It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Asymmetric cell division (ACD) underlies the development of multicellular organisms. In animal ACD, the cell division site is determined by active spindle-positioning mechanisms. In contrast, it is considered that the division site in plants is determined prior to mitosis by the microtubule-actin belt known as the preprophase band (PPB) and that the localization of the mitotic spindle is typically static and does not govern the division plane. However, in some plant species, ACD occurs in the absence of PPB. Here, we isolate a hypomorphic mutant of the conserved microtubule-associated protein TPX2 in the moss Physcomitrium patens (Physcomitrella) and observe spindle motility during PPB-independent cell division. This defect compromises the position of the division site and produces inverted daughter cell sizes in the first ACD of gametophore (leafy shoot) development. The phenotype is rescued by restoring endogenous TPX2 function and, unexpectedly, by depolymerizing actin filaments. Thus, we identify an active spindle-positioning mechanism that, reminiscent of acentrosomal ACD in animals, involves microtubules and actin filaments, and sets the division site in plants.
In plants, the site of asymmetric cell division (ACD) is generally thought to be determined by the preprophase band and the mitotic spindle is typically static. However, the authors show here that the moss Physcomitrella has motile mitotic spindles that can skew ACD in the absence of preprophase bands.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5963.9); Institute for Advanced Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan (GRID:grid.27476.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 978X); Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Division of Biological Science, Nagoya, Japan (GRID:grid.27476.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 978X)
2 Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Division of Biological Science, Nagoya, Japan (GRID:grid.27476.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 978X)
3 Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5963.9); CIBSS – Centre for Integrative Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5963.9); Cluster of Excellence livMatS @ FIT – Freiburg Center for Interactive Materials and Bioinspired Technologies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5963.9)
4 Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Division of Biological Science, Nagoya, Japan (GRID:grid.27476.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 978X); Sugashima Marine Biological Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Toba, Japan (GRID:grid.27476.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 978X)