It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
It seems intuitively obvious that species diversity promotes functional diversity: communities with more plant species imply more varied plant leaf chemistry, more species of crops provide more kinds of food, etc. Recent literature has nuanced this view, showing how the relationship between the two can be modulated along latitudinal or environmental gradients. Here we show that even without such effects, the evolution of functional trait variance can erase or even reverse the expected positive relationship between species- and functional diversity. We present theory showing that trait-based eco-evolutionary processes force species to evolve narrower trait breadths in more tightly packed, species-rich communities, in their effort to avoid competition with neighboring species. This effect is so strong that it leads to an overall reduction in trait space coverage whenever a new species establishes. Empirical data from land snail communities on the Galápagos Islands are consistent with this claim. The finding that the relationship between species- and functional diversity can be negative implies that trait data from species-poor communities may misjudge functional diversity in species-rich ones, and vice versa.
The positive relationship between species diversity and functional diversity has been shown to vary. Here, the authors use theoretical models and data from Galápagos land snail communities to show how eco-evolutionary processes can force species to evolve narrower trait breadths in more species-rich communities to avoid competition, creating a negative relationship.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Linköping University, Division of Theoretical Biology, Dept. IFM, Linköping, Sweden (GRID:grid.5640.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2162 9922); ELTE-MTA Theoretical Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary (GRID:grid.5591.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 6276)
2 University of Idaho, Department of Biological Sciences, Moscow, USA (GRID:grid.266456.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2284 9900); University of Idaho, Institute for Interdisciplinary Data Sciences, Moscow, USA (GRID:grid.266456.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2284 9900)
3 Creighton University, Department of Biology, Omaha, USA (GRID:grid.254748.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8876)
4 Universiteit Antwerpen, Evolutionary Ecology Group, Wilrijk, Belgium (GRID:grid.5284.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 3681)
5 University of Namur, Research Unit of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology (URBE), Namur, Belgium (GRID:grid.6520.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 8479); University of Namur, Institute of Complex Systems (naXys), Namur, Belgium (GRID:grid.6520.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 8479); University of Namur, Institute of Life, Earth and the Environment (ILEE), Namur, Belgium (GRID:grid.6520.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 8479)