This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Tenderness is not only the decisive factor and sensory characteristic of meat quality, but also an important index to evaluate muscle juiciness [1]. There are many factors affecting tenderness, and the characteristics of muscle fiber is one of them. Regardless of carcass weight or age, the total number of muscle fibers, muscle fiber diameter, cross-sectional area, and fiber type composition are of great significance to the growth performance and muscle quality of varieties [2]. By measuring the skeletal muscle tissue of adult animals, it was found that there were four muscle types of myosin heavy chain (Myhc), namely, type I, type IIa, type IIx, and type IIb [3], which were slow oxidation type (type I), rapid oxidation type (type IIa), intermediate type (type IIx), and rapid glycolysis type (type IIb) [4], respectively. It is also reported that the smaller diameter and the number of muscle fibers, that the smaller shear force required to cut the cross section of the muscle, and the tenderness of meat will be better [5]. The muscle with high content of muscle fiber has a higher ability to resist shear force, and the tenderness of meat is relatively low [6].
Most studies on meat quality are obtained from pig muscle, and it seems that the quantity and quality characteristics of meat products will change with the degree of fiber type profile change [7]. Thus far, the research on the effect of muscle fiber type expression on meat quality is mainly focused on the fiber type. The muscle fiber characteristics are different, and the meat quality traits are also significantly different. In muscle, the meat with the highest muscle fiber density is the most tender. The difference in meat quality between muscles can be explained by differences in muscle fiber characteristics, especially high-quality muscle [8]. There are many studies on other cattle breed muscle fiber types [9–14], but there is a lack of research on gene expression and morphology of Xinjiang brown cattle. This paper studies the morphological comparison and gene expression difference of muscle fiber types between Xinjiang brown cattle and Angus cattle to compare the differences of muscle between the two breeds and explore the causes of quality traits of Xinjiang brown beef and provide guidance for beef breed breeding, improvement, and production in China.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals
We randomly selected 12 Xinjiang Brown cattle and 12 Angus cattle from Xinjiang Bole Tianlai Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd. Under the same feeding and management conditions, the high-quality forage planting base was located at 42 north latitude, 826 meters above sea level, golden latitude, and moist soil vein with full natural essence of nature and standardized scientific planting management. The longissimus dorsi muscles were collected from the Xinjiang Brown cattle and Angus cattle at the age of 3, 7, 12, and 24 months. 3 samples were collected in each period and stored in liquid nitrogen at −80°C.
2.2. Histochemical Reactions
Adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) staining was performed. The samples frozen at −80°C were cut that using a cryostat (LEICA CM3050 S, Germany); then, the samples were cut into 10 μm thickness. All sections were incubated with 18 mM·CaCl2 and 4 mM·ATP (Sigma) at 37°C for 30 min [15]. We used distilled water to wash the muscle suctions three times for 1 min per. Then, we used 2% cobalt chloride solution (Sigma) to wash three times for 1 min per and washed with distilled water. The last, we used 1% ammonium sulfide solution (Sigma) to immerse for 30 s and washed with tap water and dehydrated.
Succinic dehydrogenase (SDHase) staining was performed. The sections in serial with those stained for myosin ATPase were stained for SDH [16]. The SDHase staining methods were referred from those of the study conducted by Wang et al. [17]. We used the Nikon electron microscope to examine the muscle sections and used image analysis software (EZ-MET) to count the density and cross-sectional area (CSA) of muscle fibers according to the method of counting up and down, and left and right under the visual field of 10 to 20 times. The CAS of muscle fibers was calculated [18]:
2.3. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Protocol
The method used quantitative real-time fluorescence PCR (qRT-PCR) was referred to the article of Heid et al. [19]. The tissue samples were first processed and the total RNA by Trizol (abm (MasterMix-EL) Company) methods. Then, the DNA was extracted. The methods of extracted DNA were referred to the study by Zurmanová et al. [20]. The primers used for real-time PCR are presented in Table 1 and obtained from Shanghai Shenggong Company, which were the same as those of Zheng Yue et al. [11]. The four myosin Myhc-I, Myhc-IIa, Myhc-IIb, and Myhc-IIx genes in longissimus dorsi muscle fibers were transcribed and expressed at the transcriptional level. The optimum annealing temperatures were 53.4°C, 69.3°C, 53.4°C, 56.0°C, and 53.4°C, respectively, and the optimum cycles were 34, 32, 34, 34, and 31 cycles, respectively. The relative quantification was carried out by using EvaGreen Express 2 × qPCR MasterMix kit and ABI QuantStudioTM 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System instrument. The reaction system is described in Table 2.
Table 1
Primer sequences used in quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Genes | Primer sequence | Accession no. | Product size |
Myhc-I | F: CTTCGGGAAATTCATTC | NM-174117 | 283 bp |
R: GTCAAAGGCGTTATCAG | |||
Myhc-IIa | F: CACTTGCTAACAAGGACCTCTGAGTTCA | XM-026521007 | 375 bp |
R: ATCCAGGCTGCGTAACGCTCTTTGAGGTTGTA | |||
Myhc-b | F: GATGTTCCTGTGGATGGTCA | NM-001123141 | 148 bp |
R: CTCGTTGGTGAAGTTGATGC | |||
Myhc-x | F: GAAACCGTCAAGGGTCTACG | NM-001104951 | 153 bp |
R: CGCTTCCTCAGCTTGTCTCT | |||
Beta-actin | F: GAGCGGGAAATCGTCCGTGAC | MF133532 | 278 bp |
R: GTGTTGGCGTAGAGGTCCTTGC |
F: sense primer; R: antisense primer.
Table 2
Fluorescence quantitative PCR system.
Reagent | Volume (μL) |
Eva green express 2 × qPCR master mix | 5 |
Forward primer | 0.3 |
Reverse primer | 0.3 |
cDNA | 1 |
RNase-free water | Up to 10 |
2.4. Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed by the SPSS 22.0 statistical software. The mismatched independent sample T test was used to compare the varieties and transform the gene expression data into 2-ΔΔCT. All the data were expressed by mean ± standard error. At the same time, univariate analysis of the data was carried out by using the statistical software GraphPad Prism 7.0. “
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Comparison of Density Determination
To compare the determination of density of Xinjiang brown cattle and Angus cattle, the results are presented in Table 3 and Figure 1 and Figure 2. It showed that the densities of type IIb and type IIx muscle fibers of 3-month-old Xinjiang brown cattle were significantly lower than that of Angus cattle (
Table 3
Comparison of different types of muscle fiber density between the same month of Xinjiang brown cattle and Angus cattle of longissimus dorsi muscle. Bc means Xinjiang Brown cattle and An means Angus cattle. Type I is dark, type IIa and type IIb are light, and type IIx is gray.
Age (m) | Breed | Type I (ATP) | Type IIa (SDH) | Type IIb (SDH) | Type IIx (ATP) |
3 | Bc | 178.64 ± 8.77 | 163.87 ± 7.13 | 94.05 ± 7.92a | 98.39 ± 7.48a |
An | 188.01 ± 7.36 | 152.85 ± 5.99 | 169.76 ± 6.65b | 160.30 ± 6.28b | |
7 | Bc | 113.28 ± 9.52 | 74.34 ± 6.25 | 66.91 ± 5.62 | 99.47 ± 8.36 |
An | 136.19 ± 10.39 | 72.97 ± 5.57 | 71.18 ± 5.43 | 109.67 ± 8.37 | |
12 | Bc | 107.79 ± 17.60 | 59.06 ± 9.65 | 62.06 ± 10.13 | 86.09 ± 14.06 |
An | 120.48 ± 21.40 | 49.78 ± 8.848 | 54.45 ± 9.67 | 84.30 ± 14.97 | |
24 | Bc | 52.53 ± 10.09 | 50.32 ± 9.67 | 75.80 ± 14.56 | 57.32 ± 11.01 |
An | 83.58 ± 7.08 | 52.06 ± 4.41 | 81.33 ± 6.89 | 74.03 ± 6.27 |
In the same age, different groups marked different low case letters indicating statistical differences at P < 0.05. Different uppercase letters indicate statistical differences at (P < 0.01), and unmarked indicate statistical differences at (P > 0.05).
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
3.2. Comparison of CSA Determination
Table 4 shows that the CSAs of type I and IIa muscle fibers of Xinjiang brown cattle were significantly smaller than that of Angus cattle at the age of 3 months (
Table 4
Comparison of CSA of different types of muscle fibers between the same month of Xinjiang brown cattle and Angus cattle in the longissimus dorsi muscle (μm2).
Age (m) | Breed | Type I (ATP) | Type IIa (SDH) | Type IIb (SDH) | Type IIx (ATP) |
3 | Bc | 361.03 ± 13.51 A | 292.66 ± 12.19 A | 981.99 ± 55.71 A | 460.10 ± 16.54 |
An | 534.28 ± 28.99 B | 407.87 ± 22.6 5 B | 623.76 ± 31.40 B | 492.24 ± 20.07 | |
7 | Bc | 1031.45 ± 43.15a | 1012.08 ± 63.10 | 2664.59 ± 231.43 | 1560.64 ± 105.23 |
An | 1174.43 ± 45.66 b | 918.06 ± 55.51 | 2554.35 ± 252.66 | 1394.44 ± 94.00 | |
12 | Bc | 1628.82 ± 97.05 A | 1270.22 ± 68.88 A | 2813.87 ± 210.34 | 1922.69 ± 98.83a |
An | 1033.78 ± 39.08 B | 990.01 ± 44.45 B | 2641.40 ± 205.23 | 1669.91 ± 69.03 b | |
24 | Bc | 2287.74 ± 231.14 | 1699.44 ± 44.68 A | 3157.79 ± 132.20 A | 2355.23 ± 134.63 A |
An | 2135.74 ± 305.02 | 1469.53 ± 35.89 B | 2316.63 ± 92.25 B | 1646.06 ± 58.74 B |
At the age of 7 months, the CSA of type I of Xinjiang brown cattle was significantly smaller than that of Angus cattle (
At the age of 24 months, the CSAs of muscle fibers of type IIa, type IIb, and type IIx of Xinjiang brown cattle were larger than Angus cattle (
The muscle have many histological characteristics. In particular, muscle fiber type and CSA histological characteristics determined meat quality tenderness, flavor, meat color, and other important factors [24]. Our results are the same with those of Lefaucheur et al. [25], in which the CSA of type I muscle fiber with the slowest contraction speed was smaller, the tenderness would be better, the proportion of type I muscle fiber was higher, the meat flavor would be rich, the muscle with higher type I fiber was generally tender and juicy, and the meat color would be bright and had better meat quality. Essén-Gustavsson et al. [26] found that the content of myoglobin and lipids in type I muscle fibers was higher than that of muscle fibers type IIa in the study of porcine longissimus dorsi muscle. Different fiber types and components affect the transformation of metabolic muscle and meat quality. Lepetit [27] found that the CSA of beef muscle fiber increased with the age, the finer muscle fiber will have the greater muscle fiber density, and the velvet-shaped CSA texture of muscle indicated good meat quality. There are significant differences in muscle fiber composition among different livestock breeds and different muscle tissues [28]. Chen and Opara [29] found that the CSA of beef muscle fibers in all eight parts were type I < type IIa < type IIb. Different from the results of this study, the CSA of Xinjiang brown cattle and Angus cattle at the age of 3, 7, and 12 months were type IIa < type I < type IIb. The reason may be that different breeds and different parts of the same animal lead to different activities [30]. Ozawa et al. [31] and Kirchofer et al. [32] found that the proportion of type IIb fibers in longissimus dorsi muscle was higher, which was the same as that in our study. Hwang et al. [33] also showed that the CSA of type IIb muscle fiber was larger than type I and type IIa muscle fiber when studying the relationship between muscle fiber type and meat quality of Korean cattle, but he concluded that the CSA of the three types of psoas major muscle fibers was not the smallest. Studies have shown that, compared with muscles with smaller muscle fiber CSA, muscles with larger muscle fiber CSA, especially type IIb fiber, the meat quality was not good [34]. In our study, we found that the number of type I muscle fibers of Xinjiang brown cattle decreased with the increase of age, and the proportion of type IIb muscle fibers increased gradually with the age of 7, 12, and 24 months old. The number of type I muscle fibers in Angus cattle was similar to that of Xinjiang brown cattle, but the proportion of type IIb muscle fibers changed irregularly with age. The result may be that the number of samples is too small. The CSA of type IIb muscle fiber is relatively large, the activities of glycogen, ATP enzyme, and glycolytic enzyme were very high, the activity of oxygen metabolic enzyme was low, and the contraction speed was fast, so the muscle with more type IIb fiber had rough texture, which will increase the shearing force of muscle, lighten the color of meat, and reduce flavor and tenderness [35].
3.3. Myhc Isoform Gene Expression
In Figure 3, the relative level of type I muscle fiber mRNA of 3-month-old Xinjiang brown cattle was significantly higher than that of Angus cattle, and the relative level of type I muscle fiber mRNA of 7-month-old, 12-month-old, and 24-month-old Xinjiang brown cattle were significantly lower than that of Angus cattle (
[figure(s) omitted; refer to PDF]
4. Conclusion
From the perspective of muscle fiber histology, we found that the muscle fiber CSA of Xinjiang brown cattle was smaller than Angus cattle, indicating that the tenderness of Xinjiang brown cattle was better than Angus cattle. Except for the 3-month-old stage, the mRNA expression levels of Myhc-I, Myhc-IIa, Myhc-IIb, and Myhc-IIx genes in the longissimus dorsi of 7-month-old, 12-month-old, and 24-month-old Xinjiang brown cattle were significantly lower than those of Angus cattle, and the Myhc-I expression level of 3-month-old Xinjiang brown cattle was significantly higher than that of Angus cattle, indicating that the tenderness of 3-month-old Xinjiang brown cattle was better than that of Angus cattle. It is shown that Xinjiang brown cattle are more suitable for the production of early fat calves and to make some reference for improving the quality of beef cattle in China.
Authors’ Contributions
Ya-wei Sun and Miao Qu are contributed equally.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Youth Fund Project of Natural Science Foundation of XinjiangUygur Autonomous Region (no. 2017D01B11), Work of Postdoctoral Station of Animal Husbandry in Xinjiang Agricultural University (no. 168138), and Tianshan Innovation Team of Autonomous Region (no. 2020D14005).
[1] S. L. Gruber, J. D. Tatum, J. A. Scanga, P. L. Chapman, G. C. Smith, K. E. Belk, "Effects of postmortem aging and USDA quality grade on Warner-Bratzler shear force values of seventeen individual beef muscles1," Journal of Animal Science, vol. 84 no. 12, pp. 3387-3396, DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-194, 2006.
[2] L. Lefaucheur, "A second look into fibre typing—relation to meat quality," Meat Science, vol. 84 no. 2, pp. 257-270, DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.05.004, 2010.
[3] M. Zhang, Y.-l. Liu, C. Y. Fu, J. Wang, S.-Y. Chen, J. Yao, S.-J. Lai, "Expression of MyHC genes, composition of muscle fiber type and their association with intramuscular fat, tenderness in skeletal muscle of Simmental hybrids," Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 41 no. 2, pp. 833-840, DOI: 10.1007/s11033-013-2923-6, 2014.
[4] K. M. Hemmings, T. Parr, Z. C. T. R. Daniel, B. Picard, P. J. Buttery, J. M. Brameld, "Examination of myosin heavy chain isoform expression in ovine skeletal muscles1," Journal of Animal Science, vol. 87 no. 12, pp. 3915-3922, DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2067, 2009.
[5] D. W. Jeong, Y. M. Choi, S. H. Lee, J. H. Choe, K. C. Hong, H. C. Park, B. C. Kim, "Correlations of trained panel sensory values of cooked pork with fatty acid composition, muscle fiber type, and pork quality characteristics in Berkshire pigs," Meat Science, vol. 86 no. 3, pp. 607-615, DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.011, 2010.
[6] A. Listrat, B. Lebret, I. Louveau, T. Astruc, M. Bonnet, L. Lefaucheur, B. Picard, J. Bugeon, "How muscle structure and composition influence meat and flesh quality," The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2016,DOI: 10.1155/2016/3182746, 2016.
[7] E. E. Pistilli, S. E. Alway, J. M. Hollander, J. H. Wimsatt, "Aging alters contractile properties and fiber morphology in pigeon skeletal muscle," Journal of Comparative Physiology B, vol. 184 no. 8, pp. 1031-1039, DOI: 10.1007/s00360-014-0857-5, 2014.
[8] G.-D. Kim, H.-S. Yang, J.-Y. Jeong, "Comparison of characteristics of myosin heavy chain-based fiber and meat quality among four bovine skeletal muscles," Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, vol. 36 no. 6, pp. 819-828, DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.6.819, 2016.
[9] Y. Komiya, W. Mizunoya, K. Kajiwara, I. Yokoyama, H. Ogasawara, K. Arihara, "Correlation between skeletal muscle fiber type and responses of a taste sensing system in various beef samples," Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho, vol. 91,DOI: 10.1111/asj.13425, 2020.
[10] Y. Lang, S. Zhang, P. Xie, X. Yang, B. Sun, H. Yang, "Muscle fiber characteristics and postmortem quality of longissimus thoracis, psoas major and semitendinosus from Chinese Simmental bulls," Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 8 no. 11, pp. 6083-6094, DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1898, 2020.
[11] Y. Zheng, S. Wang, P. Yan, "The meat quality, muscle fiber characteristics and fatty acid profile in Jinjiang and F1 Simmental × Jinjiang yellow cattle," Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, vol. 31 no. 2, pp. 301-308, DOI: 10.5713/ajas.17.0319, 2018.
[12] X. Chen, D. Liang, Z. Huang, G. Jia, H. Zhao, G. Liu, "Quercetin regulates skeletal muscle fiber type switching via adiponectin signaling," Food and Function, vol. 12 no. 6, pp. 2693-2702, DOI: 10.1039/d1fo00031d, 2021.
[13] M. Khan, A Couturier, J. F Kubens, E Most, F. C Mooren, K Krüger, R Ringseis, K Eder, "Niacin supplementation induces type II to type I muscle fiber transition in skeletal muscle of sheep," Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, vol. 55 no. 85,DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-55-85, 2013.
[14] M. Hosotani, K. Kametani, N. Ohno, K. Hiramatsu, T. Kawasaki, Y. Hasegawa, T. Iwasaki, T. Watanabe, "The unique physiological features of the broiler pectoralis major muscle as suggested by the three-dimensional ultrastructural study of mitochondria in type IIb muscle fibers," Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 83 no. 11, pp. 1764-1771, DOI: 10.1292/jvms.21-0408, 2021.
[15] S. Schiaffino, C. Reggiani, "Fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscles," Physiological Reviews, vol. 91 no. 4, pp. 1447-1531, DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2010, 2011.
[16] M. M. Nachlas, K.-C. Tsou, E. De Souza, C.-S. Cheng, A. M. Seligman, "Cytochemical demonstration of succinic dehydrogenase by the use of a new p-nitrophenyl substituted ditetrazole," Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 5 no. 4, pp. 420-436, DOI: 10.1177/5.4.420, 1957.
[17] B. Z. Wang, Y. Z. Li, B. M. Xin, Q. C. Fan, G. E. Bai, "Effects of Chinese herb compound on myocardial SDH ATP-ase and energy reserves in tail-suspended rats," Space Medicine and Medical Engineering, vol. 17, pp. 326-329, 2004.
[18] C. Pertl, M. Eblenkamp, A. Pertl, S. Pfeifer, E. Wintermantel, H. Lochmüller, M. C. Walter, S. Krause, C. Thirion, "A new web-based method for automated analysis of muscle histology," BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 14,DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-26, 2013.
[19] C. A. Heid, J. Stevens, K. J. Livak, P. M. Williams, "Real time quantitative PCR," Genome Research, vol. 6 no. 10, pp. 986-994, DOI: 10.1101/gr.6.10.986, 1996.
[20] J. Zurmanová, F. Půta, R. Stopková, T. Soukup, "Real time RT-PCR with a newly designed set of primers confirmed the presence of 2b and 2x/d myosin heavy chain mRNAs in the rat slow soleus muscle," Physiological Research, vol. 57, pp. 973-978, 2008.
[21] C. Maltin, D. Balcerzak, R. Tilley, M. Delday, "Determinants of meat quality: tenderness," Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, vol. 62 no. 2, pp. 337-347, DOI: 10.1079/pns2003248, 2003.
[22] Y. M. Choi, L. G. Garcia, K. Lee, "Correlations of sensory quality characteristics with intramuscular fat content and bundle characteristics in bovine longissimus thoracis muscle," Food Science of Animal Resources, vol. 39 no. 2, pp. 197-208, DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e15, 2019.
[23] D. Stavaux, T. Art, K. M. Entee, M. Reznick, P. Lekeux, "Muscle fibre type and size, and muscle capillary density in young double-muscled blue Belgian cattle," Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A, vol. 41, pp. 229-236, DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1994.tb00089.x, 1994.
[24] S. T. Joo, G. D. Kim, Y. H. Hwang, Y. C. Ryu, "Control of fresh meat quality through manipulation of muscle fiber characteristics," Meat Science, vol. 95 no. 4, pp. 828-836, DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.044, 2013.
[25] L. Lefaucheur, D. Milan, P. Ecolan, C. Le Callennec, "Myosin heavy chain composition of different skeletal muscles in Large White and Meishan pigs1," Journal of Animal Science, vol. 82 no. 7, pp. 1931-1941, DOI: 10.2527/2004.8271931x, 2004.
[26] B. Essén-Gustavsson, K. Karlström, K. Lundström, "Muscle fibre characteristics and metabolic response at slaughter in pigs of different halothane genotypes and their relation to meat quality," Meat Science, vol. 31, 1992.
[27] J. Lepetit, "A theoretical approach of the relationships between collagen content, collagen cross-links and meat tenderness," Meat Science, vol. 76 no. 1, pp. 147-159, DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.10.027, 2007.
[28] F. Zamora, E. Debiton, J. Lepetit, A. Lebert, E. Dransfield, A. Ouali, "Predicting variability of ageing and toughness in beef M. Longissimus lumborum et thoracis," Meat Science, vol. 43, pp. 321-333, DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(96)00020-4, 1996.
[29] L. Chen, U. L. Opara, "Approaches to analysis and modeling texture in fresh and processed foods - a review," Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 119 no. 3, pp. 497-507, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.06.028, 2013.
[30] M. Ruusunen, E. Puolanne, "Histochemical properties of fibre types in muscles of wild and domestic pigs and the effect of growth rate on muscle fibre properties," Meat Science, vol. 67 no. 3, pp. 533-539, DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.12.008, 2004.
[31] S. Ozawa, T. Mitsuhashi, M. Mitsumoto, S. Matsumoto, N. Itoh, K. Itagaki, Y. Kohno, T. Dohgo, "The characteristics of muscle fiber types of longissimus thoracis muscle and their influences on the quantity and quality of meat from Japanese Black steers," Meat Science, vol. 54 no. 1, pp. 65-70, DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(99)00072-8, 2000.
[32] K. S. Kirchofer, C. R. Calkins, B. L. Gwartney, "Fiber-type composition of muscles of the beef chuck and round1," Journal of Animal Science, vol. 80 no. 11, pp. 2872-2878, DOI: 10.2527/2002.80112872x, 2002.
[33] Y.-H. Hwang, G.-D. Kim, J.-Y. Jeong, S.-J. Hur, S.-T. Joo, "The relationship between muscle fiber characteristics and meat quality traits of highly marbled Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) steers," Meat Science, vol. 86 no. 2, pp. 456-461, DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.034, 2010.
[34] G. Renand, B. Picard, C. Touraille, P. Berge, J. Lepetit, "Relationships between muscle characteristics and meat quality traits of young Charolais bulls," Meat Science, vol. 59 no. 1, pp. 49-60, DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(01)00051-1, 2001.
[35] J. J. Bond, R. D. Warner, "Ion distribution and protein proteolysis affect water holding capacity of Longissimus thoracis et lumborum in meat of lamb subjected to antemortem exercise," Meat Science, vol. 75 no. 3, pp. 406-414, DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.08.005, 2007.
[36] G. Bee, M. B. Solomon, S. M. Czerwinski, C. Long, V. G. Pursel, "Correlation between histochemically assessed fiber type distribution and isomyosin and myosin heavy chain content in porcine skeletal muscles," Journal of Animal Science, vol. 77 no. 8, pp. 2104-2111, DOI: 10.2527/1999.7782104x, 1999.
[37] X. Chen, Y. Guo, G. Jia, G. Liu, H. Zhao, Z. Huang, "Arginine promotes skeletal muscle fiber type transformation from fast-twitch to slow-twitch via Sirt1/AMPK pathway," The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 61, pp. 155-162, DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.08.007, 2018.
[38] R.-i. Tanabe, S. Muroya, K. Chikuni, "Sequencing of the 2a, 2x, and slow isoforms of the bovine myosin heavy chain and the different expression among muscles," Mammalian Genome, vol. 9 no. 12, pp. 1056-1058, DOI: 10.1007/s003359900924, 1998.
[39] Y. C. Ryu, B. C. Kim, "The relationship between muscle fiber characteristics, postmortem metabolic rate, and meat quality of pig longissimus dorsi muscle," Meat Science, vol. 71 no. 2, pp. 351-357, DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.015, 2005.
[40] Y. J. Nam, Y. M. Choi, S. H. Lee, J. H. Choe, D. W. Jeong, Y. Y. Kim, B. C. Kim, "Sensory evaluations of porcine longissimus dorsi muscle: relationships with postmortem meat quality traits and muscle fiber characteristics," Meat Science, vol. 83 no. 4, pp. 731-736, DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.015, 2009.
[41] M. Gagaoua, C. Terlouw, I. Richardson, J.-F. Hocquette, B. Picard, "The associations between proteomic biomarkers and beef tenderness depend on the end-point cooking temperature, the country origin of the panelists and breed," Meat Science, vol. 157,DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.06.007, 2019.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2022 Ya-wei Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
The longissimus dorsi muscle of Xinjiang brown cattle and Angus cattle at the age of 3, 7, 12, and 24 months under the same feeding and management conditions were selected to explore the differences of muscle 4 fiber types in this study. The muscle histological and molecular biological reasons for the quality difference between Xinjiang brown cattle and Angus beef were discussed. The morphology of the muscle was compared by ATP enzyme staining and SDH enzyme staining, and its gene expression was detected by qRT-PCR. The mRNA expression levels of Myhc-I in 3-month-old Xinjiang brown cattle were significantly higher than those in Angus cattle of the same age (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer