Li, Z.; Hu, Q.; Bethea, F.G., Jr.; Liu, H.; Li, S.; Luo, H. Transgenic creeping bentgrass overexpressing Osa-miR393a exhibits altered plant development and improved multiple stress tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J.; 2019; 17, pp. 233-251. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12960]
219. Wang, Y.; Sun, F.; Cao, H.; Peng, H.; Ni, Z.; Sun, Q.; Yao, Y. TamiR159 directed wheat TaGAMYB cleavage and its involvement in anther development and heat response. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e48445. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048445]
220. Shi, X.; Jiang, F.; Wen, J.; Wu, Z. Overexpression of Solanum habrochaites microRNA319d (sha-miR319d) confers chilling and heat stress tolerance in tomato (S. lycopersicum). BMC Plant Biol.; 2019; 19, 214. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1823-x]
221. Stief, A.; Altmann, S.; Hoffmann, K.; Pant, B.D.; Scheible, W.R.; Baurle, I. Arabidopsis miR156 Regulates Tolerance to Recurring Environmental Stress through SPL Transcription Factors. Plant Cell.; 2014; 26, pp. 1792-1807. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.123851] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24769482]
222. Guan, Q.; Lu, X.; Zeng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, J. Heat stress induction of miR398 triggers a regulatory loop that is critical for thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J.; 2013; 74, pp. 840-851. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12169] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23480361]
223. Giacomelli, J.I.; Weigel, D.; Chan, R.L.; Manavella, P.A. Role of recently evolved miRNA regulation of sunflower HaWRKY6 in response to temperature damage. New Phytol.; 2012; 195, pp. 766-773. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04259.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22846054]
224. Liu, Q.; Yang, T.; Yu, T.; Zhang, S.; Mao, X.; Zhao, J.; Wang, X.; Dong, J.; Liu, B. Integrating Small RNA Sequencing with QTL Mapping for Identification of miRNAs and Their Target Genes Associated with Heat Tolerance at the Flowering Stage in Rice. Front. Plant Sci.; 2017; 8, 43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00043] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28174587]
225. Xia, K.; Zeng, X.; Jiao, Z.; Li, M.; Xu, W.; Nong, Q.; Mo, H.; Cheng, T.; Zhang, M. Formation of Protein Disulfide Bonds Catalyzed by OsPDIL1;1 is Mediated by MicroRNA5144-3p in Rice. Plant Cell. Physiol.; 2018; 59, pp. 331-342. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcx189]
226. Yan, K.; Liu, P.; Wu, C.A.; Yang, G.D.; Xu, R.; Guo, Q.H.; Huang, J.G.; Zheng, C.C. Stress-induced alternative splicing provides a mechanism for the regulation of microRNA processing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cell.; 2012; 48, pp. 521-531. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.032]
227. Yang, J.C.; Li, M.; Xie, X.Z.; Han, G.L.; Sui, N.; Wang, B.S. Deficiency of phytochrome B alleviates chilling-induced photoinhibition in rice. Am. J. Bot.; 2013; 100, pp. 1860-1870. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200574]
228. Sun, X.; Lin, L.; Sui, N. Regulation mechanism of microRNA in plant response to abiotic stress and breeding. Mol. Biol. Rep.; 2019; 46, pp. 1447-1457. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-018-4511-2]
229. Kumar, R. Role of microRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.; 2014; 174, pp. 93-115. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-0914-2]
230. Guo, J.; Ren, Y.; Tang, Z.; Shi, W.; Zhou, M. Characterization and expression profiling of the ICE-CBF-COR genes in wheat. PeerJ; 2019; 7, e8190. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8190]
231. Yang, C.; Li, D.; Mao, D.; Liu, X.; Ji, C.; Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Cheng, Z.; Chen, C.; Zhu, L. Overexpression of microRNA319 impacts leaf morphogenesis and leads to enhanced cold tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell. Environ.; 2013; 36, pp. 2207-2218. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.12130] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23651319]
232. Zhou, M.; Tang, W. MicroRNA156 amplifies transcription factor-associated cold stress tolerance in plant cells. Mol. Genet Genom.; 2019; 294, pp. 379-393. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00438-018-1516-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478522]
233. Song, J.B.; Gao, S.; Sun, D.; Li, H.; Shu, X.X.; Yang, Z.M. miR394 and LCR are involved in Arabidopsis salt and drought stress responses in an abscisic acid-dependent manner. BMC Plant Biol.; 2013; 13, 210. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-210] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24330668]
234. Song, J.B.; Gao, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.W.; Zhang, Y.L.; Yang, Z.M. miR394 and its target gene LCR are involved in cold stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Gene; 2016; 5, pp. 56-64. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene.2015.12.001]
235. Aslam, M.; Sugita, K.; Qin, Y.; Rahman, A. Aux/IAA14 Regulates microRNA-Mediated Cold Stress Response in Arabidopsis Roots. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 28441. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228441]
236. Tang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Xu, C.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, F.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, C. Uncovering small RNA-mediated responses to cold stress in a wheat thermosensitive genic male-sterile line by deep sequencing. Plant Physiol.; 2012; 159, pp. 721-738. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.196048]
237. Megha, S.; Basu, U.; Kav, N.N.V. Regulation of low temperature stress in plants by microRNAs. Plant Cell. Environ.; 2018; 41, pp. 1-15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.12956]
238. Das, R.; Mukherjee, A.; Basak, S.; Kundu, P. Plant miRNA responses under temperature stress. Plant Gene; 2021; 28, 100317. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene.2021.100317]
239. Dong, C.H.; Pei, H.X. Over-expression of miR397 improves plant tolerance to cold stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Biol.; 2014; 57, pp. 209-217. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12374-013-0490-y]
240. Tang, Y.; Du, G.; Xiang, J.; Hu, C.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Zhu, H.; Qiao, L.; Zhao, C.; Wang, J. et al. Genome-wide identification of auxin response factor (ARF) gene family and the miR160-ARF18-mediated response to salt stress in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Genomics; 2022; 114, pp. 171-184. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.12.015]
241. Ma, Y.; Xue, H.; Zhang, F.; Jiang, Q.; Yang, S.; Yue, P.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; He, P. et al. The miR156/SPL module regulates apple salt stress tolerance by activating MdWRKY100 expression. Plant Biotechnol. J.; 2021; 19, pp. 311-323. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13464] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885918]
242. Gao, P.; Bai, X.; Yang, L.; Lv, D.; Pan, X.; Li, Y.; Cai, H.; Ji, W.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, Y. osa-MIR393: A salinity- and alkaline stress-related microRNA gene. Mol. Biol. Rep.; 2011; 38, pp. 237-242. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-010-0100-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20336383]
243. Xia, K.; Wang, R.; Ou, X.; Fang, Z.; Tian, C.; Duan, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M. OsTIR1 and OsAFB2 downregulation via OsmiR393 overexpression leads to more tillers, early flowering and less tolerance to salt and drought in rice. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e30039. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030039] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22253868]
244. Chen, Z.; Hu, L.; Han, N.; Hu, J.; Yang, Y.; Xiang, T.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L. Overexpression of a miR393-resistant form of transport inhibitor response protein 1 (mTIR1) enhances salt tolerance by increased osmoregulation and Na+ exclusion in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. Physiol.; 2015; 56, pp. 73-83. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu149]
245. Gao, P.; Bai, X.; Yang, L.; Lv, D.; Li, Y.; Cai, H.; Ji, W.; Guo, D.; Zhu, Y. Over-expression of osa-MIR396c decreases salt and alkali stress tolerance. Planta; 2010; 231, pp. 991-1001. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1104-2]
246. Yuan, S.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.; Hu, Q.; Yuan, N.; Zhou, M.; Xia, X.; Noorai, R.; Saski, C.; Li, S. et al. MicroRNA396-mediated alteration in plant development and salinity stress response in creeping bentgrass. Hortic. Res.; 2019; 6, 48. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0130-x]
247. Lu, X.; Dun, H.; Lian, C.; Zhang, X.; Yin, W.; Xia, X. The role of peu-miR164 and its target PeNAC genes in response to abiotic stress in Populus euphratica. Plant Physiol. Biochem.; 2017; 115, pp. 418-438. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.04.009]
248. Ni, Z.Y.; Hu, Z.; Jiang, Q.Y.; Zhang, H. GmNFYA3, a target gene of miR169, is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to drought stress. Plant Mol. Biol.; 2013; 82, pp. 113-129. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-013-0040-5]
249. Wang, W.; Liu, D.; Chen, D.D.; Cheng, Y.Y.; Zhang, X.P.; Song, L.R.; Hu, M.J.; Dong, J.; Shen, F.F. MicroRNA414c affects salt tolerance of cotton by regulating reactive oxygen species metabolism under salinity stress. RNA Biol.; 2019; 16, pp. 362-375. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2019.1574163]
250. Gao, S.; Yang, L.; Zeng, H.Q.; Zhou, Z.S.; Yang, Z.M.; Li, H.; Sun, D.; Xie, F.L.; Zhang, B.H. A cotton miRNA is involved in regulation of plant response to salt stress. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 19736. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep19736]
251. Ding, Y.; Tao, Y.; Zhu, C. Emerging roles of microRNAs in the mediation of drought stress response in plants. J. Exp. Bot; 2013; 64, pp. 3077-3086. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert164] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23814278]
252. Wang, Y.J.; Dai, J.; Chen, R.; Song, C.; Wei, P.P.; Cai, Y.P.; Wang, Y.L.; Han, B.X. miRNA-Based Drought Regulation in the Important Medicinal Plant Dendrobium huoshanense. J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2021; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10366-7]
253. Shen, X.; He, J.; Ping, Y.; Guo, J.; Hou, N.; Cao, F.; Li, X.; Geng, D.; Wang, S.; Chen, P. et al. The positive feedback regulatory loop of miR160-Auxin Response Factor 17- HYPONASTIC LEAVES 1 mediates drought tolerance in apple trees. Plant Physiol.; 2021; 188, pp. 1686-1708. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab565] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893896]
254. Yang, T.; Wang, Y.; Teotia, S.; Wang, Z.; Shi, C.; Sun, H.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, G. The interaction between miR160 and miR165/166 in the control of leaf development and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 2832. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39397-7]
255. Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Srivastava, A.K.; Pan, Y.; Bai, J.; Fang, J.; Shi, H.; Zhu, J.K. Knockdown of Rice MicroRNA166 Confers Drought Resistance by Causing Leaf Rolling and Altering Stem Xylem Development. Plant Physiol.; 2018; 176, pp. 2082-2094. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01432]
256. Arshad, M.; Feyissa, B.A.; Amyot, L.; Aung, B.; Hannoufa, A. MicroRNA156 improves drought stress tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) by silencing SPL13. Plant Sci.; 2017; 258, pp. 122-136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.01.018]
257. Feyissa, B.A.; Arshad, M.; Gruber, M.Y.; Kohalmi, S.E.; Hannoufa, A. The interplay between miR156/SPL13 and DFR/WD40-1 regulate drought tolerance in alfalfa. BMC Plant Biol.; 2019; 19, 434. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2059-5]
258. Singroha, G.; Sharma, P.; Sunkur, R. Current status of microRNA-mediated regulation of drought stress responses in cereals. Physiol. Plant.; 2021; 172, pp. 1808-1821. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13451]
259. Lopez-Galiano, M.J.; Garcia-Robles, I.; Gonzalez-Hernandez, A.I.; Camanes, G.; Vicedo, B.; Real, M.D.; Rausell, C. Expression of miR159 Is Altered in Tomato Plants Undergoing Drought Stress. Plants; 2019; 8, 201. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants8070201]
260. Li, W.X.; Oono, Y.; Zhu, J.H.; He, X.J.; Wu, J.M.; Iida, K.; Lu, X.Y.; Cui, X.P.; Jin, H.L.; Zhu, J.K. The Arabidopsis NFYA5 transcription factor is regulated transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally to promote drought resistance. Plant Cell.; 2008; 20, pp. 2238-2251. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.059444]
261. Yu, Y.H.; Ni, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.; Wan, H.N.; Hu, Z.; Jiang, Q.Y.; Sun, X.J.; Zhang, H. Overexpression of soybean miR169c confers increased drought stress sensitivity in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci.; 2019; 285, pp. 68-78. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.05.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31203895]
262. Li, J.; Duan, Y.J.; Sun, N.L.; Wang, L.; Feng, S.S.; Fang, Y.J.; Wang, Y.P. The miR169n-NF-YA8 regulation module involved in drought resistance in Brassica napus L. Plant Sci.; 2021; 313, 111062. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.111062] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34763855]
263. Wang, A.; Hu, J.; Gao, C.; Chen, G.; Wang, B.; Lin, C.; Song, L.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, G. Genome-wide analysis of long non-coding RNAs unveils the regulatory roles in the heat tolerance of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis). Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 5002. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41428-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899041]
264. Li, S.; Yu, X.; Lei, N.; Cheng, Z.; Zhao, P.; He, Y.; Wang, W.; Peng, M. Corrigendum: Genome-wide identification and functional prediction of cold and/or drought-responsive lncRNAs in cassava. Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 46795. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46795]
265. Qin, T.; Zhao, H.; Cui, P.; Albesher, N.; Xiong, L. A Nucleus-Localized Long Non-Coding RNA Enhances Drought and Salt Stress Tolerance. Plant Physiol.; 2017; 175, pp. 1321-1336. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00574] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28887353]
266. Zhang, X.; Shen, J.; Xu, Q.; Dong, J.; Song, L.; Wang, W.; Shen, F. Long noncoding RNA lncRNA354 functions as a competing endogenous RNA of miR160b to regulate ARF genes in response to salt stress in upland cotton. Plant Cell. Environ.; 2021; 44, pp. 3302-3321. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.14133]
267. Cao, Z.; Zhao, T.; Wang, L.; Han, J.; Chen, J.; Hao, Y.; Guan, X. The lincRNA XH123 is involved in cotton cold-stress regulation. Plant Mol. Biol.; 2021; 106, pp. 521-531. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-021-01169-1]
268. Kindgren, P.; Ard, R.; Ivanov, M.; Marquardt, S. Transcriptional read-through of the long non-coding RNA SVALKA governs plant cold acclimation. Nat. Commun.; 2018; 9, 4561. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07010-6]
269. Zhang, B. MicroRNA: A new target for improving plant tolerance to abiotic stress. J. Exp. Bot.; 2015; 66, pp. 1749-1761. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv013]
270. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Song, Z.; Zhang, H. Repression of MYBL2 by Both microRNA858a and HY5 Leads to the Activation of Anthocyanin Biosynthetic Pathway in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant; 2016; 9, pp. 1395-1405. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2016.07.003]
271. Li, Y.; Cui, W.; Qi, X.; Lin, M.; Qiao, C.; Zhong, Y.; Hu, C.; Fang, J. MicroRNA858 negatively regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis by repressing AaMYBC1 expression in kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta). Plant Sci.; 2020; 296, 110476. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110476] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32540006]
272. Eddy, S.R. The C-value paradox, junk DNA and ENCODE. Curr. Biol.; 2012; 22, pp. R898-R899. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23137679]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
1 Key Laboratory of Saline-alkali Vegetation Ecology Restoration, Northeast Forestry University, Ministry of Education, Harbin 150040, China;
2 Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China