Abstract
Background
Evidence about the relationship between albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade and sequential systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world Japanese clinical practice is limited.
Objective
The objective of this study was to investigate ALBI grades and sequential treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Japanese clinical practice.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese hospital-based administration database to assess treatment sequence in patients with confirmed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and first prescription (index line) of lenvatinib (July 2014–June 2019; N = 1558) or sorafenib (July 2014–June 2016 [sorafenib-A; N = 1511] or June 2017–June 2019 [sorafenib-B; N = 1276]). Transition to subsequent line was assessed in patients who completed the index line without transarterial chemoembolization. The ALBI grade and sequential treatment relationships were analyzed in patients with baseline and/or end of index line ALBI scores.
Results
Transition to a subsequent line was low (sorafenib-A [n = 1320]: 12.6%; sorafenib-B [n = 1049]: 40.7%; lenvatinib [n = 786]: 27.2%). In patients with baseline ALBI data (combined cohorts; n = 385), overall treatment duration was shorter in those with baseline ALBI grade 2b or 3 vs grade 1 or 2a (median: 7.1, 6.7, 4.5, and 3.0 months for grades 1, 2a, 2b, and 3, respectively). In patients with baseline and end of index line ALBI data (combined cohorts; n = 222), ALBI grade worsened during index line regardless of baseline grade. Of these patients in the sorafenib-B or lenvatinib cohorts who completed the index line without transarterial chemoembolization (n = 120), transition to a subsequent line was higher with the end of index line grade 1/2a (66.7/68.4%) than with grade 2b/3 (34.0/11.1%).
Conclusions
Adequate liver function, indicated by ALBI grade, at the start and end of first-line treatment is associated with successful sequential therapy in Japanese clinical practice.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Huang, Yu-Jing 3 ; Cai, Zhihong 2 ; Sakaguchi, Sachi 2 1 Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Gastroenterology Center, Matsuyama, Japan (GRID:grid.414413.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1772 7425)
2 Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Medicines Development Unit, Kobe, Japan (GRID:grid.484107.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0531 2951)
3 Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA (GRID:grid.417540.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 2220 2544)





