It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
We present the constraints on the parameters of several light boson mediator models obtained from the analysis of the current data of the COHERENT CEνNS experiment. We consider a variety of vector boson mediator models: the so-called universal, the B − L and other anomaly-free U(1)′ gauge models with direct couplings of the new vector boson with neutrinos and quarks, and the anomaly-free Le− Lμ, Le− Lτ, and Lμ− Lτ gauge models where the coupling of the new vector boson with the quarks is generated by kinetic mixing with the photon at the one-loop level. We consider also a model with a new light scalar boson mediator that is assumed, for simplicity, to have universal coupling with quarks and leptons. Since the COHERENT CEνNS data are well-fitted with the cross section predicted by the Standard Model, the analysis of the data yields constraints for the mass and coupling of the new boson mediator that depend on the charges of quarks and neutrinos in each model under consideration. We compare these constraints with the limits obtained in other experiments and with the values that can explain the muon g − 2 anomaly in the models where the muon couples to the new boson mediator.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy (GRID:grid.7763.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1755 3242); Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy (GRID:grid.470195.e)
2 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy (GRID:grid.470195.e)
3 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy (GRID:grid.470222.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 7471 9712)
4 Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309); University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, School of Physical Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.410726.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1797 8419)