1. Introduction
Oxytocin (OT) is a nine-residue, cyclized peptide which, through to the oxytocin receptor (OTR), acts as both a hormone, regulating diverse processes such as glucose metabolism, social bonding, lactation, and uterine contraction, as well as a neurotransmitter, modulating neural processes including pain [1,2,3,4]. Inadequate OTR activity is associated with postpartum hemorrhage, inadequate milk production, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Prader–Willi syndrome, and migraine headaches [5,6,7,8]. Studies in both animal models and patients have demonstrated that intranasal administration of OT can relieve core symptoms in ASD, schizophrenia, migraine, and anxiety disorders [9,10,11]. Several factors have been found to alter OTR activity including OT levels, OTR expression, and OTR affinity for its ligand [8]. The last of these, OTR affinity, is closely modulated by the local concentration of the magnesium cation (Mg2+) which acts as an essential cofactor, dramatically increasing the affinity of OTR for OT [8,12,13]. Recently, Meyerowitz et al. [14] published the structure of the OT-OTR-Mg2+ coordination complex as identified using cryo-electron microscopy, demonstrating the critical role that Mg2+ plays in OT binding to OTR. Thus, alterations of serum or exogenously applied Mg2+ levels should play a critical role in OTR activity and consequently the physiological and psychological functions listed above.
Our previous work showed that OT decreases craniofacial pain in rodent models and headache severity and frequency in patients with migraine [10]. Not surprisingly, low serum Mg2+ levels strongly correlate with the frequency of headache attacks in patients with migraine [15,16,17]. However, the functional consequence of Mg2+ control of OT binding has not been adequately examined, particularly with regard to the function of OTR activity and pain. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to examine the impact of Mg2+ on OT-OTR binding efficacy by examining these effects in neuronal electrophysiology and pain behavior. The tools selected to address our question included both current clamp experiments on freshly dissociated rat trigeminal ganglia (TG) neurons to determine OT effects on neuronal excitability as well as the in vivo impact of the addition of Mg2+ to intranasally administered OT in a rat model of craniofacial pain.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
The objective of this study was to examine the impact of Mg2+ on OT-OTR binding efficacy by examining the effects on two key physiologic assays. We have previously demonstrated that OTR levels in trigeminal neurons are dependent, in part, on the presence of inflammatory cytokines [18]. Therefore, in this study, rats were pretreated with a complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) injection into the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in order to produce a robust inflammation of trigeminally innervated tissue, inducing OTR upregulation approximately 24 h prior to harvesting and dissociating TG neurons. An electrophysiological recording was used to measure the change in membrane potential of TG neurons due to vehicle/OT treatment. In a separate group of animals, approximately 24 h after CFA injection, withdrawal latencies in response to noxious heat applied to the cheek were determined. Increased withdrawal latencies was indicative of analgesia/anti-nociception. Sample sizes were chosen on their basis to detect statistically significant results, with statistical analysis detailed throughout the study.
2.2. Animals
All animal care and experimental procedures complied with the laws of the United States and regulations of the Department of Agriculture and were approved by the Stanford University (Stanford, CA, USA) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, in accordance with the 2011 National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Animal studies are reported in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (Kilkenny, Browne, Cuthill, Emerson, & Altman, 2010; McGrath & Lilley, 2015). Ethical permission (A3213-01 on 3 November 2020)
Rats (male, 250–330 g, Envigo, Indianapolis, IN, USA) were maintained two per cage in a controlled environment (temperature: 21.5 ± 4.5 °C/relative humidity: 35–55%) under a standard 12 h light/12 h dark lighting cycle (lights on at 7:00, no twilight). Cage changes occurred twice a week, using standard bedding. Food and water were provided ad libitum. Estrogen levels have been shown to drive OTR expression levels and so could drive substantial variability in response to OT treatment. Thus, we chose to use male animals for these studies to minimize this factor. We are currently pursuing separate experiments intended to explore this issue with regard to Mg2+ effects. Initial sample sizes were approximated by Power analysis, with animals assigned to groups randomly. Drug treatment experiments were conducted in a blinded fashion.
2.3. Sample Preparation
2.3.1. Solutions for Electrophysiological Recording
OT (Grindeks, Riga, Latvia) was dissolved in distilled water as 1 mM stock and diluted for external solutions. Different concentrations of OT (1.0, 3.0, 10, 30, 100, 300, or 1000 nM) were applied from the reservoir using gravity feeding through a 27G tip-blunted needle with an opening placed about 200 µm away from the recorded cell. The stream of solution covered the cell well when the switch was turned on. The cells were physically stable during perfusion.
2.3.2. Solutions for Behavior Studies
The appropriate amount of test compound was accurately weighed out using a calibrated electrical balance and placed into microcentrifuge tubes. Solutions were prepared for an administration volume of 50 μL containing vehicle or one solution for one of five doses of OT (0.5, 1.0, 4.0, 8.0, or 32.0 μg) plus or minus 300 mM magnesium citrate. These doses and concentrations were selected based on the results of prior studies [10,19,20]. Ten groups of 10 rats each were randomly assigned to receive a vehicle or one of the five doses of OT or OT plus 300 mM Mg2+. Each solution was coded by the sponsor and the experimenter performed the experiment in a strictly blinded manner, including drug administration and data analysis.
2.4. Electrophysiology
2.4.1. Induction of Inflammation
Briefly, rats (male, 250–330 g, Envigo, n = 10) were placed in an anesthesia chamber and anesthetized with 2.5% isoflurane. Prior to TMJ injection, the rat’s mouths were propped open to palpate the target area. In this position, an oval-shaped groove located in the center of the cheek and above the mandible can be distinctly felt. With the syringe positioned at a 30-degree angle from the rat’s cheek, the tip of the needle was inserted just under the articular disc (approximately 1.5 mm in diameter and 1.0 mm deep). Thereafter, 50 µL of CFA (DIFCO; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was injected (1 mL syringe with a 25G 5/8-inch needle) into the left TMJ to produce robust and prolonged orofacial inflammation. After CFA injection, rats were returned to home cages. Approximately 24 h later, rats were euthanized by decapitation after induction of deep anesthesia with isoflurane.
2.4.2. Tissue Processing
The rat’s TG were carefully dissected from the surrounding connective tissues and minced into small pieces with an iris scissor. The TG were digested in 0.5 mL of mixed enzyme solution: (w/v, final concentration) 0.1% trypsin (Sigma, T9201), 0.1% collagenase Sigma, C1764), and 0.01% DNase (Sigma, D5025) diluted in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The tissue pieces were then incubated at 32 °C with a water bath for 55 min. Following digestion, tissue fragments were mechanically dissociated using a series of glass Pasteur pipettes with decreasing internal diameter. Dissociated cells were centrifuged at 180× g for 3 min, the supernatant was removed, and the cells were gently re-suspended in an external recording solution. Cells were then plated onto poly-
2.4.3. Current Clamp Recording
Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were performed using the MultiClamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed offline with pCLAMP10.4 software (Molecular Devices, San Jose CA, USA). The external solution was composed of (in mM) NaCl (130), N-2-Hydroxyethylpiperazine-N’-2-Ethanesulfonic Acid (HEPES)-Na (10), KCl (5), CaCl2 (1), and Glucose (10), pH adjusted to 7.3–7.4 using HCl, with or without 1.75 mM MgCl2. The electrode internal solution was composed of (in mM) KF (120), HEPES (10), ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) (11), CaCl2 (1), MgCl2 (1), KCl (10), and KOH (11), pH adjusted to 7.3–7.4 using KOH. Patch-pipettes were fabricated from 1.5 mm outside diameter (OD) borosilicate capillary glass (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT, USA) using a micropipette puller (Model P-87, Sutter Instrument, Novato, CA, USA). NaCl, HEPES-Na, KCl, CaCl2, Glucose, HCl, MgCl2, KF, HEPES, EGTA, KOH were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Glass pipettes filled this intracellular saline with a resistance of 3–5 MΩ. Whole-cell patch recordings had series resistances of <25 MΩ after whole-cell configuration and were periodically checked with the seal test voltage step (10 mV, 10 ms) to monitor series resistances throughout the recordings. Hyperpolarizing current pulses (about −0.3 nA, 500 ms) were delivered every 5 s throughout the experiment, unless otherwise specified, in order to monitor membrane input resistance and stabilize membrane potential in control external solution.
Measurement of change in membrane potential: After successful current clamp recording, the effect of the vehicle external solution application to cells on membrane potential was measured. After the membrane potential had stabilized for at least 10 s, a solution containing OT plus or minus 1.75 mM Mg2+ was applied for 2–5 min until the membrane potential stabilized further (on a new level) for at least 10 s.
2.5. Behavioral Analgesia
2.5.1. Withdrawal Latency
Rats (male, 250–330 g, Envigo, n = 10 per group) were used and treated with CFA injection into the TMJ as described above in order to produce a robust inflammation of trigeminally innervated tissue. Approximately 24 h after CFA injection, withdrawal latencies in response to noxious heat applied to the depilated (NAIR® hair removal cream; Church & Dwight Co., Ewing, NJ, USA) and blackened (with India ink (Chartpak Inc., Leeds, MA, USA)) cheek were determined. Latency to withdrawal response was used as an indicator of nociceptive responsiveness. We have previously demonstrated, using single-fiber peripheral nerve recordings, that low intensity (slow ramp) skin heating evokes withdrawal responses mediated by the activation of C- (unmyelinated) nociceptive fibers; higher intensity skin heating (rapid ramp) selectively elicits responses mediated by A-delta (myelinated) thermonociceptors [21,22]. Briefly, to assess C fiber mediated responses, heat intensity was adjusted by altering the supply voltage (35–55 V) of the focused lamp until a withdrawal response was observed to occur with latency between 7.5 and 8.5 s. In order to reduce the potential for tissue damage, a cut-off latency of 15 s was implemented after which the stimulus was terminated. Rats not responding (within 10 s) to a supply voltage of 55 V during baseline testing were excluded from the study. For A-delta fiber testing, the heat intensity was adjusted by altering the supply voltage (60–85 V) of the focused lamp until withdrawal responses were observed to occur with a latency of between 2.5 and 3.5 s. The intensity applied to achieve such latencies was noted for each animal and used to assess withdrawal latencies prior to and following nasal administration of the test agent. To reduce the potential for tissue damage, a cut-off latency of 5 s was implemented during A-delta fiber testing. Rats not responding (within 3.5 s) to a supply voltage of 85 V were excluded from the study. A total of five rats were excluded from further testing by not reaching these criteria. Baseline withdrawal latencies were determined for each fiber type prior to nasal application of the test agent.
To deliver intranasal OT or vehicle the rats were anesthetized in a chamber using isoflurane (2%). They were then placed on a heating pad in a supine position as the anesthesia was continued with a nose cone. This horizontal position of the head was maintained throughout the procedure preventing drainage of the drug solution to the trachea and esophagus. The total volume of 50 μL solutions was administered by pipette in 6–7 μL drops in alternating naris every two min, over a total of 14 min. The drop was placed at the naris opening while occluding the opposite naris allowing the animal to snort the drop into the nasal cavity. The rats were allowed to wake up in a separate cage on a heating pad. Rats were then returned to their home cage. Withdrawal latencies in response to A-delta or C fiber cheek stimulation were then remeasured at 60 min following dosing. At the end of the testing session, rats were euthanized by CO2 inhalation.
2.5.2. Efficacy Evaluation
Withdrawal latencies in response to thermal stimuli (noxious heat) were recorded as an index of thermal pain sensitivity. Increased withdrawal latencies were considered indicative of analgesia/anti-nociception.
2.6. Data and Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as means ±SD with significance set at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was undertaken only for data sets where each group size was at least n = 5. All results were analyzed using the GraphPad Prism 9.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. RRID:SCR_008).
2.6.1. Electrophysiology
Data were acquired using Clampfit—V10.4, Molecular Devices (San Jose, CA, USA) and data sheets were constructed in Excel (Microsoft) and GraphPad Prism Software. Two-way ANOVA were performed to compare the overall significance of the difference between OT and OT + Mg2+. Sidak’s multiple comparison test was used to determine differences at individual concentrations. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
2.6.2. Withdrawal Latency
All data are expressed as mean withdrawal latency ±SE at 60 min post-dosing. Data generated during the testing of each fiber type (e.g., A-delta and C fibers) were analyzed, tabulated, and graphed separately. Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism statistical software. All tests were conducted at the 0.05 level of statistical significance. Data generated were assessed using separate 2-way repeated-measures ANOVAs to determine if nasal OT produced dose-dependent significant increases in withdrawal latencies for A-delta or C fiber mediated responses and whether the addition of Mg2+ would significantly increase that response as determined by a significant difference between dose-response curves. Sidak’s multiple comparison tests were used for subsequent pairwise comparisons to pretreatment latencies.
3. Results
3.1. Electrophysiology Recording: Effect of Different Doses of OT with and without Mg2+ on Membrane Potential
After a successful current clamp of TG neurons, the vehicle was applied as a control to the external solution. Both with or without 1.75 mM Mg2+, perfusion of cells with vehicle increased membrane potential insignificantly from −59.4 ± 1.9 mV to −60.6 ± 1.9 mV (p = 0.13, n = 9, student paired t-test). Figure 1A,B shows an example of a typical current clamp trace recording of a TG neuron from a CFA-inflamed rat. OT dose (3 nM) alone did not induce any change in the membrane potential (Figure 1A). However, the addition of 1.75 mM Mg2+ resulted in the hyperpolarization of membrane potential (Figure 1B). While OT alone dose-dependently induced membrane hyperpolarization, a consistently larger hyperpolarization of membrane potential was concentration-dependently observed with the addition of 1.75 mM Mg2+ (Figure 1C). Two-way ANOVA analysis showed the effect of OT on hyperpolarization was significantly different between the OT and OT + Mg2+ groups overall (2-way ANOVA, (p < 0.05)). A post-hoc multiple comparison (Sidak’s) test showed significant difference between OT and OT + Mg2+ groups at 1, 3, 10 (p < 0.05), and 1000 nM OT concentrations (p < 0.05).
In fact, while 1 or 3 nM OT had a minimal membrane potential effect (−1.4 ± 1.6 mV (n = 6) and −2.5 ± 0.6 mV (n = 6) hyperpolarization for 1 and 3 nM OT, respectively), the addition of 1.75 mM MgCl2 to the external solution induced a strong hyperpolarization, −8.1 ± 1.2 mV (n = 7 for 1 nM OT) and −9.3 ± 1.2 mV (n = 7 for 3 nM OT), respectively (Figure 1D). Two-way ANOVA analysis showed the overall effect of OT on hyperpolarization were significantly different between the OT and OT + Mg2+ groups (2-way ANOVA, (p < 0.05)). A post-hoc multiple comparison (Sidak’s) test showed a significant difference between OT and OT + Mg2+ groups at 1 (p < 0.05) and 3 nM OT concentrations (p < 0.05).
3.2. Behavioral Analgesia: Effect of Different Doses of OT with and without Mg2+ on Withdrawal Latency
Baseline testing revealed stable head withdrawal response latencies for A-delta (2.6–3.2 s) and C-fiber (7.5–8.1 s) radiant heat stimulation of the cheek (Figure 2A,B). The intranasal application of OT produced a dose-dependent increase in withdrawal latency up to the highest dose (32 μg), where efficacy was seen to dramatically decrease for both A-delta and C fiber mediated pain responses. Application of the same doses of OT in the presence of Mg2+ however, produced a significant (p < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA) increase in withdrawal latency compared to efficacy in the absence of Mg2+ for both A-delta (Figure 2A) and C-fiber (Figure 2B) testing. Follow-on analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) between OT and OT + Mg2+ for A-delta testing at OT doses of 0.5, 1.0, and 32 μg OT; C-fiber responses were significantly different at 0.5, 4.0, 8.0, and 32 μg OT.
4. Discussion and Conclusions
The requirement of Mg2+ for OT’s high affinity for its receptor has long been known [13]. More recently, the precise architecture of this Mg2+ coordination site has been elucidated in the high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure of OT bound to its receptor, revealing that OT and OTR together form an octahedral Mg2+ coordination site between the receptor and ligand [14]. However, the functional consequence of Mg2+ control of OT binding has not been adequately examined, particularly with regard to how Mg2+ levels could affect the impact of OT-OTR binding on pain as well as other phenomena. The results of the second messenger study described in [14] demonstrate that Mg2+ is an essential cofactor for full OT-OTR agonism and that Mg2+ concentration-dependently increases Gq and G11 activation in OTR-transfected HEK cells. Interestingly, this study also demonstrated that OT-OTR binding did not reach maximal efficacy at physiologically relevant Mg2+ concentrations [14]. Consistent with these findings, while OT alone dose-dependently hyperpolarized TG neurons, decreasing their excitability, the addition of a supraphysiological (1.75 mM) concentration of Mg2+ significantly enhanced this effect, implying a supportive impact of Mg2+ on OT craniofacial analgesia. In a demonstration of this support, while intranasal application of OT produced dose-dependent craniofacial analgesia, the addition of 300 mM Mg2+ to the administered OT significantly enhanced this analgesia.
The trigeminal nerve provides pain signaling from the head to the central nervous system for the perception of craniofacial pain. Thus, decreases in the excitability of these neurons should produce decreases in craniofacial pain sensitivity. The results of the current study are consistent with our previous finding [23] that OT decreases the excitability of TG neurons in vitro as evidenced by a robust increased (hyperpolarized) cell membrane potential. This work also suggested that this decrease in neuronal excitability is likely mediated, at least in part, by an increase in voltage-gated K+ channel (Kv) current density [23]. As with the second messenger findings, the addition of 1.75 mM Mg2+ to the applied OT in the same concentration range used in the second messenger study produced a significant increase in the degree of hyperpolarization of the membrane. In the absence of Mg2+, the maximal efficacy of OT is not reached, indicating the necessity of Mg2+ for the full agonism of OT. Interestingly, while the efficacy of the highest OT dose (32 μg) demonstrated a decrease in efficacy when compared to lower doses, this inversion was prevented by the addition of Mg2+. These findings indicate that the addition of Mg2+ produces a more robust decrease in cell excitability, consistent with a stronger analgesic effect than that observed with OT alone.
Using autoradiography and tissue scintillation counts, we have previously demonstrated that radiolabeled OT, when applied nasally, concentrates in the trigeminal nerve and ganglia [20,24]; an approximately 10–20 times higher concentration of radiolabeled OT was detected in the trigeminal system compared to other tissue regions [20,24]. We have also shown that intranasal OT inhibits the transmission of pain messages to the central nervous system [10], inducing analgesia in rodent craniofacial pain models [10,19] and relief from headaches in patients with migraine [10]. The current study demonstrates that, as with the in vitro assays, the addition of Mg2+ to OT significantly enhances these analgesic effects. Previously, intravenous Mg2+ has been shown to abort continuous migraines and, when given as an oral supplement, reduce their frequency [25]. We have hypothesized that these effects might be mediated, in part, by a Mg2+ induced increase in the affinity of OTR for endogenous OT, thereby decreasing the excitability of trigeminal nociceptive neurons. Similarly, we have hypothesized that the decrease in serum Mg2+ during pre-menstruation and menstruation might help explain the phenomena of menstrual migraine [8].
In addition to the menstrual cycle effects on Mg2+ and migraine, serum estrogen levels, which vary over the menstrual cycle, have been shown to drive OTR expression levels [26,27] and have been hypothesized to underly, in part, the pathogenesis of menstrual migraine [8]. The variability of serum estrogen in females could also drive substantial variability in response to intranasal OT treatment. Thus, we chose to use male animals in these studies to minimize this factor. Because of the variability of serum Mg2+ and estrogen, it is likely that the effects of OT in females may vary significantly from those in males [8]. We are currently pursuing separate experiments intended to explore this issue with regard to the impact of Mg2+ on OT analgesia in females across the menstrual cycle.
The lowest OT dose (0.5 μg), supplemented with Mg2+ produced shorter withdrawal latencies compared to the OT group without Mg2+. One explanation for this observation is based on our preliminary electrophysiological studies that show 1.75 mM Mg2+, in the absence of OT, is in fact, depolarizing in some cells. Thus, with a very low concentration of OT, it is likely that this depolarizing effect overwhelms any minimal hyperpolarizing effect of the OT. Interestingly, while the efficacy of the highest OT dose (32 μg) demonstrated a decrease in efficacy when compared to lower doses, this inversion was prevented by the addition of Mg2+. In a separate ongoing study (and so not directly comparable), we have similarly found that 128 μg demonstrates a significant drop in efficacy compared to lower doses that were preventable by the addition of Mg2+. Inverted U dose responses have been widely reported for various systems, including social recognition [28], opioid-induced respiratory depression [29], and, very recently, in an autism spectrum clinical trial [30]. Although it is not unknown for peptide neurotransmitters to have an inverted U dose-response, the specific reason for a decrease in withdrawal latency at a higher OT dose is still unclear. One explanation could be off-target effects where OT, at high enough concentrations, begins acting on a different receptor. For example, OT has a very high affinity for the V1a receptor and so it is possible that the effects of OT on this or other receptors might counteract those on the OT receptor. This decrease in efficacy at higher doses of OT may be instrumental in the difficulty in demonstrating clear efficacy of intranasal OT in many clinical studies, where a moderate effect is seen with low doses, but higher doses do not show an improvement. The addition of Mg2+ to an OT formulation should allow the use of higher doses, overcoming this barrier for a number of indications. The second messenger study by Meyerowitz et al. [14] showed that the inversion of OT dose-response was not observed, which is likely due to the simplified milieu of the transfected cells versus that of whole neurons or in vivo.
Taken together, the results of these two sets of experiments suggest that Mg2+ is required for the full agonism of OT and that, for pain and in many other therapeutic or disease settings, the efficacy of OT may be limited by the availability of Mg2+. Thus, the addition of Mg2+ to OT formulations or the development of novel OT analogs based on recently elucidated OTR structural biology [14] that obviate the need for Mg2+ may enable enhanced OTR efficacy.
The authors confirm contributions to the paper as follows: study conception and design: D.J.C., X.X. and D.C.Y.; data collection: J.M., B.Z., M.K., N.Y. and K.S.; analysis and interpretation of results: V.N.B., J.M., B.Z., M.K., N.Y., K.S., X.X. and D.C.Y.; draft manuscript preparation: V.N.B., J.M., D.J.C. and D.C.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
All animal care and experimental procedures complied with the laws of the United States and regulations of the Department of Agriculture, and were approved by Stanford University (Stanford, CA, USA) Institutional Animal Care (A3213-01 on 3 November 2020) and Use Committee, in accordance with the 2011 National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Not applicable.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
D.C.Y. is a consultant for Tonix Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Effect of addition of Mg2+ to the OT-induced decrease in excitability of TG neurons from CFA-inflamed rats. (A,B) Examples of current clamp traces of TG neurons from CFA-inflamed rat; (A) no change in membrane potential when treated with 3 nM OT in a 0 mM MgCl2 buffer and (B) hyperpolarization observed when treated with 3 nM OT in a 1.75 mM MgCl2 buffer. (C,D) OT alone dose-dependently hyperpolarizes TG cell membranes, decreasing excitability; the addition of 1.75 mM Mg2+ significantly (* p < 0.05, ANOVA) potentiates the capacity of OT to hyperpolarize TG cell membranes (C). A specific example of this is observed in (D), where the addition of Mg2+ significantly (* p < 0.05) increased the induced membrane hyperpolarization of 1 nM or 3 nM OT from −1.4 ± 1.6 mV (n = 6) and −2.5 ± 0.6 mV (n = 6) for OT alone to −8.1 ± 1.2 mV (n = 7) and −9.3 ± 1.2 mV (n = 7) for OT plus Mg2+, respectively. Subsequent pairwise comparisons indicated significant (* p < 0.05) differences from OT alone for OT plus Mg2+ at 1, 3, 10, and 1000 nM OT concentrations. This enhanced hyperpolarization is emblematic of decreased excitability and thus, decreased capacity to carry pain signals to the central nervous system for pain perception. Error bars show ± S.D.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Effect of the addition of Mg2+ on intranasal OT-induced craniofacial analgesia. For both A-delta (A) and C fiber (B) mediated withdrawal responses to noxious heat stimulation of the cheek of pre-inflamed rats, intranasally applied OT produced a dose-dependent analgesic effect as evidenced by significant (p < 0.05, ANOVA) increases in withdrawal latency at the 60 min time point after administration, n = 10. However, the addition of 300 mM Mg2+ to the treatment significantly increased OT analgesia for both stimulus types (p < 0.05). Subsequent pairwise comparisons indicated significant (* = p < 0.05) differences from OT alone for OT plus Mg2+ for A-delta testing at OT doses of 0.5, 1.0, and 32 μg (p < 0.05); C-fiber responses were significantly different (* = p < 0.05) at 0.5, 4.0, 8.0, and 32 μg OT. Interestingly, while the efficacy of the highest OT dose (32 μg) demonstrated a decrease in efficacy when compared to lower doses, this dose-response inversion was prevented by the addition of Mg2+.
References
1. Fuchs, A.R.; Fuchs, F.; Husslein, P.; Soloff, M.S.; Fernstrom, M.J. Oxytocin receptors and human parturition: A dual role for oxytocin in the initiation of labor. Science; 1982; 215, pp. 1396-1398. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.6278592] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6278592]
2. Ferguson, J.N.; Young, L.J.; Hearn, E.F.; Matzuk, M.M.; Insel, T.R.; Winslow, J.T. Social amnesia in mice lacking the oxytocin gene. Nat. Genet.; 2000; 25, pp. 284-288. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/77040]
3. Carcea, I.; Caraballo, N.L.; Marlin, B.J.; Ooyama, R.; Riceberg, J.S.; Mendoza Navarro, J.M.; Opendak, M.; Diaz, V.E.; Schuster, L.; Alvarado Torres, M.I. et al. Oxytocin neurons enable social transmission of maternal behaviour. Nature; 2021; 596, pp. 553-557. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03814-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381215]
4. Boll, S.; Almeida de Minas, A.C.; Raftogianni, A.; Herpertz, S.C.; Grinevich, V. Oxytocin and Pain Perception: From Animal Models to Human Research. Neuroscience; 2018; 387, pp. 149-161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.041] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28965836]
5. Kabasakalian, A.; Ferretti, C.J.; Hollander, E. Oxytocin and Prader-Willi Syndrome. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci.; 2018; 35, pp. 529-557. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/7854_2017_28]
6. Klimek, R.; Drewniak, K.; Bieniasz, A. Further studies on the oxytocin-oxytocinase system. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol.; 1969; 105, pp. 427-430. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(69)90275-0]
7. Aita, C.; Mizoguchi, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Seguch, I.Y.; Yatsuga, C.; Nishimura, T.; Sugimoto, Y.; Takahashi, D.; Nishihara, R.; Ueno, T. et al. Oxytocin levels and sex differences in autism spectrum disorder with severe intellectual disabilities. Psychiatry Res.; 2019; 273, pp. 67-74. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.139]
8. Bharadwaj, V.N.; Porreca, F.; Cowan, R.P.; Kori, S.; Silberstein, S.D.; Yeomans, D.C. A new hypothesis linking oxytocin to menstrual migraine. Headache; 2021; 61, pp. 1051-1059. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.14152]
9. Yamasue, H.; Okada, T.; Munesue, T.; Kuroda, M.; Fujioka, T.; Uno, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Kuwabara, H.; Mori, D.; Okamoto, Y. et al. Effect of intranasal oxytocin on the core social symptoms of autism spectrum disorder: A randomized clinical trial. Mol. Psychiatry; 2020; 25, pp. 1849-1858. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0097-2]
10. Tzabazis, A.; Kori, S.; Mechanic, J.; Miller, J.; Pascual, C.; Manering, N.; Carson, D.; Klukinov, M.; Spierings, E.; Jacobs, D. et al. Oxytocin and Migraine Headache. Headache; 2017; 57, (Suppl. 2), pp. 64-75. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.13082]
11. Gottschalk, M.G.; Domschke, K. Oxytocin and Anxiety Disorders. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci.; 2018; 35, pp. 467-498. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/7854_2017_25]
12. Gimpl, G.; Reitz, J.; Brauer, S.; Trossen, C. Oxytocin receptors: Ligand binding, signalling and cholesterol dependence. Prog. Brain Res.; 2008; 170, pp. 193-204. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00417-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18655883]
13. Antoni, F.A.; Chadio, S.E. Essential role of magnesium in oxytocin-receptor affinity and ligand specificity. Biochem. J.; 1989; 257, pp. 611-614. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bj2570611] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2539090]
14. Meyerowitz, J.G.; Robertson, M.J.; Barros-Álvarez, X.; Panova, O.; Nwokonko, R.M.; Gao, Y.; Skiniotis, G. The oxytocin signaling complex reveals a molecular switch for cation dependence. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.; 2022; 29, pp. 274-281. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41594-022-00728-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241813]
15. Talebi, M.; Savadi-Oskouei, D.; Farhoudi, M.; Mohammadzade, S.; Ghaemmaghamihezaveh, S.; Hasani, A.; Hamdi, A. Relation between serum magnesium level and migraine attacks. Neurosciences (Riyadh); 2011; 16, pp. 320-323.
16. Karim, M.R.; Bhattacharjee, M.; Islam, M.S.; Banerjee, S.; Hossain, S.; Hossain, M.I.; Haidar, M.R. Relation between Serum Magnesium Level and Migraine. Mymensingh Med. J.; 2021; 30, pp. 301-306.
17. Assarzadegan, F.; Asgarzadeh, S.; Hatamabadi, H.R.; Shahrami, A.; Tabatabaey, A.; Asgarzadeh, M. Serum concentration of magnesium as an independent risk factor in migraine attacks: A matched case-control study and review of the literature. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol.; 2016; 31, pp. 287-292. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000130]
18. Tzabazis, A.; Mechanic, J.; Miller, J.; Klukinov, M.; Pascual, C.; Manering, N.; Carson, D.S.; Jacobs, A.; Qiao, Y.; Cuellar, J. et al. Oxytocin receptor: Expression in the trigeminal nociceptive system and potential role in the treatment of headache disorders. Cephalalgia; 2016; 36, pp. 943-950. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102415618615]
19. Meidahl, A.C.; Eisenried, A.; Klukinov, M.; Cao, L.; Tzabazis, A.Z.; Yeomans, D.C. Intranasal Oxytocin Attenuates Reactive and Ongoing, Chronic Pain in a Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Headache; 2018; 58, pp. 545-558. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.13248]
20. Bharadwaj, V.N.; Tzabazis, A.Z.; Klukinov, M.; Manering, N.A.; Yeomans, D.C. Intranasal Administration for Pain: Oxytocin and Other Polypeptides. Pharmaceutics; 2021; 13, 1088. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13071088]
21. Yeomans, D.C.; Pirec, V.; Proudfit, H.K. Nociceptive responses to high and low rates of noxious cutaneous heating are mediated by different nociceptors in the rat: Behavioral evidence. Pain; 1996; 68, pp. 133-140. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03176-4]
22. Yeomans, D.C.; Proudfit, H.K. Nociceptive responses to high and low rates of noxious cutaneous heating are mediated by different nociceptors in the rat: Electrophysiological evidence. Pain; 1996; 68, pp. 141-150. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03177-6]
23. Kubo, A.; Shinoda, M.; Katagiri, A.; Takeda, M.; Suzuki, T.; Asaka, J.; Yeomans, D.C.; Iwata, K. Oxytocin alleviates orofacial mechanical hypersensitivity associated with infraorbital nerve injury through vasopressin-1A receptors of the rat trigeminal ganglia. Pain; 2017; 158, pp. 649-659. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000808] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28072605]
24. Yeomans, D.C.; Hanson, L.R.; Carson, D.S.; Tunstall, B.J.; Lee, M.R.; Tzabazis, A.Z.; Jacobs, D.; Frey, W.H., 2nd. Nasal oxytocin for the treatment of psychiatric disorders and pain: Achieving meaningful brain concentrations. Transl. Psychiatry; 2021; 11, 388. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01511-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34247185]
25. Mauskop, A.; Altura, B.M. Role of magnesium in the pathogenesis and treatment of migraines. Clin. Neurosci.; 1998; 5, pp. 24-27.
26. Lefebvre, D.L.; Farookhi, R.; Giaid, A.; Neculcea, J.; Zingg, H.H. Uterine oxytocin gene expression. II. Induction by exogenous steroid administration. Endocrinology; 1994; 134, pp. 2562-2566. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo.134.6.8194483]
27. Quinones-Jenab, V.; Jenab, S.; Ogawa, S.; Adan, R.A.; Burbach, J.P.; Pfaff, D.W. Effects of estrogen on oxytocin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the uterus, pituitary, and forebrain of the female rat. Neuroendocrinology; 1997; 65, pp. 9-17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000127160]
28. Benelli, A.; Bertolini, A.; Poggioli, R.; Menozzi, B.; Basaglia, R.; Arletti, R. Polymodal dose-response curve for oxytocin in the social recognition test. Neuropeptides; 1995; 28, pp. 251-255. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0143-4179(95)90029-2]
29. Brackley, A.D.; Toney, G.M. Oxytocin Receptor Activation Rescues Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression by Systemic Fentanyl in the Rat. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther.; 2021; 378, pp. 96-107. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.121.000535]
30. Yamasue, H.; Kojima, M.; Kuwabara, H.; Kuroda, M.; Matsumoto, K.; Kanai, C.; Inada, N.; Owada, K.; Ochi, K.; Ono, N. et al. Effect of a novel nasal oxytocin spray with enhanced bioavailability on autism: A randomized trial. Brain; 2022; 145, pp. 490-499. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab291]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Meyerowitz, Justin 1 ; Zou, Bende 2 ; Klukinov, Michael 1 ; Ni, Yan 2 ; Sharma, Kaustubh 2 ; Clark, David J 3 ; Xie, Xinmin 2 ; Yeomans, David C 1
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA;
2 AfaSci Inc., Burlingame, CA 94010, USA;
3 Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA;