Comparison of the Effectiveness of Gottman Method Couple Therapy with Narrative Therapy on Couples Burnout and Marital Adjustment in Couple of Mashhad City

Abstract

The present study aims to comparison of the eï¬Â�?�?ectiveness of Gottman method couple therapy (GMCT) with narrative therapy on couples burnout and marital adjustment in couples this study was typed of experimental studies with pretest and posttest with control group. The study consisted of all couples referred to the counseling centers in mashhad city. A sample of 24 couples with conï¬Â�?�?ict was selected, then randomly assigned to two experimental groups and one control group. The couples burnout mature (CBM) pines and dyadic adjustment scale Spanier (DAS) was used for data collection, then based on 8 meetings 90 minutes for the experimental groups. The pre-test and post-test scores were analyzed using a MANOVA test in the SPSS 20 software. According to the results of showed Gottman method couple therapy more eï¬Â�?�?ective than other experimental group and control group so narrative therapy more eï¬Â�?�?ective than control group in both variables.

Introduction

Conflict is regarded as the interaction between couples who have different views and beliefs about 61 % of divorced individuals have reported that conflict is important role in divorce that is a natural phenomenon in all family relationships [1] marital adjustment is defined as understanding in activities, which are associated with happiness and success in life. Marriage is a condition in which both husband and wife experience in happiness and satisfaction in fact the problem of marital conflict is directly related to the satisfaction of all basic needs and is more than any other category for referral and receiving psychotherapy, counseling and social work [2]. However, the difficulties of the couple are not the only cause of marital conflict, but they determine the negative relationships. Indeed, when couples engage in relations, go to life a series of dreams when in during time, conflict replace to dream then the boredom takes place. Recent one of the leading models is Gottman method couples therapy that basis in friendship, conflict management in the system of common concepts. In terms of Gottman, four factors are important, that undermine 86 percent of the predictive confidence of the divorce. The four horsemen known are criticism, blame, and defensiveness [3]. Gottman believes that by analyzing the relationship of a couple, the possibility of achieving a divorce can be predicted [4] in the meantime, different approaches have been proposed to treat family problems, one of which is a narrative therapy. Polkinghrone [5] notes in his book that the couples of the divorce applicant who attended the narrative therapy courses showed less depression and disappointment than their counterparts in the four - month follow - up. The increasing of marital conflicts, is the negative effect on the mental health of couples and their children and it has led to therapists make plans to help couples conflict each approach has proposed different treatment and training methods based on their specific explanations. Also, attention to this point that there has never been research comparing the efficacy and therapeutic effectiveness of the narrative in Iran. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to answer the question whether there is a signification effect Gottman method couple therapy and narrative therapy based couple on couples burnout and marital adjustment in couples with conflict?.

Methodology

The present study is the type of semi experiment studies, pre test post test with the control group. The study consisted of all adjustment couples referred the family court, resolution councils and counseling centers in mashhad city during the fall of 2016 24 couples based that 8 couples receive Gottman method couple therapy, eight couples narrative therapy and eight couples were the control group. First, the announcement was made to select the sample 45 couples have the condition to enter the study (fewer than 75 in DAS and more than 73 in CBM) the people have a problem cause of addiction, mental illness, homicide, and marital infidelity had been driven out of the study 24 couples selected random they have been married minimum three years and a maximum of 15 years; their age. In the range of 20 to 40 years and there was their original marriage. Selected 24 couples randomly, then based on 8 meetings 90 minutes for the experimental groups in pre-test and post-test. The control group did not receive any treatment, and they were told that they are waiting list in the process of treatment after three months the therapeutic protocols used in this study include a package Gottman method couple therapy [6] and narrative therapy [7].

Couple burnout matures Pains (CBM): it is a self - report made by Pinez [8] with the aim of measuring the degree of burnout among couples. The questionnaire includes 21 materials, 17 of which include negative phrases, such as fatigue, discomfort, and other 4 substances, including positive expressions, such as being happy and energetic. At this was a Likert scale ranging from one to seven. In addition, 4 materials is done in reverse, test-retest reliability method was 0.76 in a one - month period. The validity of this scale was calculated by the cronbach's alpha method a range between 0.91 and 0.93 in his study, the author obtained the reliability of this scale using the Cronbach's Alpha method of 0.85. Marital adjustment scale (DAS). Marital adjustment scale is designed by Spanier in 1976 [9]. The questionnaire includes 32 materials, at this was a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 between zero to 151, scoring 101 and more points to better relationship and lower scores agreeableness the validity of this scale was calculated by cronbach's alpha method 0.96 in Spanier study [9], Khodayarifard et al. [10] and Obtained the reliability of this scale 0.94.

Findings

In this research , mean and standard deviation of the age group of gmct of 32.00 ± 3.759 year in narrative therapy group 31.63 ± 3.284 year and control group was 32.383.117 the results of the analysis of variance one way(ANOVA) show that significant no difference between the mean age of participants and their peers in terms of age (t=0.195 & p=0.824) the duration of the marriage was more than 5 years in 85.5 participants the mean and standard deviation of the duration of the marriage for the GMCT group was 5.38 ± 1.147 narrative group 5.56 ± 1.365 and control group 5.69 ± 1.014the results of the anova showed that there was no significant difference between the mean duration of the marriage participants and their peers (p=0.755, t=0.282).

Table 1 shows the mean and standard deviation and results Shapiro-Wilk examine couple burnout and marital adjustment of the three groups according to Shapiro-Wilk examine (p›0.05) presumption the normal distribution of the data to conduct an analysis of MANOVA is established and the results of the leven test showed that the variance homogeneity in the two variables couple burnout (f=0.477, p=0.624) and marital adjustment (f=1.294, p=0.284)is established. Before the covariance analysis, the regression line between independent variable and the dependent variable were investigated; couple burnout(f=1.311, p=0.281) and marital adjustment (f=0.087, p=0.916) also was investigated homogeneity of the covariance-variance matrices was investigated using M box, the results showed significant for the dependent variables (f=1.080, p=0.372) (Table 1).

Table 1: Descriptive statistics and results Shapiro-Wilk examine couple burnout and marital adjustment of the three groups

Sig	Z	M±sd	Step	Group	Variable
0.477	0.949	64.69±2.214	Pre -test	GMCT	DAS
0.354	0.94	84.75±2.864	Post-test
0.085	0.902	63.69±2.330	Pre -test	Narrative Therapy
0.738	0.964	80.37±3.722	Post-test
0.518	0.954	64.00±2.852	Pre -test	Control
0.187	0.923	67.38±2.754	Post-test
0.623	0.958	90.37±4.425	Pre -test	GMCT	CBM
0.481	0.949	76.50±3.724	Post-test
0.293	0.935	87.19±2.588	Pre -test	Narrative Therapy
0.668	0.96	78.69±2.387	Post-test
0.844	0.97	88.31±3.114	Pre -test	Control
0.315	0.937	85.19±3.146	Post-test

Table 2 shows that with the pre-test effect control, according to Wilks' lambda And Pillai'strace test there is a significant difference in the three groups, at least in terms of one of the variables couple burnout and marital adjustment (Table 2).

Table 2: Results of the multi co-variance analysis of couples burnout and marital adjustment of the three groups

P	Eta	Sig	F	Value
1	0.811	0.0001	90.196	0.036	Wilks' lambda
1	0.861	0.0001	27.438	1.121	Pillai's trace
1	0.919	0.0001	232.011	22.635	Hotelling's trace

Table 3 shows that considering pretest scores as an auxiliary variable, there is a significant difference. Among the experimental and control groups in the two variables couple burnout (f=189.493, p‹0.0001) marital adjustment (f=214.834, p‹0.0001). The impact of marital adjustment was 91 % and 90 % in couple’s burnout. This is due to the difference in the membership of the therapeutic groups. Therefore, it can be confirmed that both therapies have been effective. The statistical power of 1 indicates the adequacy of the sample volume and the acceptable statistical accuracy for this conclusion (Table 3).

Table 3: Results of the co-variance analysis of effects between the mean couples burnout and marital adjustment of the three groups

P	Eta	Sig	F	Mean Sqaure	Sun of square	Source	Variable
1	0.475	0.0001	38.863	196.717	196.717	Pre-test	DAS
1	0.909	0.0001	214.834	1087.448	2174.895	Group
				5.062	217.658	Error
1	0.786	0.0001	157.822	330.797	330.797	Pre-test	CBM
1	0.898	0.0001	189.493	397.18	794.36	Group
				2.096	90.129	Error

Table 4 showed the receiving group of GMCT better than the other two groups, receiving the group of narrative therapy better than the control group in post-test 2 variables (p‹0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4: lsd’s comparison the studied variables in the three groups

Sig	Standard deviation	Average of difference	Group	Variable
0.0001	9.471	3.919*	Narrative Therapy -GMCT	DAS
0.0001	0.831	16.046*	Control -GMCT
0.0001	0.805	12.127*	Control -Narrative Therapy
0.0001	0.563	-4.667*	Narrative Therapy -GMCT	CBM
0.0001	0.534	-10.289*	Control -GMCT
0.0001	0.518	-5.662*	Control -Narrative Therapy

Sig in 0.05 *

Conclusion

The research was conducted with the objective comparison of the effectiveness of GMCT with narrative therapy based couple on couples burnout and marital adjustment in couples with conflict. It can be concluded that the therapy is more effective in groups of GMCT that aligns with the results of research, the authors [5,6,11] showed that the treatment in Gottman's method led to a rise in marital satisfaction, reduction of marital troubles to follow up a year. Other findings like in Iran pointed out that the effectiveness GMCT was effective compared to the lack of treatment in explaining this finding, the couple will be able to communicate effectively after participating in the therapeutic sessions to negotiate in their responsibilities, effectively communicate with each other, discuss the causes of disagreement and importance of the expression of their perspective on the best way to manage, and make their decision operation [12]. Wamboldt [13] found that the therapeutic narrative was effective in dealing with the problems of life one of the main reasons for this can be referred to externalizing the problem’s technique, they are asked to see the problem outside themselves so that inside himself there will be a change in the therapy sessions with the help of the partners in the narrative of stable to unstable, internal to external, uncontrollable to controllable. The effectiveness of the GMCT approach to the narrative therapy can be explained that the GMCT theory is an integrated approach including as argued that the woman is affected by husband and husband by woman, supports a system theory or it also supports the existential point of view, when seeing existentialistic dream of life; and when these dreams are described, it supports the story therapy, the method of Gottman supports a psychoanalytic, as dreams usually return to the childhood of a person and attention to the symbolic meanings, And as it seeks to change behavior, it supports the behavioral approach because it believes that the best way to change the rather than trying to change the perception in other hands we known behavior leads to change of thought [14]. White M, Epston D [15] showed trying to eliminate symptoms without talking about them is not very effective and Barrett, et al. [16] was revealed change is more important at the level of excitement than at the level of behavior in the couple. This study was specific limitations like lack of follow up was one of the main limitations of this study it can affect the generalizability of the research.

References

1. Brant C Faircloth, John E McCormack, Nicholas G Crawford, Michael G Harvey, Robb T Brumfield, et al. (2012) Ultra conserved Elements Anchor Thousands of Genetic Markers Spanning Multiple Evolutionary Timescales. Systematic Biology, 61(5): 717-26.

2. Chen Z, Tanaka N, Uji M, Hiramura H, Shikai N, et al. (2007) The role of personalities in the marital adjustment of Japanese couples. Soc Behav Pers 35(4): 561-72.

3. Gurman AS (2008) A framework for the comparative study of couple therapy: History, models, and applications. Clinical handbook of couple therapy, The Guilford Press pp: 1-26.

4. Gottman J, Swanson C, Swanson K (2002) A general systems theory of marriage: Nonlinear difference equation modeling of marital interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6(4): 326-40.

5. Gelya Frank, Donald Polkinghorne (2010) Qualitative Research in Occupational Therapy: From the First to the Second Generation. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health 30(2):51-7.

6. Gottman JM, Gottman JS (2008) Gottman method couple therapy. In: Gurman AS (Edn.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy, The Guilford Press pp: 138-64.

7. O'Hanlon WB (1998) Possibility therapy: An inclusive, collaborative, solution-based model of psychotherapy. In: Hoyt MF (Edn.) The handbook of constructive therapies: Innovative approaches from leading practitioners. Jossey-Bass/Wiley pp: 137-58.

8. Ayala Malach Pines, Renato Nunes (2003) The Relationship between Career and Couple Burnout: Implications for Career and Couple Counseling. Journal of Employment Counseling 40(2).

9. Spanier GB (1976) Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family 38:15-28.

10. Mohammad Khodayarifard, Rouhollah Shahabi, Saeed Akbari-Zardkhaneh (2013) Religiosity and Marital Satisfaction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 6: 266.

11. Babcock JC, Gottman JM, Ryan KD, Gottman JS (2013) A component analysis of a brief psycho‐educational couples' workshop: One‐year follow-up results. Journal of Family Therapy 35(3): 252-80.

12. Havasi N, Zahrakar K, Mohsenzadeh F (2017) Effectiveness of integrated Gottman-Emotional Focused and Strategic-Solution Focused approaches on decreasing the desire for divorce. Family Psychology 6(2):71- 86.

13. Emily Millikan Kean, Kimberly Kelsay, Frederick Wamboldt, Marianne Z Wamboldt (2006) Posttraumatic Stress in Adolescents with Asthma and Their ParentsJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 45(1):78-86.

14. Byrne M, Carr A, Clark M (2004) The efficacy of couples-based interventions for panic disorder with agoraphobia. Journal of Family Therapy 26(2):105-25.

15. White M, Epston D (2004) Narrative means to therapeutic ends. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy 27(4).

16. Lisa Feldman Barrett, Lucy Robin, Paula R Pietromonaco, Kristen M Eyssell (1998) Are Women the ``More Emotional’’ Sex? Evidence from Emotional Experiences in Social Context. Cognition and Emotion 12(4): 555-78.