1. Introduction
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a Gram-negative, microaerobic bacterium with demanding growth conditions, was first successfully isolated from gastric mucosal biopsies of patients with chronic active gastritis, and it is the only microbial species known to be able to survive in the human stomach [1]. H. pylori infection is an important pathogenic factor in digestive system diseases (e.g., peptic ulcers and chronic active gastritis) and is strongly associated with stomach cancer [1,2]. Nearly half of the world’s population is currently infected with H. pylori, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer has also listed H. pylori (infection) on its list of class I carcinogens [3].
In the genes encoding H. pylori’s virulence factors, which contribute to different degrees of pathogenicity of strains, very high heterogeneity and genetic variation have been found [4]. Cytotoxin-associated gene A (cagA), one of the most studied genes with a virulence-associated function, encodes the CagA effector protein, which is delivered into gastric epithelial cells through the secretion of bacterial type IV, which is an oncoprotein that induces malignant neoplasms in mammals [5,6]. Another well-known virulence factor of H. pylori is vacuolating cytotoxin A (VacA). This is a toxin secreted by the type Va secretion system (T5aSS) and is known to induce the formation of cytoplasmic vacuoles [5]. Moreover, urease is produced by H. pylori and catalyzes urea hydrolysis, producing the end products of carbon dioxide (CO2) and ammonia (NH3), facilitating survival in hostile pH conditions, and improving settlement and growth in the human gastric epithelium [7]. Urease A (UreA) and urease B (UreB) are the two structural subunits of urease heterodimers [7]. To resist H. pylori infection, the body produces corresponding anti-virulence-factor antibodies, which are also helpful for auxiliary diagnosis. Urease is the main antigenic component for antibody production in H. pylori infection. Interestingly, UreB can induce multiple autoimmune diseases by stimulating B-1 cells to generate self-reactive antibodies, e.g., IgG3, IgM-type rheumatoid factors, and anti-single stranded DNA (ssDNA) [7,8,9].
The prevalence of H. pylori varies greatly by region of the country, from a relatively low prevalence of 20%, to 50% in high-income areas, and to as high as 80% or more in low-income areas [10]. Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer deaths around the world, and H. pylori infection is the single strongest risk factor [10,11,12]. Each year, approximately 340,000 people in China suffer gastric cancer due to H. pylori infection [10]. The main methods used to diagnose H. pylori infection include (i) invasive operations to obtain mucosal tissue for histopathology and/or various molecular and nucleic acid amplification tests, and (ii) non-invasive operations such as urea breath tests, stool antigen tests, and serological tests [13,14].
The 13C-UBT, as a gold-standard method, has been in use for over 30 years and is the most widely used and accurate non-invasive test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection worldwide, with advantages such as high accuracy in H. pylori detection, easy operation, and not being influenced by the focal distribution of H. pylori in the stomach [13,14]. Unfortunately, the 13C-UBT is severely limited in patients with a history of recent use of acid-suppressant or antibacterial agents, acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, accelerated gastric emptying due to gastrectomy or gastric acid deficiency, bile reflux, and severe atrophy/enterocolitis of the gastric mucosa [5,14,15].
Since individuals infected with H. pylori develop a local and systemic immune response, specific H. pylori antibodies can be detected by rapid serological assays. Serological assays, as non-invasive methods, are simple, rapid, and inexpensive, and enable immediate patient testing for H. pylori antibodies in general practice surgeries [9]. The serological test can be used for some specific conditions (peptic ulcer bleeding, gastric MALT lymphoma, and severe gastric atrophy) [15]. A number of fast H. pylori antibody tests are commercially available; however, the clinical value of the immunoassays in different populaces has not been adequately assessed.
This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of H. pylori infection in the Beijing area and evaluate the clinical significance of the serum antibody typing of H. pylori in Chinese outpatients and the physical examination population.
2. Materials and Methods
In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of all the patients in the Health Examination Center and Outpatient Department who had undergone both H. pylori antibody typing testing (serum) and 13C-UBT, from November 2017 to September 2020, at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (ethical approval number: S-K2069).
2.1. 13C-UBT
The 13C-UBT was performed using breath test analyzer HCBT-01 and a 13C-UBT Kit (Shenzhen Zhonghe Headway Bio-Sci & Tech Co., Ltd., Guangdong, China). Briefly, breath samples were obtained, after 12 h of fasting, before (baseline) and 30 min after the intake of the Headway 13C-urea capsule in the early morning. The 13CO2 and 12CO2 concentrations were measured separately using the breath test analyzer, and then, we calculated the DOB (‰) of the change in 13C isotopic abundance versus the natural abundance of 12C in the sample and at baseline. A sample was considered positive if the 30 min value was above a 4‰ cut-off level. Eating, drinking, and smoking were not permitted until the 13C-UBT was finished. All the subjects stopped using proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), H2-receptor antagonists, and other acid suppressants for two weeks before the test, and stopped using antibacterial drugs, bismuth-based drugs, and certain herbal medicines with antibacterial effects for four weeks before the test.
2.2. H. pylori Antibody Typing Testing (Serum)
A qualitative Western blot kit assay, with an H. pylori antibody Immunoblotting Kit (Shenzhen braute Biological Products Co., Ltd., Guangdong, China), was utilized to assay IgG antibodies. The test protocol was as follows: H. pylori antigens were electrophoresed on a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)–polyacrylamide gel, separated by sub-atomic loads, and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The anti-H. pylori antibodies present in the serum responded to the antigens on the nitrocellulose membrane and were visualized with the expansion of enzyme-labeled antigens and shading reagents. A positive zone appeared as shading on the membrane. A negative result occurred when the quality-control zone showed up on the shading-rendering zone; a type 1 H. pylori immune response was observed when the CagA or VacA zone, or both, appeared, and a type 2 H. pylori immune response was observed when the UreA or UreB zone, or both, appeared and the CagA and VacA zone did not appear.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
All the experimental data were analyzed with the SPSS Statistics 26.0 software. The clinical performance of the H. pylori immunoassay was evaluated by determining the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) compared to the 13C-UBT. McNemar’s test was utilized to analyze the sensitivities and specificities for the assessment of the two diagnostic tests. The agreement between the two tests was determined utilizing Cohen’s kappa (κ) with 95% certainty stretches (CI). The degree of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. General Characteristics of the Study Population
A total of 1678 participants, including 1377 physical examination individuals, underwent the H. pylori immunoassay and 13C-UBT test, of which 1276 (76.0%) were male and 402 (24.0%) were female. The median age was 37 (range: 3–91) years. The H. pylori 13C-UBT positivity rate was 26.8% in all the subjects, with a significant difference between sexes (p = 0.026); the rates were 25.5% in males and 31.1% in females. The type 1 H. pylori-positivity rates were 25.2% and 25.1% in males and females, respectively, whereas more females than males were positive for type 2 H. pylori (11.9% versus 5.1%, respectively). Among the 1230 participants who had a negative 13C-UBT, 10.4% (n = 128) tested positive for type 1 H. pylori, and 4.7% (n = 58) tested positive for type 2 H. pylori. Furthermore, a history of previous H. pylori infections was recorded in 29.5% of the medical records. The main population demographics and antibody patterns are provided in Table 1.
Among the patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection according to clinical physicians (no clinical diagnosis information for the physical examination population), the seroprevalence was 80.6% and the 13C-UBT positivity rate was 59.7%. Interestingly, the proportion of allergic diseases (6.0%) in the population is similar to that of patients with digestive system diseases (6.5%). However, among the patients diagnosed with allergic diseases, the positivity rate for the H. pylori 13C-UBT test was 48.0%; 57.0% of allergic diseases patients were infected with type 1 H. pylori, and 15.0%, with type 2 H. pylori. On the contrary, in the group of patients with digestive system diseases, only 26.6% of the patients were 13C-UBT positive; type 1 H. pylori accounted for 29.4%, and type 2 H. pylori accounted for 16.5% (Table 1).
3.2. Comparison of H. pylori 13C-UBT Positivity Rates among Different Age Groups
The H. pylori positivity rates in the different age groups of <15, 15–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65–74, and >74 years were 35.3%, 22.8%, 25.2%, 31.3%, 30.4%, 24.3%, 18.8%, and 11.1%, respectively. There were significant differences (p = 0.033) among the age groups. The positivity rates were the highest in the 35-to-44-years group in both the immunoassays and 13C-UBT (Figure 1).
3.3. Performance of H. pylori Antibody Typing Testing
In testing for H. pylori, the 13C-UBT serves as the gold standard [9,13,14]. The results for the immunoassay were significantly different from those of the 13C-UBT for all the subjects and outpatients (p < 0.001). It is worth noting that, for physical examination individuals, the agreement between the immunoassay and the 13C-UBT was 0.64 (95%CI: 0.59–0.68; p < 0.001), and the H. pylori immunoassay demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 74.24% and 90.45%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 71.01% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.76% (Table 2).
3.4. Antibody Patterns in Different Populations
A comparison of the positivity rates for the five antibodies in all the subjects revealed that the outpatients’ seropositivity rate was higher than that of the physical examination subjects (Figure 2).
Among the patients with digestive system diseases, 29.4% were positive for CagA antibodies, and 22.0%, for VacA antibodies. In addition, 33.0% of the patients were positive for UreA antibodies, while 45.9% were positive for UreB antibodies. The results of the UBT and antibody typing tests in 14 patients with clinically diagnosed gastrointestinal tumors are shown in Table 3. All the patients were treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Only Patient 12, with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) of the gastric mucosa, tested positive for all five antibodies, based on stool antigen tests and a rapid urase test. Unexpectedly, this patient was negative for 13C-UBT. The results of the electronic gastroscopy report for Patient 12 are shown in Figure 3. Another three patients with early gastric cancer and with chronic atrophic gastritis were positive for urease antibodies and had negative UBT tests. In addition, both Patient 3 and Patient 6 were antibody-negative within a year and a half, during which time the UBT test was consistently negative. Two other patients with early gastric cancer tested positive for 13C-UBT only, and no infection was detected by immunoassay.
The rate of H. pylori antibody positivity among patients with allergic diseases is 73.5%, which is significantly higher than that of the non-allergic disease population (29.3%, p < 0.001). Of concern to us was that 69% of the patients with allergic diseases were positive for UreB antibodies, 57% for CagA, 43% for VacA, and 57% for UreA antibodies. The positivity rates for CagA, VacA, UreA, and UreB in patients with allergic diseases who tested positive in the UBT were 76.1%, 67.4%, 87.0%, and 78.3%, respectively. Of these, only four patients were negative for all the antibodies (clinical diagnosis of allergic rhinitis and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, allergic rhinitis and urticaria, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and urticaria, respectively).
4. Discussion
Gastric cancer remains the third leading cause of cancer mortality, with more than half of all the gastric cancer cases in the world occurring in East Asia, primarily in China [10,11,12]. A crucial strategy for preventing gastric cancer in China, as well as other high-risk regions worldwide, is population-wide screening for and eradication of H. pylori [16]. The preferred test for H. pylori is 13C-UBT, but the equipment required to perform this test is expensive and requires regular maintenance, and the test is also prone to false negatives for people with upper gastrointestinal bleeding or those taking acid suppressants [13,14,15]. Immunoblotting for H. pylori antibodies is inexpensive, laboratory-operated, and drug-independent, and the fifth Chinese National Consensus Report on the management of Helicobacter pylori infections has also recommended that immunoassays can be performed for patients with bleeding ulcers and diseases associated with low bacterial density (extensive mucosal atrophy and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma) [5,15]. However, the accuracy of immunoblotting for the detection of H. pylori infections in different populations had still not been fully evaluated.
13C-UBT is considered to be the most robust non-invasive gold-standard method for the detection of H. pylori [9,13,14]. In our study, whether for all the study subjects or only outpatients, the results of H. pylori antibody typing testing (serum) were significantly different from the 13C-UBT results. However, given that the two methods for the physical examination population had good consistency (95%CI: 0.59–0.68; p < 0.001), the sensitivity and specificity of the H. pylori antibody typing testing were 74.24% and 90.45%, respectively, with a PPV of 71.01% and NPV of 91.76%. The results of this study further suggest that serological testing is more appropriate for the health-screening population. In primary care hospitals or low-income remote areas, where 13C-UBT testing is not available, serum samples left over from the health-screening process could be used to screen for H. pylori infections.
Among the patients clinically diagnosed with H. pylori infections, the seroprevalence (80.6%) was significantly higher than the 13C-UBT positivity rate (59.7%). The percentage of people who tested positive for H. pylori only by serum and were negative in the 13C-UBT was 11.1%. It is widely known that, after the successful eradication of H. pylori, it may require longer than 1 year for the H. pylori antibodies to disappear [17]; a positive antibody test may only indicate a prior infection. However, it is also possible that atrophic gastritis due to severe infection may not be effectively detected by UBT, as in our abovementioned patient with early gastric cancer, who was positive in serology and fecal antigen testing but negative in the UBT alone. In this case, the antibody typing testing is a better auxiliary to the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.
A study of the physical examination population of Guangxi, China, showed significant differences among various age groups [18]. We also found that the H. pylori positivity rates in the different age groups showed significant differences (p = 0.033). However, the positivity rate in the 13C-UBT and antibodies among people older than 45 years tended to decline with age (Figure 1).
Studies have proposed that infection rates vary by geographic region [3]. A cross-sectional population study of 1797 individuals showed a H. pylori seroprevalence of 48% in Germany [19]. Enko et al. [9] used a commercially available immunoassay for 108 patients, and the seroprevalence was 45.4%. In the study of Guangxi, the seroprevalence of H. pylori infections was 58.3% [18]. However, in our study of immunoassays at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, the serological positivity rate was 31.7%. The antibody positivity rate was 25.1% if only the physical examination population was considered, and 63.1% if only outpatients were taken into account. In conclusion, the prevalence of H. pylori in Beijing is low, regardless of whether the whole population or only physical examination patients are considered. In addition, the prevalence of H. pylori infection by gender was also significantly different (p = 0.026); this is consistent with previous research that found that the prevalence of H. pylori infection was higher in females than in males [20].
CagA is one of the most well-studied virulence factors of H. pylori, a toxin encoded by cagA and carried by cag-PAI. It is known that the H. pylori strain that carries the PAI is more virulent than the strains that do not [21]. Some studies have suggested that higher serum anti-CagA IgG titers are significantly linked to gastric mucosal inflammation, and this marker can be considered a risk factor for the progression of gastric cancer [15,22]. The second important toxin in the repertoire of H. pylori virulence factors is VacA. All the type 1 H. pylori cases in our study carried the CagA gene. The limited data for digestive tumor patients in our study did not reveal a significant association between the vacA genotype or cagA and gastric cancer, and the results of the Chinese Macau study also concluded that the two aforementioned virulence factors were not associated with the development of gastric cancer [23].
The involvement of H. pylori infection in many extra-gastroduodenal manifestations remains a fascinating field of investigation. H. pylori infection might be related to such extra-gastric diseases as rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren’s syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, iron-deficiency anemia, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma [2,8]. The latest research also shows that H. pylori infection is connected with an increased risk of growth disorders in children and the progression of atherosclerotic disease [2,24]. Serum IgG should be the first choice for studying the long-term relationship between H. pylori infection and growth in children [2]. In our study, patients with allergic diseases had significantly higher rates of H. pylori seropositivity than patients with non-allergic diseases. A previous study also found that, in the Western world and some developing countries, the rates of H. pylori infection in children and adults were declining, in marked contrast to the increase in asthma and allergic diseases in children [25]. From 1983 to 2018, H. pylori’s prevalence declined by 0.9% annually in China [26], while the prevalence of asthma in China increased rapidly [27], which indicates that a similar allergic disease and H. pylori infection phenomenon also exists in China.
The major limitation of this study was that the study population was taken from a single center. However, Beijing is the political and economic center of China, with a diverse urban population, and in addition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital is a national center for the diagnosis and treatment of difficult and serious diseases appointed by the National Health Commission, so the results of the study can be considered generalizable to areas (the prevalence is about 30%) with a relatively lower prevalence.
5. Conclusions
The results of the H. pylori antibody typing test (serum) were in excellent agreement with those of the UBT test in the health-screening population, and they had a high specificity. In addition, in patients with gastric mucosal atrophy or early gastric cancer, antibody typing tests can also detect infected patients with missed UBT. The prevalence of H. pylori in Beijing is 26.8%, and the serological positivity rate for H. pylori in the population of Beijing, China, is about 31.7% (25.1% in the physical examination population), which is low compared to that in other regions. The prevalence of H. pylori antibodies in patients with allergic diseases is significantly higher than that in patients with non-allergic diseases, and in recent years, China has gradually shown a trend of decreasing prevalence of H. pylori and increasing prevalence of allergic diseases, as in Western countries.
Conceptualization, Y.Z. and Y.-C.X.; Data curation, J.-H.Y., Y.Z. and X.-F.W.; Formal analysis, J.-H.Y. and Y.Z.; Funding acquisition, Y.Z. and Y.-C.X.; Investigation, J.-H.Y., Y.Z. and X.-F.W.; Methodology, J.-H.Y., X.-F.W. and Y.-C.X.; Project administration, Y.Z. and Y.-C.X.; Writing—original draft, J.-H.Y. and X.-F.W.; Writing—review & editing, J.-H.Y., Y.Z. and Y.-C.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (protocol code S-K2069, April 2022).
The data are anonymous, and the requirement for informed consent was therefore waived.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
| H. pylori | Helicobacter pylori |
| IgG | Immunoglobulin G |
| 13C-UBT | 13C-urea breath test |
| cagA | Cytotoxin-associated gene A |
| VacA | Vacuolating cytotoxin A |
| UreA | Urease A |
| UreB | Urease B |
| NPV | Negative predictive value |
| PPV | Positive predictive value |
| CI | Confidence intervals |
| PPI | Proton-pump inhibitors |
| ESD | Endoscopic submucosal dissection |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Distribution of antibody typing in outpatients and physical examination individuals. Vac-91 and Vac-95 represent antibodies with molecular weights of 91 and 95 KD, respectively.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Patient 12, with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the gastric mucosa, tested positive on the immunoassay, stool antigen tests, and rapid urase test, and negative in the UBT. (a–c) The esophageal mucosa was smooth and pink, with no erosions, ulcers, or varices seen, and the dentate line was clear. The cardia and the mucosa of the fundus were not appreciable abnormalities. The mucosa of the gastric body was red-white and reddish, and no obvious ulcers and neoplasia were seen; the mucosa of the gastric horn was scattered thin white, mildly enteric manifestation, and no obvious ulcers and erosions were seen. (d–g) A mucosal lesion (Ila + IIc) with a diameter of about 0.5–1.0 cm was seen on the less curved side of the anterior pyloric region of the gastric sinus, with localized post-biopsy changes and clear borders, as shown by indigo carmine staining. The lesion was circumferentially marked with a DualKnife and circumferentially incised, and the lesion was peeled along the submucosa, with no adhesions in the submucosa and no significant bleeding. (h) The size of the specimen was about 2.5 × 2 cm as measured in vitro, and the size of the lesion was 0.5 × 0.5 cm.
Basic characteristics and antibody patterns of the study population.
| Variable | Frequency (%) | 13C-UBT+ | Type 1 |
Type 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (N = 1678) | ||||
| Male | 1276 (76.0) | 325 | 321 | 65 |
| Female | 402 (24.0) | 125 | 101 | 48 |
| Median age (years) | 37 |
41 |
41 |
42 |
| Only H. pylori seropositive | 186 (11.1) | / | 128 | 58 |
| Classification of diseases † | ||||
| Allergic diseases | 100 (6.0) | 48 | 57 | 15 |
| Digestive diseases * | 109 (6.5) | 29 | 32 | 18 |
| H. pylori infection | 67 (4.0) | 40 | 43 | 11 |
| Stomach tumors | 17 (1.0) | 2 | 1 | 3 |
† Physical examination individuals generally had no clinical diagnosis, and duplicate patients were not excluded. * Digestive diseases include patients with H. pylori infections and stomach tumors.
H. pylori antibody typing testing versus 13C-UBT in different populations.
| All Subjects † (n = 1678) | Outpatients ‡ (n = 301) | Physical Examination § |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H. pylori antibody+ | H. pylori antibody− | H. pylori antibody+ | H. pylori antibody− | H. pylori antibody+ | H. pylori antibody− | |
| 13C-UBT + | 346 (20.6%) | 102 (6.1%) | 106 (35.2%) | 14 (4.7%) | 245 (17.8%) | 85 (6.2%) |
| 13C-UBT − | 186 (11.1%) | 1044 (62.2%) | 84 (27.9%) | 97 (32.2%) | 100 (7.3%) | 947 (68.8%) |
† All the study subjects, including the physical examination population; ‡ Only outpatients; § Only the physical examination population.
The results of UBT and H. pylori antibody typing testing (serum) in 14 patients with clinically diagnosed gastrointestinal tumors.
| Sex | Age (Years) | Diagnosis | Sampling Time | CagA | VacA |
VacA |
UreB | UreA | 13C-UBT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | Male | 51 | HGIN (IIb); chronic atrophic gastritis | 17 January 2019 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| 52 | 5 May 2020 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | |||
| Patient 2 | Female | 57 | HGIN; chronic superficial gastritis | 25 May 2020 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| Patient 3 | Female | 65 | HGI (IIa + IIc); chronic non-atrophic gastritis | 21 March 2019 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Pos | Pos | Neg |
| 66 | 18 May 2020 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | |||
| Patient 4 | Male | 75 | HGIN | 25 July 2019 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| Patient 5 | Male | 64 | After ESD; chronic atrophic gastritis | 22 March 2019 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| Patient 6 | Female | 71 | HGI (IIa + IIc); chronic atrophic gastritis | 9 May 2019 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Pos | Pos | Neg |
| 72 | 24 August 2020 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | |||
| Patient 7 | Male | 46 | HGI (IIa + IIc); chronic atrophic gastritis | 25 April 2019 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| Patient 8 | Male | 47 | HGI (IIa + IIc); chronic atrophic gastritis | 23 April 2020 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| Patient 9 | Female | 66 | Gastric sinus mucosal lesions; H. pylori infection | 20 April 2020 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Pos |
| Patient 10 | Male | 68 | HGIN; H. pylori infection; chronic atrophic gastritis | 17 January 2019 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Pos | Neg | Neg |
| Patient 11 | Male | 74 | HGIN; chronic superficial gastritis | 26 December 2019 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| Patient 12 | Male | 53 | HGIN (IIa + IIc); H. pylori infection; chronic atrophic gastritis | 10 January 2019 | Pos | Pos | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg |
| Patient 13 | Male | 33 | HGI (IIa + IIc); H. pylori infection | 3 February 2020 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Pos |
| Patient 14 | Male | 65 | HGI (IIb + IIc); Chronic atrophic gastritis; Reflux esophagitis | 23 September 2019 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
References
1. Matos, R.; Sousa, H.S.; Nogueiro, J.; Magalhães, A.; Reis, C.A.; Carneiro, F.; Amorim, I.; Haesebrouck, F.; Gärtner, F. Helicobacter species binding to the human gastric mucosa. Helicobacter; 2022; 27, e12867. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hel.12867] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34967491]
2. Xu, C.; Wu, Y.; Xu, S. Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and growth outcomes in children: A meta-analysis. Helicobacter; 2022; 27, e12861. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hel.12861] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997950]
3. Crowe, S.E. Helicobacter pylori Infection. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2019; 380, pp. 1158-1165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1710945] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893536]
4. Dorer, M.S.; Talarico, S.; Salama, N.R. Helicobacter pylori’s Unconventional Role in Health and Disease. PLoS Pathog.; 2009; 5, e1000544. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000544]
5. Kim, H.W.; Woo, H.J.; Yang, J.Y.; Kim, J.-B.; Kim, S.-H. Hesperetin Inhibits Expression of Virulence Factors and Growth of Helicobacter pylori. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 10035. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221810035]
6. Hatakeyama, M. Helicobacter pylori CagA and Gastric Cancer: A Paradigm for Hit-and-Run Carcinogenesis. Cell Host Microbe; 2014; 15, pp. 306-316. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.008]
7. Woo, H.; Yang, J.; Lee, P.; Kim, J.-B.; Kim, S.-H. Zerumbone Inhibits Helicobacter pylori Urease Activity. Molecules; 2021; 26, 2663. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092663]
8. Pellicano, R.; Ianiro, G.; Fagoonee, S.; Settanni, C.R.; Gasbarrini, A. Review: Extragastric diseases and Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter; 2020; 25, (Suppl. 1), e12741. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hel.12741]
9. Enko, D.; Halwachs-Baumann, G.; Stolba, R.; Rössler, O.; Kriegshäuser, G. Performance evaluation of a rapid whole-blood immunoassay for the detection of IgG antibodies against Helicobacter pylori in daily clinical practice. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob.; 2016; 15, 47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-016-0161-1]
10. Yang, L.; Kartsonaki, C.; Yao, P.; de Martel, C.; Plummer, M.; Chapman, D.; Guo, Y.; Clark, S.; Walters, R.G.; Chen, Y. et al. The relative and attributable risks of cardia and non-cardia gastric cancer associated with Helicobacter pylori infection in China: A case-cohort study. Lancet Public Health; 2021; 6, pp. e888-e896. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00164-X]
11. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin.; 2021; 71, pp. 209-249. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33538338]
12. Wang, Z.; Dai, J.; Hu, N.; Miao, X.; Abnet, C.; Yang, M.; Freedman, N.D.; Chen, J.; Burdette, L.; Zhu, X. et al. Identification of new susceptibility loci for gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma: Pooled results from two Chinese genome-wide association studies. Gut; 2017; 66, pp. 581-587. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310612] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26701879]
13. Makristathis, A.; Hirschl, A.M.; Mégraud, F.; Bessède, E. Review: Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter; 2019; 24, (Suppl. 1), e12641. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hel.12641] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31486244]
14. Dore, M.P.; Graham, D.Y. Modern approach to the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther.; 2022; 55, (Suppl. 1), pp. S14-S21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16566] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34989431]
15. Liu, W.Z.; Xie, Y.; Lu, H.; Cheng, H.; Zeng, Z.R.; Zhou, L.Y.; Chen, Y.; Bin Wang, J.; Du, Y.Q.; Lu, N.H. et al. Fifth Chinese National Consensus Report on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter; 2018; 23, e12475. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hel.12475]
16. Liou, J.-M.; Malfertheiner, P.; Lee, Y.-C.; Sheu, B.-S.; Sugano, K.; Cheng, H.-C.; Yeoh, K.-G.; Hsu, P.-I.; Goh, K.-L.; Mahachai, V. et al. Screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori for gastric cancer prevention: The Taipei global consensus. Gut; 2020; 69, pp. 2093-2112. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322368]
17. Jung, H.-K.; Kang, S.J.; Lee, Y.C.; Yang, H.-J.; Park, S.-Y.; Shin, C.M.; Kim, S.E.; Lim, H.C.; Kim, J.-H.; Nam, S.Y. et al. Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Korea 2020. Gut Liver; 2021; 15, pp. 168-195. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl20288]
18. Liu, W.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, Y. Analysis of serum gastrin-17 and Helicobacter pylori antibody in healthy Chinese population. J. Clin. Lab. Anal.; 2020; 34, e23518. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23518]
19. Michel, A.; Pawlita, M.; Boeing, H.; Gissmann, L.; Waterboer, T. Helicobacter pylori antibody patterns in Germany: A cross-sectional population study. Gut Pathog.; 2014; 6, 10. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-4749-6-10]
20. Aminde, J.A.; Dedino, G.A.; Ngwasiri, C.A.; Ombaku, K.S.; Makon, C.A.M.; Aminde, L.N. Helicobacter pylori infection among patients presenting with dyspepsia at a primary care setting in Cameroon: Seroprevalence, five-year trend and predictors. BMC Infect. Dis.; 2019; 19, 30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3677-0]
21. Bridge, D.R.; Merrell, D.S. Polymorphism in the Helicobacter pylori CagA and VacA toxins and disease. Gut Microbes; 2013; 4, pp. 101-117. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/gmic.23797] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23380646]
22. Fernandez-Botran, R.; Wellmann, I.A.; Une, C.; Méndez-Chacón, E.; De Rodas, E.H.; Bhandari, B.; De Tercero, C.I.V. Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori/CagA Antibodies in Guatemalan Gastric Cancer Patients: Association of Seropositivity with Increased Plasma Levels of Pepsinogens but not Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.; 2020; 103, pp. 260-265. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0934] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32314688]
23. Pinto-Ribeiro, I.; Ferreira, R.M.; Batalha, S.; Hlaing, T.; Wong, S.I.; Carneiro, F.; Figueiredo, C. Helicobacter pylori vacA Genotypes in Chronic Gastritis and Gastric Carcinoma Patients from Macau, China. Toxins; 2016; 8, 142. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050142]
24. Shi, H.; Li, Y.; Dong, C.; Si, G.; Xu, Y.; Peng, M.; Li, Y. Helicobacter pylori infection and the progression of atherosclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Helicobacter; 2022; 27, e12865. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hel.12865] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34841620]
25. Kalach, N.; Bontems, P.; Raymond, J. Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Helicobacter; 2017; 22, (Suppl. 1), e12414. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hel.12414] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28891139]
26. Ding, S.Z.; Du, Y.Q.; Lu, H.; Wang, W.H.; Cheng, H.; Chen, S.Y.; Chen, M.H.; Chen, W.C.; Chen, Y.; Fang, J.Y. et al. Chinese Consensus Report on Family-Based Helicobacter pylori Infection Control and Management (2021 Edition). Gut; 2022; 71, pp. 238-253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325630]
27. Huang, K.; Yang, T.; Xu, J.; Yang, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, X.; Bai, C.; Kang, J.; Ran, P.; Shen, H. et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of asthma in China: A national cross-sectional study. Lancet; 2019; 394, pp. 407-418. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31147-X]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Zhao, Ying 2
; Xiao-Feng, Wang 2 ; Ying-Chun, Xu 2 1 Department of Laboratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;
2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;